Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
what exactly is the administration accused of sharing?
Why post if you're not willing to read the OP?
I did read it, now that nobody stated nothing.
What exactly is he trying to state was compromised, specifically? All I see is a generalization.1. A senior House Republican wants to hold the Obama administration accountable for what he says are violations of law limiting the sharing of space technology with China.Rep. Frank R. Wolf, chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and related agencies, said in an interview that a law passed in April restricts technology-sharing with China following attempts by Chinese hackers to steal government secrets.
They cant just flout the law, Mr. Wolf, Virginia Republican, said of the administration. We see what Chinas doing.
The Virginia congressman previously criticized NASA Administrator Charles F. Bolden Jr. for visiting China in a bid to cooperate on joint space projects.
The U.S. has no business cooperating with the PLA to help develop its space program, he said in May.
OSTP has chosen to disregard a strong and unambiguous legislative prohibition on bilateral engagement with China or Chinese-owned companies, the report said. OSTPs behavior demonstrates a lack of respect for the policy and oversight roles of the Congress.
Mr. Wolf also said Mr. Holdrens three-week trip to China was an apparent violation of the provision.
Why post if you're not willing to read the OP?
I did read it, now that nobody stated nothing.
What exactly is he trying to state was compromised, specifically? All I see is a generalization.
Nobody stated nothing. Nice...
It's been spelled out once. Here we go again:
The Virginia congressman previously criticized NASA Administrator Charles F. Bolden Jr. for visiting China in a bid to cooperate on joint space projects.
“The U.S. has no business cooperating with the PLA to help develop its space program,” he said in May.
“OSTP has chosen to disregard a strong and unambiguous legislative prohibition on bilateral engagement with China or Chinese-owned companies,” the report said. “OSTP’s behavior demonstrates a lack of respect for the policy and oversight roles of the Congress.”
Mr. Wolf also said Mr. Holdren’s three-week trip to China was an apparent violation of the provision.
Since your interest seems to be piqued, this would be a good time for you to educate yourself on the subject. Happy learning!
"If you don't stand for something you'll fall for anything"
A catchy little phrase. But the important thing is what you stand for.
but I am not sure that was an appropriate reply to my post? Please elaborate if you can.
Citi, you seem to treat most subjects like rain off a duck's back...I don't.
And the subject that I'm most passionate about is the well-being of the United States.
To trivialize the passing of technological information, a major defense of this great nation, as you do, gets my hackles up.
Perhaps, had you been born elsewhere, you'd understand how important it is to the world to defend and support America, and to recognize and execrate the fifth column...the Holdren's and the Obama's.
I did read it, now that nobody stated nothing.
What exactly is he trying to state was compromised, specifically? All I see is a generalization.
Nobody stated nothing. Nice...
It's been spelled out once. Here we go again:
OSTP has chosen to disregard a strong and unambiguous legislative prohibition on bilateral engagement with China or Chinese-owned companies, the report said. OSTPs behavior demonstrates a lack of respect for the policy and oversight roles of the Congress.
Mr. Wolf also said Mr. Holdrens three-week trip to China was an apparent violation of the provision.
Since your interest seems to be piqued, this would be a good time for you to educate yourself on the subject. Happy learning!
I ask what technologies were illegally given from the Obama administration to China and I get your version of a public school marm.
what exactly is the administration accused of sharing?
Why post if you're not willing to read the OP?
I did read it, now that nobody stated nothing.
What exactly is he trying to state was compromised, specifically? All I see is a generalization.1. A senior House Republican wants to hold the Obama administration accountable for what he says are violations of law limiting the sharing of space technology with China.Rep. Frank R. Wolf, chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and related agencies, said in an interview that a law passed in April restricts technology-sharing with China following attempts by Chinese hackers to steal government secrets.
They cant just flout the law, Mr. Wolf, Virginia Republican, said of the administration. We see what Chinas doing.
Nobody stated nothing. Nice...
It's been spelled out once. Here we go again:
Since your interest seems to be piqued, this would be a good time for you to educate yourself on the subject. Happy learning!
I ask what technologies were illegally given from the Obama administration to China and I get your version of a public school marm.
Had the article listed said technologies, along with schematics and blueprints....what makes you think you'd have the ability to judge and, as you seem to imply, decide if they should be handed over???
Wouldn't an adult put two and two together and realize that we are not speaking of the recipe for fudge brownies???
But...
....if you were an adult, you certainly wouldn't have that grade school avitar.
Why post if you're not willing to read the OP?
I did read it, now that nobody stated nothing.
What exactly is he trying to state was compromised, specifically? All I see is a generalization.1. A senior House Republican wants to hold the Obama administration accountable for what he says are violations of law limiting the sharing of space technology with China.Rep. Frank R. Wolf, chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and related agencies, said in an interview that a law passed in April restricts technology-sharing with China following attempts by Chinese hackers to steal government secrets.
They cant just flout the law, Mr. Wolf, Virginia Republican, said of the administration. We see what Chinas doing.
"....nobody stated nothing...."
A double negative is a no-no.
Why do you source material from a paper owned by a Korean Theocrat?
Interesting that the dumbest among us often attack the source rather than find any error in material itself.
You have certainly established your Left-wing creds, and the fact that standing up for America, and for the free-market system in not within your DNA..... and so it was hardly necessary for you to bang the drum about the Washington Times in order to distract from the treasonous behavior of this administration.
Hopefully others will begin to see the betrayal of our great nation by the Obama administration that was erroneously installed in Washington.
In a sad way it is almost laughable that this law breaking will not be trumpeted by the Old Left Media, as the infraction of the Boland Amendment was...
Hey don't piss China off or the shelves at our stores might be empty!
china will not need to fight us they are buying us.
And we are eager to sell ourselves.
"If you don't stand for something you'll fall for anything"
A catchy little phrase. But the important thing is what you stand for.
but I am not sure that was an appropriate reply to my post? Please elaborate if you can.
"If you don't stand for something you'll fall for anything"
A catchy little phrase. But the important thing is what you stand for.
but I am not sure that was an appropriate reply to my post? Please elaborate if you can.
Yeah..it's from this horrible little movie by ultra conservative loon Zach Synder.."Suckerpunch"
Who made the homoerotic opus "300".
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGNnqqdDbvI&feature=related]‪If You Don't Stand for Something‬‏ - YouTube[/ame]
In Progressives minds, if anyone has a robust space program it should be the ChiComs.
Maybe they will built the Space Shuttle too?
Speaking of which...is it an accident that NASA's efforts have been curtailed and the program largely turned over to Russia?
....exactly what the communist sympathizers have demanded since Reagan worried them with his space program?
Besides his nuclear summit, Obama last April also pledged with Russia to reduce stocks of U.S. weapons-grade plutonium and signed an agreement that will lower the deployed U.S. nuclear arsenals.
Obama's "science czar," John Holdren, long has petitioned for these moves at the magazine whose personnel were used for the benefit of Soviet propaganda in an attempt to disarm America, according to a former top intelligence official from the USSR.
"[Soviet politician and security chief Lavrentiy] Beria said we should think how to use Oppenheimer, Szilard and others around them in the peace campaign against nuclear armament. Disarmament and the inability to impose nuclear blackmail would deprive the United States of its advantage," wrote Sudoplatov.
Sudoplatov said his spymasters knew the lobby efforts of the bulletin editors would be a "crucial factor in establishing the new world order after the war, and we took advantage of this."
More links...
Bernard Weissbourd, a former Manhattan Project scientist who later served on the transition oversight committee for incoming Chicago Mayor Harold Washington, who was active in Communist Party fronts.
Weissbourd's son, Robert M. Weissbourd, later served as chairman of the Obama for America Campaign Urban and Metropolitan Policy Committee and on the Obama Transition Housing and Urban Development Agency Review Team in 2008.
Ruth Adams, bulletin editor, who served in the 1960s on the Advisory Committee of the Hyde Park Community Peace Center. Other center members included lifelong communist front activist Robert Havighurst, communist activist and radical Trotskyist Sydney Lens and Quentin Young, an avowed communist who has advised Obama on health care.
Among Obama's concerning remarks:
"The notion that prestige comes from holding these weapons, or that we can protect ourselves by picking and choosing which nations can have these weapons, is an illusion." Obama in Moscow in August 2009.
"No single nation should pick and choose which nations hold nuclear weapons. That is why I strongly reaffirmed America's commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons." Obama in his address to the Muslim world from Cairo in June 2009.
Besides his nuclear summit, Obama last April also pledged with Russia to reduce stocks of U.S. weapons-grade plutonium and signed an agreement that will lower the deployed U.S. nuclear arsenals.
Why do you source material from a paper owned by a Korean Theocrat?
Interesting that the dumbest among us often attack the source rather than find any error in material itself.
You have certainly established your Left-wing creds, and the fact that standing up for America, and for the free-market system in not within your DNA..... and so it was hardly necessary for you to bang the drum about the Washington Times in order to distract from the treasonous behavior of this administration.
Hopefully others will begin to see the betrayal of our great nation by the Obama administration that was erroneously installed in Washington.
In a sad way it is almost laughable that this law breaking will not be trumpeted by the Old Left Media, as the infraction of the Boland Amendment was...
You mapped Holdren to communism and engaged in Hyperbole. I am not incorrect here.
And as far as treason goes..I've established time and time again..it is conservatives and their values that do not uphold the values of the Constitution. Left to the devices of Conservatives the United States might very well look like Iran..or any number of small bannana republics that engage in the persecution of minority groups to further their aims. You've established that in you DNA..as well as an affinity for Plutocracy and Corporatism, both..are poison to the system of Capitalism.
People like Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush led this country to the brink of economic disaster while cobbling the time worn notion of the Unitary Executive. Indeed Reagan committed treason..and quite a number of things that were in breach of his oath to uphold the Constitution..and with the exception of treason..Bush made Reagan look like a boy scout in terms of Constitutional violations.
What we have now is people of your mindset..who are in the minority..committing economic terrorism against the majority in this country. And it's to fulfill your dream of a fascist oligarchical state, where freedom is vanquished and the majority of the country lives to serve a small monied elite.
And in that endeavor..I wish you disaster.
In Progressives minds, if anyone has a robust space program it should be the ChiComs.
Maybe they will built the Space Shuttle too?
Speaking of which...is it an accident that NASA's efforts have been curtailed and the program largely turned over to Russia?
....exactly what the communist sympathizers have demanded since Reagan worried them with his space program?
Besides his nuclear summit, Obama last April also pledged with Russia to reduce stocks of U.S. weapons-grade plutonium and signed an agreement that will lower the deployed U.S. nuclear arsenals.
Obama's "science czar," John Holdren, long has petitioned for these moves at the magazine whose personnel were used for the benefit of Soviet propaganda in an attempt to disarm America, according to a former top intelligence official from the USSR.
"[Soviet politician and security chief Lavrentiy] Beria said we should think how to use Oppenheimer, Szilard and others around them in the peace campaign against nuclear armament. Disarmament and the inability to impose nuclear blackmail would deprive the United States of its advantage," wrote Sudoplatov.
Sudoplatov said his spymasters knew the lobby efforts of the bulletin editors would be a "crucial factor in establishing the new world order after the war, and we took advantage of this."
More links...
Bernard Weissbourd, a former Manhattan Project scientist who later served on the transition oversight committee for incoming Chicago Mayor Harold Washington, who was active in Communist Party fronts.
Weissbourd's son, Robert M. Weissbourd, later served as chairman of the Obama for America Campaign Urban and Metropolitan Policy Committee and on the Obama Transition Housing and Urban Development Agency Review Team in 2008.
Ruth Adams, bulletin editor, who served in the 1960s on the Advisory Committee of the Hyde Park Community Peace Center. Other center members included lifelong communist front activist Robert Havighurst, communist activist and radical Trotskyist Sydney Lens and Quentin Young, an avowed communist who has advised Obama on health care.
Among Obama's concerning remarks:
"The notion that prestige comes from holding these weapons, or that we can protect ourselves by picking and choosing which nations can have these weapons, is an illusion." Obama in Moscow in August 2009.
"No single nation should pick and choose which nations hold nuclear weapons. That is why I strongly reaffirmed America's commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons." Obama in his address to the Muslim world from Cairo in June 2009.
Besides his nuclear summit, Obama last April also pledged with Russia to reduce stocks of U.S. weapons-grade plutonium and signed an agreement that will lower the deployed U.S. nuclear arsenals.
It's treasonous that Obama has put the ChiCom and Russian in a position to have a superior space program to us. That's how Reagan beat the USSR and Obama and Progressives are trying to, and in fact, have succeeded in turning the momentum so that it is that Communists who now have or will soon have an edge in space.
Pure Treason
