Sea birds struggling from loss of Arctic ice

Walrus, polar bears, harp, hooded and ring seals aren't the only species negatively impacted by the shrinking Arctic ice.

Seabird colonies are struggling as winter sea ice levels hover near record lows
Walrus, polar bears, harp, hooded and ring seals aren't the only species negatively impacted by the shrinking Arctic ice....says who? Another bogus "study" that says one thing to a news paper and another in the deposition out of public view:
Survival and Breeding Response of a Sea-ice Obligate Seabird Following the Unprecedented Low Extent of Winter Ice in the Bering Sea
It appears the lack of sea ice.....although direct causative factors have yet to be determined.
Not knowing or the lack of evidence never stopped these "scientists" from spinning their yarn:
 
No proofs in the natural sciences. And your objection to the study's honesty about its conclusions fits well with the Dunning-Kruger effect.
 
By using the far greater span of time they were given by natural processes, to adapt.


Got any actual evidence to support your claim of far greater spans of time? The only reconstructions sufficient to provide that sort of resolution, are those from ice cores taken above the arctic circle, and they show temperature changes both greater and faster than anything we have seen...So upon what actual evidence are you making your claim?

Let me guess...you are just talking out of your ass.. Here is what the gold standard ice core reconstruction shows... and there are numerous points along that graph where the temperature change was both greater than anything we have seen, and faster...

greenland-gisp2-ice-core-last-10000-years.png
 
No proofs in the natural sciences. And your objection to the study's honesty about its conclusions fits well with the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Actually, the fact that you take such tripe seriously, when there is substantial evidence that what we are seeing now is not even close to the limits of natural variability over even the past 10,000 years is pretty convincing evidence that you are just stupid and easily fooled...and lack the critical thinking skills required to check anything they tell you against history...
 
Show us the CO2 levels in the 10,000 years prior to 1750 exceeding 400 ppm. Show us the temperatures at any other time in the last 10,000 years climbing at 2.0C / 100 years. And when you fail to find those, you can tell us what YOU have learned about checking what you are told against history.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top