Senators trapped forever into silence and organized group

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by x0Maximilian0x, Mar 21, 2012.

  1. x0Maximilian0x
    Offline

    x0Maximilian0x M-Theory

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    203
    Thanks Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Milky Way
    Ratings:
    +6
    Based on this information below brings to question many things...wouldn't it be interesting if all Senators were somehow manipulated to being trapped into the situation outlined in the below paragraph?

    Asia Times is investigating 9/11 through a different approach...

    Remember the insider trading that would have a direct connection to fore knowledge of 9/11 and therefore make them an accomplice to 9/11 crimes?

    Here is todays... March 21, 2012 article on it and new technology tracking insider trading...

    [​IMG]
    Insider trading 9/11 ... the facts laid bare

    Asia Times Online :: Asian news and current affairs

    So are you still a proud American? Here is a window into your government through a foreign investigation...


    Here is a very interesting and disturbing part of the article...this helps piece together...well just read for yourself...


    "According to a report by Bloomberg published in early October 2001, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) began a probe into certain stock market transactions around 9/11 that included 38 companies, among them: American Airlines, United Airlines, Continental Airlines, Northwest Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Boeing, Lockheed Martin Corp., American Express Corp., American International Group, AXA SA, Bank of America Corp., Bank of New York Corp., Bear Stearns, Citigroup, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Morgan Stanley, General Motors and Raytheon. [14]

    So far, so good. In the same month, however, the San Francisco Chronicle newspaper reported that the SEC took the unprecedented step to deputize hundreds, if not even thousands of key stakeholders in the private sector for their investigation. In a statement that was sent to almost all listed companies in the US, the SEC asked the addressed companies to assign senior staff for the investigation, who would be aware of "the sensitive nature" of the case and could be relied on to "exercise appropriate discretion". [15]

    In essence, it was about controlling information, not about provision and disclosure of facts. Such a course of action involves compromising consequences. Ruppert:
    What happens when you deputize someone in a national security or criminal investigation is that you make it illegal for them to disclose publicly what they know. Smart move. In effect, they become government agents and are controlled by government regulations rather than their own conscience. In fact, they can be thrown into jail without a hearing if they talk publicly. I have seen this implied threat time after time with federal investigators, intelligence agents, and even members of United States Congress who are bound so tightly by secrecy oaths and agreements that they are not even able to disclose criminal activities inside the government for fear of incarceration.[16]"



    Here is some information again on how things can work...
    Quote from above: In essence, it was about controlling information, not about provision and disclosure of facts. Such a course of action involves compromising consequences. Ruppert:
    What happens when you deputize someone in a national security or criminal investigation is that you make it illegal for them to disclose publicly what they know. Smart move. In effect, they become government agents and are controlled by government regulations rather than their own conscience. In fact, they can be thrown into jail without a hearing if they talk publicly. I have seen this implied threat time after time with federal investigators, intelligence agents, and even members of United States Congress who are bound so tightly by secrecy oaths and agreements that they are not even able to disclose criminal activities inside the government for fear of incarceration.


    Based on this information above brings to question many things...wouldn't it be interesting if all Senators were somehow manipulated to being trapped into the situation outlined in the above paragraph?
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2012
  2. washamericom
    Offline

    washamericom Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2010
    Messages:
    9,373
    Thanks Received:
    734
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,692
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2012
  3. psikeyhackr
    Offline

    psikeyhackr VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2010
    Messages:
    745
    Thanks Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +70
    Aren't physicists trapped too?

    After TEN YEARS how can they say that the way steel and concrete must be distributed in any building over 200 meters tall there is no way the top 15% of that structure could come straight down and crush the rest?

    If that is true they should have figured it out and told us in 2002. So how could they explain not doing it? So try finding the tons of steel and tons of concrete on each and every level of any skyscraper in the world.

    There are 200 buildings around the world over 800 feet tall.

    psik
     
  4. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    50,369
    Thanks Received:
    3,177
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +10,099
    Yes, they are all in on it. But at least Obama also fights for the rest of us too. Democrats aren't anti rich, they are just not anti poor and anti middle class. Republicans can't say the same thing.

    But notice if/when Obama tries to go too far, they put a kabosh on it, like when we asked for Single Payer. We didn't get it. Instead the insurance companies wrote the legilation and they got a gift with the individual mandate. Now everyone has to buy their insurance.

    And Obama's regulations got him in trouble with the US Chamber of Commerce. The US Chamber represents multinational corporations. Don't mistake it for your local Chamber.

    And when Carter and Bush didn't do what they were told, they were not re elected.

    And when Kennedy took them on, he got shot.

    And when JFK passed the New Deal, the rich tried to pull a coup. Google the Business Plot.

    And when Lincoln faught them they shot him in the back.
     
  5. sealybobo
    Offline

    sealybobo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    50,369
    Thanks Received:
    3,177
    Trophy Points:
    1,845
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +10,099
    If Democrats didn't care about the middle class they wouldn't have come up with the Consumer Protection Agency. And if Republicans cared about the middle class, they wouldn't attack the Agency and Elizabeth Warren who runs it.
     
  6. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    You have a choice of partys.

    One that cares some times and can be presured into caring more by the people.

    Or


    The party who does the bidding of the 1 percent at every turn.


    Its why I vote for the Democratic party.


    It aint perfecct but it is still the BEST choice
     
  7. eots
    Offline

    eots no fly list

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    28,995
    Thanks Received:
    2,034
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    IN TH HEARTS AND MINDS OF FREE MEN
    Ratings:
    +2,606
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGkFPZPK2eY]LIAR-.ROLLINS BAND montage by eots - YouTube[/ame]
     

Share This Page