Seriously, what's wrong with Jon Huntsman?

[Neotrotsky]

Seriously, what's wrong with Jon Huntsman?

easy, he has mental issues


he thinks like a liberal

At least he does not deny that rapes happened at OWS
So there may be hope for him

 

[Katzndogz]

Huntsman comes across as a nice guy, solid, it's the direction he would take the country which is too liberal.

 

[rightwinger]

He seems like a sane and honorable gentleman to me. Why doesn't the right like him?

The fact that you like him is sufficient cause for denying him the nomination.

He's a RINO who believes in the global warming hocus-pocus.

enough said.

He agrees with the 98% of scientists who say it is real.......no wonder Conservatives hate him

He also believes Obama was born in Hawaii and in evolution

Obviously not GOP material

 

[Neotrotsky]

He seems like a sane and honorable gentleman to me. Why doesn't the right like him?

The fact that you like him is sufficient cause for denying him the nomination.

He's a RINO who believes in the global warming hocus-pocus.

enough said.

He agrees with the 98% of scientists who say it is real.......no wonder Conservatives hate him

He also believes Obama was born in Hawaii and in evolution

Obviously not GOP material

science by consensus is not science
It is a belief system, like religion
One time the the consensus thought the earth was flat

Which explains a lot about the left
They think Papa Obama is doing a good job
They believe a lot of false things

 

[The Rabbi]

He seems like a sane and honorable gentleman to me. Why doesn't the right like him?

The fact that you like him is sufficient cause for denying him the nomination.

He's a RINO who believes in the global warming hocus-pocus.

enough said.

That John McCain is a maverick who bucks his own party line. He's reached across the line many times, like McCain-Feingold, to do the right thing. The Democrats who don't like Obama would turn out in droves to vote for McCain. He's the most centrist candidate the GOP can put up. He has an honorable war history and integrity.
All of that was true until he got the nomination. Then he was a cancer ridden crazy coward who only got into the military on his daddy and grand-daddy's coat tails.
Any time the left tells us which GOP candidate they'd vote for, that should automatically bar that person from consideration. Any time they tell us how stupid and ignorant a candidate is, that ought to be whom we pick.

 

[rightwinger]

The fact that you like him is sufficient cause for denying him the nomination.

He's a RINO who believes in the global warming hocus-pocus.

enough said.

He agrees with the 98% of scientists who say it is real.......no wonder Conservatives hate him

He also believes Obama was born in Hawaii and in evolution

Obviously not GOP material

science by consensus is not science
It is a belief system, like religion
One time the the consensus thought the earth was flat

Which explains a lot about the left
They think Papa Obama is doing a good job
They believe a lot of false things

Ignoring peer reviewed studies in favor of the opinions of radio talk show hosts is not science

 

[Neotrotsky]

He agrees with the 98% of scientists who say it is real.......no wonder Conservatives hate him

He also believes Obama was born in Hawaii and in evolution

Obviously not GOP material

science by consensus is not science
It is a belief system, like religion
One time the the consensus thought the earth was flat

Which explains a lot about the left
They think Papa Obama is doing a good job
They believe a lot of false things

Ignoring peer reviewed studies in favor of the opinions of radio talk show hosts is not science

having a non falsifiable hypothesis
is not science either. Of course you might not
know that since you depend on others to tell you what to think.
It takes a critical mind, something lacking with people on the Left

You just want to believe it
For the same reason, if the solutions called for less gov't
You would choose not to believe and could because it is not based
on real science.



Science for the Left on this issue has nothing to do with it

It is a religion

 

[Dot Com]

Is Utah a Libral state?:
Jon Huntsman, Jr. - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Governor of Utah (2005–2009)
Huntsman maintained extremely high approval ratings as Governor of Utah hitting 90% approval at times. In 2008, he won re-election with 77.7% of the vote, defeating Democratic Party nominee Bob Springmeyer.[20] He left office with his approval ratings over 80%.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Of course not
so what

The US is not Leftist and
Papa Obama was able with the help of the MSM
to convince enough people that he was a centrist and
not the Leftist he really is

Now that they have a "taste" of his policies
They reject it

Which is why he can not run on his polices

 

[JoeB131]

Young -vs- Smith

Kind of like Shiite -vs- Sunni or Catholic -vs- Protestant.

And yes, they all LOOK alike, so it's a bitch trying to keep up!

Smith and Young weren't against each other...

Not sure what your point is here... I just point out that Huntsman's whole candidacy seems to be an animus against Romney. Which I have no problem with, Romney is such a loathesome, horrid creature that even other Mormons hate him.

I for the life of me don't know why Huntsman is even calling himself a Republican at this point. He gave up that right when he went to go work for Barry.

More than half my point was an attempt at warped humor - I recall some sort of rift between the followers of Brigham Young and those who followed Joseph Smith when the cult was in its formative years. I don't think it was quite the rift that the arms dealers for todays Sunnis and Shiites enjoy, but I do believe a rift exists.

That being said, I have no clue (nor do I care) if Huntsman or Romney have issues in that direction - I wanted the damn joke.

After Joseph Smith was killed, Brigham Young became leader of the main group of LDS. Smith's son, Joseph Smith III, attempted to claim leadership, but he was too young at the time. Another fellow named Strang formed an offshoot group, and after he was assassinated, Smith took leadership and formed the reorganized church of Jesus Christ and Latter Day Saints. It is today known as the Community of Christ Church. Other followers of Strang continued on with their own Church. IN addition to the Latter Day Saints cult that Romney and Huntsman belong to, there are a dozen or so offshoots.

The RCLDS stayed in IL, while the CJCLDS moved out to Utah and more hilarity ensued.

That said, I think that the animosity between the two men is personal and not theological. Both come from powerful Mormon families, and Huntsman probably wonders why he as a more accomplished governor, is putzing around at 1% while Romney is a sometimes frontrunner.

 

[JimH52]

He seems like a sane and honorable gentleman to me. Why doesn't the right like him?

He is far too logical and he has too many rational ideas to even get a second look from the far right. They want someone extreme. Sadly, there is no one like that out there right now.

 

[bripat9643]

He seems like a sane and honorable gentleman to me. Why doesn't the right like him?

The fact that you like him is sufficient cause for denying him the nomination.

He's a RINO who believes in the global warming hocus-pocus.

enough said.

So believing what nearly every credible scientist says is definitely happening makes one a RINO? THAT explains a lot.

enough said

Nearly every credible scientist doesn't say that. You're spouting warmist horseshit.

Of course, the warmist definition of "credible" is that you support the AGW hocus-pocus.

 

[Full-Auto]

The fact that you like him is sufficient cause for denying him the nomination.

He's a RINO who believes in the global warming hocus-pocus.

enough said.

So believing what nearly every credible scientist says is definitely happening makes one a RINO? THAT explains a lot.

enough said

Nearly every credible scientist doesn't say that. You're spouting warmist horseshit.

Of course, the warmist definition of "credible" is that you support the AGW hocus-pocus.

Maybe, Possibly and could be are powerful arguments for imaginations.

 

[JoeB131]

science by consensus is not science
It is a belief system, like religion
One time the the consensus thought the earth was flat

Which explains a lot about the left
They think Papa Obama is doing a good job
They believe a lot of false things

Ignoring peer reviewed studies in favor of the opinions of radio talk show hosts is not science[/QUOTE]

Again, if the evidence is so compelling, why do climate scientists feel the need to fudge it?

Climategate erupts again ahead of key summit - Climate Change - Environment - The Independent

 

[Neotrotsky]

He seems like a sane and honorable gentleman to me. Why doesn't the right like him?

He is far too logical and he has too many rational ideas to even get a second look from the far right. They want someone extreme. Sadly, there is no one like that out there right now.

Too funny

somebody from the Left who supports Papa Obama
wants to talk about people supporting extremists

 

[Katzndogz]

Romney is the front runner because of buyer's remorse in going with John McCain last time. This is Huntsman's first time around. His policies are not well received. That's the problem he has.

 

[bripat9643]

He seems like a sane and honorable gentleman to me. Why doesn't the right like him?

He is far too logical and he has too many rational ideas to even get a second look from the far right.

Translation: He's a big government socialist.

They want someone extreme. Sadly, there is no one like that out there right now.

We want someone who will actually cut the size of government. "Compromising" with commies like you always means government gets bigger. If he wants to compromise between cutting $400 billion a year and cutting $200 billion a year, but the left doesn't call that compromise. Only deciding to spend $500 billion more rather than $1 trillion more is what they consider a "compromise."

 

[rightwinger]

science by consensus is not science
It is a belief system, like religion
One time the the consensus thought the earth was flat

Which explains a lot about the left
They think Papa Obama is doing a good job
They believe a lot of false things

Ignoring peer reviewed studies in favor of the opinions of radio talk show hosts is not science

Again, if the evidence is so compelling, why do climate scientists feel the need to fudge it?

Climategate erupts again ahead of key summit - Climate Change - Environment - The Independent[/QUOTE]

Climate gate was proven to be a rightwing farce

 

[bripat9643]

Again, if the evidence is so compelling, why do climate scientists feel the need to fudge it?

Climategate erupts again ahead of key summit - Climate Change - Environment - The Independent

Climate gate was proven to be a rightwing farce

No it wasn't, turd. Committees stacked with warmist goons didn't prove a thing. They refused to even examine all the evidence.

 

[JoeB131]

Right. Those incriminating e-mail where they admitted they were cherry picking their data, pay no attention to that at all.