Russia's plan is the winner

It was obama's plan all along and Putin fell right into his diabolically clever trap to make Putin look like the man who singlehandedly pulled the world from the brink of WWIII.
 
It was obama's plan all along and Putin fell right into his diabolically clever trap to make Putin look like the man who singlehandedly pulled the world from the brink of WWIII.

Sounds exactly like what Reagan did. What cracks me up is that if Romney was president and had taken this route with the same potential result, all you cons would be telling us how smart he was for pushing forward with his threat of military action.
 
I think Obama gets at least some credit here.

He's the one who allowed John Kerry to get out there in front of the cameras and run his mouth about Syria until he said something he shouldn't have.

Without that level of ineptitude, this breakthrough may never have occurred.

That was the decision that got this ball rolling.

Not that the Obama Administration didn't try to walk it back immediately...
.
.
.
LONDON | Mon Sep 9, 2013 7:22am EDT




"Secretary Kerry was making a rhetorical argument about the impossibility and unlikelihood of Assad turning over chemical weapons he has denied he used," a U.S. State Department spokeswoman said in an emailed statement.


"His (Kerry's) point was that this brutal dictator with a history of playing fast and loose with the facts cannot be trusted to turn over chemical weapons, otherwise he would have done so long ago. That's why the world faces this moment."


Kerry speaking rhetorically over Syria turning in weapons: State Department | Reuters


Lucky for America and the world that they were unsuccessful.
 
So turns out Putin's the bigger winer here? LMAO.

He gets to keep Syria as an ally, keep the naval port and block rival pipelines. Hezbollah stays and Iran's ally stays. I'd say he won. If Obama and Kerry keep talking he may win more..:lol:
 
So turns out Putin's the bigger winer here? LMAO.

He gets to keep Syria as an ally, keep the naval port and block rival pipelines. Hezbollah stays and Iran's ally stays. I'd say he won. If Obama and Kerry keep talking he may win more..:lol:

So the Russians are the peace-keepers while the Peace-Noble-Prize-Winner is the aggressor.

Who would have thought of such a twist.

They should make a film
 
It's like telling George Zimmerman, just give us your gun and we'll forget about the whole thing
 
.

I do hope that Obama does the right thing and sends Putin something for getting him out of this fucking mess.

all-girl-thank-you-card-front.jpg
 
I think Obama gets at least some credit here.

He's the one who allowed John Kerry to get out there in front of the cameras and run his mouth about Syria until he said something he shouldn't have.

Without that level of ineptitude, this breakthrough may never have occurred.

That was the decision that got this ball rolling.

Not that the Obama Administration didn't try to walk it back immediately...
.
.
.
LONDON | Mon Sep 9, 2013 7:22am EDT




"Secretary Kerry was making a rhetorical argument about the impossibility and unlikelihood of Assad turning over chemical weapons he has denied he used," a U.S. State Department spokeswoman said in an emailed statement.


"His (Kerry's) point was that this brutal dictator with a history of playing fast and loose with the facts cannot be trusted to turn over chemical weapons, otherwise he would have done so long ago. That's why the world faces this moment."


Kerry speaking rhetorically over Syria turning in weapons: State Department | Reuters


Lucky for America and the world that they were unsuccessful.

Sure....:eusa_whistle: That was accidental....:eusa_whistle:
 
I think Obama gets at least some credit here.

He's the one who allowed John Kerry to get out there in front of the cameras and run his mouth about Syria until he said something he shouldn't have.

Without that level of ineptitude, this breakthrough may never have occurred.

That was the decision that got this ball rolling.

Not that the Obama Administration didn't try to walk it back immediately...
.
.
.
LONDON | Mon Sep 9, 2013 7:22am EDT




"Secretary Kerry was making a rhetorical argument about the impossibility and unlikelihood of Assad turning over chemical weapons he has denied he used," a U.S. State Department spokeswoman said in an emailed statement.


"His (Kerry's) point was that this brutal dictator with a history of playing fast and loose with the facts cannot be trusted to turn over chemical weapons, otherwise he would have done so long ago. That's why the world faces this moment."


Kerry speaking rhetorically over Syria turning in weapons: State Department | Reuters


Lucky for America and the world that they were unsuccessful.

Sure....:eusa_whistle: That was accidental....:eusa_whistle:


What took him so long to say anything the slightest bit diplomatic ? He's our head diplomat and the shit finally accidently dribbles out of his mouth ? He's been walking around threatening people with missile strikes as if he was head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
 
It's really sad that a former world power, keeps schooling this administration. This gets embarrassing.
 
Actually by having Russia make Syria give up their chemical weapons is actually a win by our side. They budge when normally they don't. They are the ones giving up arms not us.
 
Actually by having Russia make Syria give up their chemical weapons is actually a win by our side. They budge when normally they don't. They are the ones giving up arms not us.

They haven't given up anything yet and have bought precious time. How long do you think it will before the last WMD is accounted for and surrendered ?
 
I think Obama gets at least some credit here.

He's the one who allowed John Kerry to get out there in front of the cameras and run his mouth about Syria until he said something he shouldn't have.

Without that level of ineptitude, this breakthrough may never have occurred.

That was the decision that got this ball rolling.

Not that the Obama Administration didn't try to walk it back immediately...
.
.
.
LONDON | Mon Sep 9, 2013 7:22am EDT




"Secretary Kerry was making a rhetorical argument about the impossibility and unlikelihood of Assad turning over chemical weapons he has denied he used," a U.S. State Department spokeswoman said in an emailed statement.


"His (Kerry's) point was that this brutal dictator with a history of playing fast and loose with the facts cannot be trusted to turn over chemical weapons, otherwise he would have done so long ago. That's why the world faces this moment."


Kerry speaking rhetorically over Syria turning in weapons: State Department | Reuters


Lucky for America and the world that they were unsuccessful.

Sure....:eusa_whistle: That was accidental....:eusa_whistle:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8m2MD76PpM]Jon Stewart: John Kerry is Mr. Magoo - YouTube[/ame]
 

Forum List

Back
Top