Senate OKs amnesty for deportees

red states rule

Senior Member
May 30, 2006
16,011
573
48
What the hell is going on in DC? Do these clowns have any understanding on what they are doing?

Why have any immigration laws or any borders if we are not going to enforce them?


Senate OKs amnesty for deportees
By Stephen Dinan
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The Senate voted yesterday to grant amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens who have already been caught and ordered deported but are defying a court order, preserving their path to citizenship as part of the immigration bill.
Another showdown is scheduled for this morning on Democrats' effort to cut off the debate and force a final vote on the bill. Republicans have vowed to block that through a filibuster unless they are given assurances they can offer enough amendments before

Sen John Cornyn offered an amendment to prevent those aliens from gaining legal status, arguing they have already shown disrespect for the law and should be sent home.
"We are going to continue to be viewed as non-serious about workability, about enforcement, about restoring respect for the rule of law, unless we vote to exclude those who show nothing but defiance for our laws," the Texas Republican said.
But Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, said they were only guilty of "common, garden-variety immigration offenses" that should not disqualify them.
"Our employers beg them to come back and our broken borders make that possible," he said.

http://washingtontimes.com/national/20070607-123104-6420r.htm
 
What the hell is going on in DC? Do these clowns have any understanding on what they are doing?

Why have any immigration laws or any borders if we are not going to enforce them?


Senate OKs amnesty for deportees
By Stephen Dinan
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The Senate voted yesterday to grant amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens who have already been caught and ordered deported but are defying a court order, preserving their path to citizenship as part of the immigration bill.
Another showdown is scheduled for this morning on Democrats' effort to cut off the debate and force a final vote on the bill. Republicans have vowed to block that through a filibuster unless they are given assurances they can offer enough amendments before

Sen John Cornyn offered an amendment to prevent those aliens from gaining legal status, arguing they have already shown disrespect for the law and should be sent home.
"We are going to continue to be viewed as non-serious about workability, about enforcement, about restoring respect for the rule of law, unless we vote to exclude those who show nothing but defiance for our laws," the Texas Republican said.
But Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, said they were only guilty of "common, garden-variety immigration offenses" that should not disqualify them.
"Our employers beg them to come back and our broken borders make that possible," he said.

http://washingtontimes.com/national/20070607-123104-6420r.htm

It's not dead, until it is dead, but it appears to be on life support and Reid is clamoring to pull the plug:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070607/ap_on_go_co/immigration_congress
 
The sooner it dies, the better. Maybe while they are writing a new one they'll stop to consider why so many people were angered by the old one and attempt to make real changes. I doubt it, but I'm a class half full kind of guy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top