Should Bush find a new VP?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by JIHADTHIS, Jun 21, 2004.

  1. JIHADTHIS
    Offline

    JIHADTHIS Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    1,055
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Mowing a grassy knoll....
    Ratings:
    +22
    Cheney needs to step aside for good of Bush, party
    By James P. Gannon
    An open letter to Vice President Cheney
    Dear Mr. Vice President:

    I am writing to you as a long-time admirer. Ever since you rose to prominence 30 years ago — when you became chief of staff to President Gerald Ford and I was a Wall Street Journal reporter covering economic policy in the Ford administration — you seemed to embody the qualities needed at the right hand of the president. Your competence, calmness amid crisis and absolute devotion to duty were obvious then, as now.

    For nearly four years now, you have been a loyal and hard-working partner in the presidency of George W. Bush. Your experience, steadiness and character surely have given the president strength in these difficult times. I believe you have always considered first what is best for the president, and only secondly what is best for Dick Cheney.

    That question arises now in this election year. Forgive me for suggesting that self-sacrifice may be the greatest service you can render to President Bush in what promises to be a closely contested election. You must ask yourself now if your continued presence by his side will offer strength or weakness to the Republican ticket in November, and what it will mean for GOP prospects in the future.

    Nobody knows better than you do that you have become a lightning rod for criticism, and a favorite target for your party's political opponents. Fair or not, it is simply too easy to paint Dick Cheney as a tool of the oil industry, a too-eager advocate of war in Iraq and a too-gullible supporter of the now-disgraced Ahmad Chalabi, who fed the Bush administration false intelligence on Iraq. Your former company, Halliburton, is a political albatross around your neck, weighing down not only you but also President Bush.

    Health also an issue

    Moreover, given your history of health problems, you do not offer the Republicans what they need for 2008 and beyond — a president in training. After November, the party will need to think beyond the presidency of Bush, even if he is re-elected. Inaugurating a vice president next January who could step up to lead the party in 2008 would be a great asset for the GOP.

    You know that Bush's sense of loyalty means he would never ask you to step aside. The move would have to be yours. You would have to convince the president that your stepping aside is necessary to secure a second Bush term to pursue the agenda you both share.

    The nation is at war again, this time against the elusive enemy called international terrorism. In previous times of war, two great American presidents have found it necessary or desirable to change vice presidents in a re-election year.

    In 1864, as the Civil War raged on, Abraham Lincoln let the Republican Party convention choose a Southern Democrat, Andrew Johnson, to replace Vice President Hannibal Hamlin on a national unity ticket.

    In 1944, in the midst of World War II, President Franklin Roosevelt sidelined Vice President Henry Wallace in favor of Sen. Harry Truman of Missouri.

    Both of these new vice presidents succeeded to the presidency on the deaths of their war-time leaders only months after being inaugurated.

    As this election approaches, President Bush needs a running mate who supports the war on terrorism as much as you do, but without your political liabilities. He also needs a running mate who might help unify the nation. Your Democratic opponent, Sen. John Kerry, made overtures to Sen. John McCain to join him on a bipartisan "national unity" ticket of two war heroes.

    Follow Kerry's lead

    If it was a good idea for Kerry, why would it not be an even better idea for Bush? Think of the broad political appeal of a Bush-McCain ticket, especially to political independents whose votes may decide the outcome. Yes, I know the relationship the president and the maverick Arizona senator is full of tension and rivalry, and McCain sometimes seems to go out of his way to aggravate the White House. But you could persuade President Bush that reaching out to his onetime rival (but strong supporter in the war on Iraq and terrorism) would be a magnanimous gesture — not unlike that of Ronald Reagan picking his former GOP rival, George H.W. Bush, as his running mate in 1980.

    If not McCain, there are other intriguing running mate possibilities. Rudy Giuliani, who showed such great leadership as mayor of New York City after the terrorist attacks of 9/11, is an obvious one. Former Missouri senator John Danforth, a man of unquestioned integrity, who presided with such grace at the funeral of Reagan, also comes to mind. If he's good enough to be the next U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, wouldn't he also be good enough to be vice president?

    But you can draw up your own list of candidates. I hope that you will take it to President Bush and convince him that his chances of being re-elected — and maintaining the policies you've helped shape — are better with a new running mate. He will listen to you. You could even cast it in Reaganesque terms. Remind your boss that he is the heir to the Reagan political legacy, and the keeper of the values that Reagan espoused. For those values to triumph in 2004, it may be necessary for you to take a hit for the team, so that President Bush can win one for the Gipper.

    Sincerely,

    James P. Gannon

    Gannon is a former reporter for The Wall Street Journal and editor of The Des Moines Register.
     
  2. freeandfun1
    Offline

    freeandfun1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,201
    Thanks Received:
    295
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +296
    I did not read the post but I will. But just based on the question, I can provide an answer.

    I do believe Bush should find a new VP and I am a HUGE Bush supporter. My reason is this:

    I believe Bush should find a running mate that 1) will highlight the ticket and 2) will provide a candidate for 2008. Condi Rice would be nice.
     
  3. HGROKIT
    Offline

    HGROKIT Active Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,398
    Thanks Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Federal Way WA, USA
    Ratings:
    +19
    Shit - Bush and McCain would kill each other within a month.
     
  4. 5stringJeff
    Offline

    5stringJeff Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    9,990
    Thanks Received:
    536
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Puyallup, WA
    Ratings:
    +540
    Bush/Rice... totally awesome. I'm all for it.
     
  5. insein
    Offline

    insein Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    Messages:
    6,096
    Thanks Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Philadelphia, Amazing huh...
    Ratings:
    +356
    No new VP. You know why? ITs about loyalty. Cheney has been with Bush through all the ahrd times over the last 3.5 years. He is his friend and he is loyal to him. He doesnt abandon people because its politically expedient. That is what many people cant understand. In a world full of John Kerry's and Teddy Kennedy's who would sell out their own mothers if it meant a few more votes, people can't fathom a truly honest man as president or even a politician for that matter.

    Bush will never abandon Cheney.
     
  6. freeandfun1
    Offline

    freeandfun1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,201
    Thanks Received:
    295
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +296
    Agreed that Bush will never abandon Cheney. But perhaps, out of the good for the nation, Cheney should volunteer to go. Personally, I don't think Cheney is a negative asset. But I do believe that many others view him in a bad light and therefore, a change might help us ensure a victory in November and that is more important to the country than loyalty. Loyalty to what is best for the nation (getting Bush re-elected) should take priority over personal loyalties.

    JMHO!
     
  7. insein
    Offline

    insein Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    Messages:
    6,096
    Thanks Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Philadelphia, Amazing huh...
    Ratings:
    +356
    He's a man of conviction though. He stands up for what he believes in. His friend his hurting from baseless criticism about his competance. How would that look if he just dumped him? I think Cheney works well with Bush and that Bush is a man of character. Therefore i see no advantage to dumping cheney. JMHO.

    "One Dick, One Bush. The way God intended it."
     
  8. JIHADTHIS
    Offline

    JIHADTHIS Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    1,055
    Thanks Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Mowing a grassy knoll....
    Ratings:
    +22

    To put it politely: That's fucking rude!
     
  9. Gop guy
    Offline

    Gop guy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Messages:
    927
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    West Reading PA
    Ratings:
    +0
    YES YES YES!!!!!!!
     
  10. insein
    Offline

    insein Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    Messages:
    6,096
    Thanks Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Philadelphia, Amazing huh...
    Ratings:
    +356
    It was meant to reiterate that Cheney is a part of the team. He wont be dropped because Bush is loyal. Don't expect any new Republicans in the White House until 2008. Bush and Cheney won't be packing up anytime soon.
     

Share This Page