Seriously: WH suggests more govt gun contol in strict Baltimore after bloody Memorial Day weekend

I don't know why some of yall think this won't work.

I mean people stopped using illegal drugs when they were made illegal didn't they?

Murderers stopped murdering when murder was made illegal , didn't they?
sarcasm golly!

I'll say it again. Banning blacks would reduce crime more than banning guns would.
yes mine Führer !

You prove again how stupid you are. At NO point did I advocate banning blacks. I merely reported a fact.
bullshit the I'm just the messenger ploy doesn't wash!
 
Yes, folks, there are STILL a couple of liberals in high places who believe that the way to control criminals is to make laws that restrict only the people who obey laws.

Or to be more precise: They want YOU to believe that.

No matter how many times this ridiculous pap is smacked down and refuted, it's just a matter of time before some liberal brings it up yet again, as though it hadn't been defeated dozens of times.

One definition of insanity, is the act of doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result. White House Spokesthing Josh Earnest provides the latest example here.
 
Yes, folks, there are STILL a couple of liberals in high places who believe that the way to control criminals is to make laws that restrict only the people who obey laws.

Or to be more precise: They want YOU to believe that.

No matter how many times this ridiculous pap is smacked down and refuted, it's just a matter of time before some liberal brings it up yet again, as though it hadn't been defeated dozens of times.

One definition of insanity, is the act of doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result. White House Spokesthing Josh Earnest provides the latest example here.
AS DO YOU.
 
Most if not all of the thugs populating Baltimore should be denied access to firearms.
Most if not all the thugs in Baltimore should be denied liberty, by being tried, sentenced, and thrown in jail.

That will actually solve the problem, unlike "gun control" which has repeatedly failed.

This assumes that the liberals who have been in charge in Baltimore for the last 50 years, want to solve the problem.

Life sentence for owning an illegal firearm?

That's guaranteed to yield a 100% acquittal rate by any jury.

Thank god the government doesn't decide verdicts.
 
Yes, folks, there are STILL a couple of liberals in high places who believe that the way to control criminals is to make laws that restrict only the people who obey laws.

Or to be more precise: They want YOU to believe that.

No matter how many times this ridiculous pap is smacked down and refuted, it's just a matter of time before some liberal brings it up yet again, as though it hadn't been defeated dozens of times.

One definition of insanity, is the act of doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result. White House Spokesthing Josh Earnest provides the latest example here.

-----------------------------------------------

Seriously White House Suggests More Gun Control In Strict Baltimore After Bloody Memorial Day Weekend - Katie Pavlich

Seriously: White House Suggests More Gun Control In Strict Baltimore After Bloody Memorial Day Weekend
Katie Pavlich | May 27, 2015

Over the long holiday weekend in Baltimore, 29 were shot and nine were killed. The violence came just weeks after violent riots and protests over the death of Freddie Grey, who died in police custody. Since the riots and since Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake threw city police officers under the bus, law enforcement has taken a step back from aggressive policing.

When asked about the violence yesterday, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest suggested more gun control was one of the solutions.

“Obviously there’s some common sense things we could do – certainly passage of some gun safety laws in Congress that could keep guns out of the hands of criminals would be one thing that we could do to try to limit the violence,” Earnest said.

There's just a few problems with that suggestion. Maryland already has strict gun control laws. In fact, it was just two short years ago that new gun control measures were passed through despite overwhelming opposition.

Maryland's already-strong gun laws will become among the strictest in the nation with a measure passed by the General Assembly Thursday, sending the bill to the Democratic governor who proposed the legislation in the aftermath of December's massacre at a Newtown, Conn., elementary school.

The state Senate voted 28-19 for final passage, agreeing to a number of changes the House of Delegates approved Wednesday.

The measure would require people who buy a handgun to submit fingerprints to state police, bans 45 types of assault weapons, and limits gun magazines to 10 bullets.
Insanity is voting for Obama a second time expecting different results.
 
Yes, folks, there are STILL a couple of liberals in high places who believe that the way to control criminals is to make laws that restrict only the people who obey laws.

Or to be more precise: They want YOU to believe that.

No matter how many times this ridiculous pap is smacked down and refuted, it's just a matter of time before some liberal brings it up yet again, as though it hadn't been defeated dozens of times.

One definition of insanity, is the act of doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result. White House Spokesthing Josh Earnest provides the latest example here.

-----------------------------------------------

Seriously White House Suggests More Gun Control In Strict Baltimore After Bloody Memorial Day Weekend - Katie Pavlich

Seriously: White House Suggests More Gun Control In Strict Baltimore After Bloody Memorial Day Weekend
Katie Pavlich | May 27, 2015

Over the long holiday weekend in Baltimore, 29 were shot and nine were killed. The violence came just weeks after violent riots and protests over the death of Freddie Grey, who died in police custody. Since the riots and since Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake threw city police officers under the bus, law enforcement has taken a step back from aggressive policing.

When asked about the violence yesterday, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest suggested more gun control was one of the solutions.

“Obviously there’s some common sense things we could do – certainly passage of some gun safety laws in Congress that could keep guns out of the hands of criminals would be one thing that we could do to try to limit the violence,” Earnest said.

There's just a few problems with that suggestion. Maryland already has strict gun control laws. In fact, it was just two short years ago that new gun control measures were passed through despite overwhelming opposition.

Maryland's already-strong gun laws will become among the strictest in the nation with a measure passed by the General Assembly Thursday, sending the bill to the Democratic governor who proposed the legislation in the aftermath of December's massacre at a Newtown, Conn., elementary school.

The state Senate voted 28-19 for final passage, agreeing to a number of changes the House of Delegates approved Wednesday.

The measure would require people who buy a handgun to submit fingerprints to state police, bans 45 types of assault weapons, and limits gun magazines to 10 bullets.
Insanity is voting for Obama a second time expecting different results.
no, that was bush and then Romney.
 
Baltimore has been under the control of democrats for what, 50 years?
I'm amazed there is a privately owned firearm within 50 miles of this city.
Once again...that doesn't stop the thugs from getting their hands on stolen weapons...50 miles from D.C.? Philadelphia not that far away. Virginia. AND THEY DO.
Tell us....
What -will- prevent thugs from getting their hands on stolen weapons?
 
Life sentence for owning an illegal firearm?
That's guaranteed to yield a 100% acquittal rate by any jury.
Thank god the government doesn't decide verdicts.
That's the exact reason why government is not allowed to decide verdicts.
if as you so ignorantly suggested the government cannot decide verdicts . then why do we have a justice system ?
are our courts not part of the government ?
are not "the people" the owners and operators of the government.?
 
Yes, folks, there are STILL a couple of liberals in high places who believe that the way to control criminals is to make laws that restrict only the people who obey laws.

Or to be more precise: They want YOU to believe that.

No matter how many times this ridiculous pap is smacked down and refuted, it's just a matter of time before some liberal brings it up yet again, as though it hadn't been defeated dozens of times.

One definition of insanity, is the act of doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result. White House Spokesthing Josh Earnest provides the latest example here.

-----------------------------------------------

Seriously White House Suggests More Gun Control In Strict Baltimore After Bloody Memorial Day Weekend - Katie Pavlich

Seriously: White House Suggests More Gun Control In Strict Baltimore After Bloody Memorial Day Weekend
Katie Pavlich | May 27, 2015

Over the long holiday weekend in Baltimore, 29 were shot and nine were killed. The violence came just weeks after violent riots and protests over the death of Freddie Grey, who died in police custody. Since the riots and since Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake threw city police officers under the bus, law enforcement has taken a step back from aggressive policing.

When asked about the violence yesterday, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest suggested more gun control was one of the solutions.

“Obviously there’s some common sense things we could do – certainly passage of some gun safety laws in Congress that could keep guns out of the hands of criminals would be one thing that we could do to try to limit the violence,” Earnest said.

There's just a few problems with that suggestion. Maryland already has strict gun control laws. In fact, it was just two short years ago that new gun control measures were passed through despite overwhelming opposition.

Maryland's already-strong gun laws will become among the strictest in the nation with a measure passed by the General Assembly Thursday, sending the bill to the Democratic governor who proposed the legislation in the aftermath of December's massacre at a Newtown, Conn., elementary school.

The state Senate voted 28-19 for final passage, agreeing to a number of changes the House of Delegates approved Wednesday.

The measure would require people who buy a handgun to submit fingerprints to state police, bans 45 types of assault weapons, and limits gun magazines to 10 bullets.
Insanity is voting for Obama a second time expecting different results.
no, that was bush and then Romney.
Romney never won......so we never found out what kind of president he would be.
 
Life sentence for owning an illegal firearm?
That's guaranteed to yield a 100% acquittal rate by any jury.
Thank god the government doesn't decide verdicts.
That's the exact reason why government is not allowed to decide verdicts.
if as you so ignorantly suggested the government cannot decide verdicts . then why do we have a justice system ?
are our courts not part of the government ?
are not "the people" the owners and operators of the government.?
LOL.

The government does not decide verdicts - the justice system is set up to specifically deny the government that ability. A jury of your peers decides a verdict - not the court.

It was blatantly obvious what he was stating (and he is correct).
 
Life sentence for owning an illegal firearm?
That's guaranteed to yield a 100% acquittal rate by any jury.
Thank god the government doesn't decide verdicts.
That's the exact reason why government is not allowed to decide verdicts.
if as you so ignorantly suggested the government cannot decide verdicts . then why do we have a justice system ?
are our courts not part of the government ?
are not "the people" the owners and operators of the government.?
LOL.

The government does not decide verdicts - the justice system is set up to specifically deny the government that ability. A jury of your peers decides a verdict - not the court.

It was blatantly obvious what he was stating (and he is correct).

How long before Progressives demand that verdicts be decided by the government? What do you think the real hocus pocus about Trayvon Martin really was for (and other similar cases decided by citizens)?
 
Life sentence for owning an illegal firearm?
That's guaranteed to yield a 100% acquittal rate by any jury.
Thank god the government doesn't decide verdicts.
That's the exact reason why government is not allowed to decide verdicts.
if as you so ignorantly suggested the government cannot decide verdicts . then why do we have a justice system ?
are our courts not part of the government ?
are not "the people" the owners and operators of the government.?
LOL.

The government does not decide verdicts - the justice system is set up to specifically deny the government that ability. A jury of your peers decides a verdict - not the court.

It was blatantly obvious what he was stating (and he is correct).

How long before Progressives demand that verdicts be decided by the government? What do you think the real hocus pocus about Trayvon Martin really was for (and other similar cases decided by citizens)?
Worse. Popular opinion. By poll.
 

Forum List

Back
Top