Save the Planet- eat your pet or Liberals eat Spot

The commies have always hated pets- "too bourgeois"

The Chi-Coms have the one-child policy and now they have the one-pet policy


Sad thing is

How many nutroots think this is a good idea

China is heavily over populated, and just had a major crop failure in the northern provinces. Sounds to me like they have a policy reflecting the reality that they face.

Perhaps, do think state mandates from a centrally planned economy that kept the country from developing added to or took away from the problem?




notice in the West we don't have this problem; it is actually the opposite for most

OK, your ideological blindness is very apparent. I do not support the repressiveness of the Chinese government in any way. It is preventing and even greater expansion of their economy than they are presently experiancing.

However, who is buying whose debt? And whose economy is growing like gangbusters? Who is graduating ten times the engineers as we are? And who is doing major inovation on technologies ranging from alternative energies to electric cars?

The Chinese Communists inherited the problem of overpopulation. Even the early internal wars and firing squads made no inroads on that problem. Their 'one child' policies have. To the point that they are going to have the same problem as all the industrial nations at the same time as we are. An aging workforce, with far fewer workers to replace them.
 
Save the Planet- eat your pet or Liberals eat Spot

Time to Eat the Dog: The Real Guide to Sustainable Living

Tip: PajamasMedia


New Zealanders Robert and Brenda Vale — self-described specialists in sustainable living at Victoria University in Wellington — charge that the carbon paw-print of a pet dog is double that of an SUV driving 6,200 miles a year, while a pet cat has an eco claw-print slightly less than driving a Volkswagen Golf for a year. Confirming these results, John Barrett of the Stockholm Environment Institute in York, Britain, said, “Owning a dog really is quite an extravagance.” Pets’ detrimental impact on the environment is not limited to their carbon footprint, the Vales insist; if permitted to roam, predatory dogs and cats devastate wildlife (squirrels, birds, frogs) while their fecal matter spreads bacteria and disease in rivers and streams, killing aquatic life.

I wish this stupid cat would roam. She just sits underfoot, waiting for me to feed her...

Cats are clever. They know a soft sucker when they meet one. Be more of a biatch, Em. :lol:
I am! The bitchier I am, the more she loves on me :lol:

Damn cat.

I like cats. But this one .... well, we have a love-hate thing going on LOL
 
China is heavily over populated, and just had a major crop failure in the northern provinces. Sounds to me like they have a policy reflecting the reality that they face.

Perhaps, do think state mandates from a centrally planned economy that kept the country from developing added to or took away from the problem?




notice in the West we don't have this problem; it is actually the opposite for most

OK, your ideological blindness is very apparent. I do not support the repressiveness of the Chinese government in any way. It is preventing and even greater expansion of their economy than they are presently experiancing.

However, who is buying whose debt? And whose economy is growing like gangbusters? Who is graduating ten times the engineers as we are? And who is doing major inovation on technologies ranging from alternative energies to electric cars?

The Chinese Communists inherited the problem of overpopulation. Even the early internal wars and firing squads made no inroads on that problem. Their 'one child' policies have. To the point that they are going to have the same problem as all the industrial nations at the same time as we are. An aging workforce, with far fewer workers to replace them.


Blindness is yours my friend

Notice the same things you credit them with
these are things that have helped more to control pop. there and in the West. A movement towards a market based economy with a liberal democracy is a better answer than some oppressive gov't dictate. People when given the economic and social freedom will make rational choices under their circumstances for how many children they need and can support.



The rural lands in China- the people do not pay attention to the one child policy- tradition and they need more children to work the farm ; their children die at a greater rate than the urban people

It is a rational choice


The same reason you see the birth rate higher among the poor in the West; it is a subsidized behavior; mortality rate is higher etc- people will have more children
 
Last edited:
I wish this stupid cat would roam. She just sits underfoot, waiting for me to feed her...

Cats are clever. They know a soft sucker when they meet one. Be more of a biatch, Em. :lol:
I am! The bitchier I am, the more she loves on me :lol:

Damn cat.

I like cats. But this one .... well, we have a love-hate thing going on LOL

The opposite of 'love' is not 'hate'... it's 'indifference'. Maybe you should hate her a little less.
 
Cats are clever. They know a soft sucker when they meet one. Be more of a biatch, Em. :lol:
I am! The bitchier I am, the more she loves on me :lol:

Damn cat.

I like cats. But this one .... well, we have a love-hate thing going on LOL

The opposite of 'love' is not 'hate'... it's 'indifference'. Maybe you should hate her a little less.

Well...

Like I said, I do like cats. This one is psychotic tho'. She'll be sitting there all nice and quiet and lovey-dovey then (with no provocation) poof out and snarl and run off. (she's only bit down or grabbed me with the claws a few times in all these years, she knows better; she'll start and then get a look on her face like "uh oh... I fucked up now" as I yell at her "what the hell do you think you're doing?!") Within minutes she's back, trying to crawl into my lap again, purring and rubbing her cheeks against me. Damn cat.

I do give her credit for one thing. She's a hell of a guard cat. NO one (man or beast) approaches the yard or house without her going off.
 
Last edited:
Who eats their pet? :cuckoo:

The way i see it, if you are willing to eat your pet, then it never was your pet just your dinner. A "pet" is a companion, not something edible. A rational pet owner would not think of the wastes of an animal but of the joy. Would you eat your child bc of their carbon footprint? No. My pet is an extension of my family. I will never eat my pet or a family member.
 
Save the Planet- eat your pet or Liberals eat Spot

Time to Eat the Dog: The Real Guide to Sustainable Living

Tip: PajamasMedia


New Zealanders Robert and Brenda Vale — self-described specialists in sustainable living at Victoria University in Wellington — charge that the carbon paw-print of a pet dog is double that of an SUV driving 6,200 miles a year, while a pet cat has an eco claw-print slightly less than driving a Volkswagen Golf for a year. Confirming these results, John Barrett of the Stockholm Environment Institute in York, Britain, said, “Owning a dog really is quite an extravagance.” Pets’ detrimental impact on the environment is not limited to their carbon footprint, the Vales insist; if permitted to roam, predatory dogs and cats devastate wildlife (squirrels, birds, frogs) while their fecal matter spreads bacteria and disease in rivers and streams, killing aquatic life.
This should be a clue.

Have they been through peer review as have the 'hide-the-decline' pseudo-scientists that forwarded the bogus weather data to bolster the 'carbon footprint' shit. The ideas are similar though in one regard...both tend to impose restraints on citizens...one in trumped up taxes, the other in denial of pets. Eating dogs and cats it out of the question for a pet lover. Just because some people eat dogs and cats doesn't mean we're all ungrateful for their companionship and service.
 
How is eating a pussy going to save the planet?

But if it will help, I'm in
 

Forum List

Back
Top