Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A New Jersey family court judge's decision not to grant a restraining order to a woman who was sexually abused by her Moroccan husband and forced repeatedly to have sex with him is sounding the alarm for advocates of laws designed to ban Shariah in America.
Judge Joseph Charles, in denying the restraining order to the woman after her divorce, ruled that her ex-husband felt he had behaved according to his Muslim beliefs -- and that he did not have "criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault" his wife.
In considering the woman's plea for a restraining order after the couple divorced, Charles ruled in June 2009 that a preponderance of the evidence showed the defendant had harassed and assaulted her, but "The court believes that [defendant] was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was consistent with his practices and it was something that was not prohibited."
The woman's lawyer, Jennifer Donnelly of New Jersey Legal Services, told FoxNews.com that Charles' ruling should add to the case for a proposed Oklahoma law, which will be on the ballot in November, which would ban judges from considering "international law or Shariah Law" in their rulings.
Asked whether the imam's testimony contradicted that, [Ibrahim Hooper, national communications director for the Council for American Islamic Relations] replied, "It's just clear that a Muslim husband shouldn't do anything of this sort to his wife. It's just common sense. You don't need a religious figure to tell you that's wrong."
From The Article... said:Charles' ruling was overturned last month by New Jersey's Appellate Court, which ruled that the husband's religious beliefs were irrelevant and that the judge, in taking them into consideration, "was mistaken."
From The Article... said:Charles' ruling was overturned last month by New Jersey's Appellate Court, which ruled that the husband's religious beliefs were irrelevant and that the judge, in taking them into consideration, "was mistaken."
The system appears to work and FOX continues to sensationalize everything muslim.
*yawn*
Should the story be reported? Of course! But focus on the poor judgement of the judge and the resulting overturning of the bad ruling.
Should the original judge be fired for poor judgement? Up to the fine folks of NJ.
So we can rape anyone we want in NJ?
But Nuredin Giayash, principal of Peace Academy, Tulsa's Islamic school, said American Muslims would like to see Sharia law in the U.S. but only in the limited areas of marriage, divorce and inheritance, not criminal law, and applied only to Muslims.
Unlike the U.S., with its uniform laws for all faiths, he said, Muslim nations allow Christians and Jews to follow their own laws in family matters.
He said U.S. Muslims do not want the U.S. to adopt Sharia criminal law, with its harsh punishments such as amputation of a hand for stealing or stoning for adultery.
Read more from this Tulsa World article at Legislator's proposal would ban use of Sharia law | Tulsa World
So we can rape anyone we want in NJ?
From The Article... said:Charles' ruling was overturned last month by New Jersey's Appellate Court, which ruled that the husband's religious beliefs were irrelevant and that the judge, in taking them into consideration, "was mistaken."
The system appears to work and FOX continues to sensationalize everything muslim.
*yawn*
Should the story be reported? Of course! But focus on the poor judgement of the judge and the resulting overturning of the bad ruling.
Should the original judge be fired for poor judgement? Up to the fine folks of NJ.
But Nuredin Giayash, principal of Peace Academy, Tulsa's Islamic school, said American Muslims would like to see Sharia law in the U.S. but only in the limited areas of marriage, divorce and inheritance, not criminal law, and applied only to Muslims.
Unlike the U.S., with its uniform laws for all faiths, he said, Muslim nations allow Christians and Jews to follow their own laws in family matters.
He said U.S. Muslims do not want the U.S. to adopt Sharia criminal law, with its harsh punishments such as amputation of a hand for stealing or stoning for adultery.
Read more from this Tulsa World article at Legislator's proposal would ban use of Sharia law | Tulsa World
It seems American Muslims would be ok with marital rape, pedophilia, and polygamy, but beheadings and stoning, not so much. Good to know.
But Nuredin Giayash, principal of Peace Academy, Tulsa's Islamic school, said American Muslims would like to see Sharia law in the U.S. but only in the limited areas of marriage, divorce and inheritance, not criminal law, and applied only to Muslims.
Unlike the U.S., with its uniform laws for all faiths, he said, Muslim nations allow Christians and Jews to follow their own laws in family matters.
He said U.S. Muslims do not want the U.S. to adopt Sharia criminal law, with its harsh punishments such as amputation of a hand for stealing or stoning for adultery.
Read more from this Tulsa World article at Legislator's proposal would ban use of Sharia law | Tulsa World
It seems American Muslims would be ok with marital rape, pedophilia, and polygamy, but beheadings and stoning, not so much. Good to know.
Asked whether the imam's testimony contradicted that, [Ibrahim Hooper, national communications director for the Council for American Islamic Relations] replied, "It's just clear that a Muslim husband shouldn't do anything of this sort to his wife. It's just common sense. You don't need a religious figure to tell you that's wrong."
So we can rape anyone we want in NJ?
Is that what you got out of the Article? Did you miss this part?
a Texas district court ruled that the private "Texas Islamic Court" should decide the amount a husband owed his wife in a divorce proceeding -- because when they got married, they had signed a contract specifying that was what they wanted.
But assault is illegal, regardless of any contract, Volokh said, and the Appellate Court in New Jersey ruled correctly.
"The claimed religious practice of non-consensual sex involved in this case is so heinous that almost everybody thinks that you shouldn't have the right to do that, no matter what your religious beliefs are."
The husband in the case has been indicted on criminal charges and is expected to face trial in the fall.
-------------------------
I'm surprised Arab owned Fox would print this. Prince Abu Dabu Doo is gonna get pissed and heads will roll.
But Nuredin Giayash, principal of Peace Academy, Tulsa's Islamic school, said American Muslims would like to see Sharia law in the U.S. but only in the limited areas of marriage, divorce and inheritance, not criminal law, and applied only to Muslims.
Unlike the U.S., with its uniform laws for all faiths, he said, Muslim nations allow Christians and Jews to follow their own laws in family matters.
He said U.S. Muslims do not want the U.S. to adopt Sharia criminal law, with its harsh punishments such as amputation of a hand for stealing or stoning for adultery.
Read more from this Tulsa World article at Legislator's proposal would ban use of Sharia law | Tulsa World
It seems American Muslims would be ok with marital rape, pedophilia, and polygamy, but beheadings and stoning, not so much. Good to know.
Thank (insert your preferred Deity here)!!)So we can rape anyone we want in NJ?
Is that what you got out of the Article? Did you miss this part?
a Texas district court ruled that the private "Texas Islamic Court" should decide the amount a husband owed his wife in a divorce proceeding -- because when they got married, they had signed a contract specifying that was what they wanted.
But assault is illegal, regardless of any contract, Volokh said, and the Appellate Court in New Jersey ruled correctly.
"The claimed religious practice of non-consensual sex involved in this case is so heinous that almost everybody thinks that you shouldn't have the right to do that, no matter what your religious beliefs are."
The husband in the case has been indicted on criminal charges and is expected to face trial in the fall.
-------------------------
I'm surprised Arab owned Fox would print this. Prince Abu Dabu Doo is gonna get pissed and heads will roll.
wtf, you can't force your wife to have sex? Since when?
What happened to you! 
