Shocking: Kagan Wont Answer If It's Unconstitutional To Tell People What To Eat.

Discussion in 'Congress' started by USArmyRetired, Jun 29, 2010.

  1. USArmyRetired
    Offline

    USArmyRetired BANNED

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,601
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +346
    She wouldn't answer Senator Coburns question if it unconstitutional for congress to tell us what to eat. What does that tell us about her? It's just like the government telling us we have to purchase health care. Kagan stuttered and had no answer whether it violated the Commerce Clause. People need to wake up and jump on this. Call your senators and tell them that this woman can't be seated on the Supreme Court. This woman will not be faithful to the Constitution. She is not qualified to be seated because she rejects the Constitution and a politcal hack will do everything for her unconstitutionally qualified President and she wants to expand the federal government.

    Listen to this radical:


    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSoWGlyugTo&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - Kagan Declines To Say Gov't Has No Power to Tell Americans What To Eat[/ame]
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Jun 29, 2010
  2. Dont Taz Me Bro
    Online

    Dont Taz Me Bro USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,616
    Thanks Received:
    6,684
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nevada
    Ratings:
    +17,491
    That's pretty amazing, but I wouldn't expect anything less from an Obama nominee.
     
  3. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    31,748
    Thanks Received:
    4,242
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +8,156
    We might all consider thanking the two posters above for their 'considered' opinons. If they would be so kind as to post their CV's so all of us might know which law school they attended and the extent of their law practice on Constitutional Issues.
    On a more serious note, Alabama Sen. Sessions is an embarrassment to all Americans; is he the best and the brightest Alabama can offer?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. Granny
    Offline

    Granny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,121
    Thanks Received:
    785
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Location:
    Rocky Top, TN
    Ratings:
    +1,255
    Nor would I. We don't need any more radicals on the bench than we already have. Actually, I really need to expand on that by saying we don't need any more radicals anywhere in government than we already have.
     
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2010
  5. Soggy in NOLA
    Online

    Soggy in NOLA Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    32,745
    Thanks Received:
    4,319
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,464
    The fact that she won't answer IS your answer. She also commented that the U.S. Constitution is an amazing document as it allows for the Judiciary to re-write it based on the times (i'm paraphrasing, but that is essentially what she said).

    Scary... more "living breathing document" bullshit.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. topspin
    Offline

    topspin BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Messages:
    4,149
    Thanks Received:
    196
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +196
    she's going to be overwhelmingly approved, the faux outrage by the republiklans is very funny
     
  7. Soggy in NOLA
    Online

    Soggy in NOLA Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    32,745
    Thanks Received:
    4,319
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,464
    Of course she will... most of the lefties in Congress have little regard for our Constitution.. nothing new here. Enjoy! Only a few months to go!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. RDD_1210
    Offline

    RDD_1210 Forms his own opinions

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Messages:
    14,643
    Thanks Received:
    1,295
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,001
    So she answers first, he modifies the question to ask if we have the power to tell people what they have to eat everyday, she thinks for maybe 4 seconds when he starts talking again and the video cuts out before we can see her response.....you're right, she obviously isn't qualified due to this overwhelming evidence.

    Must be a slow news day if this is making you upset.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. Charles_Main
    Offline

    Charles_Main AR15 Owner

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Messages:
    16,692
    Thanks Received:
    2,238
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    Ratings:
    +2,251
    She is not qualified solely based on the fact she has 0 experiences as a judge. literally NONE.

    The fact she is a far left Radical, who tried to defy federal law and keep the Military from recruiting at Harvard, and hold many other far left views. DOes not make her unqualified by it's self. The problem is if she start showing she respects her Ideals more than the rule of law once on the bench. There is nothing anyone can do to stop her :) I have never like the idea of life long appointments for this reason!
     
  10. RDD_1210
    Offline

    RDD_1210 Forms his own opinions

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Messages:
    14,643
    Thanks Received:
    1,295
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,001
    That's great and all, but NONE of that is in this video and still doesn't explain why THIS video that the OP posted shows why she is so unqualified.
     

Share This Page