Scalia rips the feds in his dissent and again "after" Obama lashes out at findings

[JakeStarkey]

If the far right extremists and the crazier libertarians on this Board well represent the thinking of their comrades, the Republic is safe. What a bunch of crackpots.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The foolishness of your OP title? This is a lame thread.

Cry me a fucking river why dontcha.

c'mon ovah heah, sonny. Nobody lashed out at anybody, that is the point.

Scalia is wrong, but who cares?

Scalia was correct and Obama did lash out by directing ice not to respond to Arizona's calls post decision.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Obama just invited every criminal in Mexico to enter the US via Arizona

He's only President of the Blue States

 

[Ernie S.]

Judicial activism at it's worst.

And why is a SCOTUS Justice commenting on politics? It just reenforces the view that Scalia made his decision based on politics instead of the Constitution.

Judicial activism at its worst.

Scalia is right. It's like the Constitution wasn't even written for the states.

There you go. Fixed.

The Constitution was written for the people

For the CITIZENS! Not for illegal alien invaders.

 

[BDBoop]

Scalia is starting to lose it.

"You kids get off my lawn!"

How old is he, anyway?

 

[BDBoop]

Did Justice Antonin Scalia's immigration dissent go too far? - latimes.com

Some said it was highly unusual, and perhaps out of line, for Scalia to cite Obama's announcement in mid-June that he was granting a two-year reprieve to young people who entered the country illegally as children. Obama may have called it "the right thing to do," Scalia said, but "Arizona may not think so."

Usually, the justices rely only on what is in the legal record of the case.

Liberal commentators and some law professors said Scalia's tone was strident and partisan.

He is "sounding more like a conservative blogger or Fox News pundit than a justice," said George Washington University law professor Jeffrey Rosen.

Paul F. Campos, a law professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder, wrote on Salon about Scalia: "In his old age, he has become increasingly intolerant … and a pompous celebrant of his own virtue and rectitude."

Edward Whelan, president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and a former Scalia law clerk, said Scalia "was responding directly to the government's own argument. Scalia's basic point was to illustrate that the Arizona law didn't conflict with federal immigration law but instead was at odds with the current administration's refusal to enforce federal laws."

Scalia, now 76 and the court's senior justice, spoke only for himself. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. dissented as well, but did so in separate opinions. It was hard to miss the fact that Scalia's reproach was directed at an opinion that spoke for Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, the two who are likely to hold the deciding votes in the court's healthcare ruling, set for Thursday.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Did Justice Antonin Scalia's immigration dissent go too far? - latimes.com

Some said it was highly unusual, and perhaps out of line, for Scalia to cite Obama's announcement in mid-June that he was granting a two-year reprieve to young people who entered the country illegally as children. Obama may have called it "the right thing to do," Scalia said, but "Arizona may not think so."

Usually, the justices rely only on what is in the legal record of the case.

Liberal commentators and some law professors said Scalia's tone was strident and partisan.

He is "sounding more like a conservative blogger or Fox News pundit than a justice," said George Washington University law professor Jeffrey Rosen.

Paul F. Campos, a law professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder, wrote on Salon about Scalia: "In his old age, he has become increasingly intolerant … and a pompous celebrant of his own virtue and rectitude."

Edward Whelan, president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center and a former Scalia law clerk, said Scalia "was responding directly to the government's own argument. Scalia's basic point was to illustrate that the Arizona law didn't conflict with federal immigration law but instead was at odds with the current administration's refusal to enforce federal laws."

Scalia, now 76 and the court's senior justice, spoke only for himself. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. dissented as well, but did so in separate opinions. It was hard to miss the fact that Scalia's reproach was directed at an opinion that spoke for Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, the two who are likely to hold the deciding votes in the court's healthcare ruling, set for Thursday.

I wonder how they felt when Obama called them out in the SOTU address?

Karma is a bitch

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I want President Romney to replace Ginsberg and Breyer with justices who think and write like Scalia and Thomas

 

[Ernie S.]

Scalia is starting to lose it.

"You kids get off my lawn!"

How old is he, anyway?

3 years younger than Ginsberg.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Cry me a fucking river why dontcha.

c'mon ovah heah, sonny. Nobody lashed out at anybody, that is the point.

Scalia is wrong, but who cares?

Scalia was correct and Obama did lash out by directing ice not to respond to Arizona's calls post decision.

Nope on both accounts. Scalia makes law and Obama correctly directed ICE to act appropriately,

 

[jillian]

Scalia is starting to lose it.

"You kids get off my lawn!"

How old is he, anyway?

3 years younger than Ginsberg.

yeah, but kiki was a cheerleader in high school.. she's still got some stamina.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

c'mon ovah heah, sonny. Nobody lashed out at anybody, that is the point.

Scalia is wrong, but who cares?

Scalia was correct and Obama did lash out by directing ice not to respond to Arizona's calls post decision.

Nope on both accounts. Scalia makes law and Obama correctly directed ICE to act appropriately,

Appropriately?

Let's see how many more people get killed in Arizona thanks to Obama acting like President of the Blue States

How is inviting criminals into AZ acting "appropriately"?

 

[hjmick]

S.E. Cupp... Mmmmm...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Brewer should call up the AZ militia

 

[JakeStarkey]

To oppose the feds when the issue has been decided?

That is treason, Frank, and your are here supporting treason.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

To oppose the feds when the issue has been decided?

That is treason, Frank, and your are here supporting treason.

What did obama do when The supreme court kept the key prevision of Arizona immigration law?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

To oppose the feds when the issue has been decided?

That is treason, Frank, and your are here supporting treason.

Fake called me a traitor to Obama!





Fuck off, Moonbat

Obama's trying his best to get more people killed in AZ

 

[JakeStarkey]

Jake called Frank a traitor to the law. Pull your fist out of your butt and start thinking for a change.

This is decided, son. There is no more except calling for the overthrow of the government.

 

[Not2BSubjugated]

The left invented juducial activism, so what the heck are you talking about?

Got an example? No. Just more of Rush's command to "accuse the other side of what you yourself are doing".

Give me an example of a reasonable suspicion that someone is an illegal that has nothing to do with race. Good luck!

It's 'citing', dumbass. Now cite an example.

Going around Congress or ignoring current law is activism.

So if the SCOTUS goes around Congress to strike down the ACA on Thursday, that would be an example of activism. Thanks! I may add your quote to my sigline on Friday.

It's funny that it was the Scalia that had the "curious" notion that if a person is incarcerated but not charged with any crimes, they are not protected by the Constitution.

And this is a judge that is the hero of the right.

Oh that and he thinks a good orgy is a good way to relieve stress.

A good orgy -is- a good way to relieve stress. Nothing like busting a few nuts to get the tension out of the shoulders

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Jake called Frank a traitor to the law. Pull your fist out of your butt and start thinking for a change.

This is decided, son. There is no more except calling for the overthrow of the government.

Hitler had plenty of laws. If they aren't just they aren't to obeyed