Safe Zones For Queers On Campus

That's complete unadulterated bull shit. You know it, I know it and anyone with a lick of common sense knows it. Some queer came up with that and it's been debunked 15 ways to Sunday

Actually, the Adams study has never been debunked.

So what they did was they did a screening test and identified the realy nasty homophobes. Then they put a monitor on their weiners and showed them porn. Guess who got the chubbies when they saw the dude on dude porn.
 
You'll have to excuse me if I don't consider two hysterical homosexual websites to be credible.

Guy, we all know that most homophobes like yourself are latently gay. They've done studies on this.
In any debate about gays, the first thing a libturd does is accuse you of being a homosexual. They use the word like an epithet. You would think from the way they behave that they hate homosexuals.

BTW, they haven't done any such studies. That's total horseshit, like everything you post. Based on my experience, homosexuals are all liberal Democrats.

Pointing out a fact, that extreme homophobia is often rooted in the homophobes own latent tendencies is not an "insult" except to the homophobic bigot who has latent tendencies.


ROFL! Yeah, right. You have no intention of insulting anyone when you accuse people of being homosexuals. It's amazing how liberals tell lies that even a 5-year-old could see through.

BTW. You're a lesbian, aren't you?

It's not an insult to the person pointing out the fact, only to the person receiving the fact.

Yes, I'm a lesbian.


Horseshit. It's intended as an insult.
 
I also always wondered if gays are so pro-gay, why do they get so pissed when I mention that Al Gore was gay, Hillary is bi-sexual, and Obama is bi-sexual but mostly into guys, or mention the primary reason the left backed Obama and next Hillary was because they're gay....or the reason they were so pissed about Bush winning was because they were hoping Al Gore would win and stack the court with a bunch of women in comfortable shoes like Obama has?

We get pissed about that because you are LYING about it.

You are bearing false witness. That was a sin in your religion, isn't it?

That isn't what "bearing false witness" means, numskull.
 
You'll have to excuse me if I don't consider two hysterical homosexual websites to be credible.

Guy, we all know that most homophobes like yourself are latently gay. They've done studies on this.
In any debate about gays, the first thing a libturd does is accuse you of being a homosexual. They use the word like an epithet. You would think from the way they behave that they hate homosexuals.

BTW, they haven't done any such studies. That's total horseshit, like everything you post. Based on my experience, homosexuals are all liberal Democrats.

There was a study, some queer did it. Much like the word homophobia....made up by a queer.

She's mistaken Joe. There was a peer reviewed study that appeared in a reputable publication, the April 2012 issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology published by the University of Rochester.

Oh, and "some queer" is Dr Netta Weinstein (Dr Netta Weinstein obtained her PhD Clinical Psychology from the University of Rochester in New York, with a research emphasis of social and motivational psychology. Before joining our Department, she was an associate researcher at the University of Hamburg, in Germany, in the Department of Motivation and Education.) Dr. Richard M Ryan (From Wiki: Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci both rank among the top 1% of researchers in the field of Psychiatry and Psychology.[1] In 2012 Richard M. Ryan was selected for the 2012 Lifetime Achievement Award from the International Network on Personal Meaning)


Psychology is almost pure quackery. Psychologists are mostly cranks, and their so-called "studies" prove pretty much anything they want to prove.
 
Drunk college students get involved altercations regularly. The homos single themselves out so you notice and make it a homo victim issue. They'd probably help their own cause if they would accept the fact that hetero men are innately nauseated by homo behavior regardless of what their lefty indoctrinating academics teach them. Keep your homo life to yourselves.

So by your logic, a girl who dresses too "slutty" should fully expect to be raped, then?
How in the hell did you come up with that based on my post?
Don't crush that dwarf, hand me the pliers.
 
That's complete unadulterated bull shit. You know it, I know it and anyone with a lick of common sense knows it. Some queer came up with that and it's been debunked 15 ways to Sunday

Actually, the Adams study has never been debunked.

So what they did was they did a screening test and identified the realy nasty homophobes. Then they put a monitor on their weiners and showed them porn. Guess who got the chubbies when they saw the dude on dude porn.

I would never trust a study conducted by a bunch of queers. One thing I know is that I could never get excited by looking at some guy's hairy ass.
 
Drunk college students get involved altercations regularly. The homos single themselves out so you notice and make it a homo victim issue. They'd probably help their own cause if they would accept the fact that hetero men are innately nauseated by homo behavior regardless of what their lefty indoctrinating academics teach them. Keep your homo life to yourselves.

So by your logic, a girl who dresses too "slutty" should fully expect to be raped, then?
How in the hell did you come up with that based on my post?
Don't crush that dwarf, hand me the pliers.

How do you NOT see it being the same thing. You argued gays should be assaulted by offending straight people by their "behavior". Which is what, exactly. THrowing killer Oscar Parties? Well, never mind. In short, they were "Asking for it".

The same thing they used to say about rape victims who didn't dress like Quakers or had sex people didn't approve of.

Now, here's a question I know you won't answer. How does people being gay affect your life in any way?
 
Drunk college students get involved altercations regularly. The homos single themselves out so you notice and make it a homo victim issue. They'd probably help their own cause if they would accept the fact that hetero men are innately nauseated by homo behavior regardless of what their lefty indoctrinating academics teach them. Keep your homo life to yourselves.

So by your logic, a girl who dresses too "slutty" should fully expect to be raped, then?
How in the hell did you come up with that based on my post?
Don't crush that dwarf, hand me the pliers.

How do you NOT see it being the same thing. You argued gays should be assaulted by offending straight people by their "behavior". Which is what, exactly. THrowing killer Oscar Parties? Well, never mind. In short, they were "Asking for it".

The same thing they used to say about rape victims who didn't dress like Quakers or had sex people didn't approve of.

Now, here's a question I know you won't answer. How does people being gay affect your life in any way?
I never defended assaulting anyone. I just reminded homofascists that homo behavior elicits reactions of nausea in normal men. You homos need to bear that in mind and apply a little courtesy.
 
I would never trust a study conducted by a bunch of queers. One thing I know is that I could never get excited by looking at some guy's hairy ass.

Yes, you're kind of like a vegetarian who just can't stop talking about steak.

ROFL! I simply disagree with queers on a couple of issues: so-called "gay marriage," and "their belief that they can force people to serve them." Dispute either of those two things and a swarm of angry queer hornets will descend on you. It's not because I enjoy debating them on either issue. I thoroughly hate it. I hate interacting with queers in any way whatsoever.
 
I never defended assaulting anyone. I just reminded homofascists that homo behavior elicits reactions of nausea in normal men. You homos need to bear that in mind and apply a little courtesy.

And chicks wearing sexy short skirts and see-through blouses elicit boners from men... so they should totally expect to get raped if they aren't wearing a Bhurka.
 
ROFL! I simply disagree with queers on a couple of issues: so-called "gay marriage," and "their belief that they can force people to serve them." Dispute either of those two things and a swarm of angry queer hornets will descend on you. It's not because I enjoy debating them on either issue. I thoroughly hate it. I hate interacting with queers in any way whatsoever.

Uh, huh, which is why you can't stop talking about hairy asses.... I mean steak.

Incidentally, the law says you have to serve people if you offer a business service. It's called "Public Accommodation".
 
ROFL! I simply disagree with queers on a couple of issues: so-called "gay marriage," and "their belief that they can force people to serve them." Dispute either of those two things and a swarm of angry queer hornets will descend on you. It's not because I enjoy debating them on either issue. I thoroughly hate it. I hate interacting with queers in any way whatsoever.

Uh, huh, which is why you can't stop talking about hairy asses.... I mean steak.

Incidentally, the law says you have to serve people if you offer a business service. It's called "Public Accommodation".

So if I mention that one time, that means I can't stop talking about it? According to your own criteria, you can't stop talking about it. Apparently you're a queer.

The constitution doesn't authorize such a law. It's called "judicial activism." The foundation for it came about through intimidation when because FDR threatened to pack the court.
 
I never defended assaulting anyone. I just reminded homofascists that homo behavior elicits reactions of nausea in normal men. You homos need to bear that in mind and apply a little courtesy.

And chicks wearing sexy short skirts and see-through blouses elicit boners from men... so they should totally expect to get raped if they aren't wearing a Bhurka.
Rape is a violent crime that goes way beyond sex drive.
 
So if I mention that one time, that means I can't stop talking about it? According to your own criteria, you can't stop talking about it. Apparently you're a queer.

The constitution doesn't authorize such a law. It's called "judicial activism." The foundation for it came about through intimidation when because FDR threatened to pack the court.

I'm not the one talking about the sexual mechanics of it like you are. like you've actually given some thought to it.

But, yeah, Public Accommodation laws are a thing.

Here, I'll help you out.

Public accommodations - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
 

Forum List

Back
Top