Intolerant
Diamond Member
- Sep 18, 2012
- 4,947
- 1,856
- 2,085
And Obama wil "have more flexibility" after the election. Such a wise man.
Thinking the same thing also.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And Obama wil "have more flexibility" after the election. Such a wise man.
Oh look, the braniac chimes in.
ICBMs are actually very cheap to operate and maintain compared to other weapon systems, but dumbfucks like you wouldn't know that.
The reason why we have 450 ICBMs underground in MT, CO, WY, ND and NE is because we need to penetrate our enemies' defenses, have some in reserve during a war and have enough left if we get hit first because someone like Obamination let them sit on the ground with 100 inbound ICBMs from Russia until impact.
Oh, the missiles aren't nuclear, but I'll let you try to figure it out.
But keep rambling on dumbfuck...
Nuclear missiles are currently one of the biggest holes we throw money down, we have plenty but Republicans want even more. Explain how already having the ability to sterilize the biosphere several times over is just not enough?
Sunday must be fantasy day around the republican campfire, in what universe do you think that a Russian first strike is even a remote possibility? The cold war is over, what we have now is the MAP policy, Mutually Assured Profit, where both of our military establishments, Russia and the US, has much to gain by frightening people into spending money on them.
Call me crazy, but I feel this is more aimed at China than the U.S., but I may be wrong.