Setup Is Complete, Ukraine Comes Into Full View, Indictments Coming

[Dragonlady]

Ok, so the video agrees that the democrats have a very weak case for impeachment. They may impeach him anyway. But then again they may not, because if they do then the Senate trial is by senate rules, and the witnesses called may be very explosive. Imagine if the GOP senators got the following folks on the stand under oath: Ciaramella (WB), Schiff, Hunter Biden, Comey, McCabe, the Ohrs, Strzok, Page, and the rest of the deep state coup conspirators trying to remove Trump.

With the testifying today of Hill and Holmes trump is buried How many of you idiots believe as your scum in the senate are saying, that Ukraine responsible for screwing with our 2016 elections ,,not Russia? You're all dupes

If Trump is impeached the senate "trial" will be interesting. The House managers have no case for impeachment, so Trump is safe until 2025, but the democrats are in a lot of legal jeopardy. Imagine the following Trump defense witness list: Schiff, Hunter Biden, Ciaramella, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Rosenstein, the Ohrs, and the rest of the deep state coup plotters. If Barr, Huber, Durham and Horowitz start coming thru with indictments how will that look proving the democrat conspiracy against Trump? Trump wins in a landslide in 2020, he replaces RBG, and the courts are safe for a generation or two. Thanks democrats, impeach away.

KYZR you might has well be speaking and writing in Russian You certainly are speaking their language Shame is Americans kissing Russian ass ,those who want to bring America down

you keep blaming shit on russia but mueller didn't find anything after 2+ years of looking. dude all you are is a useful idiot shouting out past due date buzz words cause you are simply not smart enough to update them.

kinda sad.

That's because Russia is still pulling shit - like promoting the idea that the Ukraine hacked the DNC. Mueller found two hundred and fifty pages of shit Russia pulled, and filed over 100 charges against Russia for their actions in hacking the DNC and the election.

Russia is engaged in cyber warfare to disrupt and damage western democracies. Helping Donald Trump get elected was a part of it, but the whole idea is to get Americans fighting amongst themselves. They were also involved with the Brexit election, on Brexit side. Anything to undermine and destabilize the west.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Ok, so the video agrees that the democrats have a very weak case for impeachment. They may impeach him anyway. But then again they may not, because if they do then the Senate trial is by senate rules, and the witnesses called may be very explosive. Imagine if the GOP senators got the following folks on the stand under oath: Ciaramella (WB), Schiff, Hunter Biden, Comey, McCabe, the Ohrs, Strzok, Page, and the rest of the deep state coup conspirators trying to remove Trump.

With the testifying today of Hill and Holmes trump is buried How many of you idiots believe as your scum in the senate are saying, that Ukraine responsible for screwing with our 2016 elections ,,not Russia? You're all dupes

If Trump is impeached the senate "trial" will be interesting. The House managers have no case for impeachment, so Trump is safe until 2025, but the democrats are in a lot of legal jeopardy. Imagine the following Trump defense witness list: Schiff, Hunter Biden, Ciaramella, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Rosenstein, the Ohrs, and the rest of the deep state coup plotters. If Barr, Huber, Durham and Horowitz start coming thru with indictments how will that look proving the democrat conspiracy against Trump? Trump wins in a landslide in 2020, he replaces RBG, and the courts are safe for a generation or two. Thanks democrats, impeach away.

KYZR you might has well be speaking and writing in Russian You certainly are speaking their language Shame is Americans kissing Russian ass ,those who want to bring America down

you keep blaming shit on russia but mueller didn't find anything after 2+ years of looking. dude all you are is a useful idiot shouting out past due date buzz words cause you are simply not smart enough to update them.

kinda sad.

That's because Russia is still pulling shit - like promoting the idea that the Ukraine hacked the DNC. Mueller found two hundred and fifty pages of shit Russia pulled, and filed over 100 charges against Russia for their actions in hacking the DNC and the election.

Russia is engaged in cyber warfare to disrupt and damage western democracies. Helping Donald Trump get elected was a part of it, but the whole idea is to get Americans fighting amongst themselves. They were also involved with the Brexit election, on Brexit side. Anything to undermine and destabilize the west.

{
Yet Politico’s investigation found evidence of Ukrainian government involvement in the race that appears to strain diplomatic protocol dictating that governments refrain from engaging in one another’s elections.

Russia’s meddling has sparked outrage from the American body politic. The U.S. intelligence community undertook the rare move of publicizing its findings on the matter, and President Barack Obama took several steps to officially retaliate, while members of Congress continue pushing for more investigations into the hacking and a harder line against Russia, which was already viewed in Washington as America’s leading foreign adversary.

Ukraine, on the other hand, has traditionally enjoyed strong relations with U.S. administrations. Its officials worry that could change under Trump, whose team has privately expressed sentiments ranging from ambivalence to deep skepticism about Poroshenko’s regime, while sounding unusually friendly notes about Putin’s regime.

Poroshenko is scrambling to alter that dynamic, recently signing a $50,000-a-month contract with a well-connected GOP-linked Washington lobbying firm to set up meetings with U.S. government officials “to strengthen U.S.-Ukrainian relations.”
Revelations about Ukraine’s anti-Trump efforts could further set back those efforts.

“Things seem to be going from bad to worse for Ukraine,” said David A. Merkel, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council who helped oversee U.S. relations with Russia and Ukraine while working in George W. Bush’s State Department and National Security Council.}

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

 

[edward37]

With the testifying today of Hill and Holmes trump is buried How many of you idiots believe as your scum in the senate are saying, that Ukraine responsible for screwing with our 2016 elections ,,not Russia? You're all dupes

If Trump is impeached the senate "trial" will be interesting. The House managers have no case for impeachment, so Trump is safe until 2025, but the democrats are in a lot of legal jeopardy. Imagine the following Trump defense witness list: Schiff, Hunter Biden, Ciaramella, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Rosenstein, the Ohrs, and the rest of the deep state coup plotters. If Barr, Huber, Durham and Horowitz start coming thru with indictments how will that look proving the democrat conspiracy against Trump? Trump wins in a landslide in 2020, he replaces RBG, and the courts are safe for a generation or two. Thanks democrats, impeach away.

KYZR you might has well be speaking and writing in Russian You certainly are speaking their language Shame is Americans kissing Russian ass ,those who want to bring America down

you keep blaming shit on russia but mueller didn't find anything after 2+ years of looking. dude all you are is a useful idiot shouting out past due date buzz words cause you are simply not smart enough to update them.

kinda sad.

That's because Russia is still pulling shit - like promoting the idea that the Ukraine hacked the DNC. Mueller found two hundred and fifty pages of shit Russia pulled, and filed over 100 charges against Russia for their actions in hacking the DNC and the election.

Russia is engaged in cyber warfare to disrupt and damage western democracies. Helping Donald Trump get elected was a part of it, but the whole idea is to get Americans fighting amongst themselves. They were also involved with the Brexit election, on Brexit side. Anything to undermine and destabilize the west.

{
Yet Politico’s investigation found evidence of Ukrainian government involvement in the race that appears to strain diplomatic protocol dictating that governments refrain from engaging in one another’s elections.

Russia’s meddling has sparked outrage from the American body politic. The U.S. intelligence community undertook the rare move of publicizing its findings on the matter, and President Barack Obama took several steps to officially retaliate, while members of Congress continue pushing for more investigations into the hacking and a harder line against Russia, which was already viewed in Washington as America’s leading foreign adversary.

Ukraine, on the other hand, has traditionally enjoyed strong relations with U.S. administrations. Its officials worry that could change under Trump, whose team has privately expressed sentiments ranging from ambivalence to deep skepticism about Poroshenko’s regime, while sounding unusually friendly notes about Putin’s regime.

Poroshenko is scrambling to alter that dynamic, recently signing a $50,000-a-month contract with a well-connected GOP-linked Washington lobbying firm to set up meetings with U.S. government officials “to strengthen U.S.-Ukrainian relations.”
Revelations about Ukraine’s anti-Trump efforts could further set back those efforts.

“Things seem to be going from bad to worse for Ukraine,” said David A. Merkel, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council who helped oversee U.S. relations with Russia and Ukraine while working in George W. Bush’s State Department and National Security Council.}

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

Barr should be executed
he actual text of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report tells a very different story than what was in summaries produced by Attorney General William Barr in letters to Congress and in a press conference prior to the report’s release. A comparison of the report and Barr’s statements shows that Barr downplayed Mueller’s findings about Russian contacts with Trump campaign associates as well as the damning evidence of the president’s obstruction of justice that Mueller assembled. Following are examples of this gap.
Click here for a PDF version of this fact sheet

1. Whether the President Is Exonerated on Obstruction of Justice

Special Counsel Report: The report makes the statement: “f we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment.” It further states, “The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.” (Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Election, Vol. 2, page 2 (March 2019) (“Special Counsel Report”))

Barr Statements: The Attorney General omitted the Special Counsel office’s allusion to their lack of confidence in exonerating evidence as well as repeated findings that there was substantial evidence supporting the key elements of obstruction. Instead, Barr offered his own conclusions about the obstruction case against the president, stating, “I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.” (Letter from Attorney General Bill Barr to House and Senate Judiciary Committee leaders, p. 3 (March 24, 2019) (the “Barr Letter”))

1. How to Interpret the Evidence of President Trump’s Obstruction of Justice

Special Counsel Report: The report presents facts regarding eleven episodes of potentially obstructive conduct and analyzes whether, in each case, the facts established the three legal elements of an obstruction charge: (1) an obstructive act; (2) nexus to a pending or contemplated official proceeding; and (3) corrupt intent. (Special Counsel Report, Vol. 2, p. 15) In many instances, the report details substantial evidence that each of these elements were established. (Id., Vol. 2, §§ II.B, II.D, II.E, II.F, II.H, II.I, II.J, II.K.) In addition, the report emphasizes that “it is important to view the President’s pattern of conduct as a whole” including “multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations.” (Id. p. 157)

Barr Statements: Barr’s summary gave the impression that Mueller equivocated on obstruction by laying out the evidence on “both sides of the question.” Barr then went on to present his view that “the report identifies no actions that . . . constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice offense.” (Barr Letter, p. 3)

1. Role of the DOJ Policy on Indicting a Sitting President

Special Counsel Report: At the top of the obstruction of justice report, the Special Counsel’s office’s described considerations guiding its obstruction of justice review, highlighting as the first item the fact that the Department of Justice has a policy against indicting a sitting president. (Special Counsel Report, Vol. 2, p. 1)

Barr Statements: The Attorney General omitted any reference to the role the indictment policy played for the Special Counsel in his obstruction of justice inquiry. Instead, he said, the fact that the Special Counsel did not draw legal conclusions “leaves it to the Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime,” and that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein concluded that “the evidence developed during the Special Counsel’s investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.” He further noted, “Our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president.” (Barr Letter, p. 3)

1. Whether the White House Cooperated with the Mueller Inquiry

Special Counsel Report: The report stated that because core obstruction-of-justice issues turn on actions and intent, the Special Counsel’s office “sought a voluntary interview with the President,” and he declined. It further noted that the President refused to provide written answers to questions “on obstruction topics” or “events during the transition.” (Special Counsel Report, Vol. 2, p. 13) According to the report, regarding certain questions on the Trump Tower Moscow project, the President “did not answer those questions about Trump Tower Moscow directly.” (Id., Vol. 2, pp. 149-50)

Barr Statements: “The White House fully cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation,” and “the President took no act that in fact deprived the Special Counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation.” (Barr Press Conference (April 17, 2019))

1. Trump Associate Contacts with Russians

Special Counsel Report: At the outset of the section of the report on Russian contacts with Trump associates, the report states: “Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts," the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities. It also specifically states that the inquiry applied the framework of conspiracy law, not “collusion,” in evaluating these contacts, since collusion is not a legal concept, and expressly underscores, “A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.” (Special Counsel Report, Vol. 1, p. 2)

Barr Statements: The Attorney General repeatedly asserted that the Special Counsel found “no collusion” with Russia. He also reiterated the report’s statement that the investigation did not establish conspiracy or coordination but omitted any reference to the Special Counsel’s finding that the campaign had an expectation of benefit from the Russian email hack and release. (Barr Press Conference (April 17, 2019))

 

[justoffal]

Ok, so the video agrees that the democrats have a very weak case for impeachment. They may impeach him anyway. But then again they may not, because if they do then the Senate trial is by senate rules, and the witnesses called may be very explosive. Imagine if the GOP senators got the following folks on the stand under oath: Ciaramella (WB), Schiff, Hunter Biden, Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, the Ohrs, Strzok, Page, and the rest of the deep state coup conspirators trying to remove Trump.

Bingo....

Jo

 

[SAYIT]

Ok, so the video agrees that the democrats have a very weak case for impeachment. They may impeach him anyway. But then again they may not, because if they do then the Senate trial is by senate rules, and the witnesses called may be very explosive. Imagine if the GOP senators got the following folks on the stand under oath: Ciaramella (WB), Schiff, Hunter Biden, Comey, McCabe, the Ohrs, Strzok, Page, and the rest of the deep state coup conspirators trying to remove Trump.

With the testifying today of Hill and Holmes trump is buried How many of you idiots believe as your scum in the senate are saying, that Ukraine responsible for screwing with our 2016 elections ,,not Russia? You're all dupes

And here we are 5 days later and our Hysterical House Dems are so certain "trump is buried" that they chose to recess for 10 more days - their 3rd in 7 weeks - without voting to impeach. You've been duped again, Charlie Brown.

 

[Dragonlady]

With the testifying today of Hill and Holmes trump is buried How many of you idiots believe as your scum in the senate are saying, that Ukraine responsible for screwing with our 2016 elections ,,not Russia? You're all dupes

If Trump is impeached the senate "trial" will be interesting. The House managers have no case for impeachment, so Trump is safe until 2025, but the democrats are in a lot of legal jeopardy. Imagine the following Trump defense witness list: Schiff, Hunter Biden, Ciaramella, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Rosenstein, the Ohrs, and the rest of the deep state coup plotters. If Barr, Huber, Durham and Horowitz start coming thru with indictments how will that look proving the democrat conspiracy against Trump? Trump wins in a landslide in 2020, he replaces RBG, and the courts are safe for a generation or two. Thanks democrats, impeach away.

KYZR you might has well be speaking and writing in Russian You certainly are speaking their language Shame is Americans kissing Russian ass ,those who want to bring America down

you keep blaming shit on russia but mueller didn't find anything after 2+ years of looking. dude all you are is a useful idiot shouting out past due date buzz words cause you are simply not smart enough to update them.

kinda sad.

That's because Russia is still pulling shit - like promoting the idea that the Ukraine hacked the DNC. Mueller found two hundred and fifty pages of shit Russia pulled, and filed over 100 charges against Russia for their actions in hacking the DNC and the election.

Russia is engaged in cyber warfare to disrupt and damage western democracies. Helping Donald Trump get elected was a part of it, but the whole idea is to get Americans fighting amongst themselves. They were also involved with the Brexit election, on Brexit side. Anything to undermine and destabilize the west.

{
Yet Politico’s investigation found evidence of Ukrainian government involvement in the race that appears to strain diplomatic protocol dictating that governments refrain from engaging in one another’s elections.

Russia’s meddling has sparked outrage from the American body politic. The U.S. intelligence community undertook the rare move of publicizing its findings on the matter, and President Barack Obama took several steps to officially retaliate, while members of Congress continue pushing for more investigations into the hacking and a harder line against Russia, which was already viewed in Washington as America’s leading foreign adversary.

Ukraine, on the other hand, has traditionally enjoyed strong relations with U.S. administrations. Its officials worry that could change under Trump, whose team has privately expressed sentiments ranging from ambivalence to deep skepticism about Poroshenko’s regime, while sounding unusually friendly notes about Putin’s regime.

Poroshenko is scrambling to alter that dynamic, recently signing a $50,000-a-month contract with a well-connected GOP-linked Washington lobbying firm to set up meetings with U.S. government officials “to strengthen U.S.-Ukrainian relations.”
Revelations about Ukraine’s anti-Trump efforts could further set back those efforts.

“Things seem to be going from bad to worse for Ukraine,” said David A. Merkel, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council who helped oversee U.S. relations with Russia and Ukraine while working in George W. Bush’s State Department and National Security Council.}

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

Writing an op ed piece under your real name and title setting out your country's position on the election, is not "interfering" in an election. Running a propaganda campaign using disinformation and lies while pretending to be Americans is interfering in the election.

 

[Uncensored2008]

If Trump is impeached the senate "trial" will be interesting. The House managers have no case for impeachment, so Trump is safe until 2025, but the democrats are in a lot of legal jeopardy. Imagine the following Trump defense witness list: Schiff, Hunter Biden, Ciaramella, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Rosenstein, the Ohrs, and the rest of the deep state coup plotters. If Barr, Huber, Durham and Horowitz start coming thru with indictments how will that look proving the democrat conspiracy against Trump? Trump wins in a landslide in 2020, he replaces RBG, and the courts are safe for a generation or two. Thanks democrats, impeach away.

KYZR you might has well be speaking and writing in Russian You certainly are speaking their language Shame is Americans kissing Russian ass ,those who want to bring America down

you keep blaming shit on russia but mueller didn't find anything after 2+ years of looking. dude all you are is a useful idiot shouting out past due date buzz words cause you are simply not smart enough to update them.

kinda sad.

That's because Russia is still pulling shit - like promoting the idea that the Ukraine hacked the DNC. Mueller found two hundred and fifty pages of shit Russia pulled, and filed over 100 charges against Russia for their actions in hacking the DNC and the election.

Russia is engaged in cyber warfare to disrupt and damage western democracies. Helping Donald Trump get elected was a part of it, but the whole idea is to get Americans fighting amongst themselves. They were also involved with the Brexit election, on Brexit side. Anything to undermine and destabilize the west.

{
Yet Politico’s investigation found evidence of Ukrainian government involvement in the race that appears to strain diplomatic protocol dictating that governments refrain from engaging in one another’s elections.

Russia’s meddling has sparked outrage from the American body politic. The U.S. intelligence community undertook the rare move of publicizing its findings on the matter, and President Barack Obama took several steps to officially retaliate, while members of Congress continue pushing for more investigations into the hacking and a harder line against Russia, which was already viewed in Washington as America’s leading foreign adversary.

Ukraine, on the other hand, has traditionally enjoyed strong relations with U.S. administrations. Its officials worry that could change under Trump, whose team has privately expressed sentiments ranging from ambivalence to deep skepticism about Poroshenko’s regime, while sounding unusually friendly notes about Putin’s regime.

Poroshenko is scrambling to alter that dynamic, recently signing a $50,000-a-month contract with a well-connected GOP-linked Washington lobbying firm to set up meetings with U.S. government officials “to strengthen U.S.-Ukrainian relations.”
Revelations about Ukraine’s anti-Trump efforts could further set back those efforts.

“Things seem to be going from bad to worse for Ukraine,” said David A. Merkel, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council who helped oversee U.S. relations with Russia and Ukraine while working in George W. Bush’s State Department and National Security Council.}

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

Barr should be executed
he actual text of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report tells a very different story than what was in summaries produced by Attorney General William Barr in letters to Congress and in a press conference prior to the report’s release. A comparison of the report and Barr’s statements shows that Barr downplayed Mueller’s findings about Russian contacts with Trump campaign associates as well as the damning evidence of the president’s obstruction of justice that Mueller assembled. Following are examples of this gap.
Click here for a PDF version of this fact sheet

1. Whether the President Is Exonerated on Obstruction of Justice

Special Counsel Report: The report makes the statement: “f we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment.” It further states, “The evidence we obtained about the President’s actions and intent presents difficult issues that prevent us from conclusively determining that no criminal conduct occurred. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.” (Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Election, Vol. 2, page 2 (March 2019) (“Special Counsel Report”))

Barr Statements: The Attorney General omitted the Special Counsel office’s allusion to their lack of confidence in exonerating evidence as well as repeated findings that there was substantial evidence supporting the key elements of obstruction. Instead, Barr offered his own conclusions about the obstruction case against the president, stating, “I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.” (Letter from Attorney General Bill Barr to House and Senate Judiciary Committee leaders, p. 3 (March 24, 2019) (the “Barr Letter”))

1. 
   
   
   • How to Interpret the Evidence of President Trump’s Obstruction of Justice

Special Counsel Report: The report presents facts regarding eleven episodes of potentially obstructive conduct and analyzes whether, in each case, the facts established the three legal elements of an obstruction charge: (1) an obstructive act; (2) nexus to a pending or contemplated official proceeding; and (3) corrupt intent. (Special Counsel Report, Vol. 2, p. 15) In many instances, the report details substantial evidence that each of these elements were established. (Id., Vol. 2, §§ II.B, II.D, II.E, II.F, II.H, II.I, II.J, II.K.) In addition, the report emphasizes that “it is important to view the President’s pattern of conduct as a whole” including “multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations.” (Id. p. 157)

Barr Statements: Barr’s summary gave the impression that Mueller equivocated on obstruction by laying out the evidence on “both sides of the question.” Barr then went on to present his view that “the report identifies no actions that . . . constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of-justice offense.” (Barr Letter, p. 3)

1. 
   
   
   • Role of the DOJ Policy on Indicting a Sitting President

Special Counsel Report: At the top of the obstruction of justice report, the Special Counsel’s office’s described considerations guiding its obstruction of justice review, highlighting as the first item the fact that the Department of Justice has a policy against indicting a sitting president. (Special Counsel Report, Vol. 2, p. 1)

Barr Statements: The Attorney General omitted any reference to the role the indictment policy played for the Special Counsel in his obstruction of justice inquiry. Instead, he said, the fact that the Special Counsel did not draw legal conclusions “leaves it to the Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime,” and that he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein concluded that “the evidence developed during the Special Counsel’s investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.” He further noted, “Our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president.” (Barr Letter, p. 3)

1. 
   
   
   • Whether the White House Cooperated with the Mueller Inquiry

Special Counsel Report: The report stated that because core obstruction-of-justice issues turn on actions and intent, the Special Counsel’s office “sought a voluntary interview with the President,” and he declined. It further noted that the President refused to provide written answers to questions “on obstruction topics” or “events during the transition.” (Special Counsel Report, Vol. 2, p. 13) According to the report, regarding certain questions on the Trump Tower Moscow project, the President “did not answer those questions about Trump Tower Moscow directly.” (Id., Vol. 2, pp. 149-50)

Barr Statements: “The White House fully cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation,” and “the President took no act that in fact deprived the Special Counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation.” (Barr Press Conference (April 17, 2019))

1. 
   
   
   • Trump Associate Contacts with Russians

Special Counsel Report: At the outset of the section of the report on Russian contacts with Trump associates, the report states: “Although the investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts," the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities. It also specifically states that the inquiry applied the framework of conspiracy law, not “collusion,” in evaluating these contacts, since collusion is not a legal concept, and expressly underscores, “A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.” (Special Counsel Report, Vol. 1, p. 2)

Barr Statements: The Attorney General repeatedly asserted that the Special Counsel found “no collusion” with Russia. He also reiterated the report’s statement that the investigation did not establish conspiracy or coordination but omitted any reference to the Special Counsel’s finding that the campaign had an expectation of benefit from the Russian email hack and release. (Barr Press Conference (April 17, 2019))

Dumbfuck.

{
{1. Potential Coordination: Conspiracy and Collusion


As an initial matter, this Office evaluated potentially criminal conduct that involved the

collective action of multiple individuals not under the rubric of "collusion," but through the lens

of conspiracy law. In so doing, the Office recognized that the word "collud[e]" appears in the

Acting Attorney General's August 2, 2017 memorandum; it has frequently been invoked in public

reporting; and it is sometimes referenced in antitrust law, see, cg, Brooke Group 12. Brown

Williamson Tobacco Corp, 509 US. 209, 227 (1993). But collusion is not a specific offense or

theory of liability found in the US. Code; nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. To the

contrary, even as defined in legal dictionaries, collusion is largely synonymous with conspiracy as

that crime is set forth in the general federal conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. 371. See Black ?3 Law

Dictionary 321. (10th ed. 2014) (collusion is agreement to defraud another or to do or obtain

something forbidden by law?); 1 Alexander Burrill, A Law Dictionary and Glossary 31 (1871)

(?An agreement between two or more persons to defraud another by the forms of law, or to employ

such forms as means of accomplishing some unlawful object?); 1 Bouvier's Law Dictionary 352}


1. Potential Coordination: Conspiracy and Collusion


As an initial matter, this Office evaluated potentially criminal conduct that involved the

collective action of multiple individuals not under the rubric of "collusion," but through the lens

of conspiracy law. In so doing, the Office recognized that the word "collud[e]" appears in the

Acting Attorney General's August 2, 2017 memorandum; it has frequently been invoked in public

reporting; and it is sometimes referenced in antitrust law, see, cg, Brooke Group 12. Brown

Williamson Tobacco Corp, 509 US. 209, 227 (1993). But collusion is not a specific offense or

theory of liability found in the US. Code; nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. To the

contrary, even as defined in legal dictionaries, collusion is largely synonymous with conspiracy as

that crime is set forth in the general federal conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. 371. See Black's Law

Dictionary 321. (10th ed. 2014) (collusion is agreement to defraud another or to do or obtain

something forbidden by law); 1 Alexander Burrill, A Law Dictionary and Glossary 31 (1871)

(?An agreement between two or more persons to defraud another by the forms of law, or to employ

such forms as means of accomplishing some unlawful object?); 1 Bouvier's Law Dictionary 352


The investigation did not establish any agreement among Campaign officials or between such officials and Russia-linked individuals to interfere with or obstruct a lawful function of a government agency during the campaign or transition period. And, as discussed in Volume 1, Section V.A, supra, the investigation did not identify evidence that any Campaign official or associate knowingly and intentionally participated in the conspiracy to defraud that the Office charged, namely, the active-measures conspiracy described in Volume 1, Section II, supra.

Accordingly, the Office did not charge any Campaign associate or other US. person with conspiracy to defraud the United States based on the Russia-related contacts described in Section IV above.

The investigation did not, however, yield evidence sufficient to sustain any charge that any individual affiliated with the Trump Campaign acted as an agent of a foreign principal within the meaning of FARA or, in terms of Section 951, subject to the direction or control of the government of Russia, or any official thereof. In particular, the Office did not find evidence likely to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Campaign officials such as Paul Manafott, George Papadopoulos, and Carter Page acted as agents of the Russian government or at its direction, control, or request during the relevant time period.1232
}

 

[Uncensored2008]

If Trump is impeached the senate "trial" will be interesting. The House managers have no case for impeachment, so Trump is safe until 2025, but the democrats are in a lot of legal jeopardy. Imagine the following Trump defense witness list: Schiff, Hunter Biden, Ciaramella, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Rosenstein, the Ohrs, and the rest of the deep state coup plotters. If Barr, Huber, Durham and Horowitz start coming thru with indictments how will that look proving the democrat conspiracy against Trump? Trump wins in a landslide in 2020, he replaces RBG, and the courts are safe for a generation or two. Thanks democrats, impeach away.

KYZR you might has well be speaking and writing in Russian You certainly are speaking their language Shame is Americans kissing Russian ass ,those who want to bring America down

you keep blaming shit on russia but mueller didn't find anything after 2+ years of looking. dude all you are is a useful idiot shouting out past due date buzz words cause you are simply not smart enough to update them.

kinda sad.

That's because Russia is still pulling shit - like promoting the idea that the Ukraine hacked the DNC. Mueller found two hundred and fifty pages of shit Russia pulled, and filed over 100 charges against Russia for their actions in hacking the DNC and the election.

Russia is engaged in cyber warfare to disrupt and damage western democracies. Helping Donald Trump get elected was a part of it, but the whole idea is to get Americans fighting amongst themselves. They were also involved with the Brexit election, on Brexit side. Anything to undermine and destabilize the west.

{
Yet Politico’s investigation found evidence of Ukrainian government involvement in the race that appears to strain diplomatic protocol dictating that governments refrain from engaging in one another’s elections.

Russia’s meddling has sparked outrage from the American body politic. The U.S. intelligence community undertook the rare move of publicizing its findings on the matter, and President Barack Obama took several steps to officially retaliate, while members of Congress continue pushing for more investigations into the hacking and a harder line against Russia, which was already viewed in Washington as America’s leading foreign adversary.

Ukraine, on the other hand, has traditionally enjoyed strong relations with U.S. administrations. Its officials worry that could change under Trump, whose team has privately expressed sentiments ranging from ambivalence to deep skepticism about Poroshenko’s regime, while sounding unusually friendly notes about Putin’s regime.

Poroshenko is scrambling to alter that dynamic, recently signing a $50,000-a-month contract with a well-connected GOP-linked Washington lobbying firm to set up meetings with U.S. government officials “to strengthen U.S.-Ukrainian relations.”
Revelations about Ukraine’s anti-Trump efforts could further set back those efforts.

“Things seem to be going from bad to worse for Ukraine,” said David A. Merkel, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council who helped oversee U.S. relations with Russia and Ukraine while working in George W. Bush’s State Department and National Security Council.}

Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire

Writing an op ed piece under your real name and title setting out your country's position on the election, is not "interfering" in an election. Running a propaganda campaign using disinformation and lies while pretending to be Americans is interfering in the election.

So RADICAL LEFT Politico acknowledges that Ukraine was heavily involved in tampering with the 2016 election (something they are DESPERATELY trying to walk back now) and you want to pretend it never happened?

You're a hack with ZERO interest in facts.

 

[iceberg]

Ok, so the video agrees that the democrats have a very weak case for impeachment. They may impeach him anyway. But then again they may not, because if they do then the Senate trial is by senate rules, and the witnesses called may be very explosive. Imagine if the GOP senators got the following folks on the stand under oath: Ciaramella (WB), Schiff, Hunter Biden, Comey, McCabe, the Ohrs, Strzok, Page, and the rest of the deep state coup conspirators trying to remove Trump.

With the testifying today of Hill and Holmes trump is buried How many of you idiots believe as your scum in the senate are saying, that Ukraine responsible for screwing with our 2016 elections ,,not Russia? You're all dupes

If Trump is impeached the senate "trial" will be interesting. The House managers have no case for impeachment, so Trump is safe until 2025, but the democrats are in a lot of legal jeopardy. Imagine the following Trump defense witness list: Schiff, Hunter Biden, Ciaramella, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Rosenstein, the Ohrs, and the rest of the deep state coup plotters. If Barr, Huber, Durham and Horowitz start coming thru with indictments how will that look proving the democrat conspiracy against Trump? Trump wins in a landslide in 2020, he replaces RBG, and the courts are safe for a generation or two. Thanks democrats, impeach away.

KYZR you might has well be speaking and writing in Russian You certainly are speaking their language Shame is Americans kissing Russian ass ,those who want to bring America down

you keep blaming shit on russia but mueller didn't find anything after 2+ years of looking. dude all you are is a useful idiot shouting out past due date buzz words cause you are simply not smart enough to update them.

kinda sad.

That's because Russia is still pulling shit - like promoting the idea that the Ukraine hacked the DNC. Mueller found two hundred and fifty pages of shit Russia pulled, and filed over 100 charges against Russia for their actions in hacking the DNC and the election.

Russia is engaged in cyber warfare to disrupt and damage western democracies. Helping Donald Trump get elected was a part of it, but the whole idea is to get Americans fighting amongst themselves. They were also involved with the Brexit election, on Brexit side. Anything to undermine and destabilize the west.

Oh good lord. Mueller didn't find fuck all of anything yet RUSSIA.

 

[edward37]

your pos the lawyer for trump ,,barr lied about or hid everything muelleur said Trump is guilty,,,, I'd like the pos executed ,,,but that's just me

 

[iceberg]

your pos the lawyer for trump ,,barr lied about or hid everything muelleur said Trump is guilty,,,, I'd like the pos executed ,,,but that's just me

The bullshit you keep selling yourself, dude. You got a fantasy for every scenario. Anyone who calls you on it must love Trump.

Just a broken 1 trick pony

 

[bripat9643]

Ok, so the video agrees that the democrats have a very weak case for impeachment. They may impeach him anyway. But then again they may not, because if they do then the Senate trial is by senate rules, and the witnesses called may be very explosive. Imagine if the GOP senators got the following folks on the stand under oath: Ciaramella (WB), Schiff, Hunter Biden, Comey, McCabe, the Ohrs, Strzok, Page, and the rest of the deep state coup conspirators trying to remove Trump.

With the testifying today of Hill and Holmes trump is buried How many of you idiots believe as your scum in the senate are saying, that Ukraine responsible for screwing with our 2016 elections ,,not Russia? You're all dupes

Hill and Holmes had no facts. Nothing. I marvel at how you leftwing turds imagine you're winning.

 

[bripat9643]

Ok, so the video agrees that the democrats have a very weak case for impeachment. They may impeach him anyway. But then again they may not, because if they do then the Senate trial is by senate rules, and the witnesses called may be very explosive. Imagine if the GOP senators got the following folks on the stand under oath: Ciaramella (WB), Schiff, Hunter Biden, Comey, McCabe, the Ohrs, Strzok, Page, and the rest of the deep state coup conspirators trying to remove Trump.

With the testifying today of Hill and Holmes trump is buried How many of you idiots believe as your scum in the senate are saying, that Ukraine responsible for screwing with our 2016 elections ,,not Russia? You're all dupes

WASHINGTON — A former top national security adviser to President Trump told Republicans in the House impeachment inquiry Thursday morning to stop advancing a “fictional narrative” that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 U.S. elections rather than Russia.

“Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and its security services did not conduct a campaign against our country — and that perhaps, somehow, for some reason, Ukraine did. This is a fictional narrative that has been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves,” said Fiona Hill, who until July was the deputy assistant to the president and senior director for Europe and Russia on the National Security Council.

“The unfortunate truth is that Russia was the foreign power that systematically attacked our democratic institutions in 2016. This is the public conclusion of our intelligence agencies, confirmed in bipartisan congressional reports. It is beyond dispute, even if some of the underlying details must remain classified,” Hill continued.

Fiona Hill. Here credibility is nil.

 

[kyzr]

Ok, so the video agrees that the democrats have a very weak case for impeachment. They may impeach him anyway. But then again they may not, because if they do then the Senate trial is by senate rules, and the witnesses called may be very explosive. Imagine if the GOP senators got the following folks on the stand under oath: Ciaramella (WB), Schiff, Hunter Biden, Comey, McCabe, the Ohrs, Strzok, Page, and the rest of the deep state coup conspirators trying to remove Trump.

With the testifying today of Hill and Holmes trump is buried How many of you idiots believe as your scum in the senate are saying, that Ukraine responsible for screwing with our 2016 elections ,,not Russia? You're all dupes

WASHINGTON — A former top national security adviser to President Trump told Republicans in the House impeachment inquiry Thursday morning to stop advancing a “fictional narrative” that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 U.S. elections rather than Russia.

“Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and its security services did not conduct a campaign against our country — and that perhaps, somehow, for some reason, Ukraine did. This is a fictional narrative that has been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves,” said Fiona Hill, who until July was the deputy assistant to the president and senior director for Europe and Russia on the National Security Council.

“The unfortunate truth is that Russia was the foreign power that systematically attacked our democratic institutions in 2016. This is the public conclusion of our intelligence agencies, confirmed in bipartisan congressional reports. It is beyond dispute, even if some of the underlying details must remain classified,” Hill continued.

Fiona Hill. Here credibility is nil.

Agree, first she tells Obama NOT to send lethal aid to the Ukraine when there is an active war where 14,000 Ukrainians died, and now she's whining after Trump sent lethal aid (Javelins) because he delayed the funding a few weeks?? Fiona is a major hypocrite.

 

[eagle1462010]

Ok, so the video agrees that the democrats have a very weak case for impeachment. They may impeach him anyway. But then again they may not, because if they do then the Senate trial is by senate rules, and the witnesses called may be very explosive. Imagine if the GOP senators got the following folks on the stand under oath: Ciaramella (WB), Schiff, Hunter Biden, Comey, McCabe, the Ohrs, Strzok, Page, and the rest of the deep state coup conspirators trying to remove Trump.

With the testifying today of Hill and Holmes trump is buried How many of you idiots believe as your scum in the senate are saying, that Ukraine responsible for screwing with our 2016 elections ,,not Russia? You're all dupes

WASHINGTON — A former top national security adviser to President Trump told Republicans in the House impeachment inquiry Thursday morning to stop advancing a “fictional narrative” that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 U.S. elections rather than Russia.

“Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and its security services did not conduct a campaign against our country — and that perhaps, somehow, for some reason, Ukraine did. This is a fictional narrative that has been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves,” said Fiona Hill, who until July was the deputy assistant to the president and senior director for Europe and Russia on the National Security Council.

“The unfortunate truth is that Russia was the foreign power that systematically attacked our democratic institutions in 2016. This is the public conclusion of our intelligence agencies, confirmed in bipartisan congressional reports. It is beyond dispute, even if some of the underlying details must remain classified,” Hill continued.

Fiona Hill. Here credibility is nil.

Agree, first she tells Obama NOT to send lethal aid to the Ukraine when there is an active war where 14,000 Ukrainians died, and now she's whining after Trump sent lethal aid (Javelins) because he delayed the funding a few weeks?? Fiona is a major hypocrite.

And yet Trump is Russia's puppet.........LOL

 

[Paulie]

Ok, so the video agrees that the democrats have a very weak case for impeachment. They may impeach him anyway. But then again they may not, because if they do then the Senate trial is by senate rules, and the witnesses called may be very explosive. Imagine if the GOP senators got the following folks on the stand under oath: Ciaramella (WB), Schiff, Hunter Biden, Comey, McCabe, the Ohrs, Strzok, Page, and the rest of the deep state coup conspirators trying to remove Trump.

With the testifying today of Hill and Holmes trump is buried How many of you idiots believe as your scum in the senate are saying, that Ukraine responsible for screwing with our 2016 elections ,,not Russia? You're all dupes

If Trump is impeached the senate "trial" will be interesting. The House managers have no case for impeachment, so Trump is safe until 2025, but the democrats are in a lot of legal jeopardy. Imagine the following Trump defense witness list: Schiff, Hunter Biden, Ciaramella, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Rosenstein, the Ohrs, and the rest of the deep state coup plotters. If Barr, Huber, Durham and Horowitz start coming thru with indictments how will that look proving the democrat conspiracy against Trump? Trump wins in a landslide in 2020, he replaces RBG, and the courts are safe for a generation or two. Thanks democrats, impeach away.

KYZR you might has well be speaking and writing in Russian You certainly are speaking their language Shame is Americans kissing Russian ass ,those who want to bring America down

Russia Russia Russia!

You people sound like children.

 

[danielpalos]

...Oh, so you think that went WELL for you Communists, huh?

Communist? Me? Hell, boy, I've voted for more Republicans than I have Democrats in my time.

As to the hearings going well... we'll know if-and-when the House produces and passes Articles of Impeachment, won't we?

Impeaching a sitting President is a Last Resort... rather than allowing him (or her) to further endanger the Republic.

That's not the question. Do you think the Soviet Star Chamber followed by the Stalinist Show Trial improved the odds the Communist party will retain the house in 2020?

So..........what was it that made you decide to join Trump's cult? The orange glow? The threats of violence against protesters? His defense of the white supremacists in Charlottesville? His racist comments about immigrants? The "love letters" he exchanged with the brutal, murdering despot leading N. Korea? The nepotism? The pathological lying? Just curious.

You're avoiding the question, Comrade.

Do you think the Soviet Star Chamber followed by the Stalinist Show Trial improved the odds the Communist party will retain the house in 2020?

Trump wins no matter what, but the house was not a guaranteed loss prior to this circus.

Why do you say that? The only thing keeping our current President from a date with Ms. Justice, is the Protection of the Office.