Should I join Idaho's "The Citadel"

[tyroneweaver]

the Citadel : A Community of Liberty

Hundreds sign up to live in the Citadel ¿ an armed, 'defensible' fortress community planned for Idaho | Mail Online

Now that is a gated community. I think we're going to see more of this stuff as time goes on; Especially if liberal thinking as it is now, continues to pollute society.

I asked my wife if she wanted to move there, and she said no; but she did like the idea of me owning a gun.

 

[Oldguy]

Of course! Why not?

After all, the REAL American thing to do when your side loses an election is to withdraw into armed camps and separate yourself from your fellow American's, isn't it?

I mean, after all....fuck democracy and the Will of The People, right?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Ultra right radicials and libertarians despise American ways and culture.

 

[Mad Scientist]

Of course! Why not?

After all, the REAL American thing to do when your side loses an election is to withdraw into armed camps and separate yourself from your fellow American's, isn't it?

I mean, after all....fuck democracy and the Will of The People, right?

So if 51% vote to oppress the other 49% you'd go along with it? No matter what it is?

Where would you draw the line?

 

[bodecea]

the Citadel : A Community of Liberty

Hundreds sign up to live in the Citadel ¿ an armed, 'defensible' fortress community planned for Idaho | Mail Online

Now that is a gated community. I think we're going to see more of this stuff as time goes on; Especially if liberal thinking as it is now, continues to pollute society.

I asked my wife if she wanted to move there, and she said no; but she did like the idea of me owning a gun.

Surprised they aren't just using the whole state of Texas....maybe there aren't enough to support their secessionist, bunker mentality as they "think".

 

[bodecea]

Of course! Why not?

After all, the REAL American thing to do when your side loses an election is to withdraw into armed camps and separate yourself from your fellow American's, isn't it?

I mean, after all....fuck democracy and the Will of The People, right?

So if 51% vote to oppress the other 49% you'd go along with it? No matter what it is?

Where would you draw the line?

Not civil rights.....that cannot go up for a vote. So...we cannot put the 2nd up for a vote (unless an entire new amendment were to be voted by 75% of the people/states)

 

[Moonglow]

Of course! Why not?

After all, the REAL American thing to do when your side loses an election is to withdraw into armed camps and separate yourself from your fellow American's, isn't it?

I mean, after all....fuck democracy and the Will of The People, right?

So if 51% vote to oppress the other 49% you'd go along with it? No matter what it is?

Where would you draw the line?

I've been oppressed by rules and religious dogma for years. I've never gone along with it, but I work and pay taxes or you would put me down for not playing the game of life.

 

[squinch]

All gated communities are prisons.

 

[Oldguy]

Of course! Why not?

After all, the REAL American thing to do when your side loses an election is to withdraw into armed camps and separate yourself from your fellow American's, isn't it?

I mean, after all....fuck democracy and the Will of The People, right?

So if 51% vote to oppress the other 49% you'd go along with it? No matter what it is?

Where would you draw the line?

Draw the line? You do know how and why we have elections, right?

Just out of curiosity, what percentage of votes would YOU accept as reflecting the Will of The People? 100% like they used to get in the Soviet Union?

ps: One side winning an election can hardly be called oppression....except by those who don't love democracy, freedom and open elections. That's the language used by tyrants as an excuse to impose their will over the Will of The People.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Of course! Why not?

After all, the REAL American thing to do when your side loses an election is to withdraw into armed camps and separate yourself from your fellow American's, isn't it?

I mean, after all....fuck democracy and the Will of The People, right?

So if 51% vote to oppress the other 49% you'd go along with it? No matter what it is?

Where would you draw the line?

Wacks think losing an election in the USA is being "oppressed"? Really??

 

[Mac1958]

 

[Oldguy]

They needn't worry. Anybody capable of even most trivial amount of critical thinking won't be moving to The Citadel anyhow. It's apparently reserved for true, Nutter troglodytes.

 

[regent]

In reality there isn't that great a difference in most American's beliefs and ideology, yet it seems that some are using that difference to try and widen that difference even more. America seems to go back and forth on political parties voting one in and later the other, people have choices, but the choices are within reason. That's probably the way it should work. But some, when they can't get their way, and their way may not be what most Americans want, then go into their bedroom and pout or worse, break things. At least when the Republicans got a majority in the House they simply lay on the floor kicking their feet chanting no, no, no.

 

[Mad Scientist]

Of course! Why not?

After all, the REAL American thing to do when your side loses an election is to withdraw into armed camps and separate yourself from your fellow American's, isn't it?

I mean, after all....fuck democracy and the Will of The People, right?

So if 51% vote to oppress the other 49% you'd go along with it? No matter what it is?

Where would you draw the line?

Draw the line? You do know how and why we have elections, right?

Just out of curiosity, what percentage of votes would YOU accept as reflecting the Will of The People? 100% like they used to get in the Soviet Union?

ps: One side winning an election can hardly be called oppression....except by those who don't love democracy, freedom and open elections. That's the language used by tyrants as an excuse to impose their will over the Will of The People.

A Constitutional Amendment (or changes to it) requires 2/3 of both Houses THEN ratified by 3/4ths of the States.

Getting 51% in ANY Election doesn't fill that requirement.

 

[g5000]

the Citadel : A Community of Liberty

Hundreds sign up to live in the Citadel ¿ an armed, 'defensible' fortress community planned for Idaho | Mail Online

Now that is a gated community. I think we're going to see more of this stuff as time goes on; Especially if liberal thinking as it is now, continues to pollute society.

I asked my wife if she wanted to move there, and she said no; but she did like the idea of me owning a gun.

No mud people, homos or Jews need apply.

There's no HOA, but you have the midnight watch tonight on guard tower 3, Citizen!

 

[JakeStarkey]

So if 51% vote to oppress the other 49% you'd go along with it? No matter what it is?

Where would you draw the line?

Draw the line? You do know how and why we have elections, right?

Just out of curiosity, what percentage of votes would YOU accept as reflecting the Will of The People? 100% like they used to get in the Soviet Union?

ps: One side winning an election can hardly be called oppression....except by those who don't love democracy, freedom and open elections. That's the language used by tyrants as an excuse to impose their will over the Will of The People.

A Constitutional Amendment (or changes to it) requires 2/3 of both Houses THEN ratified by 3/4ths of the States.

Getting 51% in ANY Election doesn't fill that requirement.

Read Article I of the Constitution in its entirety. Then do it again. Then sit quietly and think about what you have read.

 

[Oldguy]

So if 51% vote to oppress the other 49% you'd go along with it? No matter what it is?

Where would you draw the line?

Draw the line? You do know how and why we have elections, right?

Just out of curiosity, what percentage of votes would YOU accept as reflecting the Will of The People? 100% like they used to get in the Soviet Union?

ps: One side winning an election can hardly be called oppression....except by those who don't love democracy, freedom and open elections. That's the language used by tyrants as an excuse to impose their will over the Will of The People.

A Constitutional Amendment (or changes to it) requires 2/3 of both Houses THEN ratified by 3/4ths of the States.

Getting 51% in ANY Election doesn't fill that requirement.

Constitutional amendment? What the hell are you talking about? What Constitutional amendment?

 

[Borillar]

the Citadel : A Community of Liberty

Hundreds sign up to live in the Citadel ¿ an armed, 'defensible' fortress community planned for Idaho | Mail Online

Now that is a gated community. I think we're going to see more of this stuff as time goes on; Especially if liberal thinking as it is now, continues to pollute society.

I asked my wife if she wanted to move there, and she said no; but she did like the idea of me owning a gun.

Sure. Religious groups have been doing this for ages. Jews, Mormons, Mennonites, Amish, etc, have built their own communities. Neighborhood HOA's have on occasion been formed to bunch up like minded people. What is so radical about a bunch of Right wingers setting up their own community? Probably will look like this:

 

[Dubya]

Of course! Why not?

After all, the REAL American thing to do when your side loses an election is to withdraw into armed camps and separate yourself from your fellow American's, isn't it?

I mean, after all....fuck democracy and the Will of The People, right?

So if 51% vote to oppress the other 49% you'd go along with it? No matter what it is?

Where would you draw the line?

Your kind doesn't represent 49%, you're kooks!

 

[Oldguy]

the Citadel : A Community of Liberty

Hundreds sign up to live in the Citadel ¿ an armed, 'defensible' fortress community planned for Idaho | Mail Online

Now that is a gated community. I think we're going to see more of this stuff as time goes on; Especially if liberal thinking as it is now, continues to pollute society.

I asked my wife if she wanted to move there, and she said no; but she did like the idea of me owning a gun.

Sure. Religious groups have been doing this for ages. Jews, Mormons, Mennonites, Amish, etc, have built their own communities. Neighborhood HOA's have on occasion been formed to bunch up like minded people. What is so radical about a bunch of Right wingers setting up their own community? Probably will look like this:

No. It'll look more like this: