Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'd say unbelievable....But it's not.
Why is it unbelievable? Who wants fruitcakes like Hoffman representing them?
Obviously, a lot more people in the district in question than want that Scazzwhatshernoze friutcake representing them.I'd say unbelievable....But it's not.
Why is it unbelievable? Who wants fruitcakes like Hoffman representing them?
Ame®icano;1671525 said:She was another trojan horse in Republican Party.
If elected, she would do the same as Arlen Specter.
I'd say unbelievable....But it's not.
Why is it unbelievable? Who wants fruitcakes like Hoffman representing them?
The people of the 23rd District.
You have zero room to chide anyone about ideological rigidity.Ame®icano;1671525 said:She was another trojan horse in Republican Party.
If elected, she would do the same as Arlen Specter.
So, in a district that has never had a Democrat representing it, you prefer to see a Democrat than a moderate Republican representing it? I do not mind that, but that kind of ideologic rigidity destroys political parties.
Actually, she's a Moderate and Hoffman is a Neocon. So of course she's going to support the Democrat. It has nothing to do with a third party.
With this backing, Owens will win now as I previously predicted.
Republican moderates are neocons.
You have zero room to chide anyone about ideological rigidity.Ame®icano;1671525 said:She was another trojan horse in Republican Party.
If elected, she would do the same as Arlen Specter.
So, in a district that has never had a Democrat representing it, you prefer to see a Democrat than a moderate Republican representing it? I do not mind that, but that kind of ideologic rigidity destroys political parties.
Starkey with all due respect in this day in time nothing can be counted on or out. I think Palin does have a role to play, a leading role I'm not sure for I for one isn't sold. I don't vote because of an R or D or I anymore. I'm just saying a hell of a lot of people are like myself.Palin is toast with the GOP powers. If Owens wins, she loses, forever.
We have not only Bush but yes Obama to thank for that. THey both got massive amounts of people totally fed up. How many, don't know but we will see in the polls Tuesday and 2010.
Terry, I appreciate your balance on this point. Let me amend my statement to "I think that if Owen wins, she loses, forever." My point is that the GOP chieftans are so powerful that I believe they will make deals with the Dems before they let the palinistas have a major role in national politics.
Actually, she's a Moderate and Hoffman is a Neocon. So of course she's going to support the Democrat. It has nothing to do with a third party.
With this backing, Owens will win now as I previously predicted.
Republican moderates are neocons.
A Republican moderate is not necessarily or even usually a neocon.
First you have to realize that New York has multiple political parties, the Conservative Party in New York is relatively strong for a third party.
Next you have to realize that the Republican nominee was chosen by a few Republicans who appointed her to run. She is extremely liberal; in fact, she is widely considered to be more liberal that Bill Owens who is the Democrat in the race
The National Republican Party and many Republicans supported Scozzafava in the race; however, Sarah Palin and several other conservatives have backed the Conservative Party candidate over the Republican. Note this is exactly what conservatives need to do.
...
After reading different columns from both sides of the Isle I think Hoffman will take it. I could be wrong, but this is boiling down to Liberal vs Conservative. And I believe the Conservative will take it. ( Of course I could be wrong, but i think not)
Republican moderates are neocons.
A Republican moderate is not necessarily or even usually a neocon.
A moderate would support big government, therefore a moderate is a neocon.
Ame®icano;1671525 said:She was another trojan horse in Republican Party.
If elected, she would do the same as Arlen Specter.
So, in a district that has never had a Democrat representing it, you prefer to see a Democrat than a moderate Republican representing it? I do not mind that, but that kind of ideologic rigidity destroys political parties.
A Republican moderate is not necessarily or even usually a neocon.
A moderate would support big government, therefore a moderate is a neocon.
You are sounding like Huggy. You might want to research Neocon a bit more.
Neoconservatism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Seriously,how could Newt Gingrich have endorsed this woman? She is now endorsing the Democrat for God's sake. Shame on Newt! I have lost all faith in Newt Gingrich after this debacle. I just put him on my list of phony Republicans who can never be trusted again. Is he still actually calling himself a "Conservative?" Yea he definitely joins frauds like Arlen Specter and Lindsey Graham on the list. Go get em Mr. Hoffman!
You have zero room to chide anyone about ideological rigidity.So, in a district that has never had a Democrat representing it, you prefer to see a Democrat than a moderate Republican representing it? I do not mind that, but that kind of ideologic rigidity destroys political parties.
My bunch won big time in the last election. And we are not casting out the Blue Dog Democrats.
