Scalia rips the feds in his dissent and again "after" Obama lashes out at findings

[Synthaholic]

Scalia is starting to lose it.

"You kids get off my lawn!"

No, he is correct. Wrong as always you are.

OK, Yoda.

 

[Synthaholic]

No DL, No proof of insurance, No SS#...

There you go!

Not everyone has a driver's license. My mother hasn't had one for over 10 years. Therefore, she also doesn't carry auto insurance. There are MANY people who do not drive, due to injury, disease, or just no desire to.

Do you carry your SS card around with you? I don't, and don't know anyone who does. Why would you chance it being lost or stolen?

FAIL.

So how does your mother identify herself when asked to show proof who she is? She has bound to have done it before.

I'll call her and ask. Perhaps her AARP card?

I know that when I opened a new bank account a few months ago, they wanted my driver's license number. I didn't want to give it to them, because I just don't like giving any info. I asked them what they did when people didn't have a DL and she said that those people have a state ID card, so maybe that's what my mom has.

Is Arizona willing to provide no-cost ID cards to all their citizens?

 

[GuyPinestra]

Give me an example of a reasonable suspicion that someone is an illegal that has nothing to do with race. Good luck!

No DL, No proof of insurance, No SS#...

There you go!

Not everyone has a driver's license. My mother hasn't had one for over 10 years. Therefore, she also doesn't carry auto insurance. There are MANY people who do not drive, due to injury, disease, or just no desire to.

Do you carry your SS card around with you? I don't, and don't know anyone who does. Why would you chance it being lost or stolen?

FAIL.

Those would be reasons if the subject was pulled over, you disingenuous prick! If you don't want to carry your SS card, go get a state-issued ID card for $10.

 

[Synthaholic]

Not everyone has a driver's license. My mother hasn't had one for over 10 years. Therefore, she also doesn't carry auto insurance. There are MANY people who do not drive, due to injury, disease, or just no desire to.

Do you carry your SS card around with you? I don't, and don't know anyone who does. Why would you chance it being lost or stolen?

FAIL.

So how does your mother identify herself when asked to show proof who she is? She has bound to have done it before.

The obvious fallacy of this, is that the likely scenario will be someone pulled over during a traffic stop- so having a license would seem a pretty normal thing to have in your possession.

The Arizona law does not only pertain to people being pulled over.

 

[Synthaholic]

Judicial activism at it's worst.

And why is a SCOTUS Justice commenting on politics? It just reenforces the view that Scalia made his decision based on politics instead of the Constitution.

That was his dissenting judgement. All justices weigh in on their opinions. It's normal.

No, dumbass. It would help if you actually knew what we are talking about:

Justice Antonin Scalia, meanwhile, dissented from the ruling striking down much of Arizona's harsh immigration law. But he didn't stop at criticizing the reasoning of the majority. Scalia took it upon himself to criticize an Obama administration decision not to use its resources to deport certain young immigrants brought here illegally by their parents. It was an extraordinary opinion in that the Obama policy was not even before the court.

​

Scalia, Holder, and Partisan Politics Run Amok - Susan Milligan (usnews.com)

 

[Synthaholic]

Judicial activism at it's worst.

And why is a SCOTUS Justice commenting on politics? It just reenforces the view that Scalia made his decision based on politics instead of the Constitution.

I thought that judicial activism was juuuuuuust fine... when you libs were doing it.

Got an example? No? The STFU.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Scalia makes a number of incorrect observations in his dissent, among them the inane notion of ‘sovereign states’ and the tedious canard that the Federal government is ‘failing’ to enforce immigration law.

This is yet another example of a ridiculous Scalia temper-tantrum, as a jurist he’s become isolated, extreme, and irrelevant.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Please point to the "lashing out" by me so you don't look foolish.

The foolishness of your OP title? This is a lame thread.

Cry me a fucking river why dontcha.

c'mon ovah heah, sonny. Nobody lashed out at anybody, that is the point.

Scalia is wrong, but who cares?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Scalia is starting to lose it.

"You kids get off my lawn!"

Antonin Scalia, ranting old man - Salon.com

If a liberal judge were to legislate in robes the way this old fart does and always has, the rw's would be screaming bloody murder and rightly so. But, he's lying about Obama so its okay.

Just shows how corrupt the right really is.

 

[Big Fitz]

Judicial activism at it's worst.

And why is a SCOTUS Justice commenting on politics? It just reenforces the view that Scalia made his decision based on politics instead of the Constitution.

I thought that judicial activism was juuuuuuust fine... when you libs were doing it.

Got an example? No? The STFU.

Roe v. Wade springs to mind.

The STFU is to you.

 

[jillian]

Justice Scalia scolds Obama in Dissent - Riehl World View


Justice Scalia scolds Obama in Dissent

S.E. Cupp Tweeted a bit from Scalia's dissent on the Arizona immigration law ruling.

RT @secupp: Scalia's dissent: "If securing its territory...is not w/in the power of AZ, we shld cease referring 2 it as a sovereign State.”

Business Insider has more, including Scalia's mention of a recent press conference by Obama. I'm thinking they don't see eye-to-eye. h/t Free Republic.

"'The President said at a news conference that the new program is “the right thing to do” in light of Congress’s failure to pass the Administration’s proposed revision of the Immigration Act. Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing applications of the Immigration Act that the President declines to enforce boggles the mind.'"

Who cares? It was the dissent.

Scalia --- the most ethically challenged justice I've ever seen

 

[signelect]

Chris you're insane.

of course he is, he is a demcrat. He just doesn't get it. HAVING said that there are a lot of insane people of both parties screwing things us for all of us.

 

[Big Fitz]

Justice Scalia scolds Obama in Dissent - Riehl World View


Justice Scalia scolds Obama in Dissent

S.E. Cupp Tweeted a bit from Scalia's dissent on the Arizona immigration law ruling.

RT @secupp: Scalia's dissent: "If securing its territory...is not w/in the power of AZ, we shld cease referring 2 it as a sovereign State.”

Business Insider has more, including Scalia's mention of a recent press conference by Obama. I'm thinking they don't see eye-to-eye. h/t Free Republic.

"'The President said at a news conference that the new program is “the right thing to do” in light of Congress’s failure to pass the Administration’s proposed revision of the Immigration Act. Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing applications of the Immigration Act that the President declines to enforce boggles the mind.'"

Who cares? It was the dissent.

Scalia --- the most ethically challenged justice I've ever seen

So Elena Kagan doesn't peg your needle for failing to recuse herself in this matter or the New Haven Racial Discrimination Case?

 

[Si modo]

Libs: Fuck the Constitution, this is OBAMA!

Good gawd, you are enemies of the state.

 

[Synthaholic]

I thought that judicial activism was juuuuuuust fine... when you libs were doing it.

Got an example? No? The STFU.

Roe v. Wade springs to mind.

The STFU is to you.

Explain in your most coherent way possible how they legislated from the bench.

This should be good.

 

[Synthaholic]

Justice Scalia scolds Obama in Dissent - Riehl World View


Justice Scalia scolds Obama in Dissent

S.E. Cupp Tweeted a bit from Scalia's dissent on the Arizona immigration law ruling.

RT @secupp: Scalia's dissent: "If securing its territory...is not w/in the power of AZ, we shld cease referring 2 it as a sovereign State.”

Business Insider has more, including Scalia's mention of a recent press conference by Obama. I'm thinking they don't see eye-to-eye. h/t Free Republic.

"'The President said at a news conference that the new program is “the right thing to do” in light of Congress’s failure to pass the Administration’s proposed revision of the Immigration Act. Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing applications of the Immigration Act that the President declines to enforce boggles the mind.'"

Who cares? It was the dissent.

Scalia --- the most ethically challenged justice I've ever seen

So Elena Kagan doesn't peg your needle for failing to recuse herself in this matter or the New Haven Racial Discrimination Case?

Kagen recused herself on the Arizona immigration case.

Porn addict Thomas refused to sit out the ACA case, even though his silly wife has gotten more than $1.5 million dollars from anti-ACA groups.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Sotomayor supported the ID check provision.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Scalia rips the feds in his dissent and again "after" Obama lashes out at findings

Nonsense.

Scalia didn’t ‘rip’ anyone in any manner.

All he demonstrated is the fact he’s a reactionary partisan hack.

Read his dissent, it’s filled with gaping holes of missing landmark rulings dating back to the first quarter of the 19th Century, rulings that time and again affirm and reaffirm the principle of Federal supremacy, that the states are indeed not ‘sovereign,’ and that Federal law trumps state.

Again: Scaila has become isolated, extreme, and irrelevant.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Libs: Fuck the Constitution, this is OBAMA!

Good gawd, you are enemies of the state.

repeat. repeat and reload.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Justice Scalia scolds Obama in Dissent - Riehl World View


Justice Scalia scolds Obama in Dissent

S.E. Cupp Tweeted a bit from Scalia's dissent on the Arizona immigration law ruling.

RT @secupp: Scalia's dissent: "If securing its territory...is not w/in the power of AZ, we shld cease referring 2 it as a sovereign State.”

Business Insider has more, including Scalia's mention of a recent press conference by Obama. I'm thinking they don't see eye-to-eye. h/t Free Republic.

"'The President said at a news conference that the new program is “the right thing to do” in light of Congress’s failure to pass the Administration’s proposed revision of the Immigration Act. Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing applications of the Immigration Act that the President declines to enforce boggles the mind.'"

Who cares? It was the dissent.

Scalia --- the most ethically challenged justice I've ever seen

Good god Jillian open your eyes obama is the most dis-functional president we have ever had.