Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There's a reason why Liberals refer to people as "peons". Nevertheless, the Democratic Party cares for the "peons" the way Lenin and Stalin cared for the "little people".
as I said, Liberals and Democrats care when they can use other people monies by force to do it. just look at welfare. it has done nothing but keep these people in abject poverty, running to their mailboxes every month looking for A CHECK. and yet you all call that, CARING.
you all and youR BS you care MORE. what a crock of shit.
Stephanie, all you have to do is take a look at the long-standing and very well known positions of the two parties on the major issues I discuss here (welfare, tort reform, labor unions and Big Business v. The Individual in general) and it is quite apparent which party supports the interests of the "little guy" and which party supports the interests of Big Business.
As I have often said, I don't judge - I just report.
Well my dear, your reporting and judging is out in la la land.
My first vote was back in the 70's for a DEMOCRAT.
you might have an argument for back then they DID care for the little peons, but I have watched them EVOLVE into something that is totally unrecognizable. and it ain't for the damn little people my friend. if you can't see that, then you are a blind fool, sorry, nothing personal.
precisely.
Why did he say "your mom...." if he was not speaking towards the child?
That boy's mother is so guilty of her own death that it is the next thing to suicide. Negligence. She had access to all the care in the world and didn't take it. Now we're supposed to be concerned and feel sorry for a dumb kid who is being used by the so-called "progressives"? He'll be better off in foster care.And the reason she didnt was because Obamacare was not in place. That's their whole point. Or did you miss that one?
But if Obamacare had been passed 3 months ago it still would not have altered the outcome. Which was Rush's point.
It is an illogical coupling of two different events that in reality have nothing to do with each other.
NOPE! The point was that if she had medical care available to her, she possibly would not have died at 27....THUS, you should support obamacare, because coverage for people like her with her circumstances, will be available in the future.
as i have mentioned earlier in this thread, i believe it is unhealthy for this little boy to be out there doing this during this period of grief and if i were his guardian, i would not let him do this.... the whole thing is sad.
Rush's comment to the little boy was UNCALLED FOR, none the less....he could have made his point in another manner....imo.
NOPE!!! Actually she did have medical care available to her, and she made the choice not to use it. So I'd say it's pretty safe to say that if she had insurance she would probably still have passed away. I mean even when she did have insurance she didn't go to the doctor. Then after she lost her insurance (which had nothing to do with her illness, but the fact that she didn't go to the doctor when she was employed therefore lost her job because she got so sick she didn't go to work) she still made the choice not to take advantage of the free health care that was available to her.
Rick
Stephanie, all you have to do is take a look at the long-standing and very well known positions of the two parties on the major issues I discuss here (welfare, tort reform, labor unions and Big Business v. The Individual in general) and it is quite apparent which party supports the interests of the "little guy" and which party supports the interests of Big Business.
As I have often said, I don't judge - I just report.
Well my dear, your reporting and judging is out in la la land.
My first vote was back in the 70's for a DEMOCRAT.
you might have an argument for back then they DID care for the little peons, but I have watched them EVOLVE into something that is totally unrecognizable. and it ain't for the damn little people my friend. if you can't see that, then you are a blind fool, sorry, nothing personal.
Really? How interesting. Funny - I was a registered Republican from 1958 until 1992. The Republican Party ain't what it used to be - neocons, you know? I should have gotten out a lot sooner than I did.
Obviously, we disagree on which is the party of the "little people" (I note you aren't calling them "peons" any more) and which is the party of Big Business. Oh well - I guess that's why you're a Republican and I'm a Democrat.
In any event, one thing I'm sure we can agree on - Happy St. Patrick's Day!
Why start a thread about Lush Rimbaugh?
Everyone around here knows he is a former dope head Viagra eating whore seeking hypocrite.
Great entertainer and speaker he is. I listen to him often.
These days that is all the right wing fools need. They actually believe he is a leader of the conservatives.
Goldwater is rolling in his grave.
I love how you liberals never actually address anything someone says to debunk you. but instead resort to name calling as if simply by making fun of them you can marginalize their ideas. You can't form a coherant argument. Yet you think you're amazingly intelligent. it's amusing and mindboggling at the same time.
Harry, I think there was a very valid point to be made in telling the public his Mom's story. And the point is that even it's too late to help his Mom, someone else's Mom can be saved in 2014. But we have to act now and not keep waiting or 2014 will offer as little hope as does 2010.
How is there a valid point? Even if health care reform bill had been in effect, she would have died. She recieved care. She died depsite recieving care.
How will this bill save lives? It won't. Im dreading this bill. If this bill passes I have no doubt that Im going to lose my insurance in the future. And I dont trust the government to take care of me. Nor do I want it too.
