Should anyone in this admin go to jail if


Of course this is being ignored.

I'm not ignoring it. I disagree with the premise you two portray. After 19 cease fire violations Iraq got what they had coming.

I will however say the war was conducted wrong imo.
Invade
Bomb
Depose the regime
Leave

That's what should have happened. Two month war tops
Even by your loose and totally failed attempt to give the Bush admin a pass...

Two months turning into 8+ years and counting is a COLOSSAL FAILURE!!!...by any standard.

For that alone they should all be hung and quartered...jailtime would be the least.
 
If it was proven that this administration did in fact deny Chris Stevens and the other 3 men with the security they needed after they begged for it. And they told them NO and to quit complaining . Do you think that anyone would go to jail?? I mean the buck stops at Hilary and Obama, I doubt that would happen.. But what do you think ????So far this admin has 6 bodies that they are REASON they died.. Brian Terry , Jamie Zapata and now the 4 in Libya

The answer is "no."

Refusing security should and probably will, cost Obama his job. But it was his decision to make, albeit one he made poorly. There was nothing criminal about this.
 
Was "gross negligence" the reason our last President sent our soldiers to the wrong war for the wrong reasons where over 3000 of them, and counting has died in vain?

So he and all the congress critters who voted to invade for the "wrong reasons" whatever the fuck that means should all be in prison?
Was it the Congress that ACTIVELY campaigned and pushed for these wars? Or was it the Bush Admin, namely Cheney and Rumsfeld that went on the warpath via massive scare tactics and false information? Much of which Cheney himself orchestrated.

When will you RW MFers talk some GD PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY for ONCE in your miserable lives?

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH LIED PEOPLE DIED........... Remember that?? Remember the calls to bring him up on charges?? Even before a world court?????????????

LMAO Now these same librul goons can't run fast enuff to try and cover up Bammy's clusterf*ck.
Yes, yes I remember it quite well. It was true then and it was true now. Why else you think Bush nor Cheney couldn't even show they're faces at the last RNC? When since has the last partisan President ever NOT attend their next RNC to rally support and votes?

Here's a hint putz: When their partisan Administration was a well-known COLOSSAL FAILURE!!!! That's when.
 
The same number of people should go to jail as went to jail for the 241 Americans that Reagan got killed in Beirut in 1983.
This couldn't be repeated enough.

IMO if they could dig up his bones and put them in a jailyard cemetary they should...for all the crimes that Big Time Crook committed during his so-called Administration.

Republicans are the BIGGEST criminals and seedy masterminds this side of the Western Hemisphere.

*SMH*
 
The same number of people should go to jail as went to jail for the 241 Americans that Reagan got killed in Beirut in 1983.
This couldn't be repeated enough.

IMO if they could dig up his bones and put them in a jailyard cemetary they should...for all the crimes that Big Time Crook committed during his so-called Administration.

Republicans are the BIGGEST criminals and seedy masterminds this side of the Western Hemisphere.

*SMH*

Yeah, it's pretty much case closed. Reagan got the big pass from these people; let's just apply their standards to this situation.
 
What law was broken by a member of this administration that they should go to jail for?



Selling firearms to people with the full knowledge that they were straw purchasers, said weapons later used to murder people, if this was you or I that did this we would be in prison. That's just for starters.
 
What law was broken by a member of this administration that they should go to jail for?



Selling firearms to people with the full knowledge that they were straw purchasers, said weapons later used to murder people, if this was you or I that did this we would be in prison. That's just for starters.

We're not 100% sure obama had any knowledge of that, What we do know is that he's covering up something for holder.
 
What law was broken by a member of this administration that they should go to jail for?



Selling firearms to people with the full knowledge that they were straw purchasers, said weapons later used to murder people, if this was you or I that did this we would be in prison. That's just for starters.

We're not 100% sure obama had any knowledge of that, What we do know is that he's covering up something for holder.

Doesn't really matter if he had no prior knowledge, the fact that he had knowledge AFTER the fact, and then participated in the cover up, makes him just as guilty as the rest who particapted, not to mention that he is supposed to bear full responsibility for those under his command. At best, he's an imcompetent who failed to not only hire responsible people to represent him, but failed to supervise those he appointed to positions of great power and authority, at worst, he's guilty of being an accessory to murder after the fact.
 
Selling firearms to people with the full knowledge that they were straw purchasers, said weapons later used to murder people, if this was you or I that did this we would be in prison. That's just for starters.

We're not 100% sure obama had any knowledge of that, What we do know is that he's covering up something for holder.

Doesn't really matter if he had no prior knowledge, the fact that he had knowledge AFTER the fact, and then participated in the cover up, makes him just as guilty as the rest who particapted, not to mention that he is supposed to bear full responsibility for those under his command. At best, he's an imcompetent who failed to not only hire responsible people to represent him, but failed to supervise those he appointed to positions of great power and authority, at worst, he's guilty of being an accessory to murder after the fact.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) ran a series of "gunwalking" sting operations between 2006 and 2011. So Bush must also go to jail.
 
We're not 100% sure obama had any knowledge of that, What we do know is that he's covering up something for holder.

Doesn't really matter if he had no prior knowledge, the fact that he had knowledge AFTER the fact, and then participated in the cover up, makes him just as guilty as the rest who particapted, not to mention that he is supposed to bear full responsibility for those under his command. At best, he's an imcompetent who failed to not only hire responsible people to represent him, but failed to supervise those he appointed to positions of great power and authority, at worst, he's guilty of being an accessory to murder after the fact.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) ran a series of "gunwalking" sting operations between 2006 and 2011. So Bush must also go to jail.


Lol, nice try, but not gonna work bud. See I don't get my news from MSNBC's Chris Matthews, so I know the truth about Bush's so called "gun walking" operation. Maybe you should do some research on the subject and get back to me. Here, I'll start you off, but you can get your own facts from other sources, just stay away from anything that has White House source, or MSNBC as a source, lol. Also, what does anything that the Justice dept did in 2009, 2010 and 2011 have to do with Bush?



The insinuation is that Fast and Furious is somehow a continuation of the Bush-era operation. The only problem with that theory is that it’s not true.


White House Press Secretary Jay Carney (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
Even White House Press Secretary Jay Carney last week attempted to shift the blame from Holder and the Obama administration and onto the Bush administration.

“Everything has been provided to — congressional investigators and that is really the issue, isn’t it? It is how did this operation come about. It originated in a field office during the previous administration. It was ended under this administration by this attorney general,” Carney said during a presser last week.

But even the laziest of fact-checks would prove his assertion wrong.

In no way does that excuse the Bush administration from allowing a poorly-planned operation to proceed. However, the differences between the two operations are stark and should be considered.

(1) First and foremost, operation Wide Receiver did not result in the death of a U.S. Border Patrol agent or an Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer. Fast and Furious did. The guns that ultimately killed Border Patrol agent Brian Terry and ICE officer Jamie Zapata were traced back to straw purchasers related to Fast and Furious. Zapata’s family filed a wrongful death suit against the U.S. Justice Department last week.

.

Border Agent Brian Terry (file)

In this undated photo released by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is seen slain ICE Special Agent Jaime Zapata. (AP Photo/ICE)
(Related: ‘They’re Lying and They‘re Hiding it’: Parents of Slain Border Agent Brian Terry Speak Out in Rare TV Interview)

Further, officials have confirmed that the guns from Fast and Furious have already killed hundreds of Mexican citizens and Holder has said on the record that they will likely kill many more. The total number of confirmed deaths so far from Wide Receiver: Zero.

(2) Second, Wide Receiver, though flawed, was more of a gun-tracing operation than a gun-walking program. Gun-tracing involves putting specific safeguards in place to track firearms, such as RFID chips perhaps with video or aerial surveillance. Gun-walking is what happened in Fast and Furious, where ATF agents sold thousands of guns without a reliable way to recover them, apparently just hoping for the best.

Some of the guns from Wide Receiver were implanted with RFID chips and were actively tracked electronically. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) in Phoenix also implemented aerial surveillance tactics in an attempt to follow the weapons.

However, problems reportedly arose due to poorly implanted RFID chips which were forced into the guns, bending the antennas and decreasing their effectiveness. Cartels and straw purchasers also eventually came up with creative ways to shake tracking maneuvers and overhead surveillance, such as driving in loops for hours until surveillance planes had to refuel.

Those in charge of Fast and Furious took no similar steps to strengthen their chances of recovering walked guns other than recording the serial numbers before watching them disappear in the hands of Mexican drug cartels.

In fact, ATF agents involved in Fast and Furious have previously testified that they were ordered to stand down and not track the weapons even when interdiction was possible and instead “took notes” and let the guns walk across the Mexico border. Watch some of ATF whistleblower John Dodson’s Congressional testimony:


(3) Third, one must take into account the size and scope of the operations.

Speaking to members of the Senate Judiciary Committee earlier this month, Holder said that “three hundred guns” were allowed to “walk” (although note the difference between “tracing” and “walking” above) in Wide Receiver. While there is no evidence that suggests otherwise, the figure is dwarfed by the approximately 2,000 firearms that walked in Fast and Furious. Roughly 1,400 guns were lost and about 700 have been recovered in Mexico and at crime scenes like the sites of Terry and Zapata’s murders.


U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder answers questions while testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill June 12, 2012 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
(4) Perhaps the most convincing piece of evidence proving the two operations are separate from each other is the fact that Wide Receiver was shut down in 2007 shortly after it was clear the program was a failure. This was before Obama was even in office and nearly two years before Fast and Furious began.

Fast and Furious wasn’t shut down until late 2010 after the deaths of hundreds of Mexicans, a border agent and an ICE officer.

(5) Finally, unlike Fast and Furious, officials involved in Wide Receiver were reportedly in close contact with Mexican authorities during the operation, though how involved Mexican officials were is not entirely known.

What is known is that Mexican authorities were kept completely in the dark during Fast and Furious, according to the Mexican ambassador to the U.S. Mexico. He announced on June 1, 2012, that Mexico would be launching its own probe into Fast and Furious.

It should be perfectly clear that both the Bush and Obama administration conducted two separate, flawed operations. One, however, was a much deadlier and larger operation.

If there is evidence of wrongdoing, or false testimony related to operation Wide Receiver, those responsible should be held accountable. But the argument that Fast and Furious is all about “politics” and should just be swept under the rug because the previous administration also carried out a similar program is irresponsible.

A contempt resolution will be considered by the full House of Representatives this week. If lawmakers decide to hold the attorney general in contempt, it will be a first in U.S. history for a sitting attorney general.

.
 
Doesn't really matter if he had no prior knowledge, the fact that he had knowledge AFTER the fact, and then participated in the cover up, makes him just as guilty as the rest who particapted, not to mention that he is supposed to bear full responsibility for those under his command. At best, he's an imcompetent who failed to not only hire responsible people to represent him, but failed to supervise those he appointed to positions of great power and authority, at worst, he's guilty of being an accessory to murder after the fact.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) ran a series of "gunwalking" sting operations between 2006 and 2011. So Bush must also go to jail.


Lol, nice try, but not gonna work bud. See I don't get my news from MSNBC's Chris Matthews, so I know the truth about Bush's so called "gun walking" operation. Maybe you should do some research on the subject and get back to me. Here, I'll start you off, but you can get your own facts from other sources, just stay away from anything that has White House source, or MSNBC as a source, lol. Also, what does anything that the Justice dept did in 2009, 2010 and 2011 have to do with Bush?



The insinuation is that Fast and Furious is somehow a continuation of the Bush-era operation. The only problem with that theory is that it’s not true.


White House Press Secretary Jay Carney (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
Even White House Press Secretary Jay Carney last week attempted to shift the blame from Holder and the Obama administration and onto the Bush administration.

“Everything has been provided to — congressional investigators and that is really the issue, isn’t it? It is how did this operation come about. It originated in a field office during the previous administration. It was ended under this administration by this attorney general,” Carney said during a presser last week.

But even the laziest of fact-checks would prove his assertion wrong.

In no way does that excuse the Bush administration from allowing a poorly-planned operation to proceed. However, the differences between the two operations are stark and should be considered.

(1) First and foremost, operation Wide Receiver did not result in the death of a U.S. Border Patrol agent or an Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer. Fast and Furious did. The guns that ultimately killed Border Patrol agent Brian Terry and ICE officer Jamie Zapata were traced back to straw purchasers related to Fast and Furious. Zapata’s family filed a wrongful death suit against the U.S. Justice Department last week.

.

Border Agent Brian Terry (file)

In this undated photo released by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is seen slain ICE Special Agent Jaime Zapata. (AP Photo/ICE)
(Related: ‘They’re Lying and They‘re Hiding it’: Parents of Slain Border Agent Brian Terry Speak Out in Rare TV Interview)

Further, officials have confirmed that the guns from Fast and Furious have already killed hundreds of Mexican citizens and Holder has said on the record that they will likely kill many more. The total number of confirmed deaths so far from Wide Receiver: Zero.

(2) Second, Wide Receiver, though flawed, was more of a gun-tracing operation than a gun-walking program. Gun-tracing involves putting specific safeguards in place to track firearms, such as RFID chips perhaps with video or aerial surveillance. Gun-walking is what happened in Fast and Furious, where ATF agents sold thousands of guns without a reliable way to recover them, apparently just hoping for the best.

Some of the guns from Wide Receiver were implanted with RFID chips and were actively tracked electronically. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) in Phoenix also implemented aerial surveillance tactics in an attempt to follow the weapons.

However, problems reportedly arose due to poorly implanted RFID chips which were forced into the guns, bending the antennas and decreasing their effectiveness. Cartels and straw purchasers also eventually came up with creative ways to shake tracking maneuvers and overhead surveillance, such as driving in loops for hours until surveillance planes had to refuel.

Those in charge of Fast and Furious took no similar steps to strengthen their chances of recovering walked guns other than recording the serial numbers before watching them disappear in the hands of Mexican drug cartels.

In fact, ATF agents involved in Fast and Furious have previously testified that they were ordered to stand down and not track the weapons even when interdiction was possible and instead “took notes” and let the guns walk across the Mexico border. Watch some of ATF whistleblower John Dodson’s Congressional testimony:


(3) Third, one must take into account the size and scope of the operations.

Speaking to members of the Senate Judiciary Committee earlier this month, Holder said that “three hundred guns” were allowed to “walk” (although note the difference between “tracing” and “walking” above) in Wide Receiver. While there is no evidence that suggests otherwise, the figure is dwarfed by the approximately 2,000 firearms that walked in Fast and Furious. Roughly 1,400 guns were lost and about 700 have been recovered in Mexico and at crime scenes like the sites of Terry and Zapata’s murders.


U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder answers questions while testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill June 12, 2012 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
(4) Perhaps the most convincing piece of evidence proving the two operations are separate from each other is the fact that Wide Receiver was shut down in 2007 shortly after it was clear the program was a failure. This was before Obama was even in office and nearly two years before Fast and Furious began.

Fast and Furious wasn’t shut down until late 2010 after the deaths of hundreds of Mexicans, a border agent and an ICE officer.

(5) Finally, unlike Fast and Furious, officials involved in Wide Receiver were reportedly in close contact with Mexican authorities during the operation, though how involved Mexican officials were is not entirely known.

What is known is that Mexican authorities were kept completely in the dark during Fast and Furious, according to the Mexican ambassador to the U.S. Mexico. He announced on June 1, 2012, that Mexico would be launching its own probe into Fast and Furious.

It should be perfectly clear that both the Bush and Obama administration conducted two separate, flawed operations. One, however, was a much deadlier and larger operation.

If there is evidence of wrongdoing, or false testimony related to operation Wide Receiver, those responsible should be held accountable. But the argument that Fast and Furious is all about “politics” and should just be swept under the rug because the previous administration also carried out a similar program is irresponsible.

A contempt resolution will be considered by the full House of Representatives this week. If lawmakers decide to hold the attorney general in contempt, it will be a first in U.S. history for a sitting attorney general.

.

I don't watch MSNBC and I can't stand Chris Matthews. But even your so called factual source says: "It should be perfectly clear that both the Bush and Obama administration conducted two separate, flawed operations."

And you posted a shit load of copyright material without any links or identifying your 'so called' factual source. That is a board violation. Who is your source???
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top