Santorum booed for his positions on same-sex marriage, legal pot (New Hampshire colle

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Matthew, Jan 6, 2012.

  1. Matthew
    Online

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    49,663
    Thanks Received:
    4,595
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +15,149
    Santorum booed for his positions on same-sex marriage, legal pot (New Hampshire college students)
    The Hill ^ | 1/05/11 | Alicia M. Cohn
    Santorum booed for his positions on same-sex marriage, legal pot - The Hill's Ballot Box

    Santorum booed for his positions on same-sex marriage, legal pot
    By Alicia M. Cohn - 01/05/12 06:21 PM ET


    Amid boos and occasional cheers, Rick Santorum defended his views on same-sex marriage and legalized marijuana, as he was peppered with questions by a crowd of college students in New Hampshire on Thursday.


    The conservative candidate did not sidestep a challenge issued by several members of the crowd on the subject, but instead asked students to break down their argument so he could reply at length.


    “Don’t you have to make the positive argument why the law should be changed?” he asked.


    Santorum was speaking at the College Convention 2012, an event in Concord, New Hampshire planned ahead of Santorum’s recent surprise jump in the polls.


    The initial question posed to Santorum was to explain how same-sex marriage “personally” affected him. Santorum has expressed his support of a federal ban on same-sex marriage.


    Santorum noted that he was not surprised to take a question on same-sex marriage from a college-aged audience, and said he was “happy to engage in a discussion” but emphasized that it would be “civil” even as he faced interruptions from various members of the audience.


    Santorum grilled one female audience member who chimed in on the subject, challenging her to defend her argument in favor of same-sex marriage by answering questions about whether the definition of marriage should be changed to reflect whatever makes various people happy.


    "Are we saying everybody has the right to marry," Santorum asked.


    "Yes, yes," a significant segment of the crowd responded.


    "What about three men?" Santorum challenged. “If she reflects the values that marriage can be for anybody or any group of people, as many as is necessary, any two people or any three or four, marriage really means whatever you want it to mean.”


    The student fired back a qualification that people should be allowed what makes them happy so long as it didn’t harm anyone else.


    “Who decides that, though?” Santorum said.


    Santorum concluded with a passionate defense of traditional marriage that included his argument in favor of a “birthright” of every child to know and be loved by a man and a woman. His argument earned applause.


    Asked about laws to legalize marijuana, Santorum admitted he is not familiar with the nuances of medical marijuana laws. Marijuana use by prescription has been legalized in several states, with various restrictions. Santorum pushed back against rumbling in the already testy crowd, joking he knows he’s “supposed to know everything.”


    But he said he believes marijuana use is dangerous, based on his personal experience of seeing it used. "I went to college, too,” he told the crowd.


    Santorum hit the campaign trial in New Hampshire after a near-win in the Iowa caucuses on Tuesday, where Mitt Romney beat him by just 8 votes. Santorum is enjoying a slight bump in the most recent polls in New Hampshire as a result, hitting 11 percent and 8 percent in the most recent polls from Washington Times-JZ Analytics and Suffolk University, respectively. Santorum's win in Iowa was credited in part to the large evangelical voting population and Santorum's credibility with social conservatives.
     
  2. Matthew
    Online

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    49,663
    Thanks Received:
    4,595
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +15,149
    I agree with him when it comes to gays, but disagree with him on the pot. Pot is better for you then getting drunk or smoking cigs!

    So my feelings about this are kind of 50/50 on him. Still like Ron Paul better overall.
     
    Last edited: Jan 6, 2012
  3. ShackledNation
    Offline

    ShackledNation Libertarian

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,885
    Thanks Received:
    208
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Location:
    California
    Ratings:
    +324
    If you give government the authority to arbitrarily define marriage between a man and a woman, then you give government the same authority to change its mind and arbitrarily define marriage between a man and a man or whatever else it wants.

    Government has no authority to define marriage. Individuals and their churches or whatever organization they belong to can set their own criteria for marriage. Nobody has to accept the criteria they make, but they have a right to make it and believe it nonetheless.

    The solution to protect marriage is to get government out of it entirely and abolish the marriage license. Marriage is a private social matter, not a government granted privilege. Any legal benefits of marriage can be defined in private contracts just like anything else in the private sector.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  4. Seawytch
    Offline

    Seawytch Information isnt Advocacy

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    28,998
    Thanks Received:
    3,962
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Peaking out from the redwoods
    Ratings:
    +7,043
    As long as we have divorce, the government will be involved with legal, civil marriage. Libertarian wet dream that will NEVER come true.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  5. WillowTree
    Online

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,135
    Thanks Received:
    10,161
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,678
    he didn't say a word against gays, he asked the crowd a question. They yelled "that's irrelevant" but it is relevant and it pissed them off.
     
  6. Seawytch
    Offline

    Seawytch Information isnt Advocacy

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    28,998
    Thanks Received:
    3,962
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Peaking out from the redwoods
    Ratings:
    +7,043
    At that very moment he may not have, but he's said more than enough in the past. It's why his name is now synonymous with a frothy mix...just google him.

    It is irrelevant. What does polygamy have to do with same sex legal marriage which is what her question was about?

    It's called a slippery slope fallacy for a reason.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. Crackerjack
    Offline

    Crackerjack Too sick for a cure

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2011
    Messages:
    4,266
    Thanks Received:
    769
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Your momma's house
    Ratings:
    +772
    :eusa_whistle:

    [​IMG]
     
  8. Avorysuds
    Offline

    Avorysuds Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Messages:
    13,834
    Thanks Received:
    1,655
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Eugene Oregon
    Ratings:
    +2,141
    Santorum is a bigot... I wonder if the news will pick up on it or is they save all bigot "news" for Paul's 22 year old news letters that he didn't write.
     
  9. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,659
    Thanks Received:
    7,418
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,337
    COLLEGE STUDENTS!

    They don't deserve attention. They want Ron Paul who has promised to keep them in pot.
     
  10. truthsaga
    Offline

    truthsaga Economic and BlowBack Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2009
    Messages:
    407
    Thanks Received:
    56
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +56
    It is my life Santorum, BOOOO!
     

Share This Page