Second hottest August in recorded history based on Copernicus data

To state a theory as this is, you must establish a baseline then show a difference using apples to apples data. Without a baseline and the data throughout time, from the same locations, Makes the data suspect

And that's been done to high precision. Only proud cult liars or jabbering morons pretend otherwise. You tossing out a conspiracy theory that you copied form a conspiracy website doesn't change that fact.

Here's a troubling fact:

No, that was just a senseless conspiracy rant from WUWT.

Someone who deals in facts could recognize when a kook political conspiracy blog like WUWT was bullshitting them. You couldn't. Someone who deals in facts would learn about statistics and the geographical behavior of climate trends. You're laughably ignorant of those things. You don't deal in facts. You deal in cult propaganda.

(This is going to be fun. You're clearly totally ignorant of the basics, and you're going to try to bullshit your way through with sciency-sounding words, and I'll get to rip your brainwashed babbling apart when you try, and then you'll stomp off all butthurt. What, you think we haven't seen your kind hundreds of times before?)
 
People like Pop are so damned stupid that they don't have any idea of the implications of Houston having three 500 year floods in three years. Actually, this years flood was closer to a 1000 year flood. Not only are they innocent of the slightest idea of statistics, but they will immediately ask how we know that those are the past intervals, and say something stupid, like show us some pictures of those previous floods. Their ignorance is so pervasive in every aspect of life that there is no hope of ever bringing them up to speed.
 
1f525.png
California is on fire.
1f525.png
Washington is on fire.
1f525.png
Oregon is on fire.
1f525.png
Montana is on fire.
1f525.png
British Columbia is on fire.
1f525.png
Nova Scotia is on fire.
1f525.png
Greece is on fire.
1f525.png
Brazil is on fire.
1f525.png
Portugal is on fire.
1f525.png
Algeria is on fire.
1f525.png
Tunisia is on fire.
1f525.png
Greenland is on fire.
1f525.png
The Sakha Republic of Russia is on fire.
1f525.png
Siberia is on fire.
26c8.png
⛈️ Texas is hit by Cat 4 hurricane and is underwater, as Cat 5 Hurricane Irma continues to build in the Atlantic.
26c8.png
⛈️ India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, experience record monsoons and massive death toll.
26c8.png
⛈️ Sierra Leone and Niger experience massive floods, mudslides, and deaths in the thousands.
1f321.png
️Italy, France, Spain, Switzerland, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Bosnia, Croatia, and Serbia are crushed in the death grip of a triple digit heat wave, dubbed Lucifer.
1f321.png
️Southern California continues to swelter under triple digit heat that shows no sign of letting up.
1f321.png
️ In usually chilly August, the city of San Francisco shatters all-time record at 115 degrees. Northern California continues to bake in the triple digits.
But trump says climate change is a Chinese hoax.
So, nothing to see here......






California, and most of the western US burn so frequently that the local flora actually is DEPENDENT on fire for their lifecycle. So, put that in your pipe and smoke silly girl.

6.3 billion dead trees from beetle infestations might have a bit to do with it.

Billions of dead trees force US fire crews to shift tactics
Overview
Millions of forested acres in the United States have been affected by bark beetles. By killing trees, bark beetle outbreaks can significantly influence forest carbon storage and cycling. At the same time, current research shows that warming summer and winter temperatures are driving beetle population outbreaks in susceptible forests, and allowing these insects to persist in habitats previously constrained by cold temperatures. These pages discuss how bark beetles and climate change interact to affect forested ecosystems.

Bark Beetles and Climate Change in the United States | Climate Change Resource Center

Yes, it has a great deal to do with it, and there is a reason for the sudden increase in bug killed trees.

Now prove it with the historic data I've requested in the past.

The placement of each weather reporting station and those that calibrated each for the past 3 hundred years.

You know the problem, right? If the warming is settled science, then the data would in no way be suspect. Except, those stations are not consistently placed and there numbers alone are not static. Additionally, even the sophistication of each are suspect.

Sorry dude, you have no idea if warming is even occurring
/----/ BUT the tree ring = but the tree ring....
View attachment 148461
Fuck the tree ring data. We can simply cherry pick the data to support the preconceived conclusion of the policymakers.

Fuck science! Hide the decline! ~.

 
Last edited:
People like Pop are so damned stupid that they don't have any idea of the implications of Houston having three 500 year floods in three years. Actually, this years flood was closer to a 1000 year flood. Not only are they innocent of the slightest idea of statistics, but they will immediately ask how we know that those are the past intervals, and say something stupid, like show us some pictures of those previous floods. Their ignorance is so pervasive in every aspect of life that there is no hope of ever bringing them up to speed.
/----/ who was in Texas in 1517 or 1017 to record the floods?
 
People like Pop are so damned stupid that they don't have any idea of the implications of Houston having three 500 year floods in three years. Actually, this years flood was closer to a 1000 year flood. Not only are they innocent of the slightest idea of statistics, but they will immediately ask how we know that those are the past intervals, and say something stupid, like show us some pictures of those previous floods. Their ignorance is so pervasive in every aspect of life that there is no hope of ever bringing them up to speed.
/----/ How do you know that having three major floods three years in a row isn't normal every 500 years? And why exactly 500? Why not a 457 year flood? Why not a 1,256 year flood?
 
1f525.png
California is on fire.
1f525.png
Washington is on fire.
1f525.png
Oregon is on fire.
1f525.png
Montana is on fire.
1f525.png
British Columbia is on fire.
1f525.png
Nova Scotia is on fire.
1f525.png
Greece is on fire.
1f525.png
Brazil is on fire.
1f525.png
Portugal is on fire.
1f525.png
Algeria is on fire.
1f525.png
Tunisia is on fire.
1f525.png
Greenland is on fire.
1f525.png
The Sakha Republic of Russia is on fire.
1f525.png
Siberia is on fire.
26c8.png
⛈️ Texas is hit by Cat 4 hurricane and is underwater, as Cat 5 Hurricane Irma continues to build in the Atlantic.
26c8.png
⛈️ India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, experience record monsoons and massive death toll.
26c8.png
⛈️ Sierra Leone and Niger experience massive floods, mudslides, and deaths in the thousands.
1f321.png
️Italy, France, Spain, Switzerland, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Bosnia, Croatia, and Serbia are crushed in the death grip of a triple digit heat wave, dubbed Lucifer.
1f321.png
️Southern California continues to swelter under triple digit heat that shows no sign of letting up.
1f321.png
️ In usually chilly August, the city of San Francisco shatters all-time record at 115 degrees. Northern California continues to bake in the triple digits.
But trump says climate change is a Chinese hoax.
So, nothing to see here......

How many trillions do we need to waste on windmills to ensure the climate never changes?
How will we know that it's stopped changing?
/----/ We'll know the climate stops changing when Al Gore demands we stop sending him money and the entire globe is a constant 72 degrees 24/7/365.
 
People like Pop are so damned stupid that they don't have any idea of the implications of Houston having three 500 year floods in three years. Actually, this years flood was closer to a 1000 year flood. Not only are they innocent of the slightest idea of statistics, but they will immediately ask how we know that those are the past intervals, and say something stupid, like show us some pictures of those previous floods. Their ignorance is so pervasive in every aspect of life that there is no hope of ever bringing them up to speed.



virtually no evidence any link to climate change.................

https://science.house.gov/sites/rep...ments/HHRG-115-SY-WState-RPielke-20170329.pdf
 
People like Pop are so damned stupid that they don't have any idea of the implications of Houston having three 500 year floods in three years. Actually, this years flood was closer to a 1000 year flood. Not only are they innocent of the slightest idea of statistics, but they will immediately ask how we know that those are the past intervals, and say something stupid, like show us some pictures of those previous floods. Their ignorance is so pervasive in every aspect of life that there is no hope of ever bringing them up to speed.



virtually no evidence any link to climate change.................

https://science.house.gov/sites/rep...ments/HHRG-115-SY-WState-RPielke-20170329.pdf

Anytime the weather isn't "average", it's AGW!
I mean Climate Change.
I mean severe weather.
 
People like Pop are so damned stupid that they don't have any idea of the implications of Houston having three 500 year floods in three years. Actually, this years flood was closer to a 1000 year flood. Not only are they innocent of the slightest idea of statistics, but they will immediately ask how we know that those are the past intervals, and say something stupid, like show us some pictures of those previous floods. Their ignorance is so pervasive in every aspect of life that there is no hope of ever bringing them up to speed.



virtually no evidence any link to climate change.................

https://science.house.gov/sites/rep...ments/HHRG-115-SY-WState-RPielke-20170329.pdf

Anytime the weather isn't "average", it's AGW!
I mean Climate Change.
I mean severe weather.
/----/ Don't forget Global Cooling was all the rage in 1978.
 
Average temperatures for the twelve-month period from September 2016 to August 2017 were:

August 2017 extended the spell of exceptional global warmth that has now lasted since mid-2015. It was:

  • close to 0.5°C warmer than the average August from 1981-2010;
  • the second warmest August on record, by a small margin of well under 0.1°C;
  • more than 0.1°C cooler than August 2016.
The warmest instances of each month of the year occurred from October 2015 to September 2016. Each of the eleven months from October 2016 to August 2017 has been the second warmest on record for that month of the year.

Surface air temperature for August 2017 | Copernicus Climate Change Service

Pretty fucking Amazing. If it wasn't for the last week of August it would have beaten 2015 by even more.
Did it feel hot to you where you live?
 
One of the first things the professor in the statistics class stated is that no model can duplicate nature, but they can be close enough to be useful. Now considering the predictions of the deniers, and the predictions of the professional scientists, one can see that the scientists have been far more accurate than the deniers. The scientists predicted that as the atmosphere and the oceans warmed, we would see far more extreme precipitation events. Harvey was just one example of that that we are seeing today.

Not a fan of studying history? You let the TV form your thoughts and opinions for you. Stop that.

As Terrible As Harvey Is, The Galveston Hurricane Of 1900 Was Much, Much Worse


Even if the solar system is experiencing major shifts, there is no evidence this is caused by the activity of humans. Did mankind cause the extinction of the dinosaurs?

Seriously, don't let the elites toy with you. We have been in a new scientific, literary, spiritual, and historical dark age since about 1920. The progress of humanity, at least publicly has been halted in many regards.

The technology we use to explore space is not significantly different than Hitler's V-2 rockets. The internal combustion engine that powered Ford's Model T is not significantly different than the majority of cars on the road today. These technologies are woefully outdated. They have been for some thirty to forty years now.

Cancer and heart disease still plague humanity as much today as they did back then. This is not necessary. It is a planned check on the population.



This would seem a tragedy when one considers the computing power and intelligence of the planet. The answers are known, don't delude yourself.

The problem is, the philosophies of the ruling elites, and those that control them, are not prepared to free the power of the middle and lower classes with the newer technologies, it would be harder to control them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top