Should I Believe 'em About Bachmann??

Is there anyone here who can offer a clear and concise explanation of what the point of this thread was?

That was done several times in this thread.

The fact that you refuse to comprehend it is not anyone's fault than your own.
But the original post was well written and clear (true or not irrelevant)...and further explanations as to WHY it was written were quite clear.

However, I must say this...and in my opinion.....the fact that you imply that you dont understand the point of the thread most definitely tells me that you DO understand it but dont know how to respond to it becuase you see the validity in what was said.

The only other possibility is that you have poor reading comprehension skills....but I dont believe this to be true based on the articulatiuon of many of your posts.

You are quite transparrent.
 
A thread dedicated to Bachman apoligization!!!

I am just loving it!

Clean off those specs, Citi...

...here, let me set you on the correct path...it reveals the aptitude of the Left-wing attack dogs, doesn't speak to the rectitude of Ms. Bachmann.


Questions whether one should rely on the viewpoint of the Left...

Get it now?


Hey PC......gotta go out and read the new Coulter book "Demonic"..........incredible research........

In Vietnam, the Army developed what became known as "Search and Destroy Missions". The definition of ruthless. Not mentioned in the book but it illustrates the strategy of the far left.......the self-proclaimed advocates of tolerance and endless compassion.:funnyface:

WTF does that have to do with anything? Vietnam was a war in which Guerilla warfare was the method of choice. It wasn't people in Blue Uniforms lining up and shooting at people in Red Uniforms(Revolutionary War), Nor was it even similar to WWII on the European Front.. Trench Warfare.

Finally... I remember Jane Fonda being lambasted as an anti-American Communist Sympathizer for saying basically the same damned thing. But now we have our Corporations Supporting Communist and Socialist regimes throughout the globe for the benefit of slave labor. Ann Coulter seems to me a lot like Jane Fonda... except that She supports our Corporations' Communist plot to make China and other countries stronger than us. So she's even worse than Fonda.
 
I try to avoid the silly partisan jibberish at all costs, I don't vote for either party.



But all I need to hear with regards to Bachmann are her own words and I know she's stupid. I don't need the media or democrats or anyone else to interpret that for me.
 
I try to avoid the silly partisan jibberish at all costs, I don't vote for either party.



But all I need to hear with regards to Bachmann are her own words and I know she's stupid. I don't need the media or democrats or anyone else to interpret that for me.

I just love these 'no labels' guys....
...did you say the same thing about President Obama's "own words and know he's stupid"?
 
I watched Obama's speech yesterday and no he is not stupid. He may be devious and a corporate worshipper, but stupid he is not.
 
I watched Obama's speech yesterday and no he is not stupid. He may be devious and a corporate worshipper, but stupid he is not.

I disagree. He relies very heavily on his Teleprompter and his speech yesterday made no sense. He railed against Private Jets yet his own Stimulus included Tax breaks for Private Jet owners. His whole speech made no sense and was a bit bizarre. The MSM should have attacked him the way they do Palin & Bachmann. His speech was much dumber than anything i've heard them say. He really isn't nearly as smart as the MSM has led most to believe.
 
I watched Obama's speech yesterday and no he is not stupid. He may be devious and a corporate worshipper, but stupid he is not.

I did as well...and I'll accept devious...
...but beyond that, to compare the elected representatives of the people of the United States, and by definition that would include a 'uscitizen,' to his 12 and 10 year old daughters, represents both a serious character flaw in the President, and, the ubiquitious talking-down to others by Liberals.

And is one of the reasons that this individual will not be give four more years.
 
I watched Obama's speech yesterday and no he is not stupid. He may be devious and a corporate worshipper, but stupid he is not.
.....Especially when he's takin'-on ALL comers.....and proceeds to....

WHUP MULTIPLE "conservative"-ASSES!!!!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y04g6OPLnQ]YouTube - ‪Obama Dismantles Republican Caucus Part 1 of 7‬‏[/ame]


:clap2: . :clap2: . :clap2: . :clap2: . :clap2:
 
I watched Obama's speech yesterday and no he is not stupid. He may be devious and a corporate worshipper, but stupid he is not.

I did as well...and I'll accept devious...
...but beyond that, to compare the elected representatives of the people of the United States, and by definition that would include a 'uscitizen,' to his 12 and 10 year old daughters, represents both a serious character flaw in the President, and, the ubiquitious talking-down to others by Liberals.

And is one of the reasons that this individual will not be give four more years.

yeah, talking-down to others is a really annoying habit. if it's done by liberals.
 
I watched Obama's speech yesterday and no he is not stupid. He may be devious and a corporate worshipper, but stupid he is not.

No. He is not stupid.

Actually, I have yet to find any elected official at the federal level that I would deem as stupid.

However...

Yesterday was another example to me of how Obama sees the general electorate as stupid. He believes he can say the sky is green and its the republicans that are making you think it is blue...and the genewral electorate will not only believe it, but his most devoted supporters will argue how he is right.

And sadly....he is correct.
 
Is there anyone here who can offer a clear and concise explanation of what the point of this thread was?

That was done several times in this thread.

The fact that you refuse to comprehend it is not anyone's fault than your own.
But the original post was well written and clear (true or not irrelevant)...and further explanations as to WHY it was written were quite clear.

However, I must say this...and in my opinion.....the fact that you imply that you dont understand the point of the thread most definitely tells me that you DO understand it but dont know how to respond to it becuase you see the validity in what was said.

The only other possibility is that you have poor reading comprehension skills....but I dont believe this to be true based on the articulatiuon of many of your posts.

You are quite transparrent.

I don't understand the point of the thread because the apparent point of the thread is so idiotic that I don't understand why anyone would try to make it with a straight face.

The argument of the thread is that because 5 or 6 liberals said something about John Ashcroft that the OP doesn't like, or doesn't think was accurate,

therefore,

all liberals on the planet can be automatically categorized as incapable of making credible, intelligent, valid observations.

If you agree with that, if you agree that line of reasoning is valid, then do you also agree that all I'd have to do is show you 5 or 6 conservative opinions that I don't think are accurate,

and therefore I will have established that all conservative opinions are illegitimate?
 
I watched Obama's speech yesterday and no he is not stupid. He may be devious and a corporate worshipper, but stupid he is not.

I did as well...and I'll accept devious...
...but beyond that, to compare the elected representatives of the people of the United States, and by definition that would include a 'uscitizen,' to his 12 and 10 year old daughters, represents both a serious character flaw in the President, and, the ubiquitious talking-down to others by Liberals.

And is one of the reasons that this individual will not be give four more years.

yeah, talking-down to others is a really annoying habit. if it's done by liberals.

PC is like the farmer who goes to the store with manure on his boots, and he's the only one there who doesn't notice the smell.
 
I try to avoid the silly partisan jibberish at all costs, I don't vote for either party.



But all I need to hear with regards to Bachmann are her own words and I know she's stupid. I don't need the media or democrats or anyone else to interpret that for me.

I just love these 'no labels' guys....
...did you say the same thing about President Obama's "own words and know he's stupid"?

I agree with US citizen, I think Obama is smart, I think Bush is smart too. I can disagree with a smart person's politics just as much as those from a dumb person like Bachmann. Obama is a corporatist and a warmonger, to hell with him.

You can label me, that's fine, just the overwhelming majority of times that people have tried to in the past they've been way off.
 
I did as well...and I'll accept devious...
...but beyond that, to compare the elected representatives of the people of the United States, and by definition that would include a 'uscitizen,' to his 12 and 10 year old daughters, represents both a serious character flaw in the President, and, the ubiquitious talking-down to others by Liberals.

And is one of the reasons that this individual will not be give four more years.

yeah, talking-down to others is a really annoying habit. if it's done by liberals.

PC is like the farmer who goes to the store with manure on his boots, and he's the only one there who doesn't notice the smell.

if the farmer complains to the managment about a drop of spilled milk in aisle 5, because his manure boots might get dirty.
 

Forum List

Back
Top