Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There’s no mistake. The average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years. Something you should have learned in second grade.Oh? Do you have different math that shows a different sum?It’s not bullshit just because you’re a moron.Bullshit. Why are you lying to the forum?
The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2. Divided by 7 is: 2.2
Real annual GDP for 2017: 2.2
https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdpchg.xlsx
The sum of real annual GDP from 2010-2016 was 15.2.
You're not very good at this.
Do you have different math that shows a different sum?
That's your mistake.
.... assuming you graduated from second grade.
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.LOLOLThere’s no mistake. The average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years. Something you should have learned in second grade.Do you have different math that shows a different sum?
That's your mistake.
.... assuming you graduated from second grade.
The average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years.
Yes, adding up percentage changes and dividing was your mistake.
Percentage changes should be multiplied. Then you'd need to find the 7th root.
It's a little beyond second grade, which must explain why it's new to you.
Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Here, check this out ... even investopedia is laughing at you...
Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)
The AAGR is calculated as the sum of each year's growth rate divided by the number of years
Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Nobody....well, maybe you would, because you're a moron.
Thanks for the link.
The average annual growth rate is useful for showing trends; however, it can be misleading to analysts because it does not accurately depict changing financials. In some instances, it can overestimate the growth of an investment. For example, consider an end-of-year value for year 5 of $100,000. The percentage growth rate for year 5 is -50%. The resulting AAGR would be 5.2%; however, it is evident from the beginning value of year 1 and the ending value of year 5, the performance yields a 0% return.
Too bad you didn't understand it.
Try this one. Idiot.
Compound Annual Growth Rate - CAGR
CAGR = (Ending value / Beginning value) (1/number of years) - 1
Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself in front of everyone??
Take it up with investopedia — but wait until they stop laughing at you.A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.LOLOLThere’s no mistake. The average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years. Something you should have learned in second grade.
.... assuming you graduated from second grade.
The average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years.
Yes, adding up percentage changes and dividing was your mistake.
Percentage changes should be multiplied. Then you'd need to find the 7th root.
It's a little beyond second grade, which must explain why it's new to you.
Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Here, check this out ... even investopedia is laughing at you...
Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)
The AAGR is calculated as the sum of each year's growth rate divided by the number of years
Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Nobody....well, maybe you would, because you're a moron.
Thanks for the link.
The average annual growth rate is useful for showing trends; however, it can be misleading to analysts because it does not accurately depict changing financials. In some instances, it can overestimate the growth of an investment. For example, consider an end-of-year value for year 5 of $100,000. The percentage growth rate for year 5 is -50%. The resulting AAGR would be 5.2%; however, it is evident from the beginning value of year 1 and the ending value of year 5, the performance yields a 0% return.
Too bad you didn't understand it.
Try this one. Idiot.
Compound Annual Growth Rate - CAGR
CAGR = (Ending value / Beginning value) (1/number of years) - 1
Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself in front of everyone??
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested,
GDP compounds, idiot. That's why adding together and dividing is less accurate.
Take it up with investopedia — but wait until they stop laughing at you.A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.LOLOLThe average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years.
Yes, adding up percentage changes and dividing was your mistake.
Percentage changes should be multiplied. Then you'd need to find the 7th root.
It's a little beyond second grade, which must explain why it's new to you.
Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Here, check this out ... even investopedia is laughing at you...
Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)
The AAGR is calculated as the sum of each year's growth rate divided by the number of years
Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Nobody....well, maybe you would, because you're a moron.
Thanks for the link.
The average annual growth rate is useful for showing trends; however, it can be misleading to analysts because it does not accurately depict changing financials. In some instances, it can overestimate the growth of an investment. For example, consider an end-of-year value for year 5 of $100,000. The percentage growth rate for year 5 is -50%. The resulting AAGR would be 5.2%; however, it is evident from the beginning value of year 1 and the ending value of year 5, the performance yields a 0% return.
Too bad you didn't understand it.
Try this one. Idiot.
Compound Annual Growth Rate - CAGR
CAGR = (Ending value / Beginning value) (1/number of years) - 1
Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself in front of everyone??
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested,
GDP compounds, idiot. That's why adding together and dividing is less accurate.
LOLTake it up with investopedia — but wait until they stop laughing at you.A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.LOLOL
Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Here, check this out ... even investopedia is laughing at you...
Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)
The AAGR is calculated as the sum of each year's growth rate divided by the number of years
Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Nobody....well, maybe you would, because you're a moron.
Thanks for the link.
The average annual growth rate is useful for showing trends; however, it can be misleading to analysts because it does not accurately depict changing financials. In some instances, it can overestimate the growth of an investment. For example, consider an end-of-year value for year 5 of $100,000. The percentage growth rate for year 5 is -50%. The resulting AAGR would be 5.2%; however, it is evident from the beginning value of year 1 and the ending value of year 5, the performance yields a 0% return.
Too bad you didn't understand it.
Try this one. Idiot.
Compound Annual Growth Rate - CAGR
CAGR = (Ending value / Beginning value) (1/number of years) - 1
Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself in front of everyone??
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested,
GDP compounds, idiot. That's why adding together and dividing is less accurate.
Take it up with Investopedia
You first.
Growth Rates Example
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates and is referred to as the compounded annual growth rate. Consider a stock that grows by 10% in year one, declines by 20% in year two and then grows by 30% in year three. The geometric mean of the growth rate is calculated as ((1+0.1)*(1-0.2)*(1+0.3))^(1/3) - 1 = 0.046 or 4.6% annually.
What are some examples of applications of the geometric mean?
DERP!
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
Still funny.
LOLTake it up with investopedia — but wait until they stop laughing at you.A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Nobody....well, maybe you would, because you're a moron.
Thanks for the link.
The average annual growth rate is useful for showing trends; however, it can be misleading to analysts because it does not accurately depict changing financials. In some instances, it can overestimate the growth of an investment. For example, consider an end-of-year value for year 5 of $100,000. The percentage growth rate for year 5 is -50%. The resulting AAGR would be 5.2%; however, it is evident from the beginning value of year 1 and the ending value of year 5, the performance yields a 0% return.
Too bad you didn't understand it.
Try this one. Idiot.
Compound Annual Growth Rate - CAGR
CAGR = (Ending value / Beginning value) (1/number of years) - 1
Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself in front of everyone??
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested,
GDP compounds, idiot. That's why adding together and dividing is less accurate.
Take it up with Investopedia
You first.
Growth Rates Example
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates and is referred to as the compounded annual growth rate. Consider a stock that grows by 10% in year one, declines by 20% in year two and then grows by 30% in year three. The geometric mean of the growth rate is calculated as ((1+0.1)*(1-0.2)*(1+0.3))^(1/3) - 1 = 0.046 or 4.6% annually.
What are some examples of applications of the geometric mean?
DERP!
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
Still funny.
We’re talking about GDP
BREAKING DOWN 'Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)'
The average annual growth rate is used in many fields of study. For example, in economics, it is used to provide a better picture of the changes in economic activity (e.g. growth rate in real GDP).
And why would I post the mean and not the average when I was responding to this...?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
Investopedia also says...LOLTake it up with investopedia — but wait until they stop laughing at you.A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
CAGR = (Ending value / Beginning value) (1/number of years) - 1
Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself in front of everyone??
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested,
GDP compounds, idiot. That's why adding together and dividing is less accurate.
Take it up with Investopedia
You first.
Growth Rates Example
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates and is referred to as the compounded annual growth rate. Consider a stock that grows by 10% in year one, declines by 20% in year two and then grows by 30% in year three. The geometric mean of the growth rate is calculated as ((1+0.1)*(1-0.2)*(1+0.3))^(1/3) - 1 = 0.046 or 4.6% annually.
What are some examples of applications of the geometric mean?
DERP!
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
Still funny.
We’re talking about GDP
BREAKING DOWN 'Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)'
The average annual growth rate is used in many fields of study. For example, in economics, it is used to provide a better picture of the changes in economic activity (e.g. growth rate in real GDP).
And why would I post the mean and not the average when I was responding to this...?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
We’re talking about GDP
Like Investopedia says.....
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates
And why would I post the mean and not the average
Like Investopedia says.....
Mean
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mean.asp
The simple mathematical average of a set of two or more numbers. The mean for a given set of numbers can be computed with the arithmetic mean method, which uses the sum of the numbers in the series, and the geometric mean method.
Investopedia also says...LOLTake it up with investopedia — but wait until they stop laughing at you.A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested,
GDP compounds, idiot. That's why adding together and dividing is less accurate.
Take it up with Investopedia
You first.
Growth Rates Example
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates and is referred to as the compounded annual growth rate. Consider a stock that grows by 10% in year one, declines by 20% in year two and then grows by 30% in year three. The geometric mean of the growth rate is calculated as ((1+0.1)*(1-0.2)*(1+0.3))^(1/3) - 1 = 0.046 or 4.6% annually.
What are some examples of applications of the geometric mean?
DERP!
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
Still funny.
We’re talking about GDP
BREAKING DOWN 'Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)'
The average annual growth rate is used in many fields of study. For example, in economics, it is used to provide a better picture of the changes in economic activity (e.g. growth rate in real GDP).
And why would I post the mean and not the average when I was responding to this...?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
We’re talking about GDP
Like Investopedia says.....
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates
And why would I post the mean and not the average
Like Investopedia says.....
Mean
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mean.asp
The simple mathematical average of a set of two or more numbers. The mean for a given set of numbers can be computed with the arithmetic mean method, which uses the sum of the numbers in the series, and the geometric mean method.
The average annual growth rate is used in many fields of study. For example, in economics, it is used to provide a better picture of the changes in economic activity (e.g. growth rate in real GDP).
... and again, I responded to someone talking about average annual GDP growth. Why would I switch to geometric mean when average was being discussed?
There were no analysts misled and no one was measuring growth over a period of time. Thanks for showing yet more reasons why you stupidly thought to switch from average to mean.Investopedia also says...LOLTake it up with investopedia — but wait until they stop laughing at you.
Take it up with Investopedia
You first.
Growth Rates Example
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates and is referred to as the compounded annual growth rate. Consider a stock that grows by 10% in year one, declines by 20% in year two and then grows by 30% in year three. The geometric mean of the growth rate is calculated as ((1+0.1)*(1-0.2)*(1+0.3))^(1/3) - 1 = 0.046 or 4.6% annually.
What are some examples of applications of the geometric mean?
DERP!
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
Still funny.
We’re talking about GDP
BREAKING DOWN 'Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)'
The average annual growth rate is used in many fields of study. For example, in economics, it is used to provide a better picture of the changes in economic activity (e.g. growth rate in real GDP).
And why would I post the mean and not the average when I was responding to this...?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
We’re talking about GDP
Like Investopedia says.....
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates
And why would I post the mean and not the average
Like Investopedia says.....
Mean
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mean.asp
The simple mathematical average of a set of two or more numbers. The mean for a given set of numbers can be computed with the arithmetic mean method, which uses the sum of the numbers in the series, and the geometric mean method.
The average annual growth rate is used in many fields of study. For example, in economics, it is used to provide a better picture of the changes in economic activity (e.g. growth rate in real GDP).
... and again, I responded to someone talking about average annual GDP growth. Why would I switch to geometric mean when average was being discussed?
The average annual growth rate is useful for showing trends; however, it can be misleading to analysts because it does not accurately depict changing financials. In some instances, it can overestimate the growth of an investment. For example, consider an end-of-year value for year 5 of $100,000. The percentage growth rate for year 5 is -50%. The resulting AAGR would be 5.2%; however, it is evident from the beginning value of year 1 and the ending value of year 5, the performance yields a 0% return.
There were no analysts misled and no one was measuring growth over a period of time. Thanks for showing yet more reasons why you stupidly thought to switch from average to mean.Investopedia also says...LOLTake it up with Investopedia
You first.
Growth Rates Example
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates and is referred to as the compounded annual growth rate. Consider a stock that grows by 10% in year one, declines by 20% in year two and then grows by 30% in year three. The geometric mean of the growth rate is calculated as ((1+0.1)*(1-0.2)*(1+0.3))^(1/3) - 1 = 0.046 or 4.6% annually.
What are some examples of applications of the geometric mean?
DERP!
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
Still funny.
We’re talking about GDP
BREAKING DOWN 'Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)'
The average annual growth rate is used in many fields of study. For example, in economics, it is used to provide a better picture of the changes in economic activity (e.g. growth rate in real GDP).
And why would I post the mean and not the average when I was responding to this...?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
We’re talking about GDP
Like Investopedia says.....
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates
And why would I post the mean and not the average
Like Investopedia says.....
Mean
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mean.asp
The simple mathematical average of a set of two or more numbers. The mean for a given set of numbers can be computed with the arithmetic mean method, which uses the sum of the numbers in the series, and the geometric mean method.
The average annual growth rate is used in many fields of study. For example, in economics, it is used to provide a better picture of the changes in economic activity (e.g. growth rate in real GDP).
... and again, I responded to someone talking about average annual GDP growth. Why would I switch to geometric mean when average was being discussed?
The average annual growth rate is useful for showing trends; however, it can be misleading to analysts because it does not accurately depict changing financials. In some instances, it can overestimate the growth of an investment. For example, consider an end-of-year value for year 5 of $100,000. The percentage growth rate for year 5 is -50%. The resulting AAGR would be 5.2%; however, it is evident from the beginning value of year 1 and the ending value of year 5, the performance yields a 0% return.
And you still haven’t answered the question... why would I switch to mean when I was responding to someone talking about average?
Is that how you debate? You respond to posts by switching up the discussion?
Dayam, you’re fucking retarded. I’m talking about the conversation that was taking place here. Someone was pointing out the average annual growth during Obama’s years. No one was talking about growth over a period of time — just his average.There were no analysts misled and no one was measuring growth over a period of time. Thanks for showing yet more reasons why you stupidly thought to switch from average to mean.Investopedia also says...LOL
We’re talking about GDP
BREAKING DOWN 'Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)'
The average annual growth rate is used in many fields of study. For example, in economics, it is used to provide a better picture of the changes in economic activity (e.g. growth rate in real GDP).
And why would I post the mean and not the average when I was responding to this...?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
We’re talking about GDP
Like Investopedia says.....
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates
And why would I post the mean and not the average
Like Investopedia says.....
Mean
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mean.asp
The simple mathematical average of a set of two or more numbers. The mean for a given set of numbers can be computed with the arithmetic mean method, which uses the sum of the numbers in the series, and the geometric mean method.
The average annual growth rate is used in many fields of study. For example, in economics, it is used to provide a better picture of the changes in economic activity (e.g. growth rate in real GDP).
... and again, I responded to someone talking about average annual GDP growth. Why would I switch to geometric mean when average was being discussed?
The average annual growth rate is useful for showing trends; however, it can be misleading to analysts because it does not accurately depict changing financials. In some instances, it can overestimate the growth of an investment. For example, consider an end-of-year value for year 5 of $100,000. The percentage growth rate for year 5 is -50%. The resulting AAGR would be 5.2%; however, it is evident from the beginning value of year 1 and the ending value of year 5, the performance yields a 0% return.
And you still haven’t answered the question... why would I switch to mean when I was responding to someone talking about average?
Is that how you debate? You respond to posts by switching up the discussion?
There were no analysts misled and no one was measuring growth over a period of time.
GDP during Obama wasn't growth over a period of time? LOL!
No, why would I? It showed exactly what I had done — averages out annualized GDP...Thanks for showing yet more reasons why you stupidly thought to switch from average to mean.
Did you already forget Investopedia?
Mean
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mean.asp
The simple mathematical average of a set of two or more numbers. The mean for a given set of numbers can be computed with the arithmetic mean method, which uses the sum of the numbers in the series, and the geometric mean method.
Take it up with investopedia — but wait until they stop laughing at you.A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.LOLOLThe average was dividing the sum of those years by the number of those years.
Yes, adding up percentage changes and dividing was your mistake.
Percentage changes should be multiplied. Then you'd need to find the 7th root.
It's a little beyond second grade, which must explain why it's new to you.
Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Here, check this out ... even investopedia is laughing at you...
Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)
The AAGR is calculated as the sum of each year's growth rate divided by the number of years
Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Nobody....well, maybe you would, because you're a moron.
Thanks for the link.
The average annual growth rate is useful for showing trends; however, it can be misleading to analysts because it does not accurately depict changing financials. In some instances, it can overestimate the growth of an investment. For example, consider an end-of-year value for year 5 of $100,000. The percentage growth rate for year 5 is -50%. The resulting AAGR would be 5.2%; however, it is evident from the beginning value of year 1 and the ending value of year 5, the performance yields a 0% return.
Too bad you didn't understand it.
Try this one. Idiot.
Compound Annual Growth Rate - CAGR
CAGR = (Ending value / Beginning value) (1/number of years) - 1
Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself in front of everyone??
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested,
GDP compounds, idiot. That's why adding together and dividing is less accurate.
Take it up with investopedia...Take it up with investopedia — but wait until they stop laughing at you.A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.LOLOL
Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Here, check this out ... even investopedia is laughing at you...
Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)
The AAGR is calculated as the sum of each year's growth rate divided by the number of years
Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Nobody....well, maybe you would, because you're a moron.
Thanks for the link.
The average annual growth rate is useful for showing trends; however, it can be misleading to analysts because it does not accurately depict changing financials. In some instances, it can overestimate the growth of an investment. For example, consider an end-of-year value for year 5 of $100,000. The percentage growth rate for year 5 is -50%. The resulting AAGR would be 5.2%; however, it is evident from the beginning value of year 1 and the ending value of year 5, the performance yields a 0% return.
Too bad you didn't understand it.
Try this one. Idiot.
Compound Annual Growth Rate - CAGR
CAGR = (Ending value / Beginning value) (1/number of years) - 1
Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself in front of everyone??
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested,
GDP compounds, idiot. That's why adding together and dividing is less accurate.
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
Growth Rates Example
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates and is referred to as the compounded annual growth rate. Consider a stock that grows by 10% in year one, declines by 20% in year two and then grows by 30% in year three. The geometric mean of the growth rate is calculated as ((1+0.1)*(1-0.2)*(1+0.3))^(1/3) - 1 = 0.046 or 4.6% annually.
What are some examples of applications of the geometric mean?
Still funny.
Take it up with investopedia...Take it up with investopedia — but wait until they stop laughing at you.A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Nobody....well, maybe you would, because you're a moron.
Thanks for the link.
The average annual growth rate is useful for showing trends; however, it can be misleading to analysts because it does not accurately depict changing financials. In some instances, it can overestimate the growth of an investment. For example, consider an end-of-year value for year 5 of $100,000. The percentage growth rate for year 5 is -50%. The resulting AAGR would be 5.2%; however, it is evident from the beginning value of year 1 and the ending value of year 5, the performance yields a 0% return.
Too bad you didn't understand it.
Try this one. Idiot.
Compound Annual Growth Rate - CAGR
CAGR = (Ending value / Beginning value) (1/number of years) - 1
Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself in front of everyone??
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested,
GDP compounds, idiot. That's why adding together and dividing is less accurate.
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
Growth Rates Example
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates and is referred to as the compounded annual growth rate. Consider a stock that grows by 10% in year one, declines by 20% in year two and then grows by 30% in year three. The geometric mean of the growth rate is calculated as ((1+0.1)*(1-0.2)*(1+0.3))^(1/3) - 1 = 0.046 or 4.6% annually.
What are some examples of applications of the geometric mean?
Still funny.
Why would I? I was talking about an average of annualized growth.Take it up with investopedia...Take it up with investopedia — but wait until they stop laughing at you.A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
CAGR = (Ending value / Beginning value) (1/number of years) - 1
Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself in front of everyone??
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested,
GDP compounds, idiot. That's why adding together and dividing is less accurate.
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
Growth Rates Example
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates and is referred to as the compounded annual growth rate. Consider a stock that grows by 10% in year one, declines by 20% in year two and then grows by 30% in year three. The geometric mean of the growth rate is calculated as ((1+0.1)*(1-0.2)*(1+0.3))^(1/3) - 1 = 0.046 or 4.6% annually.
What are some examples of applications of the geometric mean?
Still funny.
You didn't provide beginning and ending GDP numbers. DURR.
LOLTake it up with investopedia — but wait until they stop laughing at you.A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.Who the fuck applies a geometric mean to average annual GDP growth??
Nobody....well, maybe you would, because you're a moron.
Thanks for the link.
The average annual growth rate is useful for showing trends; however, it can be misleading to analysts because it does not accurately depict changing financials. In some instances, it can overestimate the growth of an investment. For example, consider an end-of-year value for year 5 of $100,000. The percentage growth rate for year 5 is -50%. The resulting AAGR would be 5.2%; however, it is evident from the beginning value of year 1 and the ending value of year 5, the performance yields a 0% return.
Too bad you didn't understand it.
Try this one. Idiot.
Compound Annual Growth Rate - CAGR
CAGR = (Ending value / Beginning value) (1/number of years) - 1
Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself in front of everyone??
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested,
GDP compounds, idiot. That's why adding together and dividing is less accurate.
Take it up with Investopedia
You first.
Growth Rates Example
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates and is referred to as the compounded annual growth rate. Consider a stock that grows by 10% in year one, declines by 20% in year two and then grows by 30% in year three. The geometric mean of the growth rate is calculated as ((1+0.1)*(1-0.2)*(1+0.3))^(1/3) - 1 = 0.046 or 4.6% annually.
What are some examples of applications of the geometric mean?
DERP!
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
Still funny.
We’re talking about GDP
BREAKING DOWN 'Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)'
The average annual growth rate is used in many fields of study. For example, in economics, it is used to provide a better picture of the changes in economic activity (e.g. growth rate in real GDP).
And why would I post the mean and not the average when I was responding to this...?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
Nah, not necessary as your refusal to answer actually answers for you.LOLTake it up with investopedia — but wait until they stop laughing at you.A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
CAGR = (Ending value / Beginning value) (1/number of years) - 1
Don’t you ever get tired of making a fool of yourself in front of everyone??
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested,
GDP compounds, idiot. That's why adding together and dividing is less accurate.
Take it up with Investopedia
You first.
Growth Rates Example
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates and is referred to as the compounded annual growth rate. Consider a stock that grows by 10% in year one, declines by 20% in year two and then grows by 30% in year three. The geometric mean of the growth rate is calculated as ((1+0.1)*(1-0.2)*(1+0.3))^(1/3) - 1 = 0.046 or 4.6% annually.
What are some examples of applications of the geometric mean?
DERP!
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
Still funny.
We’re talking about GDP
BREAKING DOWN 'Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)'
The average annual growth rate is used in many fields of study. For example, in economics, it is used to provide a better picture of the changes in economic activity (e.g. growth rate in real GDP).
And why would I post the mean and not the average when I was responding to this...?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
And why would I post the mean and not the average when I was responding to this...?
When you get a chance, post all the differences between mean and average.
Nah, not necessary as your refusal to answer actually answers for you.LOLTake it up with investopedia — but wait until they stop laughing at you.A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested,
GDP compounds, idiot. That's why adding together and dividing is less accurate.
Take it up with Investopedia
You first.
Growth Rates Example
The geometric mean is used in finance to calculate average growth rates and is referred to as the compounded annual growth rate. Consider a stock that grows by 10% in year one, declines by 20% in year two and then grows by 30% in year three. The geometric mean of the growth rate is calculated as ((1+0.1)*(1-0.2)*(1+0.3))^(1/3) - 1 = 0.046 or 4.6% annually.
What are some examples of applications of the geometric mean?
DERP!
A CAGR is something different entirely and not at all what you suggested, which is actually a geometric mean.
Still funny.
We’re talking about GDP
BREAKING DOWN 'Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR)'
The average annual growth rate is used in many fields of study. For example, in economics, it is used to provide a better picture of the changes in economic activity (e.g. growth rate in real GDP).
And why would I post the mean and not the average when I was responding to this...?
The average GDP during the Obama years was 1.7%.
And why would I post the mean and not the average when I was responding to this...?
When you get a chance, post all the differences between mean and average.
