Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
.................By leaving she's doing what she does best as the GOP main battle tank: .....................
I'm with AmwayMike on this one
Palin would make a wonderful Republican candidate for President
Run Sarah........RUN
LOl, last I checked, the Silicon valley companies isn't a NATURAL RESOUCE.
good gawd, what a stupid comparison.
but you were right on the last half of your post. and proves just where the Obama and the Progressive party are taking us. good one.
How was Obama experienced enough?
LOl, last I checked, the Silicon valley companies isn't a NATURAL RESOUCE.
good gawd, what a stupid comparison.
but you were right on the last half of your post. and proves just where the Obama and the Progressive party are taking us. good one.
Its a stupid comparison to you if you are stupid.
Its funny to watch so-called "conservatives" tie themselves in knots over this. Big Government Taxes to give people money is only bad for some industries, but for others, its perfectly fine.
What is so difficult to understand?Hello?? What do you think taxes are?
Letting taxpayers keep more of their money is a tax reduction
I'll explain this to you how it works.
1.) Alaska government taxes oil companies.
2.) Alaska government takes those taxes and gives it to everyone else in the state.
Or I'll draw a picture.
Money taxed from oil companies ---> goes to ---> Alaskans.
Imagine this scenario.
1.) California government taxes Silicon Valley companies
2.) California government taxes those taxes and gives it to everyone else in the state.
If California did that, I would imagine guys like you would be starting threads about "Communism" and "Socialism" and "Marxism" and "Hitlerism" in California. But, ah, Alaska does it, and its a "tax cut."
Its amazing how the mind can rationalize things, isn't it?
Alaska gets most of it's money in the state budget from oil companies in the form of taxes. If the oil companies are doing well, Alaska collects more revenue. If the oil companies are doing poorly, Alaska collects less revenue.
Alaska then needs to decide what to do with the revenue. Oil companies at the time that Sarah Palin was elected were doing well. Therefore, the Alaska budget had a surplus at this time.
Palin was pressured to spend the money on whatever stuff legislatures piss money away on. Instead of doing that she gave a tax rebate to the people of Alaska.
That is a good thing.
aww, you think you're so cute.
if you don't know anything about Alaska, stop your bitching about it. you are just making yourself look more stupid than you already are.
What is so difficult to understand?I'll explain this to you how it works.
1.) Alaska government taxes oil companies.
2.) Alaska government takes those taxes and gives it to everyone else in the state.
Or I'll draw a picture.
Money taxed from oil companies ---> goes to ---> Alaskans.
Imagine this scenario.
1.) California government taxes Silicon Valley companies
2.) California government taxes those taxes and gives it to everyone else in the state.
If California did that, I would imagine guys like you would be starting threads about "Communism" and "Socialism" and "Marxism" and "Hitlerism" in California. But, ah, Alaska does it, and its a "tax cut."
Its amazing how the mind can rationalize things, isn't it?
Alaska gets most of it's money in the state budget from oil companies in the form of taxes. If the oil companies are doing well, Alaska collects more revenue. If the oil companies are doing poorly, Alaska collects less revenue.
Alaska then needs to decide what to do with the revenue. Oil companies at the time that Sarah Palin was elected were doing well. Therefore, the Alaska budget had a surplus at this time.
Palin was pressured to spend the money on whatever stuff legislatures piss money away on. Instead of doing that she gave a tax rebate to the people of Alaska.
That is a good thing.
I think its a good thing as well. I said in an earlier post that it is generally better for the government to give it to the people than to spend it.
But understand it for what it is - it is a transference of wealth from the profits of oil companies to everybody else. If it was anything else, then the taxes for the oil companies should go lower, not taxes from the oil companies going to Alaskans. It is no different than taxing the profits of Apple or Cisco and giving it directly to everybody else. The only difference is that it is oil rather than hardware or software.
Palin is the former mediocre Guv of a small State, a neocon, a self-admitted zionist and not particularly upstanding in her personal life. SURELY conservatives (the real ones, not the Israel Firsters) can find a better Standard Bearer for 2012.
Go clone Hitler you fucking poseur
I completely agree. Being a private citizen gives her the freedom to whatever she wants, rather than just be a lightening rod for liberal viciousness.
Now she can fight back.
You guys are the only people that consider Palin to be a "private citizen".
WELL THEN, what the hell is if she isn't a PRIVATE CITIZEN. she isn't in any elected office of the guberment, now is she.
sheeesh
the difference is, the oil companies are drilling and removing a Natural Resource that belongs to the people of the State of Alaska. the Silicon Valley companies are nothing compared to that, but nice try.
She can be a public figure who is a private citizen.
the difference is, the oil companies are drilling and removing a Natural Resource that belongs to the people of the State of Alaska. the Silicon Valley companies are nothing compared to that, but nice try.
So you ARE a collectivist. I thought so.
You and Hugo Chavez have more in common than you think.
the difference is, the oil companies are drilling and removing a Natural Resource that belongs to the people of the State of Alaska. the Silicon Valley companies are nothing compared to that, but nice try.
So you ARE a collectivist. I thought so.
You and Hugo Chavez have more in common than you think.
yeah, I'm sure ole Hugo is just running out and giving away all that monies he's collecting from the oil company's that he seized by a takeover.
gawd man, get real.
So you ARE a collectivist. I thought so.
You and Hugo Chavez have more in common than you think.
yeah, I'm sure ole Hugo is just running out and giving away all that monies he's collecting from the oil company's that he seized by a takeover.
gawd man, get real.
The two collectivists who believe the natural resources of the nation are owned by the people, superseding property rights!
=
rofl!
