Should Democratics "Man up" and stop obsessing over Sarah Palin?

[rightwinger]

Palin is the defacto leader of the Republican party. As long as she continues her political attacks, she is fair game.

You liberoidals need to make up your mind. Is Palin the de facto "leader" of the GOP? Or is it Rush Limbaugh?

Wait. Don't answer. Tomorrow your answers will change like the direction of the wind.

Up until the last election cycle, Republicans cowered at the thought of being on Rush's wrong side. Now Palin is the power broker in the party.

If you believe I am wrong.....name someone with more influence in the party today. You haven't been able to do it so far

 

[Liability]

Palin is the defacto leader of the Republican party. As long as she continues her political attacks, she is fair game.

You liberoidals need to make up your mind. Is Palin the de facto "leader" of the GOP? Or is it Rush Limbaugh?

Wait. Don't answer. Tomorrow your answers will change like the direction of the wind.

Up until the last election cycle, Republicans cowered at the thought of being on Rush's wrong side. Now Palin is the power broker in the party.

If you believe I am wrong.....name someone with more influence in the party today. You haven't been able to do it so far

Sarah is not even close to being the leader of the GOP. The notion is devoid of any merit or credibility. It's just silly.

If the GOP has no "leader" at all, that still doesn't make Sarah the "leader" just because she happens to generate a good deal of media interest.

The T got it right. The entity leading the GOP at the moment appears to be the People. Even the Tea Party movement itself reflects the mood of the People.

This doesn't mean a nominal "leader" might not emerge given the passage of some time. all in due course. There's no rush. Frankly, it suffices in my view just to see the GOP as a whole taking on the socialist inclinations of the leaders of the Democrat parody. If the GOP is moving generally in the same direction, no "leader" is actually required.

 

[bodecea]

A stupid response from boredtoseeya. Not unexpected.

It makes sense for a fan of hers to obsess over her -- especially when they are likely to be in a position to vote for her if that scenario arises.

It makes damn little sense for Democratics to obsess over her since they don't get to choose their opponents.

This is you teaching me about civility, isn't it? On how to avoid it at all cost?

No. It's a place where even you can address a question ON TOPIC.

You taking on the position of Topic Police for the Mods?

 

[rightwinger]

You liberoidals need to make up your mind. Is Palin the de facto "leader" of the GOP? Or is it Rush Limbaugh?

Wait. Don't answer. Tomorrow your answers will change like the direction of the wind.

Up until the last election cycle, Republicans cowered at the thought of being on Rush's wrong side. Now Palin is the power broker in the party.

If you believe I am wrong.....name someone with more influence in the party today. You haven't been able to do it so far

Sarah is not even close to being the leader of the GOP. The notion is devoid of any merit or credibility. It's just silly.

If the GOP has no "leader" at all, that still doesn't make Sarah the "leader" just because she happens to generate a good deal of media interest.

The T got it right. The entity leading the GOP at the moment appears to be the People. Even the Tea Party movement itself reflects the mood of the People.

This doesn't mean a nominal "leader" might not emerge given the passage of some time. all in due course. There's no rush. Frankly, it suffices in my view just to see the GOP as a whole taking on the socialist inclinations of the leaders of the Democrat parody. If the GOP is moving generally in the same direction, no "leader" is actually required.

Interesting theory...

Where are the "leaders" of the Republican Party who are man enough to take on Sarah Palin? Palin pulls in the people, Palin pulls in the money, Palin is setting the agenda because there is a void in Republican leadership

 

[Liability]

This is you teaching me about civility, isn't it? On how to avoid it at all cost?

No. It's a place where even you can address a question ON TOPIC.

You taking on the position of Topic Police for the Mods?

Just noting your boundless crystal clear hypocrisy, boredtoseeya.

And enjoying shoving your nose in it.

 

[bodecea]

Try the people dipshit.

The irony of how you wrote that sentence is beyond priceless!

Nothing ironic of it. Try again.

*Note to self. Someday link Tommy to a good grammar/punctuation site to show him the power of a well placed comma as opposed to no comma at all.

 

[bodecea]

Palin is the defacto leader of the Republican party. As long as she continues her political attacks, she is fair game.

You liberoidals need to make up your mind. Is Palin the de facto "leader" of the GOP? Or is it Rush Limbaugh?

Wait. Don't answer. Tomorrow your answers will change like the direction of the wind.

Apparently a Political Party can only have one de facto leader.

 

[Liability]

The irony of how you wrote that sentence is beyond priceless!

Nothing ironic of it. Try again.

*Note to self. Someday link Tommy to a good grammar/punctuation site to show him the power of a well placed comma as opposed to no comma at all.

Always a pleasure to see boredtoseeya proving how dedicated she is to civility.

 

[bodecea]

No. It's a place where even you can address a question ON TOPIC.

You taking on the position of Topic Police for the Mods?

Just noting your boundless crystal clear hypocrisy, boredtoseeya.

And enjoying shoving your nose in it.

Another well placed Ironic post...similiar to the one where you said you were teaching me civility. And quite on topic, yourself.

 

[Liability]

You taking on the position of Topic Police for the Mods?

Just noting your boundless crystal clear hypocrisy, boredtoseeya.

And enjoying shoving your nose in it.

Another well placed Ironic post...similiar to the one where you said you were teaching me civility. And quite on topic, yourself.

Since you love to run off-topic and demonstrate your endless incivility, you surely cannot be complaining. I mean, shit. That would be all hypocritical of you, boredtoseeya!

 

[Liability]

Palin is the defacto leader of the Republican party. As long as she continues her political attacks, she is fair game.

You liberoidals need to make up your mind. Is Palin the de facto "leader" of the GOP? Or is it Rush Limbaugh?

Wait. Don't answer. Tomorrow your answers will change like the direction of the wind.

Apparently a Political Party can only have one de facto leader.

Again demonstrating your disingenuity, boredtoseeya. What leftwingshitflinger had SAID was, and I QUOTE it verbatim, "Palin is the defacto leader of the Republican party."

That highlighted article suggests that he was talking about the (singular) ONE leader.

If there's more than one leader, presumably he would have urged that Palin had become ONE OF the leaderS.

So, let's chalk aother boredtoseeya FAIL up on the scoreboard, shall we? Yes. We shall.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Should Democratics "Man up" and stop obsessing over Sarah Palin?

Just a thought.

If she runs and that constitutes a "problem" for the GOP, wouldn't that be a problem just for the Republicans? In fact, wouldn't that be a boon to the Democratics?

On the other hand, if she runs and it's not a problem for the GOP, then isn't that still not the concern of the Democratics? Wouldn't their needs be better served by finding the candidates who could most readily defeat Palin while most effectively addressing their own socialist agenda?

Why fubars like leftwingshitflinger find it so endlessly necessary to offer their unsolicited and un-valued "counsel" to the GOP remains a mystery, either way.

Are you suggesting USArmyRetarded should mitigate his obsession? Of course he's not a democrat (note small 'd'); more likely an authoritarain fascist, imho.

 

[rightwinger]

You liberoidals need to make up your mind. Is Palin the de facto "leader" of the GOP? Or is it Rush Limbaugh?

Wait. Don't answer. Tomorrow your answers will change like the direction of the wind.

Apparently a Political Party can only have one de facto leader.

Again demonstrating your disingenuity, boredtoseeya. What leftwingshitflinger had SAID was, and I QUOTE it verbatim, "Palin is the defacto leader of the Republican party."

That highlighted article suggests that he was talking about the (singular) ONE leader.

If there's more than one leader, presumably he would have urged that Palin had become ONE OF the leaderS.

So, let's chalk aother boredtoseeya FAIL up on the scoreboard, shall we? Yes. We shall.

Palin and who else are leaders?

You sure they cleared it with Sarah?

 

[bodecea]

Just noting your boundless crystal clear hypocrisy, boredtoseeya.

And enjoying shoving your nose in it.

Another well placed Ironic post...similiar to the one where you said you were teaching me civility. And quite on topic, yourself.

Since you love to run off-topic and demonstrate your endless incivility, you surely cannot be complaining. I mean, shit. That would be all hypocritical of you, boredtoseeya!

Was I complaining? Or just (as you) pointing out something....please do not feel that you are being picked on or anything....you're doing just fine...no one is hurting you.

 

[bodecea]

You liberoidals need to make up your mind. Is Palin the de facto "leader" of the GOP? Or is it Rush Limbaugh?

Wait. Don't answer. Tomorrow your answers will change like the direction of the wind.

Apparently a Political Party can only have one de facto leader.

Again demonstrating your disingenuity, boredtoseeya. What leftwingshitflinger had SAID was, and I QUOTE it verbatim, "Palin is the defacto leader of the Republican party."

That highlighted article suggests that he was talking about the (singular) ONE leader.

If there's more than one leader, presumably he would have urged that Palin had become ONE OF the leaderS.

So, let's chalk aother boredtoseeya FAIL up on the scoreboard, shall we? Yes. We shall.

And that changes what I said.....how?

 

[Liability]

Apparently a Political Party can only have one de facto leader.

Again demonstrating your disingenuity, boredtoseeya. What leftwingshitflinger had SAID was, and I QUOTE it verbatim, "Palin is the defacto leader of the Republican party."

That highlighted article suggests that he was talking about the (singular) ONE leader.

If there's more than one leader, presumably he would have urged that Palin had become ONE OF the leaderS.

So, let's chalk aother boredtoseeya FAIL up on the scoreboard, shall we? Yes. We shall.

Palin and who else are leaders?

You sure they cleared it with Sarah?

No no. Sarah is not a GOP leader. Yet. She may never be one, in fact.

But you left wingnuts still are mightily confused.

You tube steaks have insisted that Rush Limbaugh was THE leader of the GOP. But now, conveniently, and without valid basis, you make the empty claim that Sarah Palin is 'the" leader of the GOP.

Hate to break it to you. But you have no credibility and no credentials on that matter.

 

[Liability]

Apparently a Political Party can only have one de facto leader.

Again demonstrating your disingenuity, boredtoseeya. What leftwingshitflinger had SAID was, and I QUOTE it verbatim, "Palin is the defacto leader of the Republican party."

That highlighted article suggests that he was talking about the (singular) ONE leader.

If there's more than one leader, presumably he would have urged that Palin had become ONE OF the leaderS.

So, let's chalk aother boredtoseeya FAIL up on the scoreboard, shall we? Yes. We shall.

And that changes what I said.....how?

LOL.

You remain transparent, boredtoseeya.

 

[bodecea]

Nothing ironic of it. Try again.

*Note to self. Someday link Tommy to a good grammar/punctuation site to show him the power of a well placed comma as opposed to no comma at all.

Always a pleasure to see boredtoseeya proving how dedicated she is to civility.

Yep...so, you didn't need to teach me after all.

 

[rightwinger]

Again demonstrating your disingenuity, boredtoseeya. What leftwingshitflinger had SAID was, and I QUOTE it verbatim, "Palin is the defacto leader of the Republican party."

That highlighted article suggests that he was talking about the (singular) ONE leader.

If there's more than one leader, presumably he would have urged that Palin had become ONE OF the leaderS.

So, let's chalk aother boredtoseeya FAIL up on the scoreboard, shall we? Yes. We shall.

Palin and who else are leaders?

You sure they cleared it with Sarah?

No no. Sarah is not a GOP leader. Yet. She may never be one, in fact.

But you left wingnuts still are mightily confused.

You tube steaks have insisted that Rush Limbaugh was THE leader of the GOP. But now, conveniently, and without valid basis, you make the empty claim that Sarah Palin is 'the" leader of the GOP.

Hate to break it to you. But you have no credibility and no credentials on that matter.

The valid basis that Sarah Palin is the leader is that in the last election she was able to dump the preferred GOP candidate and substitute her own. That is a lot of influence. While Rush tries to push his preferred candidate, he generally fails.

If you claim other Republicans have the clout of Palin you are free to name them. I have challenged you to do so throughout this thread and you have ducked the question

So until you do so, it appears you have no credibility or credentials on the matter

 

[Stephanie]

LOL

They want to MAKE Palin the leader of the Republican party, so they have a Excuse for all the daily attacks being made against her.