Scalia rips the feds in his dissent and again "after" Obama lashes out at findings

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Justice Scalia scolds Obama in Dissent - Riehl World View


Justice Scalia scolds Obama in Dissent

S.E. Cupp Tweeted a bit from Scalia's dissent on the Arizona immigration law ruling.

RT @secupp: Scalia's dissent: "If securing its territory...is not w/in the power of AZ, we shld cease referring 2 it as a sovereign State.”

Business Insider has more, including Scalia's mention of a recent press conference by Obama. I'm thinking they don't see eye-to-eye. h/t Free Republic.

"'The President said at a news conference that the new program is “the right thing to do” in light of Congress’s failure to pass the Administration’s proposed revision of the Immigration Act. Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing applications of the Immigration Act that the President declines to enforce boggles the mind.'"

 

[Chris]

Scalia is starting to lose it.

"You kids get off my lawn!"

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Chris you're insane.

 

[Avatar4321]

Are states soveriegn if they can't protect themselves?

 

[Synthaholic]

Judicial activism at it's worst.

And why is a SCOTUS Justice commenting on politics? It just reenforces the view that Scalia made his decision based on politics instead of the Constitution.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Judicial activism at it's worst.

And why is a SCOTUS Justice commenting on politics? It just reenforces the view that Scalia made his decision based on politics instead of the Constitution.

Judicial activism at its worst.

Scalia is right. It's like the Constitution wasn't even written for the states.

There you go. Fixed.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Judicial activism at it's worst.

And why is a SCOTUS Justice commenting on politics? It just reenforces the view that Scalia made his decision based on politics instead of the Constitution.

Judges commenting on public policy is no more judicial activism than presidents commenting on court decisions is abuse of power.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Are states soveriegn if they can't protect themselves?

No they aren't. This makes a case for the states to do a Constitutional amendment and get back the authority it use to have.

 

[OODA_Loop]

Judicial activism at it's worst.

And why is a SCOTUS Justice commenting on politics? It just reenforces the view that Scalia made his decision based on politics instead of the Constitution.

Sotomayor is a judicial activist ?

 

[Claudette]

If the decision had gone the other way Barry and his boys would be telling you how great the SC and their decisions are.

The FF wanted the States to have the power, not the Fed Govt.

Glad to see the SC is adhering to the constitution.

Way to go Scalia and the rest of the SC. Sotomeyer and Ginsberg included. LOL

 

[JakeStarkey]

The only "lashing out" is by Grampa Murked.

Justice Scalia scolds Obama in Dissent - Riehl World View


Justice Scalia scolds Obama in Dissent

S.E. Cupp Tweeted a bit from Scalia's dissent on the Arizona immigration law ruling.

RT @secupp: Scalia's dissent: "If securing its territory...is not w/in the power of AZ, we shld cease referring 2 it as a sovereign State.”

Business Insider has more, including Scalia's mention of a recent press conference by Obama. I'm thinking they don't see eye-to-eye. h/t Free Republic.

"'The President said at a news conference that the new program is “the right thing to do” in light of Congress’s failure to pass the Administration’s proposed revision of the Immigration Act. Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing applications of the Immigration Act that the President declines to enforce boggles the mind.'"

 

[Conservative]

Scalia is starting to lose it.

"You kids get off my lawn!"

I think people who claim governors will be recalled and indicted, then puss away when it doesn't happen, are the ones losing it.

 

[rightwinger]

Judicial activism at it's worst.

And why is a SCOTUS Justice commenting on politics? It just reenforces the view that Scalia made his decision based on politics instead of the Constitution.

Judicial activism at its worst.

Scalia is right. It's like the Constitution wasn't even written for the states.

There you go. Fixed.

The Constitution was written for the people

 

[Zxereus]

Are states soveriegn if they can't protect themselves?

If they are not allowed to protect their borders, then no one can say they are. This ruling puts a dagger directly in the heart of states rights.

 

[StevenC]

Judicial activism at it's worst.

And why is a SCOTUS Justice commenting on politics? It just reenforces the view that Scalia made his decision based on politics instead of the Constitution.

Judicial activism at its worst.

Scalia is right. It's like the Constitution wasn't even written for the states.

There you go. Fixed.

The Constitution was written for the people

Tell that to Obama. He thinks he can ignore it.

 

[mudwhistle]

Judicial activism at it's worst.

And why is a SCOTUS Justice commenting on politics? It just reenforces the view that Scalia made his decision based on politics instead of the Constitution.

The left invented juducial activism, so what the heck are you talking about?

Judicial activism is claiming enforcing our laws is a form of racial-profiling.

Judicial activism is sighting European or International laws when providing legal arguments.

Going around Congress or ignoring current law is activism.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The only "lashing out" is by Grampa Murked.

Justice Scalia scolds Obama in Dissent - Riehl World View


Justice Scalia scolds Obama in Dissent

S.E. Cupp Tweeted a bit from Scalia's dissent on the Arizona immigration law ruling.

RT @secupp: Scalia's dissent: "If securing its territory...is not w/in the power of AZ, we shld cease referring 2 it as a sovereign State.”

Business Insider has more, including Scalia's mention of a recent press conference by Obama. I'm thinking they don't see eye-to-eye. h/t Free Republic.

"'The President said at a news conference that the new program is “the right thing to do” in light of Congress’s failure to pass the Administration’s proposed revision of the Immigration Act. Perhaps it is, though Arizona may not think so. But to say, as the Court does, that Arizona contradicts federal law by enforcing applications of the Immigration Act that the President declines to enforce boggles the mind.'"

Please point to the "lashing out" by me so you don't look foolish.

 

[Listening]

Scalia is starting to lose it.

"You kids get off my lawn!"

Actually, Scalia hit the nail on the head.

As do most conservatives on this issue.

It is unfortunate that you can't get the medical help you need to pull your head out of your ass as the fresh air, while painful at first, would give you a better view of the world.

AZ is my home state.

What is happening now is that radicals are talking about enforcing he law in their own way which will mean some dead bodies in the desert.

It is most unfortunate that Obama is to much of a fake and a moron to see that he is dooming people all in the name of his Ivory Tower world (that will never exist).

Best of luck with the extraction. I hope they don't damage your undersized brain in the process.

BTW: Missed you over on the Scott Walker thread. I guess you heard he didn't get recalled....but kicked your ass.

 

[Katzndogz]

Scalia correctly pointed out that the federal government was going to decide which laws will be followed and which laws should be ignored including which segment of the people have to obey laws and which ones don't. We knew that already. As soon as holder said that there would be no voter intimidation prosecutions of black people we knew that the regime was going to be selective in both lawful conduct and who those laws were going to be applied to.

 

[Synthaholic]

Judicial activism at it's worst.

And why is a SCOTUS Justice commenting on politics? It just reenforces the view that Scalia made his decision based on politics instead of the Constitution.

Judicial activism at its worst.

Scalia is right. It's like the Constitution wasn't even written for the states.

There you go. Fixed.

Judicial activism at it's worst.

And why is a SCOTUS Justice commenting on politics? It just reenforces the view that Scalia made his decision based on politics instead of the Constitution.

Judges commenting on public policy is no more judicial activism than presidents commenting on court decisions is abuse of power.

He didn't comment on public policy, he commented on the President.

They legislated from the bench in Bush v. Gore, Citizens United, and now this.

And if they are so in favor of states rights, why did they overturn the Montana Supreme Court's ruling yesterday?