SHOCKER: Yet another shocking liberal defending genocide!!!!????

[R.C. Christian]

I'm still trying to find proof of the assertion that Stone is advocating genocide.

Not advocating, defending. He defended Hitler. Said he was misunderstood in context because the Jews won't let the real story be told.

Somehow I think thats worse than Mel Gibson calling his wife a Jew. But hey, what do I know.

Whats all the anger at Jews about anyway? Jeez.

Do you really want to know?

 

[Bfgrn]

Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in Context' | NewsBusters.org

I've already explained to you left wingers how your heroes George Bernard Shaw and Karl Marx daydreamed of eugenics, and how Shaw wanted science to develop a humane gas that could exterminate surplus humans while listening to classical music to make it more comfortable.

I told you about Supreme Court justice Ruth Ginsberg, a worshipped liberal lady, who was disappointed that abortion wasn't used as a means to get rid of "unwanted populations" like she had hoped when she voted.

Now this. The liberal director Oliver Stone, who liberals gushed over when he made the movie "W" for bashing Bush. Who they bowed to when he attacked our efforts in Vietnam.

Now, Stone is defending Hitler and the Nazis. He said what Hitler did is only misunderstood because of the Jew dominated media. Jesus H. Christ. He said Hitler can't be understood in context because of the Jew media. Don't know what context genocide needs to be in. (See bottom of thread for BEST part)

He does on to slam our policy towards Iran as "horrible". Hey, all they want to do is see Israel go up in a mushroom cloud, they said it themselves. Who are we to stand in the way? He says we just "Don't know the full story!" with Iran.

He then defends Hugo Chavez, calling him a "brave, blunt, earthy man" and when confronted with Venezuelan human rights violations, he claims "the internet is free" and "people can say whatever they like" under Chavez. Hey, slavery is great as long as you got internet and free speech! Who needs elections!!!??

But wait, theres more!!

Liberal hero Oliver Stone went one step farther. He actually tried to blame America and the Brits for Hitler. He actually said while Hitler did some bad stuff, that Hitler "had some support"...........from America and England. He actually tried to blame Hitler on America and England.



Liberals...........I'm gonna cut you guys some slack. I'm not gonna ask you to defend this guy. As much as some of you are uncomfortable with American exceptionalism, I seriously don't think any of you are gonna blame America and the UK for Hitler, or say Hitler just needs to be understood in context because modern Jews won't allow him to be.

Liberalism is a mental disorder. Some cases are worse than others. Stone's is extreme.

Liberal ideology is the mental oil spill in the world of ideals.

Hey pea brain, is pea brainism a mental disorder?

Oliver Stone said Hitler caused more damage to the Russian people than to Jewish people, but that the American focus on the Holocaust stems from the "Jewish domination of the media."

"Hitler was a Frankenstein but there was also a Dr Frankenstein," Stone said (via The Telegraph). "German industrialists, the Americans and the British. He had a lot of support...

There is a lot of truth in his words. Isn't truth what really matters? Or is pea brainism more important to you pea brains?

FACT: No nation in the history of battle ever suffered more than the Soviet Union suffered in the course of the Second World War. At least 20 million lost their lives. Countless millions of homes and farms were burned or sacked. A third of the nation's territory, including nearly two thirds of its industrial base, was turned into a wasteland--a loss equivalent to the devastation of this country east of Chicago.

FACT: US industrialists like Henry Ford financed Adolph Hitler's nationalist and anti-Semitic movements in Munich and received the Grand Cross of the German Eagle, a Nazi decoration for distinguished foreigners.

FACT: The Jewish dominated film industry refused to release any movies that criticized Hitler before US involvement in WWII...The timidity of the studio heads was based on several factors — they didn't want to close down the European market for Hollywood films, and they were being pressured from conservatives and isolationists in Congress who opposed U.S. involvement in the European war and were concerned about Hollywood making "propaganda" films attacking the fascists.

FACT: Hitler was not a socialist, he was a nationalist, he strongly believed in Aryan exceptionalism...a folk-State.

FACT: The neoconservatives that pushed for the war with Iraq for years are all Jews. They were more that willing to send American sons & daughters into harms way to defend WHOSE national security? America's or Israel's?

 

[editec]

I always find it amusing when right wing crancks start out by telling us what the left believes.

What you're doing is called BEGGING THE QUESTION.

You're creating strawmen to knock down.

Very impressive..in broomstick cowboy kinda way.

 

[xotoxi]

Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in Context' | NewsBusters.org

I've already explained to you left wingers how your heroes George Bernard Shaw and Karl Marx daydreamed of eugenics, and how Shaw wanted science to develop a humane gas that could exterminate surplus humans while listening to classical music to make it more comfortable.

I told you about Supreme Court justice Ruth Ginsberg, a worshipped liberal lady, who was disappointed that abortion wasn't used as a means to get rid of "unwanted populations" like she had hoped when she voted.

Now this. The liberal director Oliver Stone, who liberals gushed over when he made the movie "W" for bashing Bush. Who they bowed to when he attacked our efforts in Vietnam.

Now, Stone is defending Hitler and the Nazis. He said what Hitler did is only misunderstood because of the Jew dominated media. Jesus H. Christ. He said Hitler can't be understood in context because of the Jew media. Don't know what context genocide needs to be in. (See bottom of thread for BEST part)

He does on to slam our policy towards Iran as "horrible". Hey, all they want to do is see Israel go up in a mushroom cloud, they said it themselves. Who are we to stand in the way? He says we just "Don't know the full story!" with Iran.

He then defends Hugo Chavez, calling him a "brave, blunt, earthy man" and when confronted with Venezuelan human rights violations, he claims "the internet is free" and "people can say whatever they like" under Chavez. Hey, slavery is great as long as you got internet and free speech! Who needs elections!!!??

But wait, theres more!!

Liberal hero Oliver Stone went one step farther. He actually tried to blame America and the Brits for Hitler. He actually said while Hitler did some bad stuff, that Hitler "had some support"...........from America and England. He actually tried to blame Hitler on America and England.



Liberals...........I'm gonna cut you guys some slack. I'm not gonna ask you to defend this guy. As much as some of you are uncomfortable with American exceptionalism, I seriously don't think any of you are gonna blame America and the UK for Hitler, or say Hitler just needs to be understood in context because modern Jews won't allow him to be.

Liberalism is a mental disorder. Some cases are worse than others. Stone's is extreme.

Liberal ideology is the mental oil spill in the world of ideals.

I am a strong advocate of eugenics, as long as it is used to get rid of whatever ethnic or cultural group you belong to.

Come to think of it, lets just use it for you.

 

[mudwhistle]

Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in Context' | NewsBusters.org

I've already explained to you left wingers how your heroes George Bernard Shaw and Karl Marx daydreamed of eugenics, and how Shaw wanted science to develop a humane gas that could exterminate surplus humans while listening to classical music to make it more comfortable.

I told you about Supreme Court justice Ruth Ginsberg, a worshipped liberal lady, who was disappointed that abortion wasn't used as a means to get rid of "unwanted populations" like she had hoped when she voted.

Now this. The liberal director Oliver Stone, who liberals gushed over when he made the movie "W" for bashing Bush. Who they bowed to when he attacked our efforts in Vietnam.

Now, Stone is defending Hitler and the Nazis. He said what Hitler did is only misunderstood because of the Jew dominated media. Jesus H. Christ. He said Hitler can't be understood in context because of the Jew media. Don't know what context genocide needs to be in. (See bottom of thread for BEST part)

He does on to slam our policy towards Iran as "horrible". Hey, all they want to do is see Israel go up in a mushroom cloud, they said it themselves. Who are we to stand in the way? He says we just "Don't know the full story!" with Iran.

He then defends Hugo Chavez, calling him a "brave, blunt, earthy man" and when confronted with Venezuelan human rights violations, he claims "the internet is free" and "people can say whatever they like" under Chavez. Hey, slavery is great as long as you got internet and free speech! Who needs elections!!!??

But wait, theres more!!

Liberal hero Oliver Stone went one step farther. He actually tried to blame America and the Brits for Hitler. He actually said while Hitler did some bad stuff, that Hitler "had some support"...........from America and England. He actually tried to blame Hitler on America and England.



Liberals...........I'm gonna cut you guys some slack. I'm not gonna ask you to defend this guy. As much as some of you are uncomfortable with American exceptionalism, I seriously don't think any of you are gonna blame America and the UK for Hitler, or say Hitler just needs to be understood in context because modern Jews won't allow him to be.

Liberalism is a mental disorder. Some cases are worse than others. Stone's is extreme.

Liberal ideology is the mental oil spill in the world of ideals.

Don't forget Cass Sustein who currently is the Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Obama administration....he believes in eugenics as well. Also his wife admires Mother Theresa and Chairman Mao.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Sunstein

You should read this driveling piece he wrote about Obama in the Huffington Post.
Cass R. Sunstein: The Obama I Know

 

[Bfgrn]

Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in Context' | NewsBusters.org

I've already explained to you left wingers how your heroes George Bernard Shaw and Karl Marx daydreamed of eugenics, and how Shaw wanted science to develop a humane gas that could exterminate surplus humans while listening to classical music to make it more comfortable.

I told you about Supreme Court justice Ruth Ginsberg, a worshipped liberal lady, who was disappointed that abortion wasn't used as a means to get rid of "unwanted populations" like she had hoped when she voted.

Now this. The liberal director Oliver Stone, who liberals gushed over when he made the movie "W" for bashing Bush. Who they bowed to when he attacked our efforts in Vietnam.

Now, Stone is defending Hitler and the Nazis. He said what Hitler did is only misunderstood because of the Jew dominated media. Jesus H. Christ. He said Hitler can't be understood in context because of the Jew media. Don't know what context genocide needs to be in. (See bottom of thread for BEST part)

He does on to slam our policy towards Iran as "horrible". Hey, all they want to do is see Israel go up in a mushroom cloud, they said it themselves. Who are we to stand in the way? He says we just "Don't know the full story!" with Iran.

He then defends Hugo Chavez, calling him a "brave, blunt, earthy man" and when confronted with Venezuelan human rights violations, he claims "the internet is free" and "people can say whatever they like" under Chavez. Hey, slavery is great as long as you got internet and free speech! Who needs elections!!!??

But wait, theres more!!

Liberal hero Oliver Stone went one step farther. He actually tried to blame America and the Brits for Hitler. He actually said while Hitler did some bad stuff, that Hitler "had some support"...........from America and England. He actually tried to blame Hitler on America and England.



Liberals...........I'm gonna cut you guys some slack. I'm not gonna ask you to defend this guy. As much as some of you are uncomfortable with American exceptionalism, I seriously don't think any of you are gonna blame America and the UK for Hitler, or say Hitler just needs to be understood in context because modern Jews won't allow him to be.

Liberalism is a mental disorder. Some cases are worse than others. Stone's is extreme.

Liberal ideology is the mental oil spill in the world of ideals.

Don't forget Cass Sustein who currently is the Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Obama administration....he believes in eugenics as well. Also his wife admires Mother Theresa and Chairman Mao.
Cass Sunstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You should read this driveling piece he wrote about Obama in the Huffington Post.
Cass R. Sunstein: The Obama I Know

Yea, we must never admire someone as evil as Mother Teresa!

Let us touch the dying, the poor, the lonely and the unwanted according to the graces we have received and let us not be ashamed or slow to do the humble work.
Mother Teresa

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Stone is just your average Liberal Hollywood A*shole. These loons live in their own twisted fantasy worlds. He's a typical Liberal racist nutter who probably prides himself on calling other people racists. I've met a lot of these Liberal racist types in my time. He's also a big-time Chavez & Castro butt-sniffer too. People just need to stop following these Liberal Hollywood loons. Just because they have some talent at film-making,it doesn't mean they are good people. Just look at Mel Gibson. Is he really a good person? Stone is an A*shole. Nuff said.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I tell you what though... when they come for THEM it will be just like when it's time for them to pay THEIR taxes. They'll be screaming bloody murder.

 

[bucs90]

Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in Context' | NewsBusters.org

I've already explained to you left wingers how your heroes George Bernard Shaw and Karl Marx daydreamed of eugenics, and how Shaw wanted science to develop a humane gas that could exterminate surplus humans while listening to classical music to make it more comfortable.

I told you about Supreme Court justice Ruth Ginsberg, a worshipped liberal lady, who was disappointed that abortion wasn't used as a means to get rid of "unwanted populations" like she had hoped when she voted.

Now this. The liberal director Oliver Stone, who liberals gushed over when he made the movie "W" for bashing Bush. Who they bowed to when he attacked our efforts in Vietnam.

Now, Stone is defending Hitler and the Nazis. He said what Hitler did is only misunderstood because of the Jew dominated media. Jesus H. Christ. He said Hitler can't be understood in context because of the Jew media. Don't know what context genocide needs to be in. (See bottom of thread for BEST part)

He does on to slam our policy towards Iran as "horrible". Hey, all they want to do is see Israel go up in a mushroom cloud, they said it themselves. Who are we to stand in the way? He says we just "Don't know the full story!" with Iran.

He then defends Hugo Chavez, calling him a "brave, blunt, earthy man" and when confronted with Venezuelan human rights violations, he claims "the internet is free" and "people can say whatever they like" under Chavez. Hey, slavery is great as long as you got internet and free speech! Who needs elections!!!??

But wait, theres more!!

Liberal hero Oliver Stone went one step farther. He actually tried to blame America and the Brits for Hitler. He actually said while Hitler did some bad stuff, that Hitler "had some support"...........from America and England. He actually tried to blame Hitler on America and England.



Liberals...........I'm gonna cut you guys some slack. I'm not gonna ask you to defend this guy. As much as some of you are uncomfortable with American exceptionalism, I seriously don't think any of you are gonna blame America and the UK for Hitler, or say Hitler just needs to be understood in context because modern Jews won't allow him to be.

Liberalism is a mental disorder. Some cases are worse than others. Stone's is extreme.

Liberal ideology is the mental oil spill in the world of ideals.

Hey pea brain, is pea brainism a mental disorder?

Oliver Stone said Hitler caused more damage to the Russian people than to Jewish people, but that the American focus on the Holocaust stems from the "Jewish domination of the media."

"Hitler was a Frankenstein but there was also a Dr Frankenstein," Stone said (via The Telegraph). "German industrialists, the Americans and the British. He had a lot of support...

There is a lot of truth in his words. Isn't truth what really matters? Or is pea brainism more important to you pea brains?

FACT: No nation in the history of battle ever suffered more than the Soviet Union suffered in the course of the Second World War. At least 20 million lost their lives. Countless millions of homes and farms were burned or sacked. A third of the nation's territory, including nearly two thirds of its industrial base, was turned into a wasteland--a loss equivalent to the devastation of this country east of Chicago.

FACT: US industrialists like Henry Ford financed Adolph Hitler's nationalist and anti-Semitic movements in Munich and received the Grand Cross of the German Eagle, a Nazi decoration for distinguished foreigners.

FACT: The Jewish dominated film industry refused to release any movies that criticized Hitler before US involvement in WWII...The timidity of the studio heads was based on several factors — they didn't want to close down the European market for Hollywood films, and they were being pressured from conservatives and isolationists in Congress who opposed U.S. involvement in the European war and were concerned about Hollywood making "propaganda" films attacking the fascists.

FACT: Hitler was not a socialist, he was a nationalist, he strongly believed in Aryan exceptionalism...a folk-State.

FACT: The neoconservatives that pushed for the war with Iraq for years are all Jews. They were more that willing to send American sons & daughters into harms way to defend WHOSE national security? America's or Israel's?

Now THAT was a doozy!!!!

Where to start. You say Hitler was not a socialist? What part of National SOCIALIST Party of Germany (NAZI) did you miss? I put the important part in all caps, just to help you out.

Yes. The German war machine did do more destruction to Russians than Jews. There is a bit of difference.

The Russian Army was at war with the Germans. The Russians along with the Allies attacked Germany because of what they were doing to Europe and the Jews. But before THAT, the Russians tried to appease Hitler (exactly how Obama is trying to appease Iran now) and it backfired.

The Jews had no "army" and were not a nation, and were not at war with the Nazis. The Jews being rounded up and slaughtered had no nation's army that was at war with the Nazis like the Russians did. If you see no difference in the deaths of the Jews in WW2 and deaths of Russians in WW2 then you're a fu**ing retard. Sorry. But the "Jews" never declared war on Germany. They couldn't, they aren't a nation amongst themselves. Russia did.

The US media did not cover the Russian deaths as much as the Jew deaths. Why? Could it be because of the Cold War that immediatly followed and the tyrannical and evil USSR that we were in constant diplomatic conflict with? US media is NORMALLY not sympathetic to enemies of our country, at least not until about 2004 they weren't.

And of course, your final statement, which is straight out of a UC Berkeley Human Rights 101 lecture hall. That everyone who pushed for the Iraq War was a Jew. Really? Did you really need to go that far with it? Bill Clinton bombed Iraq throughout his 2 terms. Is he a Jew? Is Bush a Jew? Is Colin Powell a Jew? Was every US Senator EXCEPT Obama who voted in favor of the war a Jew?

You exposed your liberal brain rot with your last paragraph. But oh how I await the humor that will be your response

 

[bucs90]

Stone is just your average Liberal Hollywood A*shole. These loons live in their own twisted fantasy worlds. He's a typical Liberal racist nutter who probably prides himself on calling other people racists. I've met a lot of these Liberal racist types in my time. He's also a big-time Chavez & Castro butt-sniffer too. People just need to stop following these Liberal Hollywood loons. Just because they have some talent at film-making,it doesn't mean they are good people. Just look at Mel Gibson. Is he really a good person? Stone is an A*shole. Nuff said.

Any Given Sunday was the bomb though!!!! I'll give him that! "Steamin'" Willie Beamin!!!

 

[Political Junky]

Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in Context' | NewsBusters.org

I've already explained to you left wingers how your heroes George Bernard Shaw and Karl Marx daydreamed of eugenics, and how Shaw wanted science to develop a humane gas that could exterminate surplus humans while listening to classical music to make it more comfortable.

I told you about Supreme Court justice Ruth Ginsberg, a worshipped liberal lady, who was disappointed that abortion wasn't used as a means to get rid of "unwanted populations" like she had hoped when she voted.

Now this. The liberal director Oliver Stone, who liberals gushed over when he made the movie "W" for bashing Bush. Who they bowed to when he attacked our efforts in Vietnam.

Now, Stone is defending Hitler and the Nazis. He said what Hitler did is only misunderstood because of the Jew dominated media. Jesus H. Christ. He said Hitler can't be understood in context because of the Jew media. Don't know what context genocide needs to be in. (See bottom of thread for BEST part)

He does on to slam our policy towards Iran as "horrible". Hey, all they want to do is see Israel go up in a mushroom cloud, they said it themselves. Who are we to stand in the way? He says we just "Don't know the full story!" with Iran.

He then defends Hugo Chavez, calling him a "brave, blunt, earthy man" and when confronted with Venezuelan human rights violations, he claims "the internet is free" and "people can say whatever they like" under Chavez. Hey, slavery is great as long as you got internet and free speech! Who needs elections!!!??

But wait, theres more!!

Liberal hero Oliver Stone went one step farther. He actually tried to blame America and the Brits for Hitler. He actually said while Hitler did some bad stuff, that Hitler "had some support"...........from America and England. He actually tried to blame Hitler on America and England.



Liberals...........I'm gonna cut you guys some slack. I'm not gonna ask you to defend this guy. As much as some of you are uncomfortable with American exceptionalism, I seriously don't think any of you are gonna blame America and the UK for Hitler, or say Hitler just needs to be understood in context because modern Jews won't allow him to be.

Liberalism is a mental disorder. Some cases are worse than others. Stone's is extreme.

Liberal ideology is the mental oil spill in the world of ideals.

Hey pea brain, is pea brainism a mental disorder?

Oliver Stone said Hitler caused more damage to the Russian people than to Jewish people, but that the American focus on the Holocaust stems from the "Jewish domination of the media."

"Hitler was a Frankenstein but there was also a Dr Frankenstein," Stone said (via The Telegraph). "German industrialists, the Americans and the British. He had a lot of support...

There is a lot of truth in his words. Isn't truth what really matters? Or is pea brainism more important to you pea brains?

FACT: No nation in the history of battle ever suffered more than the Soviet Union suffered in the course of the Second World War. At least 20 million lost their lives. Countless millions of homes and farms were burned or sacked. A third of the nation's territory, including nearly two thirds of its industrial base, was turned into a wasteland--a loss equivalent to the devastation of this country east of Chicago.

FACT: US industrialists like Henry Ford financed Adolph Hitler's nationalist and anti-Semitic movements in Munich and received the Grand Cross of the German Eagle, a Nazi decoration for distinguished foreigners.

FACT: The Jewish dominated film industry refused to release any movies that criticized Hitler before US involvement in WWII...The timidity of the studio heads was based on several factors — they didn't want to close down the European market for Hollywood films, and they were being pressured from conservatives and isolationists in Congress who opposed U.S. involvement in the European war and were concerned about Hollywood making "propaganda" films attacking the fascists.

FACT: Hitler was not a socialist, he was a nationalist, he strongly believed in Aryan exceptionalism...a folk-State.

FACT: The neoconservatives that pushed for the war with Iraq for years are all Jews. They were more that willing to send American sons & daughters into harms way to defend WHOSE national security? America's or Israel's?

Now THAT was a doozy!!!!

Where to start. You say Hitler was not a socialist? What part of National SOCIALIST Party of Germany (NAZI) did you miss? I put the important part in all caps, just to help you out.

Yes. The German war machine did do more destruction to Russians than Jews. There is a bit of difference.

The Russian Army was at war with the Germans. The Russians along with the Allies attacked Germany because of what they were doing to Europe and the Jews. But before THAT, the Russians tried to appease Hitler (exactly how Obama is trying to appease Iran now) and it backfired.

The Jews had no "army" and were not a nation, and were not at war with the Nazis. The Jews being rounded up and slaughtered had no nation's army that was at war with the Nazis like the Russians did. If you see no difference in the deaths of the Jews in WW2 and deaths of Russians in WW2 then you're a fu**ing retard. Sorry. But the "Jews" never declared war on Germany. They couldn't, they aren't a nation amongst themselves. Russia did.

The US media did not cover the Russian deaths as much as the Jew deaths. Why? Could it be because of the Cold War that immediatly followed and the tyrannical and evil USSR that we were in constant diplomatic conflict with? US media is NORMALLY not sympathetic to enemies of our country, at least not until about 2004 they weren't.

And of course, your final statement, which is straight out of a UC Berkeley Human Rights 101 lecture hall. That everyone who pushed for the Iraq War was a Jew. Really? Did you really need to go that far with it? Bill Clinton bombed Iraq throughout his 2 terms. Is he a Jew? Is Bush a Jew? Is Colin Powell a Jew? Was every US Senator EXCEPT Obama who voted in favor of the war a Jew?

You exposed your liberal brain rot with your last paragraph. But oh how I await the humor that will be your response

Hitler wasn't a Socialist anymore than you're a Communist because the name of China is the People's Republic of China.

 

[bucs90]

^^^???

I don't live in China. I don't lead their government or their army. Not a valid argument.

Hitler and the National SOCIALIST Party of Germany are one and the same.


I will say, though, didn't think that premise would get much resistance. Funny how many lefties are quick to defend socialists.

 

[Political Junky]

Hey pea brain, is pea brainism a mental disorder?

Oliver Stone said Hitler caused more damage to the Russian people than to Jewish people, but that the American focus on the Holocaust stems from the "Jewish domination of the media."

"Hitler was a Frankenstein but there was also a Dr Frankenstein," Stone said (via The Telegraph). "German industrialists, the Americans and the British. He had a lot of support...

There is a lot of truth in his words. Isn't truth what really matters? Or is pea brainism more important to you pea brains?

FACT: No nation in the history of battle ever suffered more than the Soviet Union suffered in the course of the Second World War. At least 20 million lost their lives. Countless millions of homes and farms were burned or sacked. A third of the nation's territory, including nearly two thirds of its industrial base, was turned into a wasteland--a loss equivalent to the devastation of this country east of Chicago.

FACT: US industrialists like Henry Ford financed Adolph Hitler's nationalist and anti-Semitic movements in Munich and received the Grand Cross of the German Eagle, a Nazi decoration for distinguished foreigners.

FACT: The Jewish dominated film industry refused to release any movies that criticized Hitler before US involvement in WWII...The timidity of the studio heads was based on several factors — they didn't want to close down the European market for Hollywood films, and they were being pressured from conservatives and isolationists in Congress who opposed U.S. involvement in the European war and were concerned about Hollywood making "propaganda" films attacking the fascists.

FACT: Hitler was not a socialist, he was a nationalist, he strongly believed in Aryan exceptionalism...a folk-State.

FACT: The neoconservatives that pushed for the war with Iraq for years are all Jews. They were more that willing to send American sons & daughters into harms way to defend WHOSE national security? America's or Israel's?

Now THAT was a doozy!!!!

Where to start. You say Hitler was not a socialist? What part of National SOCIALIST Party of Germany (NAZI) did you miss? I put the important part in all caps, just to help you out.

Yes. The German war machine did do more destruction to Russians than Jews. There is a bit of difference.

The Russian Army was at war with the Germans. The Russians along with the Allies attacked Germany because of what they were doing to Europe and the Jews. But before THAT, the Russians tried to appease Hitler (exactly how Obama is trying to appease Iran now) and it backfired.

The Jews had no "army" and were not a nation, and were not at war with the Nazis. The Jews being rounded up and slaughtered had no nation's army that was at war with the Nazis like the Russians did. If you see no difference in the deaths of the Jews in WW2 and deaths of Russians in WW2 then you're a fu**ing retard. Sorry. But the "Jews" never declared war on Germany. They couldn't, they aren't a nation amongst themselves. Russia did.

The US media did not cover the Russian deaths as much as the Jew deaths. Why? Could it be because of the Cold War that immediatly followed and the tyrannical and evil USSR that we were in constant diplomatic conflict with? US media is NORMALLY not sympathetic to enemies of our country, at least not until about 2004 they weren't.

And of course, your final statement, which is straight out of a UC Berkeley Human Rights 101 lecture hall. That everyone who pushed for the Iraq War was a Jew. Really? Did you really need to go that far with it? Bill Clinton bombed Iraq throughout his 2 terms. Is he a Jew? Is Bush a Jew? Is Colin Powell a Jew? Was every US Senator EXCEPT Obama who voted in favor of the war a Jew?

You exposed your liberal brain rot with your last paragraph. But oh how I await the humor that will be your response

Hitler wasn't a Socialist anymore than you're a Communist because the name of China is the People's Republic of China.

Nazism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nazism presented itself as politically syncretic, incorporating policies, tactics and philosophies from right- and left-wing ideologies; in practice, Nazism was a far right form of politics.[

 

[bucs90]

Now THAT was a doozy!!!!

Where to start. You say Hitler was not a socialist? What part of National SOCIALIST Party of Germany (NAZI) did you miss? I put the important part in all caps, just to help you out.

Yes. The German war machine did do more destruction to Russians than Jews. There is a bit of difference.

The Russian Army was at war with the Germans. The Russians along with the Allies attacked Germany because of what they were doing to Europe and the Jews. But before THAT, the Russians tried to appease Hitler (exactly how Obama is trying to appease Iran now) and it backfired.

The Jews had no "army" and were not a nation, and were not at war with the Nazis. The Jews being rounded up and slaughtered had no nation's army that was at war with the Nazis like the Russians did. If you see no difference in the deaths of the Jews in WW2 and deaths of Russians in WW2 then you're a fu**ing retard. Sorry. But the "Jews" never declared war on Germany. They couldn't, they aren't a nation amongst themselves. Russia did.

The US media did not cover the Russian deaths as much as the Jew deaths. Why? Could it be because of the Cold War that immediatly followed and the tyrannical and evil USSR that we were in constant diplomatic conflict with? US media is NORMALLY not sympathetic to enemies of our country, at least not until about 2004 they weren't.

And of course, your final statement, which is straight out of a UC Berkeley Human Rights 101 lecture hall. That everyone who pushed for the Iraq War was a Jew. Really? Did you really need to go that far with it? Bill Clinton bombed Iraq throughout his 2 terms. Is he a Jew? Is Bush a Jew? Is Colin Powell a Jew? Was every US Senator EXCEPT Obama who voted in favor of the war a Jew?

You exposed your liberal brain rot with your last paragraph. But oh how I await the humor that will be your response

Hitler wasn't a Socialist anymore than you're a Communist because the name of China is the People's Republic of China.

Nazism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nazism presented itself as politically syncretic, incorporating policies, tactics and philosophies from right- and left-wing ideologies; in practice, Nazism was a far right form of politics.[

Far right = smallest gov't possible. Your source is God-D**n Wikipedia. Maybe I'll go in and edit that source myself in a moment.

Nazis believed in:

- Total go'vt control of healthcare, banks, business, education (sound familiar)
- The massive green movement to promote purity in nature, and eventually, in race

Left wing socialism was the seed that sprouted Nazis. And Stalin. And Lenin. And Che. And Pol Pot. And Kim Jung Ill. And Castro. And Chavez. And Mao.

And coming soon....Obama.

 

[Bfgrn]

Oliver Stone: 'Jewish-Dominated Media' Prevents Hitler from Being Portrayed 'in Context' | NewsBusters.org

I've already explained to you left wingers how your heroes George Bernard Shaw and Karl Marx daydreamed of eugenics, and how Shaw wanted science to develop a humane gas that could exterminate surplus humans while listening to classical music to make it more comfortable.

I told you about Supreme Court justice Ruth Ginsberg, a worshipped liberal lady, who was disappointed that abortion wasn't used as a means to get rid of "unwanted populations" like she had hoped when she voted.

Now this. The liberal director Oliver Stone, who liberals gushed over when he made the movie "W" for bashing Bush. Who they bowed to when he attacked our efforts in Vietnam.

Now, Stone is defending Hitler and the Nazis. He said what Hitler did is only misunderstood because of the Jew dominated media. Jesus H. Christ. He said Hitler can't be understood in context because of the Jew media. Don't know what context genocide needs to be in. (See bottom of thread for BEST part)

He does on to slam our policy towards Iran as "horrible". Hey, all they want to do is see Israel go up in a mushroom cloud, they said it themselves. Who are we to stand in the way? He says we just "Don't know the full story!" with Iran.

He then defends Hugo Chavez, calling him a "brave, blunt, earthy man" and when confronted with Venezuelan human rights violations, he claims "the internet is free" and "people can say whatever they like" under Chavez. Hey, slavery is great as long as you got internet and free speech! Who needs elections!!!??

But wait, theres more!!

Liberal hero Oliver Stone went one step farther. He actually tried to blame America and the Brits for Hitler. He actually said while Hitler did some bad stuff, that Hitler "had some support"...........from America and England. He actually tried to blame Hitler on America and England.



Liberals...........I'm gonna cut you guys some slack. I'm not gonna ask you to defend this guy. As much as some of you are uncomfortable with American exceptionalism, I seriously don't think any of you are gonna blame America and the UK for Hitler, or say Hitler just needs to be understood in context because modern Jews won't allow him to be.

Liberalism is a mental disorder. Some cases are worse than others. Stone's is extreme.

Liberal ideology is the mental oil spill in the world of ideals.

Hey pea brain, is pea brainism a mental disorder?

Oliver Stone said Hitler caused more damage to the Russian people than to Jewish people, but that the American focus on the Holocaust stems from the "Jewish domination of the media."

"Hitler was a Frankenstein but there was also a Dr Frankenstein," Stone said (via The Telegraph). "German industrialists, the Americans and the British. He had a lot of support...

There is a lot of truth in his words. Isn't truth what really matters? Or is pea brainism more important to you pea brains?

FACT: No nation in the history of battle ever suffered more than the Soviet Union suffered in the course of the Second World War. At least 20 million lost their lives. Countless millions of homes and farms were burned or sacked. A third of the nation's territory, including nearly two thirds of its industrial base, was turned into a wasteland--a loss equivalent to the devastation of this country east of Chicago.

FACT: US industrialists like Henry Ford financed Adolph Hitler's nationalist and anti-Semitic movements in Munich and received the Grand Cross of the German Eagle, a Nazi decoration for distinguished foreigners.

FACT: The Jewish dominated film industry refused to release any movies that criticized Hitler before US involvement in WWII...The timidity of the studio heads was based on several factors — they didn't want to close down the European market for Hollywood films, and they were being pressured from conservatives and isolationists in Congress who opposed U.S. involvement in the European war and were concerned about Hollywood making "propaganda" films attacking the fascists.

FACT: Hitler was not a socialist, he was a nationalist, he strongly believed in Aryan exceptionalism...a folk-State.

FACT: The neoconservatives that pushed for the war with Iraq for years are all Jews. They were more that willing to send American sons & daughters into harms way to defend WHOSE national security? America's or Israel's?

Now THAT was a doozy!!!!

Where to start. You say Hitler was not a socialist? What part of National SOCIALIST Party of Germany (NAZI) did you miss? I put the important part in all caps, just to help you out.

Yes. The German war machine did do more destruction to Russians than Jews. There is a bit of difference.

The Russian Army was at war with the Germans. The Russians along with the Allies attacked Germany because of what they were doing to Europe and the Jews. But before THAT, the Russians tried to appease Hitler (exactly how Obama is trying to appease Iran now) and it backfired.

The Jews had no "army" and were not a nation, and were not at war with the Nazis. The Jews being rounded up and slaughtered had no nation's army that was at war with the Nazis like the Russians did. If you see no difference in the deaths of the Jews in WW2 and deaths of Russians in WW2 then you're a fu**ing retard. Sorry. But the "Jews" never declared war on Germany. They couldn't, they aren't a nation amongst themselves. Russia did.

The US media did not cover the Russian deaths as much as the Jew deaths. Why? Could it be because of the Cold War that immediatly followed and the tyrannical and evil USSR that we were in constant diplomatic conflict with? US media is NORMALLY not sympathetic to enemies of our country, at least not until about 2004 they weren't.

And of course, your final statement, which is straight out of a UC Berkeley Human Rights 101 lecture hall. That everyone who pushed for the Iraq War was a Jew. Really? Did you really need to go that far with it? Bill Clinton bombed Iraq throughout his 2 terms. Is he a Jew? Is Bush a Jew? Is Colin Powell a Jew? Was every US Senator EXCEPT Obama who voted in favor of the war a Jew?

You exposed your liberal brain rot with your last paragraph. But oh how I await the humor that will be your response

Hey pea brain...did you miss the part where Stone said "Hitler was a Frankenstein"

He did not deny the holocaust, but he stated some uncomfortable FACTS...US industrialists, bankers and media moguls were 'Dr Frankensteins' especially early on in Hitler's reign of terror.

WOW...the typical 'word bound' pea brain reply... 'You say Hitler was not a socialist? What part of National SOCIALIST Party of Germany (NAZI) did you miss?'

Hey pea brain...too bad Martin Luther King Jr didn't have you as an adviser. ALL he had to do to end segregation was to SAY: "I am a white man"

What part did I miss...the 'socialism' part pea brain. Hitler HATED Marxists, Marxism and socialists. He was a NATIONALIST, a racist and an 'Aryan' white supremacist ...What part of NATIONAL Socialist Party of Germany (NAZI) did you miss?

Here's a revolutionary concept for you pea brain...EDUCATE yourself before you open your pie hole and let out all your ignorance...you embarrass yourself...

Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler

Volume Two - The National Socialist Movement
Chapter I: Philosophy and Party


Mein Kampf - Volume II, Chapter I

Democracy is exploited by the Marxists for the purpose of paralyzing their opponents and gaining for themselves a free hand to put their own methods into action. When certain groups of Marxists use all their ingenuity for the time being to make it be believed that they are inseparably attached to the principles of democracy, it may be well to recall the fact that when critical occasions arose these same gentlemen snapped their fingers at the principle of decision by majority vote, as that principle is understood by Western Democracy. Such was the case in those days when the bourgeois parliamentarians, in their monumental shortsightedness, believed that the security of the Reich was guaranteed because it had an overwhelming numerical majority in its favour, and the Marxists did not hesitate suddenly to grasp supreme power in their own hands, backed by a mob of loafers, deserters, political place-hunters and Jewish dilettanti. That was a blow in the face for that democracy in which so many parliamentarians believed. Only those credulous parliamentary wizards who represented bourgeois democracy could have believed that the brutal determination of those whose interest it is to spread the Marxist world-pest, of which they are the carriers, could for a moment, now or in the future, be held in check by the magical formulas of Western Parliamentarianism. Marxism will march shoulder to shoulder with democracy until it succeeds indirectly in securing for its own criminal purposes even the support of those whose minds are nationally orientated and whom Marxism strives to exterminate. But if the Marxists should one day come to believe that there was a danger that from this witch's cauldron of our parliamentary democracy a majority vote might be concocted, which by reason of its numerical majority would be empowered to enact legislation and might use that power seriously to combat Marxism, then the whole parliamentarian hocus-pocus would be at an end. Instead of appealing to the democratic conscience, the standard bearers of the Red International would immediately send forth a furious rallying-cry among the proletarian masses and the ensuing fight would not take place in the sedate atmosphere of Parliament but in the factories and the streets. Then democracy would be annihilated forthwith. And what the intellectual prowess of the apostles who represented the people in Parliament had failed to accomplish would now be successfully carried out by the crow-bar and the sledge-hammer of the exasperated proletarian masses – just as in the autumn of 1918. At a blow they would awaken the bourgeois world to see the madness of thinking that the Jewish drive towards world-conquest can be effectually opposed by means of Western Democracy.

If we try to penetrate to the inner meaning of the word völkisch we arrive at the following conclusions:
The current political conception of the world is that the State, though it possesses a creative force which can build up civilizations, has nothing in common with the concept of race as the foundation of the State. The State is considered rather as something which has resulted from economic necessity, or, at best, the natural outcome of the play of political forces and impulses. Such a conception of the foundations of the State, together with all its logical consequences, not only ignores the primordial racial forces that underlie the State, but it also leads to a policy in which the importance of the individual is minimized. If it be denied that races differ from one another in their powers of cultural creativeness, then this same erroneous notion must necessarily influence our estimation of the value of the individual. The assumption that all races are alike leads to the assumption that nations and individuals are equal to one another. And international Marxism is nothing but the application – effected by the Jew, Karl Marx – of a general conception of life to a definite profession of political faith; but in reality that general concept had existed long before the time of Karl Marx. If it had not already existed as a widely diffused infection the amazing political progress of the Marxist teaching would never have been possible. In reality what distinguished Karl Marx from the millions who were affected in the same way was that, in a world already in a state of gradual decomposition, he used his keen powers of prognosis to detect the essential poisons, so as to extract them and concentrate them, with the art of a necromancer, in a solution which would bring about the rapid destruction of the independent nations on the globe. But all this was done in the service of his race.

Thus the Marxist doctrine is the concentrated extract of the mentality which underlies the general concept of life today. For this reason alone it is out of the question and even ridiculous to think that what is called our bourgeois world can put up any effective fight against Marxism. For this bourgeois world is permeated with all those same poisons and its conception of life in general differs from Marxism only in degree and in the character of the persons who hold it. The bourgeois world is Marxist but believes in the possibility of a certain group of people – that is to say, the bourgeoisie – being able to dominate the world, while Marxism itself systematically aims at delivering the world into the hands of the Jews.

Over against all this, the völkisch concept of the world recognizes that the primordial racial elements are of the greatest significance for mankind. In principle, the State is looked upon only as a means to an end and this end is the conservation of the racial characteristics of mankind. Therefore on the völkisch principle we cannot admit that one race is equal to another. By recognizing that they are different, the völkisch concept separates mankind into races of superior and inferior quality. On the basis of this recognition it feels bound in conformity with the eternal Will that dominates the universe, to postulate the victory of the better and stronger and the subordination of the inferior and weaker. And so it pays homage to the truth that the principle underlying all Nature's operations is the aristocratic principle and it believes that this law holds good even down to the last individual organism. It selects individual values from the mass and thus operates as an organizing principle, whereas Marxism acts as a disintegrating solvent.

The völkisch belief holds that humanity must have its ideals, because ideals are a necessary condition of human existence itself. But, on the other hand, it denies that an ethical ideal has the right to prevail if it endangers the existence of a race that is the standard-bearer of a higher ethical ideal. For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and negroids all ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized future for our humanity would be lost forever.

On this planet of ours human culture and civilization are indissolubly bound up with the presence of the Aryan. If he should be exterminated or subjugated, then the dark shroud of a new barbarian era would enfold the earth.

To undermine the existence of human culture by exterminating its founders and custodians would be an execrable crime in the eyes of those who believe that the folk-idea lies at the basis of human existence. Whoever would dare to raise a profane hand against that highest image of God among His creatures would sin against the bountiful Creator of this marvel and would collaborate in the expulsion from Paradise.
Hence the folk concept of the world is in profound accord with Nature's will; because it restores the free play of the forces which will lead the race through stages of sustained reciprocal education towards a higher type, until finally the best portion of mankind will possess the earth and will be free to work in every domain all over the world and even reach spheres that lie outside the earth.

We all feel that in the distant future many may be faced with problems which can be solved only by a superior race of human beings, a race destined to become master of all the other peoples and which will have at its disposal the means and resources of the whole world.

It is self-evident that so general a statement of the meaningful content of a folkish philosophy can be easily interpreted in a thousand different ways. As a matter of fact there is scarcely one of our recent political movements that does not refer at some point to this conception of the world. But the fact that this conception of the world still maintains its independent existence in face of all the others proves that their ways of looking at life are quite difierent from this. Thus the Marxist conception, directed by a central organization endowed with supreme authority, is opposed by a motley crew of opinions which is not very impressive in face of the solid phalanx presented by the enemy. Victory cannot be achieved with such weak weapons. Only when the international idea, politically organized by Marxism, is confronted by the folk idea, equally well organized in a systematic way and equally well led – only then will the fighting energy in the one camp be able to meet that of the other on an equal footing; and victory will be found on the side of eternal truth.

But a general conception of life can never be given an organic embodiment until it is precisely and definitely formulated. The function which dogma fulfils in religious belief is parallel to the function which party principles fulfil for a political party which is in the process of being built up.

Therefore, for the conception of life that is based on the folk idea it is necessary that an instrument be forged which can be used in fighting for this ideal, similar to the Marxist party organization which clears the way for internationalism.

This is the goal pursued by the National Socialist German Workers' Party.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Oliver Stone in love with Hitler? Well he's a loyal Chavez & Castro butt-sniffer so this doesn't surprise me at all. Just another Liberal Hollywood A*shole. Par for the course.

 

[Political Junky]

Oliver Stone in love with Hitler? Well he's a loyal Chavez & Castro butt-sniffer so this doesn't surprise me at all. Just another Liberal Hollywood A*shole. Par for the course.

Talk about selective reading.

 

[rdean]

I don't understand why Republicans care about what they imagine Democrats to want? After all, don't they complain that feeding poor children will only make them "breed" and the unemployed spoiled bums and hobos should "sober up" and go get a job?

 

[Political Junky]

Is a puzzlement.