Saudis and Muslim Brotherhood Prefer Obama?

[longknife]

by Steven Hayward @ Saudis and Muslim Brotherhood Prefer Obama? | Power Line

That’s what Walid Phares says this article in a Saudi-funded, Brotherhood-influenced Arabic newspaper says. From Walid’s Facebook page:

In an article published by the Saudi funded (but Brotherhood influenced) daily al Sharq al Awsat, Imad el Dine Adeeb writes that Obama “is not successful as much as we want, but he is less dangerous than Mitt Romney.”

“Interesting how radicals in the Arab world measure the difference between American Presidential candidates. They prefer Obama because he let them do what they wish, and fear Romney because they suppose that he won’t let them get away with what they want. Simple.”

 

[kvetch]

Strongly defend free speech and civil discourse

not much of that in the Mormons, is there?

 

[2ndAmendment]

by Steven Hayward @ Saudis and Muslim Brotherhood Prefer Obama? | Power Line

That’s what Walid Phares says this article in a Saudi-funded, Brotherhood-influenced Arabic newspaper says. From Walid’s Facebook page:

In an article published by the Saudi funded (but Brotherhood influenced) daily al Sharq al Awsat, Imad el Dine Adeeb writes that Obama “is not successful as much as we want, but he is less dangerous than Mitt Romney.”

“Interesting how radicals in the Arab world measure the difference between American Presidential candidates. They prefer Obama because he let them do what they wish, and fear Romney because they suppose that he won’t let them get away with what they want. Simple.”

Obama, the muslim pig, is dangerous to US. Romney is dangerous to terrorists.

Four years ago, the terrorists supported Obama too. It's not too hard to figure out why!

Good thread!