Sea Levels Rising 60% Faster Than Projected, Planet Keeps Warming As Expected

.
Sea Levels Rising 60% Faster Than Projected, Planet Keeps Warming As Expected

By Joe Romm on Nov 28, 2012

[/INDENT]A new study, “Comparing climate projections to observations up to 2011,” confirms that climate change is happening as fast — and in some cases faster — than climate models had projected. The news release explains:
The rate of sea-level rise in the past decades is greater than projected by the latest assessments of the IPCC, while global temperature increases in good agreement with its best estimates. This is shown by a study now published in the journal Environmental Research Letters. Stefan Rahmstorf from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and his colleagues compare climate projections to actual observations from 1990 up to 2011. That sea level is rising faster than expected could mean that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) sea-level rise projections for the future may be biased low as well, their results suggest.
As Dr. Rahmstorf notes, “the new findings highlight that the IPCC is far from being alarmist and in fact in some cases rather underestimates possible risks.”
The oceans are rising 60 per cent faster than the IPCC’s latest best estimates, according to the new research. The researchers compared those estimates to satellite data of observed sea-level rise. ” Satellites have a much better coverage of the globe than tide gauges and are able to measure much more accurately by using radar waves and their reflection from the sea surface,” explains Anny Cazenave from LEGOS. While the IPCC projected sea-level rise to be at a rate of 2 mm per year, satellite data recorded a rate of 3.2 mm per year.




Figure: Sea level measured by satellite altimeter (red with linear trend line) … and reconstructed from tide gauges (orange, monthly data from Church and White (2011))…. The scenarios of the IPCC are shown in blue (third assessment) and green (fourth assessment); the former have been published starting in the year 1990 and the latter from 2000.

The release notes, “The increased rate of sea-level rise is unlikely to be caused by a temporary episode of ice discharge from the ice sheets in Greenland or Antarctica or other internal variabilities in the climate system, according to the study, because it correlates very well with the increase in global temperature.”
As sea level rises, storm surges worsen, coastal populations are put at risk, and salt water infiltrates rich deltas. For more on likely future sea level rise, see “New Studies on Sea Level Rise Make Clear We Must Act Now” and “JPL bombshell: Polar ice sheet mass loss is speeding up, on pace for 1 foot sea level rise by 2050

<snip>
.

Joe Romm and ThinkProgress is just making chit up... The graph is completely dishonest.. If you look closely -- there are green lines and blue lines DIRECTLY under the actual measurement trend.. IN FACT -- from the IPCC 4th assessment directly...

https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/faq-5-1.html

Global sea level is projected to rise during the 21st century at a greater rate than during 1961 to 2003. Under the IPCC Special Report on Emission Scenarios (SRES) A1B scenario by the mid-2090s, for instance, global sea level reaches 0.22 to 0.44 m above 1990 levels, and is rising at about 4 mm yr–1.

https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/faq-5-1-figure-1.html

The only IPCC projection to make it to the Summary of the 4th assessment was for 4mm/yr.. STILL higher than what we're observing..

flacaltenn-albums-charts-picture5969-sealevelipcc.jpg


Go ahead -- draw a line thru the current rate of rise and tell me if it results in "60% greater than IPCC predictions"

AGAIN --- ThinkProgressive is not to trusted on ANY science and most likely not on ANYTHING...

They took the short range model projections for unlikely scenarios and pretended they were the best IPCC estimates..

Fact is --- the observed rate hasn't really changed significantly in 100 years and the IPCC estimates are NOT way below the observed..

Again --- you've been rolled and spun for political gain...
 
FCT, 3.2 mm/yr IS 60% greater than 2.0 mm/yr. Here is the text that accompanied that graphic.

3. Global sea-level rise
Turning to sea level, the quasi linear trend measured by satellite altimeters since 1993 has continued essentially unchanged when extending the time series by five additional years. It continues to run near the upper limit of the projected uncertainty range given in the third and fourth IPCC assessment reports (figure 2). Here, the sea-level projections provided in figure 5 of the summary for policy makers of the third assessment and in table SPM.3 of the fourth assessment are shown. The satellite-based linear trend 1993&#8211;2011 is 3.2 ± 0.5 mm yr&#8722;1, which is 60% faster than the best IPCC estimate of 2.0 mm yr&#8722;1 for the same interval (blue lines). The two temporary sea-level minima in 2007/2008 and 2010/2011 may be linked to strong La Niña events (Llovel et al 2011). The tide gauges show much greater variability, most likely since their number is too limited to properly sample the global average (Rahmstorf et al 2012). For sea level the fourth IPCC report did not publish the model-based time series (green lines), but these were made available online in 2012 (CSIRO 2012). They do not differ significantly from the projections of the third IPCC report and thus continue to underestimate the observed upward trend.

***********************************************************************************************

The multiple blue and green lines show the lowest and highest of the multiple scenarios for which the IPCC produced projections. The actual data is 60% higher than the mean of those earlier projections. That is not lying, that is presenting data reasonably and accurately.

Sea levels are rising 60% faster than the IPCC's best estimate. And this despite atmospheric temperatures leveling. Hmm... maybe Balmaseda, Trenberth and Kallen could explain what's happening.
 
Last edited:
the left wing sites are a cranking out the sky is falling propaganda fast and furious lately..

If we don't give our government control of our lives because of global warming, WE ARE ALL GONNA DIE...

Because we know they are the gods of the weather and only they can CONTROL the weather, I'm mean, US PEOPLE

What liberties are you being asked to give up to curtail anthropogenic global warming?



lmao....costs never matter to the progressive bubble dwellars.


They do to the people living outside the bubble though >>>>


Scientists Gain New Insight Into Climate Change ? And What To Do About It | Washington's Blog
 
Antarctic sea ice extent for August 19 is 18.70 million square kilometers (7.22 million square miles), a record or near-record high level (August 19, 2010 was similarly high), led by unusually extensive ice in the Bellingshausen, Amundsen, and Ross seas, and in the western Indian Ocean sector. Climate conditions since June have been variable, but the most recent surge in ice growth has occurred during a period of unusually high pressure over the center of the continent, resulting in a slowing of the circumpolar winds, warm winter conditions for the central ice sheet areas (Vostok Station and Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station both had periods of spring-like -30s earlier in the month), and cold conditions in the Bellingshausen, allowing ice to grow extensively there.

Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag

This is from a Global Warming Ice data site. They push the shrinking north and even report the expanding South.

Nature has a way of taking care of itself. We've been hearing the sky is falling issues for quite a long time. Hell, in the early days they predicted an Ice age. Oooops no we are going to be under water..........um no we really didn't mean we'd be under water by now.

Hey look at this graph water rose 4 mm over a 12 month period here, but not there, don't look at that.....

Yada Yada Yada
 
FCT, 3.2 mm/yr IS 60% greater than 2.0 mm/yr. Here is the text that accompanied that graphic.

3. Global sea-level rise
Turning to sea level, the quasi linear trend measured by satellite altimeters since 1993 has continued essentially unchanged when extending the time series by five additional years. It continues to run near the upper limit of the projected uncertainty range given in the third and fourth IPCC assessment reports (figure 2). Here, the sea-level projections provided in figure 5 of the summary for policy makers of the third assessment and in table SPM.3 of the fourth assessment are shown. The satellite-based linear trend 1993–2011 is 3.2 ± 0.5 mm yr&#8722;1, which is 60% faster than the best IPCC estimate of 2.0 mm yr&#8722;1 for the same interval (blue lines). The two temporary sea-level minima in 2007/2008 and 2010/2011 may be linked to strong La Niña events (Llovel et al 2011). The tide gauges show much greater variability, most likely since their number is too limited to properly sample the global average (Rahmstorf et al 2012). For sea level the fourth IPCC report did not publish the model-based time series (green lines), but these were made available online in 2012 (CSIRO 2012). They do not differ significantly from the projections of the third IPCC report and thus continue to underestimate the observed upward trend.

***********************************************************************************************

The multiple blue and green lines show the lowest and highest of the multiple scenarios for which the IPCC produced projections. The actual data is 60% higher than the mean of those earlier projections. That is not lying, that is presenting data reasonably and accurately.

Sea levels are rising 60% faster than the IPCC's best estimate. And this despite atmospheric temperatures leveling. Hmm... maybe Balmaseda, Trenberth and Kallen could explain what's happening.

"Turning to sea level, the quasi linear trend measured by satellite altimeters since 1993 has continued essentially unchanged when extending the time series by five additional years." -- LOL

That's it?

A fraud organization trending since 1993?
 
((((YAWN))))

-Geaux

Unprecedented July Cold - Arctic Sees Shortest Summer On Record

Unprecedented July Cold – Arctic Sees Shortest Summer On Record
by ROBERT on AUGUST 2, 2013 ·
r

“Normally the high Arctic has about 90 days above freezing. This year there was less than half that,” says Steven Goddard website.

Yet, right now this is the sixth lowest ice minimum on record.

Northern Hemisphere Sea Ice Area

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.area.arctic.png

And the Northeast Passage is almost ice free once again;

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/NEWIMAGES/arctic.seaice.color.000.png
 
If that was true we would see many of the smaller Islands being swallowed up by the sea.
Not even one has disappeared.
 
FCT, 3.2 mm/yr IS 60% greater than 2.0 mm/yr. Here is the text that accompanied that graphic.

3. Global sea-level rise
Turning to sea level, the quasi linear trend measured by satellite altimeters since 1993 has continued essentially unchanged when extending the time series by five additional years. It continues to run near the upper limit of the projected uncertainty range given in the third and fourth IPCC assessment reports (figure 2). Here, the sea-level projections provided in figure 5 of the summary for policy makers of the third assessment and in table SPM.3 of the fourth assessment are shown. The satellite-based linear trend 1993–2011 is 3.2 ± 0.5 mm yr&#8722;1, which is 60% faster than the best IPCC estimate of 2.0 mm yr&#8722;1 for the same interval (blue lines). The two temporary sea-level minima in 2007/2008 and 2010/2011 may be linked to strong La Niña events (Llovel et al 2011). The tide gauges show much greater variability, most likely since their number is too limited to properly sample the global average (Rahmstorf et al 2012). For sea level the fourth IPCC report did not publish the model-based time series (green lines), but these were made available online in 2012 (CSIRO 2012). They do not differ significantly from the projections of the third IPCC report and thus continue to underestimate the observed upward trend.

***********************************************************************************************

The multiple blue and green lines show the lowest and highest of the multiple scenarios for which the IPCC produced projections. The actual data is 60% higher than the mean of those earlier projections. That is not lying, that is presenting data reasonably and accurately.

Sea levels are rising 60% faster than the IPCC's best estimate. And this despite atmospheric temperatures leveling. Hmm... maybe Balmaseda, Trenberth and Kallen could explain what's happening.

Complete and UTTER BullShit... The IPCC NEVER projected 2mm/yr in AR3 or AR4 as most likely or most probable..

By then --- they had 15 YEARS of satellite readings of 3.0 mm/yr trend lines.. As I quoted from the FAQ section of AR4...

https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/faq-5-1.html
Satellite observations available since the early 1990s provide more accurate sea level data with nearly global coverage. This decade-long satellite altimetry data set shows that since 1993, sea level has been rising at a rate of around 3 mm yr–1, significantly higher than the average during the previous half century. Coastal tide gauge measurements confirm this observation, and indicate that similar rates have occurred in some earlier decades.

You want us to suspend belief and say that IPCC was forecasting A REDUCTION is the presently observed rate.. Didn't happen.. IPCC NEVER forecasted LOWERING sea level rates of rise. It says SINCE 1993 -- the observed rates were HIGHER than 2.0mm/yr!!!!!

That rules out the majority of the relevent IPCC reports shown in that phoney ThinkProgress graph.

AND --- I have no f-ing idea what you are quoting from when you say "text of that graphic".. Are those the words of the lying Joe Romm??? Give a link please..

This is desparation with sweat coming from every pore.. And pretty soon, even the mental midgets will recognize the distortion of truth..
 
((((YAWN))))

-Geaux

Unprecedented July Cold - Arctic Sees Shortest Summer On Record

Unprecedented July Cold – Arctic Sees Shortest Summer On Record
by ROBERT on AUGUST 2, 2013 ·
r

“Normally the high Arctic has about 90 days above freezing. This year there was less than half that,” says Steven Goddard website.

Yet, right now this is the sixth lowest ice minimum on record.

Northern Hemisphere Sea Ice Area

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.area.arctic.png

And the Northeast Passage is almost ice free once again;

http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/NEWIMAGES/arctic.seaice.color.000.png

First its summer

Second its never constant, there are ancient maps showing the coastlines of Antarctica

Third, it has nothing whatsoever to do with a wisp of CO2
 
Second its never constant, there are ancient maps showing the coastlines of Antarctica

Wow. I thought some conspiracy theories were too wacky even for Frank, but I was clearly mistaken.

He's talking about the Piri Reis map, an 1513 Ottoman map where the cartographer, trying to reconcile a dozen contradictory maps, twisted the southeastern coast of South America around towards the east. This "Antarctic coast" doesn't look anything like the actual Antarctic coast, but does look like the southeastern coast of South America.
 

Forum List

Back
Top