Rush Limbag Challenges MSNBC

[sealybobo]

It sounds like he's whining to me.

he was whining about msnbc talking about him to "boost its ratings" while talking about msnbc to boost HIS ratings.

he's so sad.

the right's stuck with rush, and the left is stuck with sealybobo.

all in all, the right got the better deal.

I'm not costing the left elections. In fact, elections lately have suggested I'm right and you are wrong. Not that you ever have an opinion.

 

[sealybobo]

Ha ha, it's pretty funny that the Obama network couldn't go ten minutes without mentioning his name.

It is good for Rush, personally, but it is horrible for your party because he is seen as a joke to people who aren't loyal Rushbots.

We love it.

And did you hear he quit/resigned yesterday? As the leader of the GOP.

So who is your leader now?

It can't be anyone good because you guys through anyone that was good under the bus a long time ago. Powell should be your spokesman, but instead its Boner, Gizdal, Rash, O'Really, Slanaty, NailinPalin, Huckelberry.

Maybe go with Ron Paul. Oh yea, I forgot, you through him under the bus during the campaign.

It should be Mitt Romney. I shouldn't tell you that because it will help you guys, but he is your best shot. A mormon.

Or Jeb Bush. Just let 8 years go by and run him like you ran that idiot GW.

What do you have, a fucking memory desease?

How many times do I have to say in large print:

I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN YOU ASSHOLE, AND NEVER HAVE BEEN.

You keep claiming I am a GoPer I will start neg repping your stupid ass until you stop it.

Then stop sounding like one.

 

[del]

he was whining about msnbc talking about him to "boost its ratings" while talking about msnbc to boost HIS ratings.

he's so sad.

the right's stuck with rush, and the left is stuck with sealybobo.

all in all, the right got the better deal.

I'm not costing the left elections. In fact, elections lately have suggested I'm right and you are wrong. Not that you ever have an opinion.

i have tons of opinions, sealy. here's one.
you are, hands down, the best bang for the buck for entertainment, available in america. i say that with complete sincerity. whenever i need a good laugh, you're there for me with your spout on analysis of current events, politics and the economy.
for free.
thanks, pal.

 

[sealybobo]

the right's stuck with rush, and the left is stuck with sealybobo.

all in all, the right got the better deal.

I'm not costing the left elections. In fact, elections lately have suggested I'm right and you are wrong. Not that you ever have an opinion.

i have tons of opinions, sealy. here's one.
you are, hands down, the best bang for the buck for entertainment, available in america. i say that with complete sincerity. whenever i need a good laugh, you're there for me with your spout on analysis of current events, politics and the economy.
for free.
thanks, pal.

In the future, be more specific. Instead of just pulling a Pat Buchanan on me and just saying I'm wrong, how about you explain/prove how/why I am wrong.

You can't, because I'm right. You just disagree because you are conservative.

You guys are all alike. I tell you why/how wages for labor are down and corporate profits are up and you guys come back with:

Why do you hate the rich or sealy's a socialist.

Fuck all you idiots. I know I'm right. I don't know about Dodd or Pelosi though. They could be corrupt scum for all I know. All I know is that the GOP is not an option.

If you think they are, then you are the fucking idiot Del. What do you think about that? What makes you think voting for Bush or McCain or Mitt Romney is the right thing to do? Or were you the asshole who said he doesn't vote?

That would explain a lot. Just like you can't back up your beliefs, you also don't vote.

Anyways, I'd love to hear your opinions some day so I can learn what you know. HA!

 

[del]

I'm not costing the left elections. In fact, elections lately have suggested I'm right and you are wrong. Not that you ever have an opinion.

i have tons of opinions, sealy. here's one.
you are, hands down, the best bang for the buck for entertainment, available in america. i say that with complete sincerity. whenever i need a good laugh, you're there for me with your spout on analysis of current events, politics and the economy.
for free.
thanks, pal.

In the future, be more specific. Instead of just pulling a Pat Buchanan on me and just saying I'm wrong, how about you explain/prove how/why I am wrong.

You can't, because I'm right. You just disagree because you are conservative.

You guys are all alike. I tell you why/how wages for labor are down and corporate profits are up and you guys come back with:

Why do you hate the rich or sealy's a socialist.

Fuck all you idiots. I know I'm right. I don't know about Dodd or Pelosi though. They could be corrupt scum for all I know. All I know is that the GOP is not an option.

If you think they are, then you are the fucking idiot Del. What do you think about that? What makes you think voting for Bush or McCain or Mitt Romney is the right thing to do? Or were you the asshole who said he doesn't vote?

That would explain a lot. Just like you can't back up your beliefs, you also don't vote.

Anyways, I'd love to hear your opinions some day so I can learn what you know. HA!

explaining why you're wrong would have the same utility as explaining the theory of relativity to my dog. it would be kind of fun and a complete waste of time.

you don't listen, you have a tenuous grasp on reality and you spout complete bullshit repetitively in the belief that everyone else is as gullible/stupid as you are and will eventually accept whatever hogwash is presented as fact.

you are correct in one thing; i didn't cast a vote for any of the incompetent leeches that were presented as choices for POTUS last fall.

 

[Sarah G]

It is good for Rush, personally, but it is horrible for your party because he is seen as a joke to people who aren't loyal Rushbots.

We love it.

And did you hear he quit/resigned yesterday? As the leader of the GOP.

So who is your leader now?

It can't be anyone good because you guys through anyone that was good under the bus a long time ago. Powell should be your spokesman, but instead its Boner, Gizdal, Rash, O'Really, Slanaty, NailinPalin, Huckelberry.

Maybe go with Ron Paul. Oh yea, I forgot, you through him under the bus during the campaign.

It should be Mitt Romney. I shouldn't tell you that because it will help you guys, but he is your best shot. A mormon.

Or Jeb Bush. Just let 8 years go by and run him like you ran that idiot GW.

I agree, it should be Mitt or Jeb. On second thought, Jeb may not be the best choice now, he'll never be elected after the W failures of the past 8 years. He ruined his brother's chances of ever being president.

Mitt should be their choice if they want to have a shot at it in 8 years.

You must be too young to remember HW Bush's presidency. He was horrible. The economy was bad and we were in Iraq. I was graduating college and he sucked, which is why Clinton won. I said the same thing when GW Bush ran in 2000. NO WAY I said.

But American voters have a very short memory. They forgot about daddy Bush in 8 short years.

And consider that Jeb will get 40% of the vote no problem. If the Democratic contender is weak, like Gore or Kerry, he could easily get another 11%. Consider he'll win Florida back for the GOP.

PS. I don't know why Americans would vote for Mitt. People brag that he was a CEO. I think that is a bad thing. I think CEO's are responsible for ruining the companies in America and sending all our jobs overseas. I think Democrats would be wise to make that a theme just like the GOP bashed John Edwards for being a "TRIAL LAWYER". If they run Mitt, the dems need to talk about CEO pay and wages being cut and jobs going overseas. And blame it on CEO'S, like Mitt Romney!!!

Fight fire with fire.

It will likely be Hillary in 2016, not a weak candidate.

 

[del]

I agree, it should be Mitt or Jeb. On second thought, Jeb may not be the best choice now, he'll never be elected after the W failures of the past 8 years. He ruined his brother's chances of ever being president.

Mitt should be their choice if they want to have a shot at it in 8 years.

You must be too young to remember HW Bush's presidency. He was horrible. The economy was bad and we were in Iraq. I was graduating college and he sucked, which is why Clinton won. I said the same thing when GW Bush ran in 2000. NO WAY I said.

But American voters have a very short memory. They forgot about daddy Bush in 8 short years.

And consider that Jeb will get 40% of the vote no problem. If the Democratic contender is weak, like Gore or Kerry, he could easily get another 11%. Consider he'll win Florida back for the GOP.

PS. I don't know why Americans would vote for Mitt. People brag that he was a CEO. I think that is a bad thing. I think CEO's are responsible for ruining the companies in America and sending all our jobs overseas. I think Democrats would be wise to make that a theme just like the GOP bashed John Edwards for being a "TRIAL LAWYER". If they run Mitt, the dems need to talk about CEO pay and wages being cut and jobs going overseas. And blame it on CEO'S, like Mitt Romney!!!

Fight fire with fire.

It will likely be Hillary in 2016, not a weak candidate.

too old

 

[sealybobo]

I agree, it should be Mitt or Jeb. On second thought, Jeb may not be the best choice now, he'll never be elected after the W failures of the past 8 years. He ruined his brother's chances of ever being president.

Mitt should be their choice if they want to have a shot at it in 8 years.

You must be too young to remember HW Bush's presidency. He was horrible. The economy was bad and we were in Iraq. I was graduating college and he sucked, which is why Clinton won. I said the same thing when GW Bush ran in 2000. NO WAY I said.

But American voters have a very short memory. They forgot about daddy Bush in 8 short years.

And consider that Jeb will get 40% of the vote no problem. If the Democratic contender is weak, like Gore or Kerry, he could easily get another 11%. Consider he'll win Florida back for the GOP.

PS. I don't know why Americans would vote for Mitt. People brag that he was a CEO. I think that is a bad thing. I think CEO's are responsible for ruining the companies in America and sending all our jobs overseas. I think Democrats would be wise to make that a theme just like the GOP bashed John Edwards for being a "TRIAL LAWYER". If they run Mitt, the dems need to talk about CEO pay and wages being cut and jobs going overseas. And blame it on CEO'S, like Mitt Romney!!!

Fight fire with fire.

It will likely be Hillary in 2016, not a weak candidate.

Hate to say it, but Del's right. Biden will be too old too. Maybe Michelle Obama will run.

And before you laugh, consider that Hillary was nothing but a lawyer before she became a Senator and then ran on her husband's coat tales.

Not that I think this will happen.

Gosh, who will we run in 2012. John "i cheat on my wife and get $500 haircuts" Edwards?

 

[Sarah G]

You must be too young to remember HW Bush's presidency. He was horrible. The economy was bad and we were in Iraq. I was graduating college and he sucked, which is why Clinton won. I said the same thing when GW Bush ran in 2000. NO WAY I said.

But American voters have a very short memory. They forgot about daddy Bush in 8 short years.

And consider that Jeb will get 40% of the vote no problem. If the Democratic contender is weak, like Gore or Kerry, he could easily get another 11%. Consider he'll win Florida back for the GOP.

PS. I don't know why Americans would vote for Mitt. People brag that he was a CEO. I think that is a bad thing. I think CEO's are responsible for ruining the companies in America and sending all our jobs overseas. I think Democrats would be wise to make that a theme just like the GOP bashed John Edwards for being a "TRIAL LAWYER". If they run Mitt, the dems need to talk about CEO pay and wages being cut and jobs going overseas. And blame it on CEO'S, like Mitt Romney!!!

Fight fire with fire.

It will likely be Hillary in 2016, not a weak candidate.

too old

Maybe. She's 62 now.

Another strong Dem could emerge by then. Perhaps a governor.

 

[Oddball]

Ha ha, it's pretty funny that the Obama network couldn't go ten minutes without mentioning his name.

Yep.

Something else that people around here can't seem to wrap their heads around is that Rush ALREADY HAS the highest ratings in the radio biz....His point in all of this folderol and hubub is that GLBTNBC couldn't keep their anemic viewership from going bulimic without using him as their daily strawman to beat on at will.

The real puncline of this joke is that Rush has never run for any office.....He can't tax us, regulate us, or send anyone off to fight and die in some stupid foreign war.

 

[xotoxi]

Rush who?

 

[WiseOldMan]

I think Rush Limbaugh (and most of his supporters) are fudge packers.



I'd be extremely surprised to find out Rush and his listeners are straight.

 

[DamnYankee]

Ha ha, it's pretty funny that the Obama network couldn't go ten minutes without mentioning his name.

It is good for Rush, personally, but it is horrible for your party because he is seen as a joke to people who aren't loyal Rushbots.

We love it.

And did you hear he quit/resigned yesterday? As the leader of the GOP.
So who is your leader now?

It can't be anyone good because you guys through anyone that was good under the bus a long time ago. Powell should be your spokesman, but instead its Boner, Gizdal, Rash, O'Really, Slanaty, NailinPalin, Huckelberry.

Maybe go with Ron Paul. Oh yea, I forgot, you through him under the bus during the campaign.

It should be Mitt Romney. I shouldn't tell you that because it will help you guys, but he is your best shot. A mormon.

Or Jeb Bush. Just let 8 years go by and run him like you ran that idiot GW.

Any number of people the Dems "through" under the bus to make history.... LOL

What's really interesting about your comments up there? It's your "dittoheads" and media rags who have designated Rush the "leader of the GOP". The "thinkers" have been saying there isn't ONE at the moment. Naturally, that's a concept that libs wouldn't know anything about -- what with such a smooth-sailing primary and all....

 

[editec]

I challenge Rush not to talk about himself for thirty days.

 

[DamnYankee]

I challenge Rush not to talk about himself for thirty days.

Oh, come on.... That's ridiculous. I don't believe anyone ever said he wasn't an egotist. Look, I don't listen to him any more than I listen to Olbermann. Both are obsessive. But the fact is, if the OTHER guys didn't pay so much attention to Rush, he'd have only his audience to play to. Well... except for those who claim to listen so they'll know in advance what the "dittoheads" will be saying in the morning.... <snicker>

 

[Political Junky]

You know Rush is pissed that Olbermann constantly plays tape of Limbaugh undulating his fat body and waving his fat arms.

 

[Oddball]

That's Rush's problem.

But that doesn't speak any better for Olberdouche's adolescent behavior, either.

 

[driveby]

It sounds like he's whining to me.

he was whining about msnbc talking about him to "boost its ratings" while talking about msnbc to boost HIS ratings.

he's so sad.

You could talk about grass growing and it would boost their ratings ....

 

[driveby]

It will likely be Hillary in 2016, not a weak candidate.

too old

Maybe. She's 62 now.

Another strong Dem could emerge by then. Perhaps a governor.

Perhaps another Senator with 6 months experience that comes out of nowhere singing hope and change.......

 

[driveby]

You know Rush is pissed that Olbermann constantly plays tape of Limbaugh undulating his fat body and waving his fat arms.

wow, sick burn .....