Russia reduces air fleet in Syria

Bleipriester

Freedom!
Nov 14, 2012
31,776
3,993
1,140
Doucheland
Russia has withdrawn almost half of its aircraft deployed at the Hmaymim Airbase (part of Bassel Al-Assad international airport).

m9ti5iu3.jpg


"“The number of terrorist units has decreased, which allowed us to withdraw almost half of the aircraft based at the Hmeymim airbase,” chief of the Main Operational Directorate Col. Gen. Sergei Rudskoi said at the VI Moscow Conference on International Security.

The withdrawal of these aircraft does not mean the Russians are halting their air campaign, but rather, taking effective measures to limit its hardware inside of Syria."

Russia withdraws half of their planes from Hmaymim Airbase
 
In other words the planes are worth more then Syrians.
Huh? How do you come to this conclusion?
Easy. We are building right outside of there. The Kurds are moving and you will have no air cover. They pulled the planes because the new advanced system we are putting can track and blow them up. One lone remote battery can down 6 planes at once!
 
In other words the planes are worth more then Syrians.
Huh? How do you come to this conclusion?
Easy. We are building right outside of there. The Kurds are moving and you will have no air cover. They pulled the planes because the new advanced system we are putting can track and blow them up. One lone remote battery can down 6 planes at once!
Turbid conclusions. At first, Russia did not withdraw all planes. Second, Russia has deployed and withdrawn airplanes several times according to the needs. In case of need, more aircraft can be deployed within hours. Third, Syria has its own airforce. Fourthly, Russia continues to bomb terrorists.
 
In other words the planes are worth more then Syrians.
Huh? How do you come to this conclusion?
Easy. We are building right outside of there. The Kurds are moving and you will have no air cover. They pulled the planes because the new advanced system we are putting can track and blow them up. One lone remote battery can down 6 planes at once!
Turbid conclusions. At first, Russia did not withdraw all planes. Second, Russia has deployed and withdrawn airplanes several times according to the needs. In case of need, more aircraft can be deployed within hours. Third, Syria has its own airforce. Fourthly, Russia continues to bomb terrorists.
America called Russia about the bombing.
Russians moved their planes.
Russians did NOT tell the Syrians.

Now WHOSE side did you say Putin was on?
 
In other words the planes are worth more then Syrians.
Huh? How do you come to this conclusion?
Easy. We are building right outside of there. The Kurds are moving and you will have no air cover. They pulled the planes because the new advanced system we are putting can track and blow them up. One lone remote battery can down 6 planes at once!
Turbid conclusions. At first, Russia did not withdraw all planes. Second, Russia has deployed and withdrawn airplanes several times according to the needs. In case of need, more aircraft can be deployed within hours. Third, Syria has its own airforce. Fourthly, Russia continues to bomb terrorists.
America called Russia about the bombing.
Russians moved their planes.
Russians did NOT tell the Syrians.

Now WHOSE side did you say Putin was on?
The Russians did not "move their planes". You are in an Trumpian power craze, that´s all. In reality, a major "rebel" offensive has failed and northern "rebels" are unable to pose a threat at this time.
 
In other words the planes are worth more then Syrians.
Huh? How do you come to this conclusion?
Easy. We are building right outside of there. The Kurds are moving and you will have no air cover. They pulled the planes because the new advanced system we are putting can track and blow them up. One lone remote battery can down 6 planes at once!
Turbid conclusions. At first, Russia did not withdraw all planes. Second, Russia has deployed and withdrawn airplanes several times according to the needs. In case of need, more aircraft can be deployed within hours. Third, Syria has its own airforce. Fourthly, Russia continues to bomb terrorists.
America called Russia about the bombing.
Russians moved their planes.
Russians did NOT tell the Syrians.

Now WHOSE side did you say Putin was on?
The Russians did not "move their planes". You are in an Trumpian power craze, that´s all. In reality, a major "rebel" offensive has failed and northern "rebels" are unable to pose a threat at this time.
Did the Russians do anything to stop the bombing? No
Did they even call the Syrians? No
Did they fire one anti aircraft gun? No
Did they deploy one single plane? No


It's not what you do when defending a friend now is it?
 
This the typical SOP for Russia, step up making dire ominous noises to deflect from the real plan of backing off from having to deal with anybody of even halfway comparable strength they can't bully and intimidate into submission. The Mad Midget and his masters are doing the same now re N. Korea; there is a real chance The Mad Midget will conveniently turn up dead via something like' food poisoning' or 'a sudden unexpected heart attack' in the very near future and the masters can defuse their self-inflicted crisis and save face, put in a 'reformer' launch a 'Korean Spring' campaign or something similar.
 
Huh? How do you come to this conclusion?
Easy. We are building right outside of there. The Kurds are moving and you will have no air cover. They pulled the planes because the new advanced system we are putting can track and blow them up. One lone remote battery can down 6 planes at once!
Turbid conclusions. At first, Russia did not withdraw all planes. Second, Russia has deployed and withdrawn airplanes several times according to the needs. In case of need, more aircraft can be deployed within hours. Third, Syria has its own airforce. Fourthly, Russia continues to bomb terrorists.
America called Russia about the bombing.
Russians moved their planes.
Russians did NOT tell the Syrians.

Now WHOSE side did you say Putin was on?
The Russians did not "move their planes". You are in an Trumpian power craze, that´s all. In reality, a major "rebel" offensive has failed and northern "rebels" are unable to pose a threat at this time.
Did the Russians do anything to stop the bombing? No
Did they even call the Syrians? No
Did they fire one anti aircraft gun? No
Did they deploy one single plane? No


It's not what you do when defending a friend now is it?
What are you talking about?
 
Easy. We are building right outside of there. The Kurds are moving and you will have no air cover. They pulled the planes because the new advanced system we are putting can track and blow them up. One lone remote battery can down 6 planes at once!
Turbid conclusions. At first, Russia did not withdraw all planes. Second, Russia has deployed and withdrawn airplanes several times according to the needs. In case of need, more aircraft can be deployed within hours. Third, Syria has its own airforce. Fourthly, Russia continues to bomb terrorists.
America called Russia about the bombing.
Russians moved their planes.
Russians did NOT tell the Syrians.

Now WHOSE side did you say Putin was on?
The Russians did not "move their planes". You are in an Trumpian power craze, that´s all. In reality, a major "rebel" offensive has failed and northern "rebels" are unable to pose a threat at this time.
Did the Russians do anything to stop the bombing? No
Did they even call the Syrians? No
Did they fire one anti aircraft gun? No
Did they deploy one single plane? No


It's not what you do when defending a friend now is it?
What are you talking about?
Did he defend you or not?
 
Turbid conclusions. At first, Russia did not withdraw all planes. Second, Russia has deployed and withdrawn airplanes several times according to the needs. In case of need, more aircraft can be deployed within hours. Third, Syria has its own airforce. Fourthly, Russia continues to bomb terrorists.
America called Russia about the bombing.
Russians moved their planes.
Russians did NOT tell the Syrians.

Now WHOSE side did you say Putin was on?
The Russians did not "move their planes". You are in an Trumpian power craze, that´s all. In reality, a major "rebel" offensive has failed and northern "rebels" are unable to pose a threat at this time.
Did the Russians do anything to stop the bombing? No
Did they even call the Syrians? No
Did they fire one anti aircraft gun? No
Did they deploy one single plane? No


It's not what you do when defending a friend now is it?
What are you talking about?
Did he defend you or not?
Again, the Russians are not "away" nor "flown out" or something. Again, the number of active aircraft were adapted according to the requirements. Surely, the Syrians were informed about the movement.
 
America called Russia about the bombing.
Russians moved their planes.
Russians did NOT tell the Syrians.

Now WHOSE side did you say Putin was on?
The Russians did not "move their planes". You are in an Trumpian power craze, that´s all. In reality, a major "rebel" offensive has failed and northern "rebels" are unable to pose a threat at this time.
Did the Russians do anything to stop the bombing? No
Did they even call the Syrians? No
Did they fire one anti aircraft gun? No
Did they deploy one single plane? No


It's not what you do when defending a friend now is it?
What are you talking about?
Did he defend you or not?
Again, the Russians are not "away" nor "flown out" or something. Again, the number of active aircraft were adapted according to the requirements. Surely, the Syrians were informed about the movement.
Explain then how or why the airbase went unprotected?
 
The Russians did not "move their planes". You are in an Trumpian power craze, that´s all. In reality, a major "rebel" offensive has failed and northern "rebels" are unable to pose a threat at this time.
Did the Russians do anything to stop the bombing? No
Did they even call the Syrians? No
Did they fire one anti aircraft gun? No
Did they deploy one single plane? No


It's not what you do when defending a friend now is it?
What are you talking about?
Did he defend you or not?
Again, the Russians are not "away" nor "flown out" or something. Again, the number of active aircraft were adapted according to the requirements. Surely, the Syrians were informed about the movement.
Explain then how or why the airbase went unprotected?
So who claims their base is "unprotected"?
 
Airstrike news

"DAMASCUS, SYRIA (7:00 P.M.) – Hundreds of airstrikes targeted jihadist strongholds in northern Hama this week, leaving Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham (Syrian Al-Qaeda), Jaish al-Izza (Free Syrian Army branch) and some 14 other active insurgent groups zero chance of regrouping for a general rebel counter-offensive towards the provincial capital.

Again today, dozens of joint Russian and Syrian sorties were conducted over Lataminah, Morek and Kafr Zita. Below, footage of the aerial bombardment on the latter town is available:

Following the airstrikes on Kafr Zita, Jaish Al-Izza mourned the death of 6 fighters, identified as Ahmad Al-Saiyed, Asaad Marii, Hayel Mulhem, Ammar Halel, Khaled Khabbas and Abd Allah Al-Homsi.

The Syrian Arab Air Force (SyAAF) has dispatched many choppers to bomb the urban areas of the rebel-held region while Russian jets mostly target jihadist positions in rural areas.

On behalf of the armed Syrian Opposition, these groups are active in northern Hama:
► Hay’at Tahrir Al-Sham (Syrian Al-Qaeda affiliate)
► Jaish Al-Izza
► Jaish Al-Nasr
► Free Idlib Army
► Al-Firqa Al-Wosta
► Ajnad Al-Sham
► Ahrar Al-Sham
► Turkistan Islamic Party
► Liwa Ahrar Halfaya
► Liwa Omar
► Jaish Al-Nukhba
► Harkatul Muhajireen Sunna (Iranian Al-Qaeda group)
► Abnaa Al-Sham
► Tajamou Al-Sham
► Failaq Al-Sham
► Muhajireen Al-Ansar"


"BEIRUT, LEBANON (1:10 A.M.) – The Syrian Arab Air Force (SYAAF) carried out a strategic airstrike in the southern countryside of Idlib this week, targeting another Al-Qaeda camp with Russian help.

A Russian drone captured footage of the Syrian Air Force attacking this base in southern Idlib, showing the moment the Al-Qaeda camp was destroyed by the airstrike.



Since launching their counter-offensive in northern Hama, the Syrian and Russian air forces have intensified their airstrikes over the Idlib countryside in order to obstruct the flow of jihadists to the front-lines.

The Syrian Arab Army is expected to resume their offensive operations in the northern countryside of Hama in the coming days, as they look to attack both Morek and Al-Lataminah."

VIDEO: Islamist rebels in disarray as non-stop airstrikes devastate northern Hama
Syrian Air Force obliterates Al-Qaeda base in southern Idlib: video
 

Forum List

Back
Top