Should Dean's life be ruined for saying the N-word 30-40-50 years ago?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Should Dean's life be ruined for saying the N-word 30-40-50 years ago?

Doesn't that qualify her to work for FOXNEWS?
 
Last edited:
Deen is a person, Hack, yes. And that person in her role as a cooking show host has nothing to do with politics,

And the show had nothing to do with the suit. YOU jump in because it is an opportunity to engage in racism on behalf of your shameful party. Hacks like you are the link to politics.

any more than it has to do with her being righthanded or a Capricorninan or a blonde. The TV show is not a function of any of that. The lawsuit is not a function of any of that. NONE of that is a function.

Now if you've got a nice link to Paula Deen's days in the Weather Underground, bring it in and we'll talk turkey. Until then, your fallacy tack is a hack.

What you're floating here is this -- ask Paula if she's got a recipe:

Deen - a good Obamabot - savaged by the party at the drop of the hat.

They'll turn on you just as fast - if convenient.

In the 1990's - you of the left undertook a program to purge all remaining ethics and integrity from the party. That program has been an astounding success. What Deen failed to grasp is that loyalty is a matter of integrity; a party devoid of ethics will show no loyalty - no matter how faithfully one served the hive. The drones - like you - are programed to hate and spew epithets, and so you do.
 
>> By party and region

Note: "Southern", as used in this section, refers to members of Congress from the eleven states that made up the Confederate States of America in the American Civil War. "Northern" refers to members from the other 39 states, regardless of the geographic location of those states.

The original House version:
Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)

Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94–6%)
Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85–15%)

The Senate version:
Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%) (only Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%) (John Tower of Texas)
Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%) (only Robert Byrd of West Virginia voted against)
Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%) << (Wiki)

Total House: 156 D - 130 R (55%D - 45%R)
Total Senate: 46 D - 27 R (59%D - 41%R)
Total Congress: 202 D - 157 R (56%D - 44%R)

You actually think nobody will call 'bullshit' when you lie?

The Revisionistas Greatest Shits:
  • "FDR caused the Great Depression"
  • "Obama caused the 2008 Recession"
  • "The KKK was founded by Democrats"
  • "The Republican Party was founded by Thomas Jefferson"
  • "Hitler was a liberal"
  • Republicans passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964"

"War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery"...
and most usefully,
"Ignorance is Strength"


This is where you shine at purging yourself of integrity, Pogo.

Total Republicans in both houses - 164.

Number who voted for the CRA - 138, number who voted against 34. Is that 41% or 45%?

But you said it was? Oh, you were just lying - because you're a partisan scumbag without a hint of integrity - and lying is what you do.

84.1% of Republicans voted for the CRA - you fucking liar.
 
So my wife just told me one of the recipies on her show was a hamburger and the bun was a glazed donut cut in half. ok, if you are going to fire her, fire her for that. not saying the N word decades ago
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top