Safety net for the poor

[Contumacious]

SAFETY NET FOR THE POOR SINCE 1967


$431,000,000,000.00

Fuck, that ain't shit.

They need mo'

.

 

[Contumacious]

SAFETY NET FOR THE POOR SINCE 1967


$431,000,000,000.00

Fuck, that ain't shit.

They need mo'

.

431 BBBBBBBBBBBillion dollar per year.


So WHY the fucketh are they still poe'.

.

 

[syrenn]

SAFETY NET FOR THE POOR SINCE 1967


$431,000,000,000.00

Fuck, that ain't shit.

They need mo'

.

431 BBBBBBBBBBBillion dollar per year.


So WHY the fucketh are they still poe'.

.

They breed.


And then they want MORE!

 

[Old Rocks]

952 billion from the same chart for defense. Defense is important, but aiding citizens in need is not? What then are we defending?

 

[occupied]

Just look at it as insurance against looting, widespread revolt and food riots. It's cheaper to feed the poor than to keep them locked up in jails. Don't think it can't happen here, a hungry man will steal to eat in any country.

 

[Old Rocks]

In a land of plenty, if there are no jobs, and the rule is 'root, hog, or die', a hungry citizen is right to steal and to riot.

 

[Contumacious]

952 billion from the same chart for defense. Defense is important, but aiding citizens in need is not? What then are we defending?

BTW, in a fascist country such as ours militarism is part of the welfare programs.

$431,000,000,000.00
+ 952,000,000,000.00
_____________________________
1,383,000,000,000.00

So the welfare/warfare grand total is over a TTTrillion dollars.

.

 

[Valox]

Yawn....still is small in comparison to corporate welfare.

Remember who got the bailout after the financial crisis? Wall St. or Main St?


Yet, Contards, blame the poor for welfare. When will you fucking assholes start attacking corporate welfare with the same passion that you attack the poor?

 

[Contumacious]

Yawn....still is small in comparison to corporate welfare.

Remember who got the bailout after the financial crisis? Wall St. or Main St?


Yet, Contards, blame the poor for welfare. When will you fucking assholes start attacking corporate welfare with the same passion that you attack the poor?

Excuse me son, but I am not a "conservative" as a LIBERTARIAN I oppose welfare , period. All forms and all shapes

.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Where would we be if that money stopped circulating through our economy?

 

[Steelplate]

$431B was the budget for 2012. The OP lies... it's not since 1967 that it's been $431B/year.

More Faux Outrage from the "Johnny can't read(or comprehend)" Faction.

 

[sfcalifornia]

SAFETY NET FOR THE POOR SINCE 1967


$431,000,000,000.00

Fuck, that ain't shit.

They need mo'

.

Perhaps if the Education budget of 3% came even close to the Defense budget of 25% we wouldn't be spending 12% of our budget on welfare.

 

[Cowman]

SAFETY NET FOR THE POOR SINCE 1967


$431,000,000,000.00

Fuck, that ain't shit.

They need mo'

.

431 BBBBBBBBBBBillion dollar per year.


So WHY the fucketh are they still poe'.

.

Yes... they're squandering all that money. They could be rich if only they stopped squandering it all!

Don't be so stupid.

 

[Swagger]

Although I support a welfare system that takes an active/relentless role in finding their clients a job, the endemic absence of constructive checks and balances across the board means that the safety net has become a fishing net used to trawl the system for whatever benefits it can yield. By all means make state assistance available to those who genuinely need it, but make it a two-way street where the recipient's job seeking is effectively scrutinised whilst legally reserving the option of withdrawing said assistance as a result of unsatisfactory efforts to seek/find work from the unemployed.

 

[Cowman]

Although I support a welfare system that takes an active/relentless role in finding their clients a job, the endemic absence of constructive checks and balances across the board means that the safety net has become a fishing net used to trawl the system for whatever benefits it can yield. By all means make state assistance available to those who genuinely need it, but make it a two-way street where the recipient's job seeking is effectively scrutinised whilst legally reserving the option of withdrawing said assistance as a result of unsatisfactory efforts to seek/find work from the unemployed.

Start hiring more government employees to do that then. Create jobs!

 

[The T]

952 billion from the same chart for defense. Defense is important, but aiding citizens in need is not? What then are we defending?

Defense is Constitutionally mandated, twerp.

 

[P F Tinmore]

952 billion from the same chart for defense. Defense is important, but aiding citizens in need is not? What then are we defending?

Defense is Constitutionally mandated, twerp.

There is no mandate for us to waste that much money on it.

 

[Truthmatters]

SAFETY NET FOR THE POOR SINCE 1967


$431,000,000,000.00

Fuck, that ain't shit.

They need mo'

.

431 BBBBBBBBBBBillion dollar per year.


So WHY the fucketh are they still poe'.

.

They breed.


And then they want MORE!

This is how the wealthy in this country see the poor.

They have the compassion of sharks

 

[Truthmatters]

Yawn....still is small in comparison to corporate welfare.

Remember who got the bailout after the financial crisis? Wall St. or Main St?


Yet, Contards, blame the poor for welfare. When will you fucking assholes start attacking corporate welfare with the same passion that you attack the poor?

Excuse me son, but I am not a "conservative" as a LIBERTARIAN I oppose welfare , period. All forms and all shapes

.

TOO BAD!

you are not the majority and this is a democracy.

dont like what that the majority dont want children to go hungry and cold then fucking move.

 

[The T]

952 billion from the same chart for defense. Defense is important, but aiding citizens in need is not? What then are we defending?

Defense is Constitutionally mandated, twerp.

There is no mandate for us to waste that much money on it.

There is no mandate to pay off moochers to vote for politicians so they can keep thier power over us.