Sanders held out, the FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017

Penelope

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2014
60,260
15,767
2,210
The Trump administration had sought to have 100 percent of the FDA be funded by user fees. However, the user fee agreement had already been negotiated between the agency and the industry, leaving little time to return to the negotiating table.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-signs-fda-funding-bill
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Although health care is one of the most partisan political subjects, a new health care law was just signed with almost unanimous support. The FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017 aims to lower prescription drug prices, amid skyrocketing health insurance costs.

What the law does

The law is an amalgamation of provisions from at least eight different standalone healthcare-related bills which had been introduced earlier this year from both parties. Among its most notable provisions:

  • Reauthorizes so-called “user fees” to the Food and Drug Administration for five years. These fees are paid for by medical drug and device manufacturers with every new product application, and will account for $8 billion over the next five years, or about a quarter of the FDA’s total budget. President Trump actually wanted the FDA funded 100 percent by user fees, as a way of keeping the agency funded while slashing the taxpayer-funded portion, but that plan was rejected by Congress for now.
  • Allows certain types of hearing aids to be sold over the counter. An estimated five-sixths of Americans with hearing loss don’t get hearing aids, in large part because the devices are so expensive. The provision passed over the opposition from an unlikely but powerful source: gun rights groups, which claimed the provision could allow the FDA to regulate sound amplification devices often used by hunters. (It wouldn’t.)
  • Requires the FDA speed up approval process for many types of generic drugs. The sped-up process would be invoked if a similar medication is being sold at an “egregious” price. That could mean huge savings for consumers and taxpayers, as generic drugs usually cost about 80 to 85 percent less than their name-brand competitors.
  • The Right to Try Act was separately passed by the Senate. This would allow the terminally ill to access experimental drugs and medications prior to FDA approval, a process which can normally take years. Although that’s a separate bill, Senate lead sponsor Ron Johnson (R-WI) threatened to hold up the entire FDA Reauthorization Act — which he otherwise supported and ultimately voted for — unless his own languishing Right to Try Act received a separate vote in the Senate. It passed with unanimous consent, and now awaits a vote in the House. If enacted, it would be as standalone legislation, not as a component of the FDA Reauthorization Act.
snip

· Only former presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) voted against the bill in the Senate.

· Sanders believed the legislation “does nothing to lower drug prices and is a giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry,” a spokesperson told Axios. rejecting a provision he also

· proposed for the bill, which would have allowed Americans to more easily purchase or obtain medications from Canada, where costs are noticeably less expensive.

· The last time the reauthorization of FDA fees passed passed was in 2012, and Sanders was the only Senate opposer then too.

Summary of H.R. 2430: FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017 - GovTrack.us

------------------------------------------------------
now we all know why meds are expensive , especially new meds, except for generics.
 
So instead of tax money, its put on the consumer. Apparently Trump doesn't want to give any money to the FDA, like its his money.

Who does this hurt, everyone, and especially those on median income and below.

You right wingers want low taxes though, you are actually hurting the vets and also it will cost you more as insurance goes up. The wealthy are not phased by this.
 
Last edited:
The middle income people are paying for the newer meds that the upper class use, because not many median income and lower can afford to get new cancer etc. meds.
 

Forum List

Back
Top