San Francisco leaders want taxpayers to pay for green cards, citizenship

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by hjmick, Aug 10, 2007.

  1. hjmick
    Offline

    hjmick Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    16,170
    Thanks Received:
    4,676
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Ratings:
    +7,109
    This is wrong on so many levels. Using taxpayer money to subsidize the fees immigrants pay to be here legally? WTF?

    It seems that not many of the Herald readers like the idea of taxpayer money going to subsidize green cards, citizenship papers, etc., nor do many of them have a problem with what Michael Savage had to say. The comments section makes for entertaining reading.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. hjmick
    Offline

    hjmick Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    16,170
    Thanks Received:
    4,676
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Ratings:
    +7,109
    Wow, somehow I thought this might resonate with people of any political persuasion. Go figure.
     
  3. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    My take on it was ---these people are so wacky that it's not even worth being appalled anymore.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. CSM
    Offline

    CSM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    708
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northeast US
    Ratings:
    +708
    If the city decides to use city funds, then the citizens who pay taxes in that city have a choice to make. They can stay and pay the tax or they can move.

    If the city tries to use federal funds for that, then I guess that wold be a different matter entirely.
     
  5. Ninja
    Offline

    Ninja Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,220
    Thanks Received:
    377
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Glorious People's Republic of California
    Ratings:
    +377
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. hjmick
    Offline

    hjmick Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    16,170
    Thanks Received:
    4,676
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Ratings:
    +7,109
  7. ScreamingEagle
    Offline

    ScreamingEagle Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    12,887
    Thanks Received:
    1,610
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,159
    Me too. It's time to fight the anti-free speech liberals.

    As Savage said in your link:

     
  8. manu1959
    Offline

    manu1959 Left Coast Isolationist

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2004
    Messages:
    13,761
    Thanks Received:
    1,625
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    california
    Ratings:
    +1,626
    we have sf supervisors that don't even live in the city....fuckin hypocrits....
     
  9. Larkinn
    Offline

    Larkinn Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,598
    Thanks Received:
    174
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +175
    You are urging someone to sue someone else for their speech on the basis of wanting to fight anti-free speech liberals. You do, I hope, get the irony.
     
  10. ScreamingEagle
    Offline

    ScreamingEagle Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    12,887
    Thanks Received:
    1,610
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,159
    It's called a countersuit...I hope you get the irony.
     

Share This Page