"The District Court dismissed the suit, but the D. C. Circuit reversed, holding that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess firearms and that the city’s total ban on handguns, as well as its requirement that firearms in the home be kept nonfunctional even when necessary for self-defense, violated that right."A well regulate militia being necessary to the security of a free State!Our Second Amendment clearly states it is about the security of our free States not the rights of indivduals.Yes it does and that is irrefutable.no, it doesn't. both the people and the militia are plural and collective in regard to the security of our free States.
It means individuals as only individuals have rights which is another fact you cannot refute,
The people means individual citizens'
that is an appeal to ignorance.A supreme court decision is not an appeal to ignorance it is a citation from people much smarter than you.a simple appeal to ignorance.no, it doesn't. both the people and the militia are plural and collective in regard to the security of our free States.
STFU, dumbass!
" 1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53."
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER
You can only be unconnected with well regulated militia not the unorganized militia.
The second requires no connection as it applies to individual rights as we have proven here in this debate which you lost
You are either well regulated or not.
"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
i don't need to take the, nine hundred ninety-nine, seriously.We have a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge. The person who resorts to the fewest fallacies is the truest witness bearer and the most moral; hypocrite.you have no facts, only appeals to ignorance.
I stated facts and you know it and are simply a liar and coward
And the pledge is meaningless tripe unrelated to what we are proving you massively ignorant and wrong about
You only make claims right winger because it is your knee jerk defense when proven wrong
it does not say, individuals of the People are necessary.A well regulate militia being necessary to the security of a free State!Our Second Amendment clearly states it is about the security of our free States not the rights of indivduals.
Half does not count.
The right of the people means individual citizens not members of a specific group
1 more time, then I start reporting your bullshit.
" 1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53."
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER