Schumer agrees to fund the wall

Interesting, we will see.

It could be he just doesn't want to hand the Democrats a million+ votes before the mid terms. He might figure, the longer it goes, the better the economy, maybe he can get a super majority. He also might view DACA as a vote killer to his base.
 
Last edited:

Actually, no he didn't.

Chuck Schumer said he agreed to fund border wall to prevent shutdown — but here’s the truth

What did Schumer claim?

During his speech, Schumer detailed the meeting he had with Trump over cheeseburgers at the White House earlier in the day. Schumer said it was a “lengthy and substantive” discussion about keeping the government open.

That’s when the top Senate Democrat explained what concessions he allegedly made during the meeting, including, he explained, granting Trump his border wall.

“In exchange for strong DACA protections, I reluctantly put the border wall on the table for discussion,” Schumer claimed on the Senate floor. “Even that was not enough to entice the president to finish the deal.”

But the Times’ extensive report on the effort to strike a deal told a different story.

What did the report say?

According to the Times, Schumer only agreed to discuss the “possibility” of the wall if Trump conceded on DACA and met his other demands first.
Schumer is a douchebag.
 
IT SHOULDNT MAKE TWO SHITS !!

as much as that son of a bitch has yammered and bragged about the BIG BEAUTIFUL 2000 MILE WALL he shouldnt even flinch if the dems offer to fund it ..

now he'll say it was the dems fault and his pissant drones will lick his ass, agree, and thank him.


But Trump’s chief of staff, John Kelly, called Schumer later to say the Dreamers deal was too liberal. The deal was off.

LIAR ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ??? YES OR NO.
 
Last edited:

Actually, no he didn't.

Chuck Schumer said he agreed to fund border wall to prevent shutdown — but here’s the truth

What did Schumer claim?

During his speech, Schumer detailed the meeting he had with Trump over cheeseburgers at the White House earlier in the day. Schumer said it was a “lengthy and substantive” discussion about keeping the government open.

That’s when the top Senate Democrat explained what concessions he allegedly made during the meeting, including, he explained, granting Trump his border wall.

“In exchange for strong DACA protections, I reluctantly put the border wall on the table for discussion,” Schumer claimed on the Senate floor. “Even that was not enough to entice the president to finish the deal.”

But the Times’ extensive report on the effort to strike a deal told a different story.

What did the report say?

According to the Times, Schumer only agreed to discuss the “possibility” of the wall if Trump conceded on DACA and met his other demands first.
Schumer is a douchebag.

like Ive been telling you since day one ... AINT GONNA BE NO WALL

write that down colonbreath
 
Big difference between possibility and also funding "after DACA". That's just bs.

The Democrats have been drawn far left, to the point they can't even be trusted to stand behind American citizens rights over illegal immigrants, how could they be trusted to keep a promise on wall funding AFTER the fact?
 
Last edited:
IT SHOULDNT MAKE TWO SHITS !!

as much as that son of a bitch has yammered and bragged about the BIG BEAUTIFUL 2000 MILE WALL he shouldnt even flinch if the dems offer to fund it ..

now he'll say it was the dems fault and his pissant drones will lick his ass, agree, and thank him.


But Trump’s chief of staff, John Kelly, called Schumer later to say the Dreamers deal was too liberal. The deal was off.

LIAR ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ??? YES OR NO.


Why are we funding a wall Mexico is paying for. Something not right with this.
 
IT SHOULDNT MAKE TWO SHITS !!

as much as that son of a bitch has yammered and bragged about the BIG BEAUTIFUL 2000 MILE WALL he shouldnt even flinch if the dems offer to fund it ..

now he'll say it was the dems fault and his pissant drones will lick his ass, agree, and thank him.


But Trump’s chief of staff, John Kelly, called Schumer later to say the Dreamers deal was too liberal. The deal was off.

LIAR ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ??? YES OR NO.
Just shoot the invaders and drug mules when they try to cross.
 
WHERE IS THAT WALL?

nope, no wall over here
no wall over there either


maybe its under this table ...


:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:
 
Breaking;

if all of you Trumpbots havent figured out by now that Goldilocks will do an about face and fuck you like one of his porn star sluts faster than you can say obama, youre F'n IDIOTS.

for his administration to even talk about not building a wall should give you a clue THAT YOURE FUCKED
 
Breaking;

if all of you Trumpbots havent figured out by now that Goldilocks will do an about face and fuck you like one of his porn star sluts faster than you can say obama, youre F'n IDIOTS.

for his administration to even talk about not building a wall should give you a clue THAT YOURE FUCKED



 





"Wall Street Journal White House reporter Eli Stokols has a possible theory about why"



A reporter has a theory?


Well, I'm pleased he is not just reporting it as a fact, based on that.


Beyond that, FUCK THE MEDIA.

Trump willing to support legal status for 'Dreamers' in exchange for border wall: White House sources

CHANGED HIS MIND ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ that or the shutdown isnt really going on


LMAO
 





"Wall Street Journal White House reporter Eli Stokols has a possible theory about why"



A reporter has a theory?


Well, I'm pleased he is not just reporting it as a fact, based on that.


Beyond that, FUCK THE MEDIA.

Trump willing to support legal status for 'Dreamers' in exchange for border wall: White House sources

CHANGED HIS MIND ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ that or the shutdown isnt really going on


LMAO


Yes, that was discussed days ago. Chain immigration is a big deal. Getting rid of that will be a great victory for America.


Taking the hit on DACA is worth it, imo.


My point about the reporters theory remains.

Also, FUCK THE MEDIA.
 





"Wall Street Journal White House reporter Eli Stokols has a possible theory about why"



A reporter has a theory?


Well, I'm pleased he is not just reporting it as a fact, based on that.


Beyond that, FUCK THE MEDIA.

Trump willing to support legal status for 'Dreamers' in exchange for border wall: White House sources

CHANGED HIS MIND ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ that or the shutdown isnt really going on


LMAO


Yes, that was discussed days ago. Chain immigration is a big deal. Getting rid of that will be a great victory for America.


Taking the hit on DACA is worth it, imo.


My point about the reporters theory remains.

Also, FUCK THE MEDIA.

the point is, there wont be a wall, and like anyone else that would rather kiss trumps fat old ass than face that fact the hand writing on on the WALL

pun intended
 
Last edited:





"Wall Street Journal White House reporter Eli Stokols has a possible theory about why"



A reporter has a theory?


Well, I'm pleased he is not just reporting it as a fact, based on that.


Beyond that, FUCK THE MEDIA.

Trump willing to support legal status for 'Dreamers' in exchange for border wall: White House sources

CHANGED HIS MIND ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ that or the shutdown isnt really going on


LMAO


Yes, that was discussed days ago. Chain immigration is a big deal. Getting rid of that will be a great victory for America.


Taking the hit on DACA is worth it, imo.


My point about the reporters theory remains.

Also, FUCK THE MEDIA.

the point is, there wont be a wall, and like anyone else that would rather kiss trumps fat old ass than face that fact the hand writing on on the WALL

pun intended


With the reporters's theory as supporting "evidence"?


LOL!!
 
IT SHOULDNT MAKE TWO SHITS !!

as much as that son of a bitch has yammered and bragged about the BIG BEAUTIFUL 2000 MILE WALL he shouldnt even flinch if the dems offer to fund it ..

now he'll say it was the dems fault and his pissant drones will lick his ass, agree, and thank him.


But Trump’s chief of staff, John Kelly, called Schumer later to say the Dreamers deal was too liberal. The deal was off.

LIAR ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ??? YES OR NO.


No. Deportation and a wall was the promise. Amnesty is a few weeks out, maybe sooner. Why you crying?
 

Forum List

Back
Top