Sarah Palin: Vote 'NO' On New Start

Discussion in 'Politics' started by USArmyRetired, Dec 17, 2010.

  1. USArmyRetired
    Offline

    USArmyRetired BANNED

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,601
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +346
    Palin once again knows what she is talking about. She understands about missile defense since she commanded the 49th Missile Battalion in Alaska, the only guard unit that stays active 24/7 in the nation. She was briefed daily. Gotta give credit when credit is due. She nailed it. This is a dangerous treaty. We would have to give up our sea based nuclear weapons platforms (Subs). The Russians have been after this for along time. Between this and DADT we may not have a military left when they are all done with this because of Obama. This is the death of our national security.








    Senate Republicans: Vote No on New START - By Sarah Palin - The Corner - National Review Online

    READ THIS:

    The proposed New START agreement should be evaluated by the only criteria that matters for a treaty: Is it in America’s interest? I am convinced this treaty is not. It should not be rammed through in the lame duck session using behind the scenes deal-making reminiscent of the tactics used in the health care debate.

    New START actually requires the U.S. to reduce our nuclear weapons and allows the Russians to increase theirs. This is one-sided and makes no strategic sense. New START’s verification regime is weaker than the treaty it replaces, making it harder for us to detect Russian cheating. Since we now know Russia has not complied with many arms control agreements currently in force, this is a serious matter.

    New START recognizes a link between offensive and defensive weapons – a position the Russians have sought for years. Russia claims the treaty constrains U.S. missile defenses and that they will withdraw from the treaty if we pursue missile defenses. This linkage virtually guarantees that either we limit our missile defenses or the Russians will withdraw from the treaty. The Obama administration claims that this is not the case; but if that is true, why agree to linking offensive and defensive weapons in the treaty? At the height of the Cold War, President Reagan pursued missile defense while also pursuing verifiable arms control with the then-Soviet Union. That position was right in the 1980’s, and it is still right today. We cannot and must not give up the right to missile defense to protect our population – whether the missiles that threaten us come from Russia, Iran, China, North Korea, or anywhere else. I fought the Obama administration’s plans to cut funds for missile defense in Alaska while I was Governor, and I will continue to speak out for missile defenses that will protect our people and our allies

    more in link:
     
  2. (R)IGHTeous 1
    Offline

    (R)IGHTeous 1 GOPROUD

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,869
    Thanks Received:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    southeast Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +123

    Got damn, that woman remains brilliant. More proof she's got presidential material in her. :clap2::clap2::clap2:
     
  3. Toro
    Offline

    Toro Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    50,782
    Thanks Received:
    11,059
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    The Big Bend via Riderville
    Ratings:
    +25,112
    [​IMG]
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. (R)IGHTeous 1
    Offline

    (R)IGHTeous 1 GOPROUD

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,869
    Thanks Received:
    123
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    southeast Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +123
    Then don't eat it.

    Care to actually contribute now?
     
  5. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    So we should also listen to what Charlie Sheen says since he has more viewers than Palin?

    Palin is just an entertainment celebrity now.
     
  6. Toro
    Offline

    Toro Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    50,782
    Thanks Received:
    11,059
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    The Big Bend via Riderville
    Ratings:
    +25,112
    Contribute to a USArmyRetarded Spam Thread?

    How 'bout this?

    [​IMG]
     
  7. loosecannon
    Offline

    loosecannon Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,888
    Thanks Received:
    263
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +264
    Reagan would want you kids to support START. It was after all his legacy.

    Do this for the Gipper.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. NYcarbineer
    Offline

    NYcarbineer Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    96,213
    Thanks Received:
    11,272
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Location:
    Finger Lakes, NY
    Ratings:
    +30,300
    Holy crap.

    Is this the same Palin who thought her credentials on foreign policy came from watching out for Putin coming over the horizon in a bomber??

    lol

    Now she's against making that situation safer?
     
  9. Oscar Wao
    Offline

    Oscar Wao Victory is Mine

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    2,139
    Thanks Received:
    301
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Quahog, RI
    Ratings:
    +301
    To the OP:

    Sarah Palin is MARRIED. She's HAPPY in her marriage. She's NOT going to go for you. Go out...meet some women...find a woman who will actually RECIPROCATE romantic feelings...this little Palin crush of yours is pretty unhealthy...
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. USArmyRetired
    Offline

    USArmyRetired BANNED

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,601
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +346
    How is reducing our deterrance against nuclear attack and Russia increasing their missile capabilities makes the situation safer?
     

Share This Page