SCIENTISTS!!! Earth been COOLING for 2,000 years NOT warming!

[healthmyths]

• Tree ring study gives first accurate climate reading back to 138BC
• World has been slowly cooling for 2,000 years
• World was warmer in Roman and Medieval times than it is now
• Study of semi-fossilised trees in Finland

'Our results suggest that the large-scale climate reconstruction shown by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) likely underestimate this long-term cooling trend over the past few millennia.’

Tree-ring study proves that climate was WARMER in Roman and Medieval times than it is in the modern industrial age | Mail Online

 

[bobgnote]

No SHIT? Do you ever go to environment threads, or is this science shit brand new, for you?

Take a look at the recent trend, of global temperature, since 1880:

Let's go over some more, of this cool scientific shit! It turns out, solar intensity is less, but temperature is going UP. What do you suppose could do THAT?

Why, then! CO2 has been going UP, since humans have been clearing forests and burning fossil fuels. But then, humans got CHAINSAWS and CARS, so even though the Earth got less warmth, from the sun, the atmosphere retains more IR radiation, so we are heating the fuck UP:

Solar intensity has been relatively low, for the last several decades, our current cycle is cool, but temperature is going UP, and the climate is fucking up, bigtime. I wonder what the fuck you are trying to prove, since the next time that sun warms up, we are going right UP, past:

1. the Medieval Warming Period
2. the Roman Warming Period
3. the Minoan Warming Period
4. the Holocene Maximum
5. the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum

. . . toward the Permian-Triassic Extinction, which our Mass Extinction Event 6 will challenge, for top killer, of ALL GEOLOGIC TIME!! What are you trying to prove, HM?

 

[Truthmatters]

they only like science when it says somthing they think will back their completely bullshit party platform.

 

[bobgnote]

Meanwhile, the Holocene Thermal Maximum and the several ancient warming periods were ALL warmer, than our modern warming period.

Not to worry! Modern human activity includes fucktards and greedy people, with a carbon footprint. This will ensure our superiority, at GLOBAL WARMING. We will blast right past all those previous pathetic temperature records, as soon as the sun warms up, WHICH IT ALWAYS DOES:

What's your motive, for posting irrelevant shit, about how we aren't as warm as any several Holocene Maximum periods, NOT YET? We will be warmer, than ALL OF THE ABOVE, all the way back to records, which were set millions of years ago, DD.

 

[healthmyths]

No SHIT? Do you ever go to environment threads, or is this science shit brand new, for you?

Take a look at the recent trend, of global temperature, since 1880:

Let's go over some more, of this cool scientific shit! It turns out, solar intensity is less, but temperature is going UP. What do you suppose could do THAT?

Why, then! CO2 has been going UP, since humans have been clearing forests and burning fossil fuels. But then, humans got CHAINSAWS and CARS, so even though the Earth got less warmth, from the sun, the atmosphere retains more IR radiation, so we are heating the fuck UP:

Solar intensity has been relatively low, for the last several decades, our current cycle is cool, but temperature is going UP, and the climate is fucking up, bigtime. I wonder what the fuck you are trying to prove, since the next time that sun warms up, we are going right UP, past:

1. the Medieval Warming Period
2. the Roman Warming Period
3. the Minoan Warming Period
4. the Holocene Maximum
5. the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum

. . . toward the Permian-Triassic Extinction, which our Mass Extinction Event 6 will challenge, for top killer, of ALL GEOLOGIC TIME!! What are you trying to prove, HM?

"Of course you realize all your above temperature readings come from 87.5% of the world's land mass...
The reason I ask is because one of the criticism's of global warming data was
the exclusion over 50 years of data from 12.5% of the world's land mass.

Those readings were for Siberia and when added to the other readings would have
diminished the premise that the earth's temperature was rising.

"The number of [Siberian ]stations increased from 8 in 1901 to 23 in 1951 and
then decreased to 12 from 1989 to present Only four stations,
those at Irkutsk, Bratsk, Chita and Kirensk, cover the entire 20th century.

IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large
populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect
more frequently than the correct data of remote stations…

The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature data in order
to assess the scale of such exaggeration.
Climategatekeeping: Siberia « Climate Audit

Please dumb f...k explain how YOUR temperature readings ARE NOT higher because Siberian temperatures representing 12.5% of the WORLD's land mass aren't included?

 

[Douger]

OMG ! It's a Siberian conspiracy !
Pooty-Poot will fix it !
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXMsGw_NC6M&feature=related]Putin fights wildfires with water bomber - YouTube[/ame]

 

[bobgnote]

HEY! DD! When the local solar maximum heads up, to where it was, 1998-2000, the Earth will heat the hell UP, no matter what political shit happens.

Political shit needed to re-green deserts and polluted areas, ALL FUCKING READY, but since that didn't happen, when the solar cycle goes up, we heat UP, and even if we stopped all emissions, the sea would still go up, several feet:

 

[healthmyths]

HEY! DD! When the local solar maximum heads up, to where it was, 1998-2000, the Earth will heat the hell UP, no matter what political shit happens.

Political shit needed to re-green deserts and polluted areas, ALL FUCKING READY, but since that didn't happen, when the solar cycle goes up, we heat UP, and even if we stopped all emissions, the sea would still go up, several feet:

Seas will go up "several feet"??
We've been warned by your high priest AlGore the melting glaciers will raise the sea levels so his home he recently bought will be under water!

So with 5,773,000,000,000,000,000 (5.7 quintillion gallons in all the Ice caps,Glaciers),..
and it all melted it would add to all the oceans seas, bays with 321 quintillion gallons that would be equal to adding 1.74% to the oceans.

That is equal to adding to a 648,000 gallon Olympic sized pool at 9 feet 10 inches
2 inches!

In Florida the commonly used example, the gulf of Mexico is a depth of less then
100 feet for over 100 miles from shore. 1.74% increase of water due to melting of all glaciers would add 1.7 feet. NOT perceivable nor affecting life much less covering the state!

The total water supply of the world is 326 million cubic miles
(a cubic mile is an imaginary cube (a square box) measuring one mile on each side).
A cubic mile of water equals more than one trillion gallons.
Oceans, Seas, & Bays 321,000,000 1,338,000,000 -- 96.5
Ice caps, Glaciers, & Permanent Snow 5,773,000 24,064,000 68.7 1.74
Ground water 5,614,000 23,400,000 -- 1.7
Fresh 2,526,000 10,530,000 30.1 0.76
Saline 3,088,000 12,870,000 -- 0.94
Soil Moisture 3,959 16,500 0.05 0.001
Ground Ice & Permafrost 71,970 300,000 0.86 0.022
Lakes 42,320 176,400 -- 0.013
Fresh 21,830 91,000 0.26 0.007
Saline 20,490 85,400 -- 0.006
Atmosphere 3,095 12,900 0.04 0.001
Swamp Water 2,752 11,470 0.03 0.0008
Rivers 509 2,120 0.006 0.0002
Biological Water 269 1,120 0.003 0.0001

 

[edthecynic]

• Tree ring study gives first accurate climate reading back to 138BC
• World has been slowly cooling for 2,000 years
• World was warmer in Roman and Medieval times than it is now
• Study of semi-fossilised trees in Finland

'Our results suggest that the large-scale climate reconstruction shown by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) likely underestimate this long-term cooling trend over the past few millennia.’

Tree-ring study proves that climate was WARMER in Roman and Medieval times than it is in the modern industrial age | Mail Online

No SHIT? Do you ever go to environment threads, or is this science shit brand new, for you?

Take a look at the recent trend, of global temperature, since 1880:

Let's go over some more, of this cool scientific shit! It turns out, solar intensity is less, but temperature is going UP. What do you suppose could do THAT?

Why, then! CO2 has been going UP, since humans have been clearing forests and burning fossil fuels. But then, humans got CHAINSAWS and CARS, so even though the Earth got less warmth, from the sun, the atmosphere retains more IR radiation, so we are heating the fuck UP:

Solar intensity has been relatively low, for the last several decades, our current cycle is cool, but temperature is going UP, and the climate is fucking up, bigtime. I wonder what the fuck you are trying to prove, since the next time that sun warms up, we are going right UP, past:

1. the Medieval Warming Period
2. the Roman Warming Period
3. the Minoan Warming Period
4. the Holocene Maximum
5. the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum

. . . toward the Permian-Triassic Extinction, which our Mass Extinction Event 6 will challenge, for top killer, of ALL GEOLOGIC TIME!! What are you trying to prove, HM?

"Of course you realize all your above temperature readings come from 87.5% of the world's land mass...
The reason I ask is because one of the criticism's of global warming data was
the exclusion over 50 years of data from 12.5% of the world's land mass.

Those readings were for Siberia and when added to the other readings would have
diminished the premise that the earth's temperature was rising.

"The number of [Siberian ]stations increased from 8 in 1901 to 23 in 1951 and
then decreased to 12 from 1989 to present Only four stations,
those at Irkutsk, Bratsk, Chita and Kirensk, cover the entire 20th century.

IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large
populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect
more frequently than the correct data of remote stations…

The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature data in order
to assess the scale of such exaggeration.
Climategatekeeping: Siberia « Climate Audit

Please dumb f...k explain how YOUR temperature readings ARE NOT higher because Siberian temperatures representing 12.5% of the WORLD's land mass aren't included?

Please dumb fuck, you tell us what % of the WORLD'S land mass is Finland?

 

[BlindBoo]

And somehow you this debunks the currently accepted scientific theory that the current increase in global temprature is being cause by man's burning fossel fuels?

Might the scientists rethink it in terms of it's worse than we thought? Bejesus we've reversed a 2000 year long trend of cooling.......

 

[healthmyths]

• Tree ring study gives first accurate climate reading back to 138BC
• World has been slowly cooling for 2,000 years
• World was warmer in Roman and Medieval times than it is now
• Study of semi-fossilised trees in Finland

'Our results suggest that the large-scale climate reconstruction shown by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) likely underestimate this long-term cooling trend over the past few millennia.’

Tree-ring study proves that climate was WARMER in Roman and Medieval times than it is in the modern industrial age | Mail Online

No SHIT? Do you ever go to environment threads, or is this science shit brand new, for you?

Take a look at the recent trend, of global temperature, since 1880:

Let's go over some more, of this cool scientific shit! It turns out, solar intensity is less, but temperature is going UP. What do you suppose could do THAT?

Why, then! CO2 has been going UP, since humans have been clearing forests and burning fossil fuels. But then, humans got CHAINSAWS and CARS, so even though the Earth got less warmth, from the sun, the atmosphere retains more IR radiation, so we are heating the fuck UP:

Solar intensity has been relatively low, for the last several decades, our current cycle is cool, but temperature is going UP, and the climate is fucking up, bigtime. I wonder what the fuck you are trying to prove, since the next time that sun warms up, we are going right UP, past:

1. the Medieval Warming Period
2. the Roman Warming Period
3. the Minoan Warming Period
4. the Holocene Maximum
5. the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum

. . . toward the Permian-Triassic Extinction, which our Mass Extinction Event 6 will challenge, for top killer, of ALL GEOLOGIC TIME!! What are you trying to prove, HM?

"Of course you realize all your above temperature readings come from 87.5% of the world's land mass...
The reason I ask is because one of the criticism's of global warming data was
the exclusion over 50 years of data from 12.5% of the world's land mass.

Those readings were for Siberia and when added to the other readings would have
diminished the premise that the earth's temperature was rising.

"The number of [Siberian ]stations increased from 8 in 1901 to 23 in 1951 and
then decreased to 12 from 1989 to present Only four stations,
those at Irkutsk, Bratsk, Chita and Kirensk, cover the entire 20th century.

IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large
populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect
more frequently than the correct data of remote stations…

The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature data in order
to assess the scale of such exaggeration.
Climategatekeeping: Siberia « Climate Audit

Please dumb f...k explain how YOUR temperature readings ARE NOT higher because Siberian temperatures representing 12.5% of the WORLD's land mass aren't included?

Please dumb fuck, you tell us what % of the WORLD'S land mass is Finland?

YOU ARE RIGHT!!!!!!
See which then should we believe?
Tree rings in Finland or 60 years of not including 12.5% of the WORLD's land mass in temperature readings?

So OK I'll give up the tree rings but will you agree temperature readings that left out 12.5% of the land mass biases the readings over 60 years?

 

[Moonglow]

• Tree ring study gives first accurate climate reading back to 138BC
• World has been slowly cooling for 2,000 years
• World was warmer in Roman and Medieval times than it is now
• Study of semi-fossilised trees in Finland

'Our results suggest that the large-scale climate reconstruction shown by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) likely underestimate this long-term cooling trend over the past few millennia.’

Tree-ring study proves that climate was WARMER in Roman and Medieval times than it is in the modern industrial age | Mail Online

and the sun is getting hotter. why inna billion years we may have to move.

 

[Liability]

The AGW Faithers will NOT be deterred by mere facts.

 

[Old Rocks]

HEY! DD! When the local solar maximum heads up, to where it was, 1998-2000, the Earth will heat the hell UP, no matter what political shit happens.

Political shit needed to re-green deserts and polluted areas, ALL FUCKING READY, but since that didn't happen, when the solar cycle goes up, we heat UP, and even if we stopped all emissions, the sea would still go up, several feet:

Seas will go up "several feet"??
We've been warned by your high priest AlGore the melting glaciers will raise the sea levels so his home he recently bought will be under water!

So with 5,773,000,000,000,000,000 (5.7 quintillion gallons in all the Ice caps,Glaciers),..
and it all melted it would add to all the oceans seas, bays with 321 quintillion gallons that would be equal to adding 1.74% to the oceans.

That is equal to adding to a 648,000 gallon Olympic sized pool at 9 feet 10 inches
2 inches!

In Florida the commonly used example, the gulf of Mexico is a depth of less then
100 feet for over 100 miles from shore. 1.74% increase of water due to melting of all glaciers would add 1.7 feet. NOT perceivable nor affecting life much less covering the state!

The total water supply of the world is 326 million cubic miles
(a cubic mile is an imaginary cube (a square box) measuring one mile on each side).
A cubic mile of water equals more than one trillion gallons.
Oceans, Seas, & Bays 321,000,000 1,338,000,000 -- 96.5
Ice caps, Glaciers, & Permanent Snow 5,773,000 24,064,000 68.7 1.74
Ground water 5,614,000 23,400,000 -- 1.7
Fresh 2,526,000 10,530,000 30.1 0.76
Saline 3,088,000 12,870,000 -- 0.94
Soil Moisture 3,959 16,500 0.05 0.001
Ground Ice & Permafrost 71,970 300,000 0.86 0.022
Lakes 42,320 176,400 -- 0.013
Fresh 21,830 91,000 0.26 0.007
Saline 20,490 85,400 -- 0.006
Atmosphere 3,095 12,900 0.04 0.001
Swamp Water 2,752 11,470 0.03 0.0008
Rivers 509 2,120 0.006 0.0002
Biological Water 269 1,120 0.003 0.0001

Seems like I have answered this dumb fuck post before. The average depth of the ocean is 14,000 ft.

How deep is the ocean?

So adding 1.7% more water to that would be around 250 ft to the sea level. Significant indeed. That would put about 170 feet of salt water over the roof of my house in Portland Oregon. There would not be much of Florida left.

Really be too much to expect of you dumb fuck 'Conservatives' to do a bit of research before you make asses of yourself.

 

[Old Rocks]

• Tree ring study gives first accurate climate reading back to 138BC
• World has been slowly cooling for 2,000 years
• World was warmer in Roman and Medieval times than it is now
• Study of semi-fossilised trees in Finland

'Our results suggest that the large-scale climate reconstruction shown by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) likely underestimate this long-term cooling trend over the past few millennia.’

Tree-ring study proves that climate was WARMER in Roman and Medieval times than it is in the modern industrial age | Mail Online

"Of course you realize all your above temperature readings come from 87.5% of the world's land mass...
The reason I ask is because one of the criticism's of global warming data was
the exclusion over 50 years of data from 12.5% of the world's land mass.

Those readings were for Siberia and when added to the other readings would have
diminished the premise that the earth's temperature was rising.

"The number of [Siberian ]stations increased from 8 in 1901 to 23 in 1951 and
then decreased to 12 from 1989 to present Only four stations,
those at Irkutsk, Bratsk, Chita and Kirensk, cover the entire 20th century.

IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large
populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect
more frequently than the correct data of remote stations…

The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature data in order
to assess the scale of such exaggeration.
Climategatekeeping: Siberia « Climate Audit

Please dumb f...k explain how YOUR temperature readings ARE NOT higher because Siberian temperatures representing 12.5% of the WORLD's land mass aren't included?

Please dumb fuck, you tell us what % of the WORLD'S land mass is Finland?

YOU ARE RIGHT!!!!!!
See which then should we believe?
Tree rings in Finland or 60 years of not including 12.5% of the WORLD's land mass in temperature readings?

So OK I'll give up the tree rings but will you agree temperature readings that left out 12.5% of the land mass biases the readings over 60 years?

The last 33 years of global warming. From the satellite record, land and oceans.

UAH Global Temperature Update for June, 2012: +0.37 deg. C « Roy Spencer, Ph. D.

 

[edthecynic]

• Tree ring study gives first accurate climate reading back to 138BC
• World has been slowly cooling for 2,000 years
• World was warmer in Roman and Medieval times than it is now
• Study of semi-fossilised trees in Finland

'Our results suggest that the large-scale climate reconstruction shown by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) likely underestimate this long-term cooling trend over the past few millennia.’

Tree-ring study proves that climate was WARMER in Roman and Medieval times than it is in the modern industrial age | Mail Online

"Of course you realize all your above temperature readings come from 87.5% of the world's land mass...
The reason I ask is because one of the criticism's of global warming data was
the exclusion over 50 years of data from 12.5% of the world's land mass.

Those readings were for Siberia and when added to the other readings would have
diminished the premise that the earth's temperature was rising.

"The number of [Siberian ]stations increased from 8 in 1901 to 23 in 1951 and
then decreased to 12 from 1989 to present Only four stations,
those at Irkutsk, Bratsk, Chita and Kirensk, cover the entire 20th century.

IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large
populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect
more frequently than the correct data of remote stations…

The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature data in order
to assess the scale of such exaggeration.
Climategatekeeping: Siberia « Climate Audit

Please dumb f...k explain how YOUR temperature readings ARE NOT higher because Siberian temperatures representing 12.5% of the WORLD's land mass aren't included?

Please dumb fuck, you tell us what % of the WORLD'S land mass is Finland?

YOU ARE RIGHT!!!!!!
See which then should we believe?
Tree rings in Finland or 60 years of not including 12.5% of the WORLD's land mass in temperature readings?

So OK I'll give up the tree rings but will you agree temperature readings that left out 12.5% of the land mass biases the readings over 60 years?

Let me see, tree ring proxy data from Finland's .074% of the world's land mass or the direct instrument measurement readings of 87.5% of the world's land mass, which might be more accurate???? That's a tough one. (sarcasm)

Satellites read the whole globe and seem to agree with the ground station direct instrument readings, so I'l go with the satellites.

 

[BlindBoo]

The AGW Faithers will NOT be deterred by mere facts.

Orbital forcing of tree-ring data : Nature Climate Change : Nature Publishing Group

 

[Old Rocks]

The AGW Faithers will NOT be deterred by mere facts.

Every single Scientific Society, every single National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world states that AGW is a fact, and that it represents a clear and present danger. Any yet you deny that it exists.

On what basis? Faith? Seems like you are projecting your own ignorance and cupidity.

 

[Avatar4321]

Didn't get the memo? All evidence of the globe getting cooler is evidence for global warming.

It doesnt matter whether the tempature increases or decreases, somehow that proves the globe is warming because of fossil fuel use.

 

[Avatar4321]

The AGW Faithers will NOT be deterred by mere facts.

Every single Scientific Society, every single National Academy of Science, and every major University in the world states that AGW is a fact, and that it represents a clear and present danger. Any yet you deny that it exists.

On what basis? Faith? Seems like you are projecting your own ignorance and cupidity.

Every scientific society, National Academy of science, and major university in the world once stated that it was scientific fact that the earth was flat.

The data didnt support them. It doesnt support you.