S&P 500 Has Performed Far Worse Under Trump Than Under Obama

Discussion in 'Stock Market' started by Synthaholic, Jun 5, 2019.

  1. Synthaholic
    Offline

    Synthaholic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    43,601
    Thanks Received:
    5,912
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Kicking PoliticalChic's ass up & down the forum
    Ratings:
    +14,627
    Where have we seen this before? Trump inherits a solid financial situation and squanders it.

    S&P 500 Has Performed Far Worse Under Trump Than Under Obama

    So much for having the “best” stock market returns.

    During his first two years in office, Donald Trump regularly pointed to the stock market as proof of his leadership’s effectiveness. Experts may have shaken their heads, saying that stock values aren’t an accurate measure of the country’s economic performance. But they are popular with voters, who check their 401(k) investments, and, thus, with politicians. Particularly since “presidents can have a major impact on the financial markets in the short run,” said David Kass, professor of finance at the University of Maryland.
     
  2. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    49,152
    Thanks Received:
    6,958
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +28,005
    Comparing apples and oranges. Obama's numbers reflect increases after a severe drop due to the MBS fiasco in 2008.

    Trump's numbers are in a midpoint phase of an economic cycle.
     
  3. Synthaholic
    Offline

    Synthaholic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    43,601
    Thanks Received:
    5,912
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Kicking PoliticalChic's ass up & down the forum
    Ratings:
    +14,627
    When it comes to talking himself up, Trump in particular has compared himself to Barack Obama. So, how do the two presidents measure up in terms of growth in major indexes, measured between their inauguration and May 31 of their third year in office?

    The short answer is that Trump has quite a way to go. Under Obama, the S&P 500 grew by 56.4%. The Dow Jones Industrials Average was up 50.6% and the Nasdaq, 92.9%.

    The numbers under Trump were 21.4% for the S&P 500, 25.2% for the Dow, and 34.2% for Nasdaq.

    [​IMG]

    “The first three years of the Obama years is confidence returning to the market and investors emerging out of the bunker mentality of the financial crisis,” Mitchell said.
     
  4. Synthaholic
    Offline

    Synthaholic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    43,601
    Thanks Received:
    5,912
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Kicking PoliticalChic's ass up & down the forum
    Ratings:
    +14,627
    Yes, ‘Fortune’ magazine must be confused about the financial world.

    Sit down, rube.
     
  5. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    49,152
    Thanks Received:
    6,958
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +28,005
    No, they are presenting the information in a slanted way. Please tell me what part of my statement was wrong.

    Why aren't they showing graphs with overall value?

    It's spin, nothing else but.
     
  6. Synthaholic
    Offline

    Synthaholic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    43,601
    Thanks Received:
    5,912
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Kicking PoliticalChic's ass up & down the forum
    Ratings:
    +14,627
    Yes, because Fortune magazine is just full of Wall Street Liberals.

    Sit down, rube.
     
  7. iamwhatiseem
    Online

    iamwhatiseem Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    22,959
    Thanks Received:
    4,723
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    On a hill
    Ratings:
    +14,766
    Heloo??????
    Trump doesn't have nearlly $4 Trillion to pump the system up like Obama did.
    Good God people are this dumb?
    Ever hear of TARP?
     
  8. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    49,152
    Thanks Received:
    6,958
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +28,005
    The author in particular, judging by his past articles is no Trump fan.

    But of course your narrative got smashed by me, so you can't answer any of my questions directly.
     
  9. Synthaholic
    Offline

    Synthaholic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    43,601
    Thanks Received:
    5,912
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Kicking PoliticalChic's ass up & down the forum
    Ratings:
    +14,627
    TARP didn’t go to S&P companies, dumbass. It went to the banks.
     
  10. MarathonMike
    Offline

    MarathonMike Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2014
    Messages:
    15,692
    Thanks Received:
    4,756
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    The Southwestern Desert
    Ratings:
    +28,218
    Obama had as much to do with the rebound of the stock market as he did getting bin Laden. In both instances he was the beneficiary of efforts of others. Bush, Cheney and Seal Team 6 led to bin Laden's capture and Ben Bernanke's Fed policies made it ridiculously easy for corporations and banks to show great earnings to investors.
     

Share This Page