Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Just because there are multiple holes does not mean sealing one does no good.If the bill does not include a provision barring congressmen from contact with lobbyists who work for industries they own stock in then it is useless. I am certain most insider information comes in the form of bribes from lobbyists.
Just because there are multiple holes does not mean sealing one does no good.If the bill does not include a provision barring congressmen from contact with lobbyists who work for industries they own stock in then it is useless. I am certain most insider information comes in the form of bribes from lobbyists.
Oh well hell, since we can't get em all, let's not do even ONE right thing!
Good plan to sit on your ass and support nothing, while continuing to whine like a bitch nobody is doing anything.
I'm pretty-certain Scott Brown can't see into-the-Future.
(Better check your dates.)
How do you know the "he" wasn't President Obama?
Check the fucking date, idiot.
Scott Brown introduced the 'insider trading' bill in November 2011.
Obama gets his panties in a wad about insider trading January 2012.
So.... who got the idea from who?
Your Messiah got it from Brown.
Idiot.
How do you know the "he" wasn't President Obama?
Check the fucking date, idiot.
Scott Brown introduced the 'insider trading' bill in November 2011.
Obama gets his panties in a wad about insider trading January 2012.
So.... who got the idea from who?
Your Messiah got it from Brown.
Idiot.
Up to now no previous president, democrat OR republican has gotten their 'panties in a wad' over it. It's just been considered one of the perks.
I personally had no idea this was allowed. I was absolutely stunned.
I hope this passes.
But the mention of the issue opens eyes as the Statists in Congress are embroiled in Class Warfare...The O leading the charge, and sounded the siren call to arms as they benefit from thier corporist cronies...If the bill does not include a provision barring congressmen from contact with lobbyists who work for industries they own stock in then it is useless. I am certain most insider information comes in the form of bribes from lobbyists.
But the mention of the issue opens eyes as the Statists in Congress are embroiled in Class Warfare...The O leading the charge, and sounded the siren call to arms as they benefit from thier corporist cronies...If the bill does not include a provision barring congressmen from contact with lobbyists who work for industries they own stock in then it is useless. I am certain most insider information comes in the form of bribes from lobbyists.
Ever though outside the box? it's evident that you don't and are comfy in your self-imposed station...
Guess it was the ( R) subtitle that did it for him...But the mention of the issue opens eyes as the Statists in Congress are embroiled in Class Warfare...The O leading the charge, and sounded the siren call to arms as they benefit from thier corporist cronies...If the bill does not include a provision barring congressmen from contact with lobbyists who work for industries they own stock in then it is useless. I am certain most insider information comes in the form of bribes from lobbyists.
Ever though outside the box? it's evident that you don't and are comfy in your self-imposed station...
Actually, he is - as usual - jumping on a bandwagon.... started by Scott Brown (Republican).
Check the fucking date, idiot.
Scott Brown introduced the 'insider trading' bill in November 2011.
Obama gets his panties in a wad about insider trading January 2012.
So.... who got the idea from who?
Your Messiah got it from Brown.
Idiot.
Up to now no previous president, democrat OR republican has gotten their 'panties in a wad' over it. It's just been considered one of the perks.
Thank you, Captain Obvious.
I wrote to Bush about it years ago. Because I'm a nagging bitch with politicians. Also, I wrote to Obama about it when he became POTUS.
Go Senator Brown! This bill should have no problem passing and I think both sides of the aisle can support it.
If you don't support the bill lets discuss why.
Senate to hear Scott Brown insider trading bill - BostonHerald.com
A day after U.S. Sen. Scott Brown filed a bill to prohibit insider trading in Congress, a key Senate committee has agreed to hold a public hearing on the measure.
The Massachusetts Republican’s bill would bar members or employees of Congress and the executive branch from using nonpublic information obtained through their public service for the purpose of investing for personal financial gain.
Sen. Joe Lieberman, chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs announced Wednesday that the committee would hold a hearing to examine how insider trading laws apply to Congress.
Lieberman, an independent from Connecticut, said the hearing was also sparked by a report by CBS’ "60 Minutes" and is intended to clarify the laws and rules that govern members of Congress who may profit from non-public information
Go Senator Brown! This bill should have no problem passing and I think both sides of the aisle can support it.
If you don't support the bill lets discuss why.
Senate to hear Scott Brown insider trading bill - BostonHerald.com
A day after U.S. Sen. Scott Brown filed a bill to prohibit insider trading in Congress, a key Senate committee has agreed to hold a public hearing on the measure.
The Massachusetts Republican’s bill would bar members or employees of Congress and the executive branch from using nonpublic information obtained through their public service for the purpose of investing for personal financial gain.
Sen. Joe Lieberman, chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs announced Wednesday that the committee would hold a hearing to examine how insider trading laws apply to Congress.
Lieberman, an independent from Connecticut, said the hearing was also sparked by a report by CBS’ "60 Minutes" and is intended to clarify the laws and rules that govern members of Congress who may profit from non-public information
And NANCY PELOSI after getting outed for insider trading is on board for passing this too
Elected officials should have to live under the same laws they impose on us. Insider trading is something we would get thrown in jail for--yet our elected officials have been getting RICH off of it.
The law was already there--some of them just ignored it--& frankly I am not certain why they were not CHARGED (both sides of isle doing this) with insider trading. The CORRUPTION at the Federal government is flat unbelievable--& we should not tolerate it any longer--and that goes for Croni Capitalism too. These people should be considered
(UNFIT) to hold elected office.
How do you know the "he" wasn't President Obama?
Because you made the post?
If you ever need a clue you are completely wrong about something, Shaman actually scoring a point off of you is a good indication.
Ahhh, but I didn't "name names". You just assumed.
Up to now no previous president, democrat OR republican has gotten their 'panties in a wad' over it. It's just been considered one of the perks.
Thank you, Captain Obvious.
I wrote to Bush about it years ago. Because I'm a nagging bitch with politicians. Also, I wrote to Obama about it when he became POTUS.
Well, maybe you should have tried to improve your skills and make your 'writing' more effective!
Brown has turned out to be much more moderate and reasonable than people assumed.
How do you know the "he" wasn't President Obama?
Check the fucking date, idiot.
Scott Brown introduced the 'insider trading' bill in November 2011.
Obama gets his panties in a wad about insider trading January 2012.
So.... who got the idea from who?
Your Messiah got it from Brown.
Idiot.
Up to now no previous president, democrat OR republican has gotten their 'panties in a wad' over it. It's just been considered one of the perks.
check the fucking date, idiot.
Scott brown introduced the 'insider trading' bill in november 2011.
Obama gets his panties in a wad about insider trading january 2012.
So.... Who got the idea from who?
Your messiah got it from brown.
Idiot.
up to now no previous president, democrat or republican has gotten their 'panties in a wad' over it. It's just been considered one of the perks.
i don't see why insider trading for anyone is illegal in the first place, but if it is, it should be illegal for everyone.
Check the fucking date, idiot.
Scott Brown introduced the 'insider trading' bill in November 2011.
Obama gets his panties in a wad about insider trading January 2012.
So.... who got the idea from who?
Your Messiah got it from Brown.
Idiot.
Up to now no previous president, democrat OR republican has gotten their 'panties in a wad' over it. It's just been considered one of the perks.
I don't see why insider trading for anyone is illegal in the first place, but if it is, it should be illegal for everyone.
But WE are Congress...WE are your Gubmint...our shit doesn't stink...Check the fucking date, idiot.
Scott Brown introduced the 'insider trading' bill in November 2011.
Obama gets his panties in a wad about insider trading January 2012.
So.... who got the idea from who?
Your Messiah got it from Brown.
Idiot.
Up to now no previous president, democrat OR republican has gotten their 'panties in a wad' over it. It's just been considered one of the perks.
I don't see why insider trading for anyone is illegal in the first place, but if it is, it should be illegal for everyone.
