Ryan's War On People in Poverty: Here We GO Again: 47% message

[Procrustes Stretched]

Ryan's War On People in Poverty: Here We GO Again: 47% message Paul Ryan calls for cuts to anti-poverty programs in GOP budget - latimes.com


By Lisa Mascaro This post has been corrected. See note at the bottom for details.

March 3, 2014, 10:07 a.m.

WASHINGTON - House Budget Committee Chairman Paul D. Ryan is taking aim at the nation's poverty programs, unveiling an ambitious report Monday that will underpin Republican budget priorities this election year.

The former Republican vice presidential nominee is long on criticism of the nearly $800 billion in government spending on more than 90 different poverty programs in 2012 that provided food, housing, education and other assistance for low-income Americans.

But the report is short on policy prescriptions, which are coming later from the budget chairman.

Paul Ryan calls for cuts to anti-poverty programs in GOP budget - latimes.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------


Poor GOP. It can't catch a break what with all those wingnuts in positions of power in their caucus

 

[Stephanie]

we know that you all have run out of idea on how to attack and smear people

so we now have ANTI-POVERTY programs, when the hell did we get that? Get that title from the slimes folks

You all must feel desperate? must be that almost 60% disapproval of your dear leader his Democrat comrades in arms

the LAslimes is just what they are, slimy and in the back pockets of the DNC

take anything they say with a grain of salt

and the laslimes is so worried about poverty, why aren't they out raising money for "the people in poverty"?

oh wait, they expect all you TAXPAYERS to use your monies

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I say send them to Fight Obama's War for Ukrainian Oil

 

[bedowin62]

that 47% had it MUCH BETTER WHEN REPUBLICANS RAN THINGS

true story


libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[bedowin62]

not only did that 47% have things MUCH BETTER UNDER BUSH AND REPUBS; but 93% of American households are WORSE OFF UNDER OBAMA.
in fact the top 7% of the RICHEST Americans and ONLY that 7%; has seen an increase in Household Income


libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[Stephanie]

They will do anything to for their party..even after Obama's record and how many people disapprove of him

it's just sad how many loyal subjects and tools they have hooked

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

we know that you all have run out of idea on how to attack and smear people

so we now have ANTI-POVERTY programs, when the hell did we get that? Get that title from the slimes folks

You all must feel desperate? must be that almost 60% disapproval of your dear leader his Democrat comrades in arms

the LAslimes is just what they are, slimy and in the back pockets of the DNC

take anything they say with a grain of salt

and the laslimes is so worried about poverty, why aren't they out raising money for "the people in poverty"?

oh wait, they expect all you TAXPAYERS to use your monies

Translator in aisle 5?!

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

I say send them to Fight Obama's War for Ukrainian Oil

Ukranian oil?

 

[rightwinger]

that 47% had it MUCH BETTER WHEN REPUBLICANS RAN THINGS

true story


libs are losers who lie to themselves

Being sent to two wars and losing 700,000 jobs a month? Oh yea, the 47% were THRILLED with the Republicans and showed it at the polls

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

In the upside down world of right wing loons, people are worse off for accepting government assistance as if the assistance came before the need.

Ignore why people need assistance, just mention they are worse off than before they accepted assistance. DO not question why they need assistance

 

[Stephanie]

and we get, Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh

lol

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

from the conservative Heritage Foundation

Why I do not trust conservatives when it comes to criticism of Obamacare

http://thinkprogress.org/health/201...all-households-to-obtain-adequate-insurance/#

 

[bedowin62]

In the upside down world of right wing loons, people are worse off for accepting government assistance as if the assistance came before the need.

Ignore why people need assistance, just mention they are worse off than before they accepted assistance. DO not question why they need assistance

YOU POOR BABBLING IDIOT. people are worse off because THINGS ARE WORSE under obama. and because obama has loosened welfare restrictions. we're not living in an upside down world leftard; you're living in DENIAL. THE TWO items are not mutually exclusive. ....... under obama there are more needy AND more people gaming the system

 

[bedowin62]

look at the left-wing idiot trying to talk out of both sides of his mouth!

wants us to question why people need assistence. ok; but why dont you take your own advice? where is your intellectual curiosity? how can food stamps, welfare and unemployment have to remain at RECORD, EMERGENCY LEVELS that are from teh end of the bush years and beginning of the obama years; if you left-wing morons are insisting things are so much better now then when we were losing 700,000 jobs per month at the height of the recession?

 

[rightwinger]

Poor people can't succeed unless they are suffering.......Ryan knows what is best for the poor

 

[bedowin62]

Poor people can't succeed unless they are suffering.......Ryan knows what is best for the poor

YAWN
there are more poor people since a brilliant Progressive community activist became a wannabe dictator. the Left knows what is best for the poor; they're creating them; and keeping them there

true story

 

[bedowin62]

that 47% had it MUCH BETTER WHEN REPUBLICANS RAN THINGS

true story


libs are losers who lie to themselves

Being sent to two wars and losing 700,000 jobs a month? Oh yea, the 47% were THRILLED with the Republicans and showed it at the polls

obama oversaw the largest increase in House Republicans in 60 years.. so yea what were people showing at the polls then genius?

libs are idiots who lie to themselves

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Poor people can't succeed unless they are suffering.......Ryan knows what is best for the poor

YAWN
there are more poor people since a brilliant Progressive community activist became a wannabe dictator. the Left knows what is best for the poor; they're creating them; and keeping them there

true story

ah, when and how did these people become poor?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

In the upside down world of right wing loons, people are worse off for accepting government assistance as if the assistance came before the need.

Ignore why people need assistance, just mention they are worse off than before they accepted assistance. DO not question why they need assistance

YOU POOR BABBLING IDIOT. people are worse off because THINGS ARE WORSE under obama. and because obama has loosened welfare restrictions. we're not living in an upside down world leftard; you're living in DENIAL. THE TWO items are not mutually exclusive. ....... under obama there are more needy AND more people gaming the system

of course things got worse...but why?

 

[jillian]

Ryan's War On People in Poverty: Here We GO Again: 47% message Paul Ryan calls for cuts to anti-poverty programs in GOP budget - latimes.com


By Lisa Mascaro This post has been corrected. See note at the bottom for details.

March 3, 2014, 10:07 a.m.

WASHINGTON - House Budget Committee Chairman Paul D. Ryan is taking aim at the nation's poverty programs, unveiling an ambitious report Monday that will underpin Republican budget priorities this election year.

The former Republican vice presidential nominee is long on criticism of the nearly $800 billion in government spending on more than 90 different poverty programs in 2012 that provided food, housing, education and other assistance for low-income Americans.

But the report is short on policy prescriptions, which are coming later from the budget chairman.

Paul Ryan calls for cuts to anti-poverty programs in GOP budget - latimes.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------


Poor GOP. It can't catch a break what with all those wingnuts in positions of power in their caucus

time to vote them out until they can cull the herd of the nutbars