Russia to upgrade missiles to evade US space arms

Status
Not open for further replies.

Shogun

Free: Mudholes Stomped
Jan 8, 2007
30,528
2,263
1,045
MOSCOW (AP) - Russia's military is planning to upgrade its missiles to allow them to evade American weapons in space and penetrate any prospective missile shield, a Russian general said Monday.

In comments to the Interfax news agency, Russia's Strategic Missile Forces chief, Col.-Gen. Nikolai Solovtsov, as saying that Russia's intercontinental ballistic missiles will be modernized to protect them from space-based components of the U.S. missile defense system.

The upgrade will make the missiles' warheads capable of flying "outside the range" of the space-based system, Solovtsov was quoted as saying.

He didn't elaborate, but Russian officials have previously boasted about prospective new warheads capable of making sharp maneuvers to dodge missile defense systems.

Solovtsov also reportedly said the military will commission new RS-24 missiles equipped with state-of-the-art systems to help penetrate a missile shield. He did not specify that Moscow intended to penetrate a U.S. missile shield, but the Kremlin has fiercely opposed the U.S. plan to deploy a battery of 10 missile interceptors in Poland and a related radar in the Czech Republic.

Russia has criticized U.S. plans for space-based weapons, saying they could trigger a new arms race. Washington has resisted efforts by Russia and China to negotiate a global ban on weapons in space.

Reflecting Russia's suspicions about U.S. intentions, Solovtsov alleged Monday that the U.S. is considering the scenario of a first nuclear strike that would destroy most Russian missiles. A few surviving Russian weapons launched in retaliation could then be destroyed by the U.S. missile defense system.

Solovtsov said the concept was not feasible.

"The Americans will never be able to implement this scenario, because Russian strategic nuclear forces, including the Strategic Missile Forces, will be capable of delivering a strike of retribution under any course of developments," he was quoted by Interfax as saying.

U.S. officials have said repeatedly that the prospective missile defense system isn't intended to be used against Russia. But Russian leaders have dismissed U.S. claims that the sites in Poland and the Czech Republic are intended to counter a missile threat from Iran, saying they will threaten Russia's nuclear forces.

The day after Barack Obama's victory in the U.S. presidential election, President Dmitry Medvedev warned that Russia will respond to the U.S. plans by deploying short-range missiles in its westernmost Kaliningrad region near Poland.

Medvedev and his predecessor and mentor, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, then took a step back, saying that Russia will only make the move if the U.S. deploys the missile defense in Europe. They expressed hope that the new U.S. administration will scrap the plan.

Although windfall oil revenues allowed the Kremlin to boost military budgets, Russian arms makers have had trouble producing new weapons because of the loss of key technologies and the exodus of qualified workers. The prospective Bulava intercontinental ballistic missile for nuclear submarines, for example, has failed repeatedly over the years.

However, officials said a Bulava test last week was a success, and Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said Monday the test program was to be completed next year. He said the missile has already been ordered into serial production.

Russia to upgrade missiles to evade US space arms
 
I blame stupid motherfuckers who thought putting weapons in space would be a good idea.
 
Cause and effect:

America puts a new anti-missile system in Poland, Russia upgrades its missile system to evade this anti-missile system.

Dubyah just loves making more enemies.
 
Russian military missiles are fast-burn boosters, so there is only a two- or three-minute interval when an infrared-guided anti-missile could actually see and hope to hit its target. The flight path is so far north of the proposed bases that to reach the missile in that interval would require a rocket able to achieve 20 to 40 G’s and a burnout velocity four times escape velocity from Earth’s gravity: far greater power than any rocket ever built or even just imagined. If this interval is missed, the would-be anti-missile would then be in a hopeless “tail chase” of the Russian missile, requiring the anti-missile to be much bigger and much faster than its target.

The Space Review: The dozen space weapons myths

Nobody is building such an anti-missile, and probably nobody knows how to even start. So by principles of rocket science, the recent Russian complaints can be exposed as fraudulent. Is it too much to expect that, fifty years after Sputnik, diplomats and journalists and policy wonks begin to get a few clues about how rockets really work, and how propagandists play to baseless fears and ignorance?
 
Key word here is "planning". Russia is "planning" on upgrading. We've shown before that we can out plan them easily.

yea dude.. the mutually assured destruction motto of the cold war sure does support that statement.
 
I blame stupid motherfuckers who thought putting weapons in space would be a good idea.

Exactly. There should a total ban on weapons in outer space. Fueling arms races in outer space, what a waste of money.

If there was a Heaven, the same people would be putting up missiles up there. "We'll secure our place there... NO MATTER THE COST."
 
I'm not sure what MAD has to do with what I wrote but then again you are too stupid to comprehend most time. :eusa_whistle:

well, lets recap your stupid offering to this thread, shall we?


glockmail Key word here is "planning". Russia is "planning" on upgrading. We've shown before that we can out plan them easily.


Shogun
Quote:
Originally Posted by glockmail View Post
Key word here is "planning". Russia is "planning" on upgrading. We've shown before that we can out plan them easily.
yea dude.. the mutually assured destruction motto of the cold war sure does support that statement.


now, if you can't figure out how Mutually Assured Destruction was never a matter of "we've shown them before that we can out plan them easily" then it makes a lot of sense why I routinely stomp a mudhole in your ass here in this forum.
 
Exactly. There should a total ban on weapons in outer space. Fueling arms races in outer space, what a waste of money.

If there was a Heaven, the same people would be putting up missiles up there. "We'll secure our place there... NO MATTER THE COST."

Indeed, but then armchair gungho motherfuckers whose last braincell was flushed down a toilet 30 years ago come into the picture and say stupid shit like "yea, but uh we can show em how kickass we are like we did during the cold war!"


Russia has criticized U.S. plans for space-based weapons, saying they could trigger a new arms race. Washington has resisted efforts by Russia and China to negotiate a global ban on weapons in space.
 
Russian military missiles are fast-burn boosters, so there is only a two- or three-minute interval when an infrared-guided anti-missile could actually see and hope to hit its target. The flight path is so far north of the proposed bases that to reach the missile in that interval would require a rocket able to achieve 20 to 40 G’s and a burnout velocity four times escape velocity from Earth’s gravity: far greater power than any rocket ever built or even just imagined. If this interval is missed, the would-be anti-missile would then be in a hopeless “tail chase” of the Russian missile, requiring the anti-missile to be much bigger and much faster than its target.

The Space Review: The dozen space weapons myths

Nobody is building such an anti-missile, and probably nobody knows how to even start. So by principles of rocket science, the recent Russian complaints can be exposed as fraudulent. Is it too much to expect that, fifty years after Sputnik, diplomats and journalists and policy wonks begin to get a few clues about how rockets really work, and how propagandists play to baseless fears and ignorance?
i guess no one else read your link
maybe you should also send that to Putin
;)
 
well, lets recap your stupid offering to this thread, shall we?


glockmail Key word here is "planning". Russia is "planning" on upgrading. We've shown before that we can out plan them easily.


Shogun
Quote:
Originally Posted by glockmail View Post
Key word here is "planning". Russia is "planning" on upgrading. We've shown before that we can out plan them easily.
yea dude.. the mutually assured destruction motto of the cold war sure does support that statement.


now, if you can't figure out how Mutually Assured Destruction was never a matter of "we've shown them before that we can out plan them easily" then it makes a lot of sense why I routinely stomp a mudhole in your ass here in this forum.

In case you don't realize (you obviously don't) we are talking about knocking down Russian missiles into the ocean before they get to the US, not MAD.

The only mudholes that you stomp are off the steps from your single wide, now that your mother has kicked you out of her basement.
 
In case you don't realize (you obviously don't) we are talking about knocking down Russian missiles into the ocean before they get to the US, not MAD.

The only mudholes that you stomp are off the steps from your single wide, now that your mother has kicked you out of her basement.

yea dude! and thats probably where ESCALATIONS will end!

way to keep up.


*POST EDITED*
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top