Sandy Hook families can sue gun manufacturers.

[Faun]

wrong, dumbass.

 

[2aguy]

No, they would have prevailed. You forget the SCOTUS loves them their "precedent". Especially the Progs. They live and die by precedent, so, as usual, you are wrong.

Only when precedent serves their goals.....if not, they don't give a rat's ass about precedent....

 

[2aguy]

No they wouldn't have. The Miller ruling was in regards to a "well-regulated militia." That would have limited guns to a "well-regulated militia."

You are dumb...Miller didn't do anything like that.

You guys can't stop lying.

 

[westwall]

No they wouldn't have. The Miller ruling was in regards to a "well-regulated militia." That would have limited guns to a "well-regulated militia."

Indeed. Well Regulated meaning, "IN GOOD WORKING ORDER". The language of the TIME IT WAS WRITTEN, sport.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No they wouldn't have. The Miller ruling was in regards to a "well-regulated militia." That would have limited guns to a "well-regulated militia."

Dumbass I see what direction you are trying to escape to. The government doesn't have a second amendment right. It's reserved to the people. The people are the militia

 

[westwall]

Only when precedent serves their goals.....if not, they don't give a rat's ass about precedent....

True, but they are bound by it never the less. A weapon to be used whenever possible.

 

[westwall]

Dumbass I see what direction you are trying to escape to. The government doesn't have a second amendment right. It's reserved to the people. The people are the militia

Isn't it funny how these retards can quote chapter and verse how all of the Bill of Rights are for the individual, but the 2nd.. oooh no, that is so the government can have guns. How retarded is that. Government IS POWER. It has no rights, only power. It loves to take away Rights from people.

 

[bripat9643]

Isn't it funny how these retards can quote chapter and verse how all of the Bill of Rights are for the individual, but the 2nd.. oooh no, that is so the government can have guns. How retarded is that. Government IS POWER. It has no rights, only power. It loves to take away Rights from people.

The idea that the government needs to have its ability to use firearms protected couldn't be more absurd.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Some semiautomatic rifles have been banned before and they can be banned again.

None of the law enforcement, local and State government in my area is going to enforce unconstitutional bans again . They would be out on their asses the next day.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

None of the law enforcement, local and State government in my area is going to enforce unconstitutional bans again . They would be out on their asses the next day.

Text history and tradition says it's never going to happen again.

 

[Libby von H]

I'm sure the ultimate goal here is to try to put gun manufacturers out of business.

It would have the opposite effect as fools like Biden are unawared. We currently have 110 guns for every 100 Americans. Stop production and the criminal world gets involved. People make big money selling guns to those who want one and BANG !! more violence than ever.

 

[PeterPilot]

If traditional discovery were allowed in the SH case, the plaintiff "families" would be exposed as the play actors they are.

 

[FA_Q2]

Isn't it funny how these retards can quote chapter and verse how all of the Bill of Rights are for the individual, but the 2nd.. oooh no, that is so the government can have guns. How retarded is that. Government IS POWER. It has no rights, only power. It loves to take away Rights from people.

This.