- Nov 5, 2012
- 23,506
- 14,698
- 1,405
The fact I do it daily and you’re too dumb to even know it is satisfaction enough. You can keep your welfare check to yourself for now.Since youve never done that I would say nothing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The fact I do it daily and you’re too dumb to even know it is satisfaction enough. You can keep your welfare check to yourself for now.Since youve never done that I would say nothing.
But you dont do it daily.The fact I do it daily...
Back to Washington State, under Michael Bloomberg's gun control initiative. Apparently the Second Amendment has been repealed without process, and there's a runaway cherry-picked grand jury.From your link: The program was inspired by one run in neighboring Richmond, California, in 2016 that studies have said reduced gun crime by up to 70 percent, officials told the local station.
Interesting claim.
I did it just now. You aren’t real bright.But you dont do it daily.
I guess it’s illegal in Washington to say antics terrorists trying to burn down federal buildings and blacks looting Target is a problem.Back to Washington State, under Michael Bloomberg's gun control initiative. Apparently the Second Amendment has been repealed without process, and there's a runaway cherry-picked grand jury.
Seeing as how the mere possession of a firearm, without any provable real act or intention to do harm, is already classified as a violent gun crime.Avowed White Supremacist indicted by grand jury for illegal firearms possession
Seattle – A federal grand jury today returned an indictment charging a 44-year-old Battle Ground, Washington man with two federal felonies for illegal firearms possession, announced Acting U.S. Attorney Tessa M. Gorman.www.justice.gov
Being a "white supremacist" or otherwise having or even to some degree expressing feelings of racial superiority is not a crime, and cannot be a crime in and of itself, under any kind of due process of law.
As if it were a "hate crime" merely to possess a weapon. And properly speaking, a defendant's alleged previous criminal history cannot be used as a bar to dictate what is or is not legal to do or possess or to determine the sentencing or punishment for the matter at hand in court.
Sure you did champ.I did it just now. You aren’t real bright.
Interesting, sounds like a mixed bag. I suppose it depends on if the reduced gun violence was more than the increase in other types of violence and by how much.