Sandra Fluke Argued for Mandatory Coverage for Sex-Change Surgery

[Jroc]

Birth control is not all that Ms. Fluke believes private health insurance must cover. She also, apparently, believes that it is discrimination deserving of legal action if “gender reassignment” surgeries are not covered by employer provided health insurance. She makes these views clear in an article she co-edited with Karen Hu in the Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law.
The title of the article . . . is “Employment Discrimination Against LGBTQ Persons” and was published in the Journal’s 2011 Annual Review.

Remember, as Byron York previously reported, Fluke was rejected as a last-minute substitute witness at a Feb. 16 committee hearing because staffers for Chairman Issa were unable to discover Fluke’s claim to expertise relevant to the subject of the hearing. This law school journal article is the sort of thing that might have been discovered about Fluke’s background, had the Democrats who put Fluke forward as a witness done so with the usual 72-hour advance notice. Here’s one brief quote from the article:

Transgender persons wishing to undergo the gender reassignment process frequently face heterosexist employer health insurance policies that label the surgery as cosmetic or medically unnecessary and therefore uncovered.

Now, imagine Fluke trying to defend this language about “heterosexist” policies in a public hearing, with Republican members of the committee questioning her about whether religious institutions (or private businesses, or taxpayers) should also be required to foot the bill for “gender reassignment.”

Congratulations, America: You’ve been scammed!

Sandra Fluke Argued for Mandatory Coverage for Sex-Change Surgery | Digg PresidentObama

 

[Avatar4321]

In short, she wants everyone else to work for and pay for her desired goods and services.

Didn't we outlaw slavery at one point?

 

[Listening]

Sounds like she needs to argue for vitamins and pediolite for all her lovers !

Not that I believe she is having that much sex.....

Just clowning around.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Slut or not the chick is whack.

 

[Listening]

I have a snide comment to make about the POTUS (maybe they should check that birth certificate to see what the gender was).....but I'll keep it clean.

 

[Jroc]

Left wing activist whack job.. I suppose sex change surgery protects people from some kind of disease. This stupidity will die quickly, then we can get back to the real issues.

 

[skookerasbil]

Left wing activist whack job.. I suppose sex change surgery protects people from some kind of disease. This stupidity will die quickly, then we can get back to the real issues.

 

[8537]

So...It's OK to call a woman a slut and a prostitute - and request she broadcast her sex - because you disagree with her?

I hope Cons stand up against the War on Rush. Stand loud and proud. Scream from the rooftops! "Rush was Right!"

 

[Avatar4321]

So...It's OK to call a woman a slut and a prostitute - and request she broadcast her sex - because you disagree with her?

I hope Cons stand up against the War on Rush. Stand loud and proud. Scream from the rooftops! "Rush was Right!"

Is there a problem with responding to the topic at hand? Why do you feel the need to change it to something we arent discussing?

 

[8537]

So...It's OK to call a woman a slut and a prostitute - and request she broadcast her sex - because you disagree with her?

I hope Cons stand up against the War on Rush. Stand loud and proud. Scream from the rooftops! "Rush was Right!"

Is there a problem with responding to the topic at hand? Why do you feel the need to change it to something we arent discussing?

So the point of this topic just happens to be about a women that, as it turns out (coincidentally, mind you) just got called a slut and a prostitute by Rush?

Or, perhaps, the point of this topic is to further alienate Ms. Fluke and justify Rushs' actions?

Methinks I don't need a compass to figure out which direction the OP was headed. I'm not stupid.

 

[uscitizen]

Yeah the thread was about gas station signs.

 

[Avatar4321]

So...It's OK to call a woman a slut and a prostitute - and request she broadcast her sex - because you disagree with her?

I hope Cons stand up against the War on Rush. Stand loud and proud. Scream from the rooftops! "Rush was Right!"

Is there a problem with responding to the topic at hand? Why do you feel the need to change it to something we arent discussing?

So the point of this topic just happens to be about a women that, as it turns out (coincidentally, mind you) just got called a slut and a prostitute by Rush?

Or, perhaps, the point of this topic is to further alienate Ms. Fluke and justify Rushs' actions?

Methinks I don't need a compass to figure out which direction the OP was headed. I'm not stupid.

Perhaps you do.

 

[8537]

Is there a problem with responding to the topic at hand? Why do you feel the need to change it to something we arent discussing?

So the point of this topic just happens to be about a women that, as it turns out (coincidentally, mind you) just got called a slut and a prostitute by Rush?

Or, perhaps, the point of this topic is to further alienate Ms. Fluke and justify Rushs' actions?

Methinks I don't need a compass to figure out which direction the OP was headed. I'm not stupid.

Perhaps you do.

So you believe the intent of this OP was simply to discuss a random law school student's view of HC coverage?

Seriously, don't act that stupid.

 

[DontBeStupid]

In short, she wants everyone else to work for and pay for her desired goods and services.

Didn't we outlaw slavery at one point?

What? How is an insurance company covering this the same as getting it for free or slavery?

 

[Listening]

So...It's OK to call a woman a slut and a prostitute - and request she broadcast her sex - because you disagree with her?

I hope Cons stand up against the War on Rush. Stand loud and proud. Scream from the rooftops! "Rush was Right!"

Is there a problem with responding to the topic at hand? Why do you feel the need to change it to something we arent discussing?

It's what they do.

I looked further on and you still have references for getting things for free.

 

[tinydancer]

So the point of this topic just happens to be about a women that, as it turns out (coincidentally, mind you) just got called a slut and a prostitute by Rush?

Or, perhaps, the point of this topic is to further alienate Ms. Fluke and justify Rushs' actions?

Methinks I don't need a compass to figure out which direction the OP was headed. I'm not stupid.

Perhaps you do.

So you believe the intent of this OP was simply to discuss a random law school student's view of HC coverage?

Seriously, don't act that stupid.

She's a professional female activist. You should check out her resume.

Fluke will no doubt have a position upon graduation at a high ranking Democrat Law Firm. And the issue at hand is religious freedom not her "no named friends" needs for $3000. worth of contraception over several school years.

 

[Si modo]

In short, she wants everyone else to work for and pay for her desired goods and services.

Didn't we outlaw slavery at one point?

Just a guess, but I would imagine she especially wants men to pay. Some women just aren't big fans of men.

 

[Political Junky]

In short, she wants everyone else to work for and pay for her desired goods and services.

Didn't we outlaw slavery at one point?

Just a guess, but I would imagine she especially wants men to pay. Some women just aren't big fans of men.

Someone should tell Rush. He thinks she's fucking every man on campus.

 

[JoeB131]

In short, she wants everyone else to work for and pay for her desired goods and services.

Didn't we outlaw slavery at one point?

Insurance is earned. If you support a system where health insurance is a form of compensation instead of a public service, then it should be regulated like any other form of compensation. Sorry. Argument fail.

Now, really, it doesn't amaze me a mutant like JROC (who whines about socialism when it's not practiced by Zionists) is still trying to bite Sandra's ankles when the argument has been lost.

What amazes me is this is the best argument you have against ObamaCare. Because Romney supported the same thing. YOu don't have an argument.

 

[JoeB131]

In short, she wants everyone else to work for and pay for her desired goods and services.

Didn't we outlaw slavery at one point?

Just a guess, but I would imagine she especially wants men to pay. Some women just aren't big fans of men.

Not an honest argument. She is already paying $30,000 a year to Georgetown for a package that includes health coverage. So they've already agreed to have a transactional relationship.

They'll give her an education and medical coverage and room and board. She gives them $30,000/year.

Sounds reasonable.

Now all they are discussing are terms.

In a purely fiscal sense, it's really in GeorgeTown's interest to pay for her family planning expenses. (A Gender reassignment, maybe not so much.) They want her to finish her degree so she can pay off her student loans and give money to the Alumni association, after all. And family planning is cheaper than unplanned pregnancies.