Russia honors Obama with postage Stamp

Putin loves Obama...Becouse he can play him like a drum:eusa_whistle:

Russia honors Obama with postage stamp for 50th birthday

Vladimir Putin, Prime Minister of Russia, and former head of the KGB, rules as de facto czar of enormous empire that spans 11 time zones. A confirmed and dedicated Communist, Putin has decided that Russia should publicly honor another fellow socialist on his 50th birthday.

From "The Voice of Russia" English language website we read:

Russia's Post Office has issued a collection of stamps and envelopes to mark the 50th jubilee of the US President Barack Obama.

The US leader is celebrating his birthday on the 4th of August.

In one of his recent interviews Mr. Obama said that fifty years ago nobody could imagine Russia and the US as partners. He added that confrontation ended together with the Cold War.

He said that the Internet and mass media have made people from all over the globe closer to each other. "It is important to contribute to mutual understating between Russia and the US, one of the world's leading countries", Mr. Obama said.

Russia's Post Office also presented the US leader with a postmark featuring his portrait. Mr. Obama liked the gift, stamped several envelopes and then signed one of them with dedication to the museum of the Russian Post Office.

I'm willing to wager a considerable sum of our devalued American dollars that the NY Times, NBC, nor any of the usual liberal media suspect's outlets will run this story.

Blog: Russia honors Obama with postage stamp for 50th birthday

LMAO.

I guess I'll take the partisan tact and point out how Putin spun Bush like a top.

"I looked into the man's eyes......"

Some time later, Russia was supporting Iran and screwing up our position in Iraq.

Bush was eager to work with Putin. Obama has placed more distance between the U.S. and the Russian despot.

Bush thought he could work with Putin, He found out the opposite. Obama knows he can work with Putin, since their goals are the same.. knocking American military power down to size.
 
Last edited:
Gorbachev is hated in Russia; but is a hero to the West.

I believe that the reverse will be true concerning Obama.

Obama will be hated in America; but viewed as a national hero in Russia

Like this guy is a Russian hero.
220px-1990_CPA_6266.jpg


For those who can't read russian, that is Kim Philby.
 
the Russians never issued postage stamps for Alger Hiss or Harry Dexter White. I bet they were pissed they missed out.
 
Ignorance is bliss to many posters here. Many, many non communist and non Russians were honored.
remeber that Russia(non-communist) is not the Soviet Union(semi-communist)




Louis Braille, French inventor (1959)
George Gordon Byron, English poet (1988)
Robert Burns, Scottish poet (1956)
Albert Calmette, French physician and microbiologist (1963)
James Fenimore Cooper, American writer (1989)
Marie Skłodowska Curie, Polish-French physicist and chemist (1987)
Pierre Curie, French physicist (1956)
Charles Darwin, English naturalist (1959)
Charles Dickens, English writer (1962)
Denis Diderot, French encyclopedist (1963)

Jacques Duclaux, French physician (1975)

Albert Einstein, German physicist (1979)
Heino Eller, Estonian composer (1987)
Friedrich Engels, German philosopher
Leonhard Euler, Swiss mathematician (1957)

Everyone on that list is a communist.

That's why Liberals honor them komrade.
 
Putin loves Obama...Becouse he can play him like a drum:eusa_whistle:



Blog: Russia honors Obama with postage stamp for 50th birthday

LMAO.

I guess I'll take the partisan tact and point out how Putin spun Bush like a top.

"I looked into the man's eyes......"

Some time later, Russia was supporting Iran and screwing up our position in Iraq.

Bush was eager to work with Putin. Obama has placed more distance between the U.S. and the Russian despot.

Bush thought he could work with Putin, He found out the opposite. Obama knows he can work with Putin, since their goals are the same.. knocking American military power down to size.

Of course Bush gets a pass for his nincompoopery.

How specifically, aside from your absurd hyperbole, has Obama "worked with Putin".
 
Curious, is Obama wearing a Lenin beard or a Mao hat on the stamp?

Yep.

And there's a special stamp of him standing in front of the Tea Party...who are decked out in their Nazi finest.

Oh Sallow, our poor deluded Sallow. A clear case can be made of Obama's infatuation with socialism and Marxism. The TP and Nazis........not so much......since they are actually all about personal responsibility, smaller gubmint, lower taxes and liberty. But there is no convincing those who refuse facts and embrace fantasy. I bet you are a hoot at parties.

Naw.

They are just Nazis. By the way..the Nazis talked about the very same things! :lol:
 
I am almost 100% positive that the next aircraft carrier will be the USS Obama.

And the ship's Captain and most of its officers and crew will be African-American.

you forgot the Gays!!!! The good ship USS. Lolly-Pop
 
How specifically, aside from your absurd hyperbole, has Obama "worked with Putin".

Click the link and learn something

An Independent Assessment of New START

Proponents of the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) suggest that the new Treaty not be judged against the standards of Cold War strategic arms treaties because contemporary conditions no longer require the treaty characteristics that Cold War conditions demanded of those earlier treaties. Even accepting that point, New START may be evaluated against other sets of standards. Those used in this brief assessment include the specific claims made on its behalf by the Obama Administration, in addition to comparisons to the post–Cold War 2002 Moscow Treaty and the 1994 START I Treaty (both treaties ran concurrently through December 2009).

The Claimed 30 Percent Reduction of Strategic Warheads

The Obama Administration has made claims on behalf of New START that are based on comparisons to the Bush Administration’s Moscow Treaty or to START I. For example, the Obama Administration claims that New START will reduce by 30 percent the number of deployed strategic warheads now permitted by the Moscow Treaty. If ratified by the U.S. Senate, New START would limit deployed strategic warheads to 1,550, while the Moscow Treaty limits the number of operationally deployed strategic nuclear weapons to the range of 1,700–2,200. Despite the superficial comparison (1,550 to 2,200 warheads) suggesting that New START reduces the number of deployed strategic warheads by 30 percent, such a comparison is deceiving, as will be discussed below. In general, the Moscow Treaty limitations running concurrently with the original START I Treaty required deeper reductions and were more restrictive than those contained in the New START treaty. (New START, if ratified, will supersede the Moscow Treaty.)[1]

In fact, despite Obama Administration claims to the contrary, New START’s counting rules and apparent lapses will permit increases in Russian strategic force levels above the 1,700–2,200 deployed warhead limit of the Moscow Treaty. RIA Novosti, an official news agency of the Russian Federation, already has reported that given New START’s counting rules, Russia will be able to retain 2,100 strategic nuclear warheads under New START, not 1,550.[2] Russia will be able to deploy even higher numbers under New START if it follows through on announced modernization programs, particularly the new heavy bomber. In addition Russia could deploy strategic nuclear systems that were limited or prohibited under START I, but appear not to be limited whatsoever under New START.

If Russia exploits the legal lapses in New START, there is no actual limit in the new Treaty on the number of strategic nuclear warheads that can be deployed. The number of Russia’s strategic nuclear warheads would be limited only by the financial resources it is able to devote to strategic forces, not by New START warhead ceilings—which would be the case without this new Treaty.

One of the biggest of these lapses is the bomber weapon counting rule. It is much more permissive than under the Moscow Treaty. Unlike the Moscow Treaty, which counts all nuclear warheads present at heavy bomber bases,[3] New START has a counting or attribution rule of one warhead per bomber.[4] That is, regardless of the actual number of weapons carried by a bomber or deployed at each base, each bomber will be counted as having a single weapon under New START’s 1,550 ceiling. This allows the deployment of a large number of uncounted bomber warheads. Even with existing bombers, as RIA Novosti reported, “Under the Treaty, one nuclear warhead will be counted for each deployed heavy bomber which can carry 12-24 missiles or bombs, depending on its type.”[5] There is no limit to the number of bomber weapons that may be carried by a bomber under New START because it omits the START I limit of 16–20 long-range nuclear air-launched cruise missiles (ALCMs) per bomber.[6] It also omits the START prohibition on arsenal aircraft that can carry very large numbers of nuclear long-range cruise missiles.[7] This New START counting rule alone would permit Russia legally to deploy hundreds of nuclear warheads over New START’s supposed ceiling of 1,550 deployed warheads, and the number could be much higher if a new bomber is deployed. The repeated claims of a 30 percent reduction in the number of permitted warheads under New START are false


An Independent Assessment of New START
 
Yep.

And there's a special stamp of him standing in front of the Tea Party...who are decked out in their Nazi finest.

Oh Sallow, our poor deluded Sallow. A clear case can be made of Obama's infatuation with socialism and Marxism. The TP and Nazis........not so much......since they are actually all about personal responsibility, smaller gubmint, lower taxes and liberty. But there is no convincing those who refuse facts and embrace fantasy. I bet you are a hoot at parties.

Naw.

They are just Nazis. By the way..the Nazis talked about the very same things! :lol:

When you can point to a TP site and factually prove your "argument", I'll listen. Until then you are just pissing in the wind.
 
Gorbachev is hated in Russia; but is a hero to the West.

I believe that the reverse will be true concerning Obama.

Obama will be hated in America; but viewed as a national hero in Russia

Like this guy is a Russian hero.
220px-1990_CPA_6266.jpg


For those who can't read russian, that is Kim Philby.

I don't know about him being a Russian hero. He was a SOVIET hero. That's NOT a Russian stamp!!!
 
Lol despite our country being partially destroyed by our 2 idiot parties, I can say I'm very entertained by the babbling of you partisans.

If Bush had a stamp, it'd be a sign of how great his diplomacy was, if Obama has one, he's trying to resusitate Stalin.

or

Obama is a great diplomat with our new Russian allie, if Bush hadn't been a poopy face to Putin, he would've been honored with a stamp.



Keep up the good work guys.
 
Lol despite our country being partially destroyed by our 2 idiot parties, I can say I'm very entertained by the babbling of you partisans.

If Bush had a stamp, it'd be a sign of how great his diplomacy was, if Obama has one, he's trying to resusitate Stalin.

or

Obama is a great diplomat with our new Russian allie, if Bush hadn't been a poopy face to Putin, he would've been honored with a stamp.



Keep up the good work guys.


Wrong and your assumptions prove your an ass:cuckoo:
 
Lol despite our country being partially destroyed by our 2 idiot parties, I can say I'm very entertained by the babbling of you partisans.

If Bush had a stamp, it'd be a sign of how great his diplomacy was, if Obama has one, he's trying to resusitate Stalin.

or

Obama is a great diplomat with our new Russian allie, if Bush hadn't been a poopy face to Putin, he would've been honored with a stamp.



Keep up the good work guys.

Yes and adding to this same rich irony were the thread(s?) yesterday about how Obama is a poopy head because Putin said that the US economy is a leech on the system. So yesterday, Obama BAD cuz Putin dissed his economy, today Obama BAD cuz Putin offered a sign of respect.
 
Lol despite our country being partially destroyed by our 2 idiot parties, I can say I'm very entertained by the babbling of you partisans.

If Bush had a stamp, it'd be a sign of how great his diplomacy was, if Obama has one, he's trying to resusitate Stalin.

or

Obama is a great diplomat with our new Russian allie, if Bush hadn't been a poopy face to Putin, he would've been honored with a stamp.



Keep up the good work guys.


Wrong and your assumptions prove your an ass:cuckoo:

I wish they were assumptions, I've seen enough of it on this board to know it's the case.

I wish our 2 garbage parties didn't have a grip on americans brains, a grip that constantly feeds them b-s propaganda that the party followers buy into because they like the image being connected to a party brings them.

But like I said, I enjoy it and it's entertaining, keep it up.
 
Ignorance is bliss to many posters here. Many, many non communist and non Russians were honored.
remeber that Russia(non-communist) is not the Soviet Union(semi-communist)




Louis Braille, French inventor (1959)
George Gordon Byron, English poet (1988)
Robert Burns, Scottish poet (1956)
Albert Calmette, French physician and microbiologist (1963)
James Fenimore Cooper, American writer (1989)
Marie Skłodowska Curie, Polish-French physicist and chemist (1987)
Pierre Curie, French physicist (1956)
Charles Darwin, English naturalist (1959)
Charles Dickens, English writer (1962)
Denis Diderot, French encyclopedist (1963)

Jacques Duclaux, French physician (1975)

Albert Einstein, German physicist (1979)
Heino Eller, Estonian composer (1987)
Friedrich Engels, German philosopher
Leonhard Euler, Swiss mathematician (1957)

Why would you be so ignorant as to assume we don't know this? Why are you such a self-righteous and sanctimonious douche bag?
 
Lol despite our country being partially destroyed by our 2 idiot parties, I can say I'm very entertained by the babbling of you partisans.

If Bush had a stamp, it'd be a sign of how great his diplomacy was, if Obama has one, he's trying to resusitate Stalin.

or

Obama is a great diplomat with our new Russian allie, if Bush hadn't been a poopy face to Putin, he would've been honored with a stamp.



Keep up the good work guys.

Yes and adding to this same rich irony were the thread(s?) yesterday about how Obama is a poopy head because Putin said that the US economy is a leech on the system. So yesterday, Obama BAD cuz Putin dissed his economy, today Obama BAD cuz Putin offered a sign of respect.

I dunno about all that, but I do know this, Obama sucks ass for being an ignorant fool.
 

Forum List

Back
Top