Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I don't know, but neither should be.Murder is rarely a federal crime. But no, when and if it is deemed a federal crime it is tried in federal court.So only the federal government can try murder cases, because there are federal murder laws. Also, only federal marshalls can issue a speeding ticket on a US interstate? Are you retarded?
The interstate thing is silly...there are no federal traffic cops and speed limits are not set by the fed.
Why is carjacking a federal crime? Or possession of a single small rock of crack?
Murder is rarely a federal crime. But no, when and if it is deemed a federal crime it is tried in federal court.Oh, Jesus...FoxNews.
A state doesn't have the jurisdiction to arrest people that are breaking federal law. They also don't have the jurisdiction to try, convict and sentence them.
They MAY assist the Feds but they cannot write laws that give them the power to implement Federal laws in this manner.
So only the federal government can try murder cases, because there are federal murder laws. Also, only federal marshalls can issue a speeding ticket on a US interstate? Are you retarded?
The interstate thing is silly...there are no federal traffic cops and speed limits are not set by the fed.
HOLY HABEUS CORPUS, BATMAN!!A state doesn't have the jurisdiction to arrest people that are breaking federal law. They also don't have the jurisdiction to try, convict and sentence them.
They MAY assist the Feds but they cannot write laws that give them the power to implement Federal laws in this manner.
Actually, it turns out that though they are called federal roads...or interstate highways, and the fed gives money to the states to maintain them, the roads are actually owned by the states.Murder is rarely a federal crime. But no, when and if it is deemed a federal crime it is tried in federal court.So only the federal government can try murder cases, because there are federal murder laws. Also, only federal marshalls can issue a speeding ticket on a US interstate? Are you retarded?
The interstate thing is silly...there are no federal traffic cops and speed limits are not set by the fed.
Yet it is a federal road under their control. Sort of shoots holes in your little theory. Besides, states are allowed to assist the federal government in law enforcement. There are laws against being an illegal in this country. States have the right to enforce their own or federal law. Once again, 0bama is sending the wrong message to the world.
Actually, it turns out that though they are called federal roads...or interstate highways, and the fed gives money to the states to maintain them, the roads are actually owned by the states.Murder is rarely a federal crime. But no, when and if it is deemed a federal crime it is tried in federal court.
The interstate thing is silly...there are no federal traffic cops and speed limits are not set by the fed.
Yet it is a federal road under their control. Sort of shoots holes in your little theory. Besides, states are allowed to assist the federal government in law enforcement. There are laws against being an illegal in this country. States have the right to enforce their own or federal law. Once again, 0bama is sending the wrong message to the world.
Pretty much why the 55 mph federal speed limit law was repealed.
It's pretty amusing to see you all arguing against states rights.
Your hero Obama is the one SUING them claiming they do not as a state have a right to do what they did.
I was under the impression we were discussing sanctuary cities...that is where you are all arguing against states rights.Actually, it turns out that though they are called federal roads...or interstate highways, and the fed gives money to the states to maintain them, the roads are actually owned by the states.Yet it is a federal road under their control. Sort of shoots holes in your little theory. Besides, states are allowed to assist the federal government in law enforcement. There are laws against being an illegal in this country. States have the right to enforce their own or federal law. Once again, 0bama is sending the wrong message to the world.
Pretty much why the 55 mph federal speed limit law was repealed.
It's pretty amusing to see you all arguing against states rights.
Wait now we are the ones arguing against states rights. Reality check Girl, You are the one opposed to Arizona's right to Pass laws about immigration. Not us
you are the worst spin doctor ever. Every time you post more BS, you look even more ignorant.
All that blathering doesn't mean anything. His point is valid.
Murder is rarely a federal crime. But no, when and if it is deemed a federal crime it is tried in federal court.So only the federal government can try murder cases, because there are federal murder laws. Also, only federal marshalls can issue a speeding ticket on a US interstate? Are you retarded?
The interstate thing is silly...there are no federal traffic cops and speed limits are not set by the fed.
Yet it is a federal road under their control. Sort of shoots holes in your little theory. Besides, states are allowed to assist the federal government in law enforcement. There are laws against being an illegal in this country. States have the right to enforce their own or federal law. Once again, 0bama is sending the wrong message to the world.
I was under the impression we were discussing sanctuary cities...that is where you are all arguing against states rights.Actually, it turns out that though they are called federal roads...or interstate highways, and the fed gives money to the states to maintain them, the roads are actually owned by the states.
Pretty much why the 55 mph federal speed limit law was repealed.
It's pretty amusing to see you all arguing against states rights.
Wait now we are the ones arguing against states rights. Reality check Girl, You are the one opposed to Arizona's right to Pass laws about immigration. Not us
you are the worst spin doctor ever. Every time you post more BS, you look even more ignorant.
But I do believe that the states cannot pass laws that are the jurisdiction of the federal government. The can chose to round people up and turn them over to ICE but they cannot bring charges against people for violating a federal law.
States are neither required to enforce Federal immigration policies nor constitutionally allowed to arrest people for violating Federal immigration policies.
It's pretty simple, really.
Where in the constitution does it say cities must enforce Federal immigration policy?
So your comment about officials swearing to uphold the constitution was a non-sequitur. Got it.Where in the constitution does it say cities must enforce Federal immigration policy?
Where does it say there is social security, medicare or unemployment insurance?
States aren't required to enforce Federal immigration policy. States aren't free to enact laws that allow them to arrest people for violating federal immigration policy.
Not sure where the confusion lies...but obviously many of you are confused.
They don't do they? That's why we have the FBI, the ATF and the DEA. And ICE.Where in the constitution does it say cities must enforce Federal immigration policy?
I like this line of thought.
Using this logic the states don't have to enforce federal law. I really like this ravi now your thinking like states rights people, Kudos girl!!!
Oh, Jesus...FoxNews.States aren't required to enforce Federal immigration policy. States aren't free to enact laws that allow them to arrest people for violating federal immigration policy.
Not sure where the confusion lies...but obviously many of you are confused.
The confusion lies in your head.
Federal law allows state and local law enforcement to assist in enforcing immigration law. Arizona is not trying to enforce policy, and the portions of the law requiring employers to check the immigration status of the people they hire are actually required by federal law, Arizona just imposes harsher penalties on employers who violate it. The feds routinely argue that states have the right to make laws that are tougher than federal laws, even if those laws actually affect producers on a national level. They will happily file a brief in favor of California's new requirement that all eggs sold in their state come from hens with enough room to move around, even if those eggs come from outside the border of California.
Believe it or not, this is entirely a partisan and politically motivated suit, one that is opposed even by the current Democratic candidate for the governor of Arizona. If you want to maintain your reputation as a partisan hack, feel free to keep posting in favor of the suit against Arizona.
Torn in Two Different Directions - Video - FoxNews.com
A state doesn't have the jurisdiction to arrest people that are breaking federal law. They also don't have the jurisdiction to try, convict and sentence them.
They MAY assist the Feds but they cannot write laws that give them the power to implement Federal laws in this manner.
It's not the same thing.
"That's different. Somehow. It just is. Neener neener!!"
States can't limit constitutionally granted rights...see the recent 2nd amendment case.
Uh...no...they arrest them and hold them in jail and don't turn them over to ICE. That is the law they made...it is illegal to be in Arizona if you aren't a citizen or have a green card.Haven't we figured this out yet? AZ is doing nothing that they haven't always done if they find an illegal. They turn them over to ICE. Under their new law if they find an Illegal they will again and still turn them over to ICE. (and ICE will probably free them on this side of the border)
The only real change is that AZ will be busting more illegals and ICE will be setting more of them free.
Oh, and the Federal law suit, Obamas DOJ should loose this one easily.
Subtle, yet different.
ICE doesn't have the budget to deal with 20 million illegals. If they did, we wouldn't be having this conversation.Uh...no...they arrest them and hold them in jail and don't turn them over to ICE. That is the law they made...it is illegal to be in Arizona if you aren't a citizen or have a green card.
Subtle, yet different.
Clearly you need to read the law again. lol
They will only be held until ICE takes them. If Ice refuses to take them, well then who knows lol. That is kinda the whole point of the law. If the Feds were doing their job Arizona would never have passed their law.
Put your money where your mouth is.
