Science Proves the Bible Again

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by Death Angel, Jan 25, 2019.

  1. Hollie
    Offline

    Hollie Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    30,237
    Thanks Received:
    2,691
    Trophy Points:
    1,115
    Ratings:
    +9,703
    Humans didn’t “ come from monkeys”. That’s a typically ignorant canard you cut and paste from the fundie cranks at creation.com.

    You should understand that when you don’t have the first clue as to the subject matter you rail against, such ignorant statements make the rest of your commentary just useless noise.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. Hollie
    Offline

    Hollie Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    30,237
    Thanks Received:
    2,691
    Trophy Points:
    1,115
    Ratings:
    +9,703
    There is no reason for anyone to blindly accept your claims to supernatural creation when supernaturalism is entirely absent in the natural world.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. Hollie
    Offline

    Hollie Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    30,237
    Thanks Received:
    2,691
    Trophy Points:
    1,115
    Ratings:
    +9,703
    The hyper-religious are not finding evidence of anything.

    You are free to counter that statement by presenting “findings” made by any of the fundamentalist ministries which they have presented for peer review.

    It should be a simple matter to provide a link to the journal Nature, for example, where creation.com has submitted a detailed account of their “findings” that support magic as the cause of existence.

    How about an article that examines a 600 year old Noah.

    How about a gene study that identifies the affects of Noah and his immediate family being left to repopulate the world. Would the charlatans at creation.com like to opine on your gods allowance for incestuous and familial relations?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  4. Fort Fun Indiana
    Online

    Fort Fun Indiana Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2017
    Messages:
    22,191
    Thanks Received:
    1,519
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +10,441
    Says no qualified scientist on the planet. Bond, you are embarrassing yourself, you colossal fraud. I have told you many times to stop this idiotic dog and pony show, and just admit that your beliefs are purely faith based. Instead, you lie and cheat and plagiarize, while knowing less than nothing factual about this material. You say things that would make a 6th grader cringe, and that would make a 10th grader laugh your dumb ass out of the room.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. alang1216
    Offline

    alang1216 Pragmatist

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2014
    Messages:
    5,173
    Thanks Received:
    450
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings:
    +1,700
    You are ignorant, at least of the ToE since the ToE says that gorillas did NOT beget chimps, only that they share a COMMON ANCESTOR. And that is why evo researchers would never look for one.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. bripat9643
    Online

    bripat9643 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    108,381
    Thanks Received:
    13,688
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Ratings:
    +60,306
    We don't assume anything. We know it.

    The only thing a lack of fossils proves is that we have a lack of fossils. The idea that we should have a complete fossil record is idiotic. The lack of one sure as hell doesn't prove the Bible theory of creation.

    The rest of your post is unintelligible gibberish.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. bripat9643
    Online

    bripat9643 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    108,381
    Thanks Received:
    13,688
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Ratings:
    +60,306
    When you quote the Bible, you aren't arguing anything. You're retreating into mysticism. You have abandoned the playing field.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. james bond
    Offline

    james bond Silver Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2015
    Messages:
    3,095
    Thanks Received:
    138
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Ratings:
    +1,071
    You are so wrong. These are common ancestors. Look it up. ToE is the dumb theory that you believe in. I'm not going to teach you ToE, stupie.
     
  9. james bond
    Offline

    james bond Silver Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2015
    Messages:
    3,095
    Thanks Received:
    138
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Ratings:
    +1,071
    If you know it, then why can't you answer my questions? It shows you do not know.

    The fossils are also found in layers. The names of these layers do not have anything to do with time. They are not chronological. They name locations.

    You do not even have a valid argument. So far, I presented the evidence of no transitional fossils, and you agreed. Thus, it is likely that Lucy and Ardi were not transitional. They were chimps or apes. It is hilarious that you are the one who brought up fossil evidence and I turned the tables on you and demonstrated no transitional fossils and you agreed. Thus, evolution did not happen. To the contrary, the fossil evidence that YOU brought up, just completed my argument and you agreed.
     
  10. james bond
    Offline

    james bond Silver Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2015
    Messages:
    3,095
    Thanks Received:
    138
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Ratings:
    +1,071
    So you deny science states the BB created the universe? Can you provide some links where you get this? I want to see where you get your BELIEFS.

    Your first sentence is wrong. Science is about best theories and thus it is all about beliefs. It is about the search for the truth, but it's not final unless it is observable, testable and falsifiable or becomes a scientific fact. Even then scientists do not believe it so. We have crazy people who believe that laws of physics or laws of thermodynamics did not apply at some points in time without any evidence whatsoever. They believe in multiverses without one shred of evidence. These are supposedly the top secular/atheist scientists.

    This is not science, but faith-based beliefs.
     

Share This Page